WebHorizon - Intel Xeon CPU 2 Core 4 GB Ram NO
Comprehensive VPS benchmark results from Norway tested on May 25, 2023. Learn our methodology.
Benchmark Steps
| # | Suite | Run At | Raw Output |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
PassMark
v1
|
Apr 24, 2023 20:42 |
View Raw OutputPassMark PerformanceTest Linux Intel Xeon CPU E5-2690 v4 @ 2.60GHz (x86_64) 2 cores @ 2596 MHz | 3.8 GiB RAM Number of Processes: 2 | Test Iterations: 2 | Test Duration: Very Long -------------------------------------------------------------------------- CPU Mark: 2819 Integer Math 7476 Million Operations/s Floating Point Math 6341 Million Operations/s Prime Numbers 25.0 Million Primes/s Sorting 5381 Thousand Strings/s Encryption 711 MB/s Compression 38438 KB/s CPU Single Threaded 1944 Million Operations/s Physics 403 Frames/s Extended Instructions (SSE) 2243 Million Matrices/s Memory Mark: 1565 Database Operations 1255 Thousand Operations/s Memory Read Cached 22382 MB/s Memory Read Uncached 8362 MB/s Memory Write 6573 MB/s Available RAM 3282 Megabytes Memory Latency 57 Nanoseconds Memory Threaded 16655 MB/s |
| 2 |
Bench
v1
|
May 24, 2023 08:59 |
View Raw Output-------------------- A Bench.sh Script By Teddysun ------------------- Version : v2022-06-01 Usage : wget -qO- bench.sh | bash ---------------------------------------------------------------------- CPU Model : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2690 v4 @ 2.60GHz CPU Cores : 2 @ 2596.948 MHz CPU Cache : 35840 KB AES-NI : Enabled VM-x/AMD-V : Enabled Total Disk : 58.1 GB (2.1 GB Used) Total Mem : 3.8 GB (151.2 MB Used) System uptime : 0 days, 0 hour 2 min Load average : 0.04, 0.04, 0.01 OS : Ubuntu 20.04.6 LTS Arch : x86_64 (64 Bit) Kernel : 5.4.0-149-generic TCP CC : bbr Virtualization : KVM Organization : AS149020 WebHorizon Internet Services Location : Sandefjord / NO Region : Vestfold og Telemark ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I/O Speed(1st run) : 498 MB/s I/O Speed(2nd run) : 538 MB/s I/O Speed(3rd run) : 541 MB/s I/O Speed(average) : 525.7 MB/s ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Node Name Upload Speed Download Speed Latency Speedtest.net 9209.38 Mbps 8754.66 Mbps 0.12 ms Los Angeles, US 511.20 Mbps 2711.78 Mbps 158.51 ms Dallas, US 623.35 Mbps 3384.23 Mbps 130.51 ms Montreal, CA 542.11 Mbps 723.68 Mbps 102.56 ms Paris, FR 2749.37 Mbps 5754.41 Mbps 30.52 ms Amsterdam, NL 3455.99 Mbps 7890.07 Mbps 20.09 ms Shanghai, CN 275.54 Mbps 2478.81 Mbps 290.16 ms Nanjing, CN 308.22 Mbps 2801.62 Mbps 258.04 ms Guangzhou, CN 1.93 Mbps 170.91 Mbps 312.94 ms Hongkong, CN 271.79 Mbps 2236.03 Mbps 275.21 ms Singapore, SG 279.93 Mbps 630.92 Mbps 278.68 ms Tokyo, JP 312.72 Mbps 3056.79 Mbps 246.53 ms ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Finished in : 6 min 22 sec Timestamp : 2023-05-24 20:08:59 WIB ---------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| 3 |
Benchy
v1
|
May 24, 2023 20:42 |
View Raw Output# # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Benchy v2.6 # # https://github.com/L1so/benchy # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # 24 May 2023 20:42 WIB # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Server Insight Hardware Information --------------------- --------------------- OS : Ubuntu 20.04.6 LTS Model : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2690 v4 @ 2.60GHz Location : Norway Core : 2 @ 2596.948 MHz Kernel : 5.4.0-149-generic AES-NI : ✔ Enabled Uptime : 0 days, 0 hrs, 42 mins, 12 secs VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled Virt : kvm Swap : 0.0 KiB Disk & Memory Usage Network Information --------------------- --------------------- Disk (1) : 58.0 GiB ASN : AS149020 Disk Usage : 2.1 GiB (4% Used) ISP : WebHorizon Internet Services Mem : 3.8 GiB IPv4 : ✔ Enabled Mem Usage : 0.2 GiB (4% Used) IPv6 : ✔ Enabled Ookla Network Speedtest (Region: Europe) +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Provider | Location | Download | Upload | Data Used | Latency | +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | TestDebit | Marseille, FR | 8.6 Gb/s | 2.1 Gb/s | 13.4 GB | 39.8 ms | | Vancis | Amsterdam, NL | 7.0 Gb/s | 2.2 Gb/s | 12.8 GB | 23.4 ms | | Upp Corp. | London, GB | 8.7 Gb/s | 2.4 Gb/s | 18.1 GB | 33.7 ms | | Skynet | Warsaw, PL | 7.3 Gb/s | 2.2 Gb/s | 15.1 GB | 38.7 ms | | Vodafone | Milan, IT | 8.2 Gb/s | 2.7 Gb/s | 17.3 GB | 30.5 ms | +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ Network Performance Test (Region: Europe) +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Prot. | Provider | Location | Send | Receive | Latency | +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | IPv4 | FiberBy | Copenhagen, DK | 3.5 Gb/s | 6.5 Gb/s | 21.2 ms | | | WOBCOM | Wolfsburg, DE | 7.4 Gb/s | 3.4 Gb/s | 30.1 ms | | | Novogara | Amsterdam, NL | 5.9 Gb/s | 5.5 Gb/s | 27.0 ms | | | Sasag | Schaff, CH | 4.9 Gb/s | 5.1 Gb/s | 32.2 ms | | | Alwyzon | Vienna, AT | 5.6 Gb/s | 5.6 Gb/s | 33.7 ms | +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | IPv6 | FiberBy | Copenhagen, DK | 3.9 Gb/s | 6.7 Gb/s | 21.4 ms | | | WOBCOM | Wolfsburg, DE | 7.0 Gb/s | 3.1 Gb/s | 30.0 ms | | | Novogara | Amsterdam, NL | 7.4 Gb/s | 6.7 Gb/s | 27.0 ms | | | Sasag | Schaff, CH | 5.1 Gb/s | 4.4 Gb/s | 32.0 ms | | | Alwyzon | Vienna, AT | 5.6 Gb/s | 5.4 Gb/s | 33.7 ms | +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ |
| 4 |
Speedtest Global
v1
|
May 24, 2023 22:50 |
View Raw Output---------------------------- network-speed.xyz ----------------------------
A simple script to test network performance using speedtest-cli
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Version : v2023.05.24
Global Speedtest : wget -qO- network-speed.xyz | bash
Region Speedtest : wget -qO- network-speed.xyz | bash -s -- -r <region>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Basic System Info
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
CPU Model : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2690 v4 @ 2.60GHz
CPU Cores : 2 @ 2596.948 MHz
CPU Cache : 35840 KB
AES-NI : ✔ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
Total Disk : 58.1 GB (2.1 GB Used)
Total RAM : 3.8 GB (153.0 MB Used)
System uptime : 0 days, 0 hour 14 min
Load average : 0.24, 0.28, 0.18
OS : Ubuntu 20.04.6 LTS
Arch : x86_64 (64 Bit)
Kernel : 5.4.0-149-generic
Virtualization : KVM
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Basic Network Info
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Primary Network : IPv6
ISP : WebHorizon IT Broadband Limited
ASN : AS149020 WebHorizon Internet Services
Host : WebHorizon IT Broadband Limited
Location : Washington, District of Columbia-DC, United States
Location (IPv4) : Sandefjord, Vestfold og Telemark, NO
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Speedtest.net (Region: GLOBAL)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Location Latency Loss DL Speed UP Speed Server
ISP: WebHorizon Internet Services
Nearest 1.55 ms 0.0% 7128.39 Mbps 9089.24 Mbps Speedtest.net - Sandefjord
Kochi, IN 182.07 ms 0.0% 3904.00 Mbps 429.62 Mbps Asianet Broadband - Cochin
Bangalore, IN 153.05 ms 0.0% 4859.53 Mbps 484.94 Mbps Bharti Airtel Ltd - Bangalore
Chennai, IN 169.70 ms N/A 4741.40 Mbps 481.77 Mbps Jio - Chennai
Mumbai, IN 156.68 ms 0.0% 4868.89 Mbps 529.87 Mbps i3D.net - Mumbai
Delhi, IN 163.93 ms 0.0% 4429.18 Mbps 421.24 Mbps Tata Play Fiber - New Delhi
Los Angeles, US 150.72 ms 0.0% 4244.08 Mbps 522.31 Mbps ReliableSite Hosting - Los Angeles, CA
Dallas, US 129.62 ms 0.0% 3235.57 Mbps 636.81 Mbps Hivelocity - Dallas, TX
New York, US 89.53 ms 0.0% 4645.52 Mbps 913.55 Mbps Clouvider Ltd - New York, NY
Seattle, US 161.50 ms N/A 3450.88 Mbps 495.36 Mbps Comcast - Seattle, WA
Miami, US 129.81 ms 0.0% 2480.08 Mbps 635.13 Mbps AT&T - Miami, FL
Toronto, CA 105.88 ms 0.0% 6325.41 Mbps 765.20 Mbps Rogers - Toronto, ON
Paris, FR 30.78 ms N/A 6403.04 Mbps 2738.86 Mbps ORANGE FRANCE - Paris
Amsterdam, NL 21.11 ms 0.0% 7155.56 Mbps 3839.90 Mbps Clouvider Ltd - Amsterdam
Warsaw, PL 38.22 ms 0.0% 6898.53 Mbps 2141.86 Mbps UPC Polska - Warszawa
London, UK 33.29 ms 0.0% 7256.04 Mbps 2285.05 Mbps VeloxServ Communications - London
Frankfurt, DE 23.89 ms 0.0% 7976.19 Mbps 2714.81 Mbps 23M GmbH - Frankfurt Am Main
Bucharest, RO 58.04 ms 0.0% 7599.35 Mbps 1437.96 Mbps Vodafone Romania Fixed - Bucharest - Bucharest
Dubai, AE 151.87 ms 0.0% 3393.83 Mbps 543.70 Mbps du - Dubai
Fujairah, AE 144.37 ms 0.0% 5797.08 Mbps 593.56 Mbps ETISALAT-UAE - Fujairah
Jeddah, KSA 97.89 ms 0.0% 5373.29 Mbps 818.58 Mbps Saudi Telecom Company
Shanghai, CU-CN 296.28 ms 0.0% 2788.02 Mbps 288.64 Mbps China Unicom 5G - ShangHai
Nanjing, CT-CN 248.80 ms 0.0% 3079.10 Mbps 308.39 Mbps China Telecom JiangSu 5G - Nanjing
Hong Kong, HKG 255.03 ms N/A 2679.83 Mbps 305.54 Mbps STC - Hong Kong
Singapore, SG 328.07 ms 0.0% 3345.58 Mbps 320.81 Mbps i3D.net - Singapore
Jakarta, ID 208.67 ms 0.0% 3420.56 Mbps 365.92 Mbps PT. Telekomunikasi Indonesia - Jakarta
Tokyo, JP 284.26 ms N/A 2856.02 Mbps 189.14 Mbps fdcservers.net - Tokyo
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Avg DL Speed : 4827.26 Mbps
Avg UL Speed : 1270.29 Mbps
Total DL Data : 185.30 GB
Total UL Data : 35.70 GB
Total Data : 221.00 GB
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Duration : 13 min 31 sec
System Time : 24/05/2023 - 22:50:28 WIB
Total Script Runs : 2692
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Result : https://cdn1.frocdn.ch/NvxXg57n03U1PSr.txt
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| 5 |
UnixBench
v1
|
May 25, 2023 00:16 |
View Raw Output------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Thu May 25 2023 00:16:45 - 00:44:43
2 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 38084292.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 7011.3 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 3080.1 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 570868.2 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 148078.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1693500.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 753391.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 79159.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 8082.2 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 8946.0 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1860.0 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 453391.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 38084292.8 3263.4
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 7011.3 1274.8
Execl Throughput 43.0 3080.1 716.3
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 570868.2 1441.6
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 148078.0 894.7
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1693500.8 2919.8
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 753391.9 605.6
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 79159.8 197.9
Process Creation 126.0 8082.2 641.4
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 8946.0 2109.9
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1860.0 3099.9
System Call Overhead 15000.0 453391.2 302.3
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 1045.5
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Thu May 25 2023 00:44:43 - 01:12:44
2 CPUs in system; running 2 parallel copies of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 74922310.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 14012.8 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 6015.0 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1048499.3 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 275554.2 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 2666890.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 1488150.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 289944.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 13438.7 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 13027.1 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1957.5 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 894086.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 74922310.9 6420.1
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 14012.8 2547.8
Execl Throughput 43.0 6015.0 1398.8
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 1048499.3 2647.7
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 275554.2 1665.0
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 2666890.5 4598.1
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1488150.2 1196.3
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 289944.1 724.9
Process Creation 126.0 13438.7 1066.6
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 13027.1 3072.4
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1957.5 3262.6
System Call Overhead 15000.0 894086.6 596.1
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 1923.4
|
System Specifications
Additional Benchmarks
Comprehensive performance metrics from specialized benchmark tools
UnixBench
System Performance Index
WordPress Bench
Web Application Performance
🌟 Recommended VPS Provider
Onidel Cloud VPS
CPU Performance (Geekbench)
CPU benchmarks measure processing power for compute-intensive tasks. Learn how we test CPU performance.
I/O Speed Summary (dd)
IOPS Performance by Block Size
FIO Benchmark Details
Detailed I/O performance test results
fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):
---------------------------------
Block Size | 4k (IOPS) | 64k (IOPS)
------ | --- ---- | ---- ----
Read | 188.66 MB/s (47.1k) | 1.50 GB/s (23.4k)
Write | 189.16 MB/s (47.2k) | 1.50 GB/s (23.5k)
Total | 377.83 MB/s (94.4k) | 3.01 GB/s (47.0k)
| |
Block Size | 512k (IOPS) | 1m (IOPS)
------ | --- ---- | ---- ----
Read | 1.85 GB/s (3.6k) | 1.86 GB/s (1.8k)
Write | 1.95 GB/s (3.8k) | 1.99 GB/s (1.9k)
Total | 3.81 GB/s (7.4k) | 3.85 GB/s (3.7k)
Test 1 - Block Size: 4k (mixed_rw_50_50)
Test 2 - Block Size: 64k (mixed_rw_50_50)
Test 3 - Block Size: 512k (mixed_rw_50_50)
Test 4 - Block Size: 1m (mixed_rw_50_50)
Related Resources
Browse More Benchmarks
Explore comprehensive VPS benchmarks across providers and locations.
Compare Providers
View aggregated performance metrics across all VPS providers.
Performance Dashboard
Access real-time statistics, top performers, and latest results.
Testing Methodology
Learn about our comprehensive testing procedures and tools.
Understanding VPS Benchmark Results
This comprehensive benchmark report provides detailed performance analysis for WebHorizon Intel Xeon CPU 2 Core 4 GB Ram NO VPS in Norway . Our standardized testing methodology measures CPU performance, disk I/O operations, network bandwidth, and real-world application performance to give you complete insights into VPS capabilities. Browse more VPS benchmarks to compare performance across providers.
Each benchmark metric serves a specific purpose in evaluating VPS performance. CPU benchmarks reveal processing power for applications, disk I/O tests measure storage performance for databases and file operations, network tests show bandwidth capacity for content delivery, and application benchmarks demonstrate real-world hosting performance. Together, these metrics provide a complete performance profile. Use our VPS comparison tool to analyze multiple plans side-by-side.
Benchmark Metrics & Features
Detailed Geekbench CPU performance scores (single & multi-core)
FIO disk I/O benchmarks with IOPS and bandwidth metrics
Network bandwidth testing with iPerf (download & upload speeds)
UnixBench system performance comprehensive results
WordPress real-world application performance tests
Sequential disk performance with DiskSeq benchmarks
Complete VPS specifications (CPU, RAM, storage details)
Provider and plan pricing information
Data center location and geographic details
Benchmark execution date and freshness indicators
Historical benchmark data for performance trends
AI-powered performance analysis and insights (for logged-in users)
Performance Analysis Use Cases
Evaluating VPS CPU performance for compute-intensive applications
Testing disk I/O performance for database workloads
Measuring network bandwidth for media streaming services
Comparing VPS performance across different providers
Analyzing WordPress site performance on specific VPS plans
Assessing value-for-money based on performance and pricing
Checking real-world application performance metrics
Understanding geographic performance variations by location
Reviewing detailed benchmark metrics before VPS purchase
Comparing single-core vs multi-core CPU performance
Validating provider performance claims with actual data
Making informed hosting decisions based on comprehensive benchmarks
How to Interpret Benchmark Results
1. CPU Performance (Geekbench)
Geekbench measures CPU performance through single-core and multi-core scores. Single-core scores (typically 800-2000) indicate performance for single-threaded applications and general responsiveness. Multi-core scores (1500-8000) show performance when all CPU cores are utilized for parallel processing. Higher scores mean better performance. Visit our testing methodology to learn more about CPU benchmarks.
2. Disk I/O Performance (FIO)
FIO benchmarks measure disk performance through IOPS (Input/Output Operations Per Second) and bandwidth (MB/s). High IOPS (10,000+ for NVMe, 5,000-10,000 for SSD) is crucial for database workloads with many small operations. High bandwidth is important for large file transfers and media applications. Compare disk performance across different providers in our database.
3. Network Bandwidth (iPerf)
Network tests measure download (incoming) and upload (outgoing) bandwidth capacity. Most modern VPS offers 1-10 Gbps connectivity. Download speed affects data ingestion, while upload speed determines content delivery performance to users. Consider your application's data transfer patterns when evaluating network metrics. Check our performance dashboard for network performance statistics.
4. Application Performance
Real-world application benchmarks (WordPress, UnixBench) show how the VPS handles typical web workloads including PHP processing, database queries, and static file serving. These results measured in requests per second and page load times directly apply to web hosting scenarios. Need help choosing the right VPS? Contact our team or visit about us to learn more about VPSMetrics.
Looking for more resources? Explore our free developer tools including SSL checkers, DNS lookup, WHOIS lookup, and server diagnostics to help you manage your VPS infrastructure effectively.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I interpret the Geekbench single-core and multi-core scores?
Geekbench single-core scores indicate CPU performance for single-threaded applications, important for general responsiveness and web applications. Multi-core scores show performance when all CPU cores are utilized, crucial for parallel processing and multi-threaded applications. Higher scores indicate better performance. Modern VPS typically score 800-2000 (single) and 1500-8000 (multi) depending on the plan. Learn more about our comprehensive testing methodology for CPU benchmarks.
What do IOPS numbers mean in disk I/O benchmarks?
IOPS (Input/Output Operations Per Second) measures how many read/write operations your disk can handle per second. Higher IOPS means better performance for database operations and applications with many small file operations. NVMe SSD VPS typically delivers 10,000+ IOPS, while traditional SSD offers 5,000-10,000 IOPS. HDD-based storage usually provides under 1,000 IOPS. Visit our How We Test page to understand disk performance metrics in detail.
How important are network speed benchmarks?
Network bandwidth (measured by iPerf) is crucial for applications serving content, APIs, or media streaming. Download speeds affect how fast your server receives data, while upload speeds determine content delivery to users. Most modern VPS offers 1-10 Gbps network connectivity. Consider your application's data transfer requirements when evaluating network performance. Compare network speeds across different VPS providers in our database.
What is UnixBench and why does it matter?
UnixBench is a comprehensive system-level benchmark suite that tests various aspects of Unix-like system performance including process creation, file operations, and system calls. It provides a holistic view of overall system performance beyond just CPU or disk metrics. Higher UnixBench scores indicate better overall system efficiency. Browse all VPS benchmarks to compare UnixBench scores across providers and plans.
How reliable are WordPress benchmark results?
WordPress benchmarks provide real-world application performance metrics by testing actual WordPress installations. These results show how the VPS handles typical web application workloads including PHP processing, database queries, and static file serving. Results are measured in requests per second and page load times, directly applicable to web hosting scenarios. Check our performance dashboard to see which VPS plans excel at WordPress hosting.
Can I trust these benchmark results for my use case?
Our benchmarks provide standardized, reproducible test results using industry-standard tools. While they offer excellent performance indicators, your actual experience may vary based on your specific workload, application optimization, and usage patterns. Use these benchmarks as a reliable starting point for comparison between providers. Read about our methodology to understand how we ensure accuracy and consistency.
Why do benchmark results vary by location?
Different data center locations may have different hardware configurations, CPU generations, storage types, and network infrastructure. Providers often upgrade facilities at different rates across regions. Location-specific benchmarks help you choose a VPS in the right region with the best performance for your target audience. Use our benchmark filters to narrow down by location and compare provider performance across geographic regions.
How current are these benchmark results?
Each benchmark displays its execution date. We continuously add new benchmarks and re-test providers to capture infrastructure changes and upgrades. Check the benchmark date to ensure data freshness. Providers may upgrade CPUs, storage, or network capacity over time, affecting performance. Visit our dashboard to see the latest benchmark results and recent additions to our database.
What should I prioritize: CPU, disk, or network performance?
Priority depends on your workload. CPU-intensive applications (video processing, rendering) need high Geekbench scores. Database-heavy applications require high IOPS. Content delivery and API services benefit from high network bandwidth. Web applications typically need balanced performance across all metrics. Use our VPS comparison tool to analyze multiple plans side-by-side and find the best match for your requirements.
How do I use AI Summary for benchmark analysis?
The AI Summary feature (available for logged-in users) analyzes benchmark results and provides insights about performance strengths, weaknesses, and use case recommendations. It considers all benchmark metrics together to give you a comprehensive understanding of the VPS performance profile in plain language. Need help? Contact our support team or explore our free developer tools for additional VPS management utilities.
Making Informed VPS Decisions
Use these comprehensive benchmark results to make data-driven hosting decisions. Compare multiple metrics together rather than focusing on a single aspect - a balanced VPS performs well across CPU, disk, and network benchmarks. Consider your specific workload requirements: CPU-intensive applications need high Geekbench scores, database-heavy applications require high IOPS, and content delivery services benefit from high network bandwidth.
Our benchmarks provide standardized, reproducible test results using industry-standard tools. While they offer excellent performance indicators, your actual experience may vary based on specific workload patterns and application optimization. Use these benchmarks as a reliable starting point for comparison between providers and configurations.
Check the benchmark execution date to ensure data freshness - providers may upgrade infrastructure over time. Compare results from the same time period for fair evaluation. For the most comprehensive analysis, review multiple benchmarks from the same provider and location to understand performance consistency.
Compare More VPS Options
Explore additional benchmarks, compare multiple VPS plans side-by-side, and discover the best performing options for your specific requirements and budget.