Webdock - Intel Xeon 5 Core 10 GB Ram CA
Comprehensive VPS benchmark results from Canada tested on May 08, 2023. Learn our methodology.
Benchmark Steps
| # | Suite | Run At | Raw Output |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Bench
v1
|
May 08, 2023 13:45 |
View Raw Output-------------------- A Bench.sh Script By Teddysun ------------------- Version : v2022-06-01 Usage : wget -qO- bench.sh | bash ---------------------------------------------------------------------- CPU Model : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2699 v3 @ 2.30GHz CPU Cores : 10 @ 2299.970 MHz CPU Cache : 16384 KB AES-NI : Enabled VM-x/AMD-V : Enabled Total Disk : 90.2 GB (1.9 GB Used) Total Mem : 9.0 GB (192.8 MB Used) System uptime : 0 days, 1 hour 14 min Load average : 1.95, 3.18, 3.31 OS : Ubuntu 20.04.6 LTS Arch : x86_64 (64 Bit) Kernel : 5.4.0-148-generic TCP CC : bbr Virtualization : KVM Organization : AS55286 B2 Net Solutions Inc. Location : Montréal / CA Region : Quebec ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I/O Speed(1st run) : 1.0 GB/s I/O Speed(2nd run) : 924 MB/s I/O Speed(3rd run) : 914 MB/s I/O Speed(average) : 954.0 MB/s ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Node Name Upload Speed Download Speed Latency Speedtest.net 966.65 Mbps 936.69 Mbps 1.00 ms Los Angeles, US 830.23 Mbps 920.71 Mbps 95.25 ms Dallas, US 898.48 Mbps 917.75 Mbps 42.99 ms Montreal, CA 885.51 Mbps 647.71 Mbps 14.54 ms Paris, FR 737.68 Mbps 927.31 Mbps 83.30 ms Amsterdam, NL 702.00 Mbps 925.32 Mbps 83.59 ms Shanghai, CN 297.96 Mbps 317.19 Mbps 257.38 ms Nanjing, CN 346.84 Mbps 872.96 Mbps 222.63 ms Singapore, SG 327.17 Mbps 401.45 Mbps 238.61 ms Tokyo, JP 453.15 Mbps 935.47 Mbps 176.22 ms ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Finished in : 4 min 47 sec Timestamp : 2023-05-08 13:45:14 UTC ---------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| 2 |
Speedtest Global
v1
|
May 08, 2023 14:04 |
View Raw Output---------------------------- network-speed.xyz ----------------------------
A simple script to test network performance using speedtest-cli
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Version : v2023.05.01
Global Speedtest : wget -qO- network-speed.xyz | bash
Region Speedtest : wget -qO- network-speed.xyz | bash -s -- -r <region>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Basic System Info
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
CPU Model : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2699 v3 @ 2.30GHz
CPU Cores : 10 @ 2299.970 MHz
CPU Cache : 16384 KB
AES-NI : ✔ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
Total Disk : 90.2 GB (1.9 GB Used)
Total RAM : 9.0 GB (197.5 MB Used)
System uptime : 0 days, 1 hour 26 min
Load average : 0.27, 0.49, 1.67
OS : Ubuntu 20.04.6 LTS
Arch : x86_64 (64 Bit)
Kernel : 5.4.0-148-generic
Virtualization : QEMU
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Basic Network Info
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Primary Network : IPv6
ISP : B2 Net Solutions Inc.
ASN : AS55286 B2 Net Solutions Inc.
Host : ServerMania Inc
Location : Montreal, Quebec-QC, Canada
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Speedtest.net (Region: GLOBAL)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Location Latency Loss DL Speed UP Speed Server
ISP: ServerMania
Nearest 0.99 ms 0.0% 932.02 Mbps 996.65 Mbps Connexio - Montréal, QC
Kochi, IN 298.28 ms 0.0% 821.48 Mbps 274.47 Mbps Asianet Broadband - Cochin
Bangalore, IN 253.38 ms 0.3% 916.45 Mbps 195.37 Mbps Bharti Airtel Ltd - Bangalore
Chennai, IN 256.27 ms N/A 943.30 Mbps 317.46 Mbps Jio - Chennai
Mumbai, IN 241.72 ms 0.3% 930.46 Mbps 309.21 Mbps i3D.net - Mumbai
Delhi, IN 267.84 ms 0.0% 883.43 Mbps 294.42 Mbps Tata Play Fiber - New Delhi
Los Angeles, US 66.61 ms 0.0% 927.77 Mbps 700.58 Mbps ReliableSite Hosting - Los Angeles, CA
Dallas, US 43.47 ms 0.0% 745.48 Mbps 912.98 Mbps Hivelocity - Dallas, TX
New York, US 9.73 ms 0.0% 927.50 Mbps 986.35 Mbps Clouvider Ltd - New York, NY
Seattle, US 85.79 ms N/A 928.32 Mbps 746.19 Mbps Comcast - Seattle, WA
Miami, US 51.56 ms 0.0% 871.71 Mbps 932.45 Mbps AT&T - Miami, FL
Toronto, CA 8.58 ms 0.0% 915.40 Mbps 996.41 Mbps Rogers - Toronto, ON
Paris, FR 83.25 ms 0.0% 919.80 Mbps 737.77 Mbps ORANGE FRANCE - Paris
Amsterdam, NL 82.42 ms 0.0% 910.32 Mbps 673.41 Mbps Clouvider Ltd - Amsterdam
Warsaw, PL 116.23 ms 0.0% 900.60 Mbps 682.49 Mbps UPC Polska - Warszawa
London, UK 75.57 ms 0.0% 723.12 Mbps 774.15 Mbps VeloxServ Communications - London
Frankfurt, DE 100.74 ms 0.0% 924.57 Mbps 806.13 Mbps 23M GmbH - Frankfurt Am Main
Dubai, AE 199.66 ms 0.0% 960.97 Mbps 408.12 Mbps du - Dubai
Fujairah, AE 198.37 ms 0.0% 768.31 Mbps 424.83 Mbps ETISALAT-UAE - Fujairah
Jeddah, KSA 144.20 ms 0.0% 934.37 Mbps 544.44 Mbps Saudi Telecom Company
Shanghai, CU-CN 258.40 ms 0.0% 593.78 Mbps 303.73 Mbps China Unicom 5G - ShangHai
Nanjing, CT-CN 223.97 ms 0.0% 798.52 Mbps 379.88 Mbps China Telecom JiangSu 5G - Nanjing
Hong Kong, HKG 228.20 ms N/A 939.41 Mbps 349.25 Mbps STC - Hong Kong
Singapore, SG 234.14 ms 2.7% 941.15 Mbps 220.19 Mbps i3D.net - Singapore
Jakarta, ID 242.81 ms 0.0% 939.17 Mbps 146.65 Mbps PT Indosat Tbk - Jakarta
Tokyo, JP 176.01 ms N/A 802.36 Mbps 477.67 Mbps fdcservers.net - Tokyo
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Avg DL Speed : 876.92 Mbps
Avg UL Speed : 561.20 Mbps
Total DL Data : 30.90 GB
Total UL Data : 18.05 GB
Total Data : 48.95 GB
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Duration : 12 min 35 sec
System Time : 08/05/2023 - 14:04:10 UTC
Total Script Runs : 2136
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Result : https://cdn1.frocdn.ch/bqQWGMsNYBBA3r4.txt
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| 3 |
Benchy
v1
|
May 08, 2023 14:14 |
View Raw Output# # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Benchy v2.6 # # https://github.com/L1so/benchy # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # 08 May 2023 14:14 UTC # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Server Insight Hardware Information --------------------- --------------------- OS : Ubuntu 20.04.6 LTS Model : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2699 v3 @ 2.30GHz Location : Canada Core : 10 @ 2299.970 MHz Kernel : 5.4.0-148-generic AES-NI : ✔ Enabled Uptime : 0 days, 1 hrs, 48 mins, 56 secs VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled Virt : none Swap : 0.0 KiB Disk & Memory Usage Network Information --------------------- --------------------- Disk (1) : 90.1 GiB ASN : AS55286 Disk Usage : 1.9 GiB (2% Used) ISP : B2 Net Solutions Inc. Mem : 9.0 GiB IPv4 : ✔ Enabled Mem Usage : 0.2 GiB (2% Used) IPv6 : ✔ Enabled Ookla Network Speedtest (Region: North America) +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Provider | Location | Download | Upload | Data Used | Latency | +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Comcast | Houston, US | 929.7 Mb/s | 946.9 Mb/s | 2.4 GB | 36.5 ms | | Spectrum | New York, US | 928.4 Mb/s | 989.6 Mb/s | 2.0 GB | 10.8 ms | | Telus | Edmonton, CA | 915.6 Mb/s | 784.4 Mb/s | 2.3 GB | 58.4 ms | | Airstream | Wisconsin, US | 929.9 Mb/s | 988.4 Mb/s | 2.3 GB | 25.4 ms | | Hivelocity | Dallas, US | 831.4 Mb/s | 922.4 Mb/s | 2.4 GB | 43.4 ms | +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ Network Performance Test (Region: North America) +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Prot. | Provider | Location | Send | Receive | Latency | +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | IPv4 | Airstream | Wisconsin, US | 994.2 Mb/s | 930.9 Mb/s | 25.8 ms | | | Clouvider | Dallas, US | 938.4 Mb/s | 909.1 Mb/s | 41.3 ms | | | Clouvider | Phoenix, US | 912.3 Mb/s | 921.6 Mb/s | 62.0 ms | | | Clouvider | Los Angeles, US | 872.8 Mb/s | 909.2 Mb/s | 62.3 ms | +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | IPv6 | Airstream | Wisconsin, US | 978.0 Mb/s | 937.3 Mb/s | 26.0 ms | | | Clouvider | Dallas, US | 958.4 Mb/s | 914.4 Mb/s | 41.3 ms | | | Clouvider | Phoenix, US | 889.8 Mb/s | 898.2 Mb/s | 62.1 ms | | | Clouvider | Los Angeles, US | 916.5 Mb/s | 900.2 Mb/s | 61.7 ms | +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ |
| 4 |
PassMark
v1
|
May 08, 2023 14:14 |
View Raw OutputPassMark PerformanceTest Linux Intel Xeon CPU E5-2699 v3 @ 2.30GHz (x86_64) 10 cores @ 2299 MHz | 9.0 GiB RAM Number of Processes: 10 | Test Iterations: 2 | Test Duration: Very Long -------------------------------------------------------------------------- CPU Mark: 10184 Integer Math 31425 Million Operations/s Floating Point Math 21499 Million Operations/s Prime Numbers 79.2 Million Primes/s Sorting 20642 Thousand Strings/s Encryption 2913 MB/s Compression 149328 KB/s CPU Single Threaded 1610 Million Operations/s Physics 1161 Frames/s Extended Instructions (SSE) 8847 Million Matrices/s Memory Mark: 1793 Database Operations 4511 Thousand Operations/s Memory Read Cached 17512 MB/s Memory Read Uncached 7087 MB/s Memory Write 7270 MB/s Available RAM 8881 Megabytes Memory Latency 65 Nanoseconds Memory Threaded 46814 MB/s -------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| 5 |
UnixBench
v1
|
May 08, 2023 15:52 |
View Raw Output------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Mon May 08 2023 15:52:15 - 16:20:18
10 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 30592672.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 5252.1 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 2503.3 lps (29.7 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 443976.3 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 120929.3 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1228882.1 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 622101.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 51696.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 4602.9 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 6738.0 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 3428.1 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 369778.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 30592672.5 2621.5
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 5252.1 954.9
Execl Throughput 43.0 2503.3 582.2
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 443976.3 1121.2
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 120929.3 730.7
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1228882.1 2118.8
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 622101.9 500.1
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 51696.9 129.2
Process Creation 126.0 4602.9 365.3
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 6738.0 1589.2
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 3428.1 5713.4
System Call Overhead 15000.0 369778.4 246.5
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 845.6
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Mon May 08 2023 16:20:18 - 16:48:28
10 CPUs in system; running 10 parallel copies of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 293156054.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 51373.5 MWIPS (9.8 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 18151.8 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1650654.7 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 375233.7 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5827768.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 5855696.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 1081545.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 25147.1 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 31531.9 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 5683.0 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 3510085.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 293156054.2 25120.5
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 51373.5 9340.6
Execl Throughput 43.0 18151.8 4221.4
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 1650654.7 4168.3
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 375233.7 2267.3
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 5827768.4 10047.9
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 5855696.6 4707.2
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 1081545.0 2703.9
Process Creation 126.0 25147.1 1995.8
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 31531.9 7436.8
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 5683.0 9471.7
System Call Overhead 15000.0 3510085.8 2340.1
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 5203.2
|
System Specifications
Additional Benchmarks
Comprehensive performance metrics from specialized benchmark tools
UnixBench
System Performance Index
WordPress Bench
Web Application Performance
🌟 Recommended VPS Provider
Onidel Cloud VPS
CPU Performance (Geekbench)
CPU benchmarks measure processing power for compute-intensive tasks. Learn how we test CPU performance.
I/O Speed Summary (dd)
IOPS Performance by Block Size
FIO Benchmark Details
Detailed I/O performance test results
fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):
---------------------------------
Block Size | 4k (IOPS) | 64k (IOPS)
------ | --- ---- | ---- ----
Read | 158.12 MB/s (39.5k) | 2.07 GB/s (32.3k)
Write | 158.54 MB/s (39.6k) | 2.08 GB/s (32.5k)
Total | 316.67 MB/s (79.1k) | 4.15 GB/s (64.8k)
| |
Block Size | 512k (IOPS) | 1m (IOPS)
------ | --- ---- | ---- ----
Read | 4.97 GB/s (9.7k) | 4.08 GB/s (3.9k)
Write | 5.23 GB/s (10.2k) | 4.35 GB/s (4.2k)
Total | 10.20 GB/s (19.9k) | 8.43 GB/s (8.2k)
Test 1 - Block Size: 4k (mixed_rw_50_50)
Test 2 - Block Size: 64k (mixed_rw_50_50)
Test 3 - Block Size: 512k (mixed_rw_50_50)
Test 4 - Block Size: 1m (mixed_rw_50_50)
Related Resources
Browse More Benchmarks
Explore comprehensive VPS benchmarks across providers and locations.
Compare Providers
View aggregated performance metrics across all VPS providers.
Performance Dashboard
Access real-time statistics, top performers, and latest results.
Testing Methodology
Learn about our comprehensive testing procedures and tools.
Understanding VPS Benchmark Results
This comprehensive benchmark report provides detailed performance analysis for Webdock Intel Xeon 5 Core 10 GB Ram CA VPS in Canada . Our standardized testing methodology measures CPU performance, disk I/O operations, network bandwidth, and real-world application performance to give you complete insights into VPS capabilities. Browse more VPS benchmarks to compare performance across providers.
Each benchmark metric serves a specific purpose in evaluating VPS performance. CPU benchmarks reveal processing power for applications, disk I/O tests measure storage performance for databases and file operations, network tests show bandwidth capacity for content delivery, and application benchmarks demonstrate real-world hosting performance. Together, these metrics provide a complete performance profile. Use our VPS comparison tool to analyze multiple plans side-by-side.
Benchmark Metrics & Features
Detailed Geekbench CPU performance scores (single & multi-core)
FIO disk I/O benchmarks with IOPS and bandwidth metrics
Network bandwidth testing with iPerf (download & upload speeds)
UnixBench system performance comprehensive results
WordPress real-world application performance tests
Sequential disk performance with DiskSeq benchmarks
Complete VPS specifications (CPU, RAM, storage details)
Provider and plan pricing information
Data center location and geographic details
Benchmark execution date and freshness indicators
Historical benchmark data for performance trends
AI-powered performance analysis and insights (for logged-in users)
Performance Analysis Use Cases
Evaluating VPS CPU performance for compute-intensive applications
Testing disk I/O performance for database workloads
Measuring network bandwidth for media streaming services
Comparing VPS performance across different providers
Analyzing WordPress site performance on specific VPS plans
Assessing value-for-money based on performance and pricing
Checking real-world application performance metrics
Understanding geographic performance variations by location
Reviewing detailed benchmark metrics before VPS purchase
Comparing single-core vs multi-core CPU performance
Validating provider performance claims with actual data
Making informed hosting decisions based on comprehensive benchmarks
How to Interpret Benchmark Results
1. CPU Performance (Geekbench)
Geekbench measures CPU performance through single-core and multi-core scores. Single-core scores (typically 800-2000) indicate performance for single-threaded applications and general responsiveness. Multi-core scores (1500-8000) show performance when all CPU cores are utilized for parallel processing. Higher scores mean better performance. Visit our testing methodology to learn more about CPU benchmarks.
2. Disk I/O Performance (FIO)
FIO benchmarks measure disk performance through IOPS (Input/Output Operations Per Second) and bandwidth (MB/s). High IOPS (10,000+ for NVMe, 5,000-10,000 for SSD) is crucial for database workloads with many small operations. High bandwidth is important for large file transfers and media applications. Compare disk performance across different providers in our database.
3. Network Bandwidth (iPerf)
Network tests measure download (incoming) and upload (outgoing) bandwidth capacity. Most modern VPS offers 1-10 Gbps connectivity. Download speed affects data ingestion, while upload speed determines content delivery performance to users. Consider your application's data transfer patterns when evaluating network metrics. Check our performance dashboard for network performance statistics.
4. Application Performance
Real-world application benchmarks (WordPress, UnixBench) show how the VPS handles typical web workloads including PHP processing, database queries, and static file serving. These results measured in requests per second and page load times directly apply to web hosting scenarios. Need help choosing the right VPS? Contact our team or visit about us to learn more about VPSMetrics.
Looking for more resources? Explore our free developer tools including SSL checkers, DNS lookup, WHOIS lookup, and server diagnostics to help you manage your VPS infrastructure effectively.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I interpret the Geekbench single-core and multi-core scores?
Geekbench single-core scores indicate CPU performance for single-threaded applications, important for general responsiveness and web applications. Multi-core scores show performance when all CPU cores are utilized, crucial for parallel processing and multi-threaded applications. Higher scores indicate better performance. Modern VPS typically score 800-2000 (single) and 1500-8000 (multi) depending on the plan. Learn more about our comprehensive testing methodology for CPU benchmarks.
What do IOPS numbers mean in disk I/O benchmarks?
IOPS (Input/Output Operations Per Second) measures how many read/write operations your disk can handle per second. Higher IOPS means better performance for database operations and applications with many small file operations. NVMe SSD VPS typically delivers 10,000+ IOPS, while traditional SSD offers 5,000-10,000 IOPS. HDD-based storage usually provides under 1,000 IOPS. Visit our How We Test page to understand disk performance metrics in detail.
How important are network speed benchmarks?
Network bandwidth (measured by iPerf) is crucial for applications serving content, APIs, or media streaming. Download speeds affect how fast your server receives data, while upload speeds determine content delivery to users. Most modern VPS offers 1-10 Gbps network connectivity. Consider your application's data transfer requirements when evaluating network performance. Compare network speeds across different VPS providers in our database.
What is UnixBench and why does it matter?
UnixBench is a comprehensive system-level benchmark suite that tests various aspects of Unix-like system performance including process creation, file operations, and system calls. It provides a holistic view of overall system performance beyond just CPU or disk metrics. Higher UnixBench scores indicate better overall system efficiency. Browse all VPS benchmarks to compare UnixBench scores across providers and plans.
How reliable are WordPress benchmark results?
WordPress benchmarks provide real-world application performance metrics by testing actual WordPress installations. These results show how the VPS handles typical web application workloads including PHP processing, database queries, and static file serving. Results are measured in requests per second and page load times, directly applicable to web hosting scenarios. Check our performance dashboard to see which VPS plans excel at WordPress hosting.
Can I trust these benchmark results for my use case?
Our benchmarks provide standardized, reproducible test results using industry-standard tools. While they offer excellent performance indicators, your actual experience may vary based on your specific workload, application optimization, and usage patterns. Use these benchmarks as a reliable starting point for comparison between providers. Read about our methodology to understand how we ensure accuracy and consistency.
Why do benchmark results vary by location?
Different data center locations may have different hardware configurations, CPU generations, storage types, and network infrastructure. Providers often upgrade facilities at different rates across regions. Location-specific benchmarks help you choose a VPS in the right region with the best performance for your target audience. Use our benchmark filters to narrow down by location and compare provider performance across geographic regions.
How current are these benchmark results?
Each benchmark displays its execution date. We continuously add new benchmarks and re-test providers to capture infrastructure changes and upgrades. Check the benchmark date to ensure data freshness. Providers may upgrade CPUs, storage, or network capacity over time, affecting performance. Visit our dashboard to see the latest benchmark results and recent additions to our database.
What should I prioritize: CPU, disk, or network performance?
Priority depends on your workload. CPU-intensive applications (video processing, rendering) need high Geekbench scores. Database-heavy applications require high IOPS. Content delivery and API services benefit from high network bandwidth. Web applications typically need balanced performance across all metrics. Use our VPS comparison tool to analyze multiple plans side-by-side and find the best match for your requirements.
How do I use AI Summary for benchmark analysis?
The AI Summary feature (available for logged-in users) analyzes benchmark results and provides insights about performance strengths, weaknesses, and use case recommendations. It considers all benchmark metrics together to give you a comprehensive understanding of the VPS performance profile in plain language. Need help? Contact our support team or explore our free developer tools for additional VPS management utilities.
Making Informed VPS Decisions
Use these comprehensive benchmark results to make data-driven hosting decisions. Compare multiple metrics together rather than focusing on a single aspect - a balanced VPS performs well across CPU, disk, and network benchmarks. Consider your specific workload requirements: CPU-intensive applications need high Geekbench scores, database-heavy applications require high IOPS, and content delivery services benefit from high network bandwidth.
Our benchmarks provide standardized, reproducible test results using industry-standard tools. While they offer excellent performance indicators, your actual experience may vary based on specific workload patterns and application optimization. Use these benchmarks as a reliable starting point for comparison between providers and configurations.
Check the benchmark execution date to ensure data freshness - providers may upgrade infrastructure over time. Compare results from the same time period for fair evaluation. For the most comprehensive analysis, review multiple benchmarks from the same provider and location to understand performance consistency.
Compare More VPS Options
Explore additional benchmarks, compare multiple VPS plans side-by-side, and discover the best performing options for your specific requirements and budget.