Warnahost - Intel Xeon Platinum 2 Core 4 GB Ram ID

Comprehensive VPS benchmark results from Indonesia tested on Aug 19, 2025. Learn our methodology.

Intel Xeon Platinum 2 Core 4 GB Ram ID
Indonesia
Aug 19, 2025
$15.53 /month

Benchmark Steps

# Suite Run At Raw Output
1
Bench
v1
Aug 09, 2025 19:29
View Raw Output
----------------------------------------------------------------------
 CPU Model          : Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 8158 CPU @ 3.00GHz
 CPU Cores          : 2 @ 2992.966 MHz
 CPU Cache          : 16384 KB
 AES-NI             : ✓ Enabled
 VM-x/AMD-V         : ✓ Enabled
 Total Disk         : 29.0 GB (5.4 GB Used)
 Total Mem          : 3.8 GB (1.2 GB Used)
 System uptime      : 4 days, 23 hour 11 min
 Load average       : 0.06, 0.02, 0.00
 OS                 : Ubuntu 24.04.1 LTS
 Arch               : x86_64 (64 Bit)
 Kernel             : 6.8.0-71-generic
 TCP CC             : cubic
 Virtualization     : KVM
 IPv4/IPv6          : ✓ Online / ✓ Online
 Organization       : AS141120 PT Warna Data Multimedia
 Location           : Jakarta / ID
 Region             : Jakarta
----------------------------------------------------------------------
 I/O Speed(1st run) : 1.1 GB/s
 I/O Speed(2nd run) : 1.3 GB/s
 I/O Speed(3rd run) : 1.2 GB/s
 I/O Speed(average) : 1228.8 MB/s
----------------------------------------------------------------------
 Node Name        Upload Speed      Download Speed      Latency
 Speedtest.net    8406.25 Mbps      6484.44 Mbps        0.41 ms
 Paris, FR        303.73 Mbps       1936.46 Mbps        155.33 ms
 Amsterdam, NL    284.74 Mbps       784.63 Mbps         167.39 ms
 Shanghai, CN     197.84 Mbps       1569.15 Mbps        362.42 ms
 Singapore, SG    672.04 Mbps       1740.73 Mbps        14.21 ms
 Tokyo, JP        373.38 Mbps       1951.67 Mbps        79.49 ms
----------------------------------------------------------------------
2
Benchy
v1
Aug 09, 2025 19:29
View Raw Output
Server Insight                                  Hardware Information
---------------------                           ---------------------
OS         : Ubuntu 24.04.1 LTS                 Model       : Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 8158 CPU @ 3.00
Location   : Indonesia                          Core        : 2 @ 2992.966 MHz
Kernel     : 6.8.0-71-generic                   AES-NI      : ✔ Enabled
Uptime     : 4 days, 23 hrs, 29 mins, 10 secs   VM-x/AMD-V  : ✔ Enabled
Virt       : kvm                                Swap        : 0.0 KiB

Disk & Memory Usage                             Network Information
---------------------                           ---------------------
Disk (2)   : 28.9 GiB                           ASN         : AS141120
Disk Usage : 7.6 GiB (26% Used)                 ISP         : PT Warna Data Multimedia
Mem        : 3.8 GiB                            IPv4        : ✔ Enabled
Mem Usage  : 1.2 GiB (30% Used)                 IPv6        : ✔ Enabled

Disk Performance Check (ext4 on /dev/sda1) (R: Read, W: Write, T: Total)
+---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Size | Read        | Write       | Total       |       IOPS (R,W,T)       |
+===========================================================================+
| 4k   | 108.90 MB/s | 109.19 MB/s | 218.10 MB/s | 27.9k  | 27.9k  | 55.8k  |
| 64k  | 721.52 MB/s | 725.31 MB/s | 1.41 GB/s   | 11.5k  | 11.6k  | 23.1k  |
| 512k | 934.42 MB/s | 984.07 MB/s | 1.87 GB/s   | 1.9k   | 2.0k   | 3.8k   |
| 1m   | 968.71 MB/s | 1.00 GB/s   | 1.95 GB/s   | 1.0k   | 1.0k   | 2.0k   |
+---------------------------------------------------------------------------+

Network Performance Test (Region: Mixed)
+---------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Prot. | Provider    | Location        | Send         | Receive      | Latency   |
+---------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| IPv4  | Airstream   | Wisconsin, US   |  135.8 Mb/s  |  586.7 Mb/s  |  204.6 ms |
|       | Uztelecom   | Tashkent, UZ    |        busy  |        busy  |  190.8 ms |
|       | Novogara    | Amsterdam, NL   |        busy  |  629.0 Mb/s  |  164.3 ms |
|       | FiberBy     | Copenhagen, DK  |  192.9 Mb/s  |  284.5 Mb/s  |  170.1 ms |
+---------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| IPv6  | Airstream   | Wisconsin, US   |   78.2 Mb/s  |  802.0 Mb/s  |  204.6 ms |
|       | Uztelecom   | Tashkent, UZ    |  336.2 Mb/s  |        busy  |  190.0 ms |
|       | Novogara    | Amsterdam, NL   |  339.6 Mb/s  |    1.3 Gb/s  |  164.4 ms |
|       | FiberBy     | Copenhagen, DK  |  183.2 Mb/s  |  214.1 Mb/s  |  170.1 ms |
+---------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
3
PassMark
v1
Aug 09, 2025 19:29
View Raw Output
                   PassMark PerformanceTest Linux (11.0.1002)


Intel Xeon Platinum 8158 CPU @ 3.00GHz (x86_64)
2 cores @ 0 MHz  |  3.8 GiB RAM
Number of Processes: 2  |  Test Iterations: 1  |  Test Duration: Medium
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CPU Mark:                          2567
  Integer Math                     7000 Million Operations/s
  Floating Point Math              4948 Million Operations/s
  Prime Numbers                    15.5 Million Primes/s
  Sorting                          4223 Thousand Strings/s
  Encryption                       806 MB/s
  Compression                      29881 KB/s
  CPU Single Threaded              1635 Million Operations/s
  Physics                          304 Frames/s
  Extended Instructions (SSE)      2286 Million Matrices/s

Memory Mark:                       812
  Database Operations              737 Thousand Operations/s
  Memory Read Cached               20273 MB/s
  Memory Read Uncached             6021 MB/s
  Memory Write                     6692 MB/s
  Available RAM                    678 Megabytes
  Memory Latency                   84 Nanoseconds
  Memory Threaded                  8984 MB/s
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
4
UnixBench
v1
Aug 09, 2025 19:29
View Raw Output
Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0       4286.1    779.3
Execl Throughput                                 43.0       1321.9    307.4
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0     320537.7    809.4
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0      98833.0    597.2
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0    1158028.4   1996.6
Pipe Throughput                               12440.0     471254.4    378.8
Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0      36588.9     91.5
Process Creation                                126.0       4563.9    362.2
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4       6620.1   1561.3
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0       1288.6   2147.7
System Call Overhead                          15000.0     241719.9    161.1
                                                                   ========
System Benchmarks Index Score                                         637.0

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Sat Aug 09 2025 19:29:11 - 19:57:18
2 CPUs in system; running 2 parallel copies of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables       73014304.4 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone                    12627.8 MWIPS (9.7 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput                               3542.6 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks        759556.2 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks          194227.7 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks       2337166.6 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput                              930344.4 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching                 184187.2 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation                               9299.3 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                   9076.4 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                   1302.6 lpm   (60.1 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead                         472625.8 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0   73014304.4   6256.6
Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0      12627.8   2296.0
Execl Throughput                                 43.0       3542.6    823.9
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0     759556.2   1918.1
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0     194227.7   1173.6
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0    2337166.6   4029.6
Pipe Throughput                               12440.0     930344.4    747.9
Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0     184187.2    460.5
Process Creation                                126.0       9299.3    738.0
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4       9076.4   2140.7
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0       1302.6   2171.0
System Call Overhead                          15000.0     472625.8    315.1
                                                                   ========
System Benchmarks Index Score                                        1359.8
5
Speedtest Lokal
v1
Aug 10, 2025 17:26
View Raw Output
 Speedtest.net (Region: INDONESIA)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Location         Latency     Loss    DL Speed       UP Speed       Server

 ISP: PT Warna Data Multimedia

 Nearest          0.35 ms     0.0%    7925.98 Mbps   7916.30 Mbps   BitsNet - Jakarta

 Jakarta          FAILED
 Jakarta          1.56 ms     0.0%    1995.07 Mbps   649.79 Mbps    DomaiNesia - Jakarta
 Jakarta          218.65 ms   0.0%    1624.36 Mbps   247.20 Mbps    PT. Telekomunikasi Indonesia - Jakarta
 Jakarta          23.44 ms    0.0%    1880.15 Mbps   807.13 Mbps    PT. Indosat Tbk - Jakarta
 Jakarta          FAILED

 Bandung          FAILED
 Bekasi           1.02 ms     0.0%    7525.20 Mbps   6296.52 Mbps   PT Lintas Jaringan Nusantara - Bekasi
 Bogor            FAILED
 Malang           15.59 ms    0.0%    3332.34 Mbps   472.62 Mbps    GlobalXtreme - Malang
 Semarang         0.69 ms     0.0%    2372.87 Mbps   1608.14 Mbps   Global Media Data Prima - Semarang
 Surabaya         FAILED
 Yogyakarta       10.09 ms    0.0%    939.30 Mbps    623.75 Mbps    PT Union Routelink Communication - Yogyakarta

 Banda Aceh       FAILED
 Medan            27.90 ms    0.0%    938.57 Mbps    364.38 Mbps    WIZNET - Medan
 Palembang        15.90 ms    0.0%    870.63 Mbps    616.84 Mbps    PT. Java Digital Nusantara - Palembang
 Pekanbaru        21.50 ms    0.0%    1886.57 Mbps   898.06 Mbps    BertuahIX - Pekanbaru

 Makassar         24.81 ms    0.0%    2320.29 Mbps   839.96 Mbps    PT Medialink Global Mandiri - Makassar
 Depok            0.85 ms     0.0%    935.53 Mbps    1538.88 Mbps   PT ADI - Jakarta
 Tangerang        12.49 ms    0.0%    925.65 Mbps    409.25 Mbps    PT. Java Medianet Tekhnologi - Tangerang
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Avg DL Speed       : 2533.75 Mbps
 Avg UL Speed       : 1663.49 Mbps

 Total DL Data      : 39.84 GB
 Total UL Data      : 20.48 GB
 Total Data         : 60.32 GB
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Duration           : 5 min 30 sec
 System Time        : 10/08/2025 - 17:26:23 UTC
 Total Script Runs  : 120377
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Result             : https://result.nws.sh/r/1754846184_EYRZH2_INDONESIA.txt
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
6
Speedtest Global
v1
Aug 19, 2025 15:49
View Raw Output
 Speedtest.net (Region: GLOBAL)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Location         Latency     Loss    DL Speed       UP Speed       Server

 ISP: PT Warna Data Multimedia

 Nearest          0.34 ms     0.0%    7674.38 Mbps   7517.98 Mbps   BitsNet - Jakarta

 Bangalore, IN    50.08 ms    0.0%    1158.10 Mbps   546.14 Mbps    Bharti Airtel Ltd - Bangalore
 Chennai, IN      127.37 ms   0.0%    1169.83 Mbps   575.89 Mbps    Jio - Chennai
 Mumbai, IN       87.19 ms    0.0%    1896.56 Mbps   389.60 Mbps    Melbicom - Mumbai

 Seattle, US      171.73 ms   N/A     1486.74 Mbps   198.19 Mbps    Comcast - Seattle, WA
 Los Angeles, US  180.78 ms   0.0%    1536.37 Mbps   324.26 Mbps    ReliableSite Hosting - Los Angeles, CA
 Dallas, US       210.56 ms   0.0%    1298.31 Mbps   273.41 Mbps    Hivelocity - Dallas, TX
 Miami, US        253.99 ms   0.0%    1716.79 Mbps   342.34 Mbps    Telxius - Miami, FL
 New York, US     248.96 ms   0.0%    1169.31 Mbps   109.08 Mbps    GSL Networks - New York, NY
 Toronto, CA      209.23 ms   0.0%    1784.34 Mbps   205.64 Mbps    Rogers - Toronto, ON
 Mexico City, MX  228.16 ms   N/A     1788.65 Mbps   315.55 Mbps    INFINITUM - Ciudad de México

 London, UK       164.43 ms   0.0%    1888.35 Mbps   148.36 Mbps    VeloxServ Communications - London
 Amsterdam, NL    166.29 ms   0.0%    1261.98 Mbps   324.22 Mbps    31173 Services AB - Amsterdam
 Paris, FR        158.87 ms   N/A     1407.48 Mbps   228.27 Mbps    Axione - Paris
 Frankfurt, DE    174.30 ms   0.0%    1644.38 Mbps   308.77 Mbps    Clouvider Ltd - Frankfurt am Main
 Warsaw, PL       173.49 ms   0.0%    1805.81 Mbps   340.71 Mbps    Play - Warszawa
 Bucharest, RO    209.58 ms   0.0%    1253.22 Mbps   163.88 Mbps    Vodafone Romania Mobile - Bucharest - Bucharest
 Moscow, RU       FAILED

 Jeddah, SA       228.19 ms   0.0%    1753.83 Mbps   250.76 Mbps    Saudi Telecom Company
 Dubai, AE        89.31 ms    N/A     1561.29 Mbps   88.97 Mbps     e& UAE - Dubai
 Istanbul, TR     196.58 ms   0.0%    1856.02 Mbps   326.20 Mbps    Turkcell - Istanbul
 Tehran, IR       258.41 ms   0.0%    917.68 Mbps    191.86 Mbps    Irancell - Tehran
 Cairo, EG        192.55 ms   0.0%    897.53 Mbps    176.51 Mbps    Telecom Egypt - Cairo

 Tokyo, JP        FAILED
 Chengdu, CM-CN   FAILED
 Hong Kong, CN    44.89 ms    N/A     1586.10 Mbps   352.94 Mbps    Misaka Network, Inc. - Hong Kong
 Singapore, SG    FAILED
 Jakarta, ID      0.65 ms     0.0%    8297.94 Mbps   8976.01 Mbps   PT Solnet Indonesia - Jakarta

 Sydney, AU       104.38 ms   0.0%    1885.95 Mbps   188.54 Mbps    Aussie Broadband - Sydney
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Avg DL Speed       : 2027.88 Mbps
 Avg UL Speed       : 914.56 Mbps

 Total DL Data      : 59.90 GB
 Total UL Data      : 20.04 GB
 Total Data         : 79.94 GB
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Duration           : 12 min 44 sec
 System Time        : 10/08/2025 - 15:49:59 UTC
 Total Script Runs  : 120371
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Result             : https://result.nws.sh/r/1754840400_PZH79E_GLOBAL.txt
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
921
Geekbench SC
1,169
Geekbench MC
59,700
Max IOPS
1,542.7
Avg MB/s

System Specifications

Memory 4.00 GB
Storage 60.00 GB
Bandwidth 999.00 TB
OS Ubuntu

Additional Benchmarks

Comprehensive performance metrics from specialized benchmark tools

UnixBench

System Performance Index

Single-Core Index Individual core performance
637.0
points
Multi-Core Index Parallel processing power
1,359.0
points

WordPress Bench

Web Application Performance

Overall Score WordPress performance rating
7.4
score

🌟 Recommended VPS Provider

Onidel Cloud VPS
99.99% Uptime SLA - Enterprise-grade reliability
Starting at $4.95/month - Unbeatable pricing
AMD EPYC CPUs + NVMe storage + DDoS Protection
5 Global Locations - Singapore, Sydney, Amsterdam, Ho Chi Minh
Perfect for: Web applications, databases, development, production workloads
Get Started Now
⚡ Instant deployment

CPU Performance (Geekbench)

CPU benchmarks measure processing power for compute-intensive tasks. Learn how we test CPU performance.

Single-Core Score
Individual core performance
921
Multi-Core Score
All cores combined performance
1,169

I/O Speed Summary (dd)

738.8 MB/s
Read Speed
742.7 MB/s
Write Speed
1.2 GB/s
Average I/O Speed
Performance Runs:
Run 1:
1.1
Run 2:
1.3
Run 3:
1.2

IOPS Performance by Block Size

FIO Benchmark Details

Detailed I/O performance test results

Test 1 - Block Size: 4k (mixed_rw_50_50)

29,800
Read IOPS
29,900
Write IOPS
119.4
Read MB/s
119.7
Write MB/s

Test 2 - Block Size: 64k (mixed_rw_50_50)

11,500
Read IOPS
11,600
Write IOPS
738.8
Read MB/s
742.7
Write MB/s

Test 3 - Block Size: 512k (mixed_rw_50_50)

2,000
Read IOPS
2,100
Write IOPS
1,020.0
Read MB/s
1,080.0
Write MB/s

Test 4 - Block Size: 1m (mixed_rw_50_50)

1,100
Read IOPS
1,100
Write IOPS
1,140.0
Read MB/s
1,210.0
Write MB/s
Login Required

Please login to access AI Summary feature. AI-powered benchmark analysis is available for authenticated users only.

By logging in, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Understanding VPS Benchmark Results

This comprehensive benchmark report provides detailed performance analysis for Warnahost Intel Xeon Platinum 2 Core 4 GB Ram ID VPS in Indonesia. Our standardized testing methodology measures CPU performance, disk I/O operations, network bandwidth, and real-world application performance to give you complete insights into VPS capabilities. Browse more VPS benchmarks to compare performance across providers.

Each benchmark metric serves a specific purpose in evaluating VPS performance. CPU benchmarks reveal processing power for applications, disk I/O tests measure storage performance for databases and file operations, network tests show bandwidth capacity for content delivery, and application benchmarks demonstrate real-world hosting performance. Together, these metrics provide a complete performance profile. Use our VPS comparison tool to analyze multiple plans side-by-side.

Benchmark Metrics & Features

Detailed Geekbench CPU performance scores (single & multi-core)

FIO disk I/O benchmarks with IOPS and bandwidth metrics

Network bandwidth testing with iPerf (download & upload speeds)

UnixBench system performance comprehensive results

WordPress real-world application performance tests

Sequential disk performance with DiskSeq benchmarks

Complete VPS specifications (CPU, RAM, storage details)

Provider and plan pricing information

Data center location and geographic details

Benchmark execution date and freshness indicators

Historical benchmark data for performance trends

AI-powered performance analysis and insights (for logged-in users)

Performance Analysis Use Cases

Evaluating VPS CPU performance for compute-intensive applications

Testing disk I/O performance for database workloads

Measuring network bandwidth for media streaming services

Comparing VPS performance across different providers

Analyzing WordPress site performance on specific VPS plans

Assessing value-for-money based on performance and pricing

Checking real-world application performance metrics

Understanding geographic performance variations by location

Reviewing detailed benchmark metrics before VPS purchase

Comparing single-core vs multi-core CPU performance

Validating provider performance claims with actual data

Making informed hosting decisions based on comprehensive benchmarks

How to Interpret Benchmark Results

1. CPU Performance (Geekbench)

Geekbench measures CPU performance through single-core and multi-core scores. Single-core scores (typically 800-2000) indicate performance for single-threaded applications and general responsiveness. Multi-core scores (1500-8000) show performance when all CPU cores are utilized for parallel processing. Higher scores mean better performance. Visit our testing methodology to learn more about CPU benchmarks.

2. Disk I/O Performance (FIO)

FIO benchmarks measure disk performance through IOPS (Input/Output Operations Per Second) and bandwidth (MB/s). High IOPS (10,000+ for NVMe, 5,000-10,000 for SSD) is crucial for database workloads with many small operations. High bandwidth is important for large file transfers and media applications. Compare disk performance across different providers in our database.

3. Network Bandwidth (iPerf)

Network tests measure download (incoming) and upload (outgoing) bandwidth capacity. Most modern VPS offers 1-10 Gbps connectivity. Download speed affects data ingestion, while upload speed determines content delivery performance to users. Consider your application's data transfer patterns when evaluating network metrics. Check our performance dashboard for network performance statistics.

4. Application Performance

Real-world application benchmarks (WordPress, UnixBench) show how the VPS handles typical web workloads including PHP processing, database queries, and static file serving. These results measured in requests per second and page load times directly apply to web hosting scenarios. Need help choosing the right VPS? Contact our team or visit about us to learn more about VPSMetrics.

Looking for more resources? Explore our free developer tools including SSL checkers, DNS lookup, WHOIS lookup, and server diagnostics to help you manage your VPS infrastructure effectively.

Frequently Asked Questions

How do I interpret the Geekbench single-core and multi-core scores?

Geekbench single-core scores indicate CPU performance for single-threaded applications, important for general responsiveness and web applications. Multi-core scores show performance when all CPU cores are utilized, crucial for parallel processing and multi-threaded applications. Higher scores indicate better performance. Modern VPS typically score 800-2000 (single) and 1500-8000 (multi) depending on the plan. Learn more about our comprehensive testing methodology for CPU benchmarks.

What do IOPS numbers mean in disk I/O benchmarks?

IOPS (Input/Output Operations Per Second) measures how many read/write operations your disk can handle per second. Higher IOPS means better performance for database operations and applications with many small file operations. NVMe SSD VPS typically delivers 10,000+ IOPS, while traditional SSD offers 5,000-10,000 IOPS. HDD-based storage usually provides under 1,000 IOPS. Visit our How We Test page to understand disk performance metrics in detail.

How important are network speed benchmarks?

Network bandwidth (measured by iPerf) is crucial for applications serving content, APIs, or media streaming. Download speeds affect how fast your server receives data, while upload speeds determine content delivery to users. Most modern VPS offers 1-10 Gbps network connectivity. Consider your application's data transfer requirements when evaluating network performance. Compare network speeds across different VPS providers in our database.

What is UnixBench and why does it matter?

UnixBench is a comprehensive system-level benchmark suite that tests various aspects of Unix-like system performance including process creation, file operations, and system calls. It provides a holistic view of overall system performance beyond just CPU or disk metrics. Higher UnixBench scores indicate better overall system efficiency. Browse all VPS benchmarks to compare UnixBench scores across providers and plans.

How reliable are WordPress benchmark results?

WordPress benchmarks provide real-world application performance metrics by testing actual WordPress installations. These results show how the VPS handles typical web application workloads including PHP processing, database queries, and static file serving. Results are measured in requests per second and page load times, directly applicable to web hosting scenarios. Check our performance dashboard to see which VPS plans excel at WordPress hosting.

Can I trust these benchmark results for my use case?

Our benchmarks provide standardized, reproducible test results using industry-standard tools. While they offer excellent performance indicators, your actual experience may vary based on your specific workload, application optimization, and usage patterns. Use these benchmarks as a reliable starting point for comparison between providers. Read about our methodology to understand how we ensure accuracy and consistency.

Why do benchmark results vary by location?

Different data center locations may have different hardware configurations, CPU generations, storage types, and network infrastructure. Providers often upgrade facilities at different rates across regions. Location-specific benchmarks help you choose a VPS in the right region with the best performance for your target audience. Use our benchmark filters to narrow down by location and compare provider performance across geographic regions.

How current are these benchmark results?

Each benchmark displays its execution date. We continuously add new benchmarks and re-test providers to capture infrastructure changes and upgrades. Check the benchmark date to ensure data freshness. Providers may upgrade CPUs, storage, or network capacity over time, affecting performance. Visit our dashboard to see the latest benchmark results and recent additions to our database.

What should I prioritize: CPU, disk, or network performance?

Priority depends on your workload. CPU-intensive applications (video processing, rendering) need high Geekbench scores. Database-heavy applications require high IOPS. Content delivery and API services benefit from high network bandwidth. Web applications typically need balanced performance across all metrics. Use our VPS comparison tool to analyze multiple plans side-by-side and find the best match for your requirements.

How do I use AI Summary for benchmark analysis?

The AI Summary feature (available for logged-in users) analyzes benchmark results and provides insights about performance strengths, weaknesses, and use case recommendations. It considers all benchmark metrics together to give you a comprehensive understanding of the VPS performance profile in plain language. Need help? Contact our support team or explore our free developer tools for additional VPS management utilities.

Making Informed VPS Decisions

Use these comprehensive benchmark results to make data-driven hosting decisions. Compare multiple metrics together rather than focusing on a single aspect - a balanced VPS performs well across CPU, disk, and network benchmarks. Consider your specific workload requirements: CPU-intensive applications need high Geekbench scores, database-heavy applications require high IOPS, and content delivery services benefit from high network bandwidth.

Our benchmarks provide standardized, reproducible test results using industry-standard tools. While they offer excellent performance indicators, your actual experience may vary based on specific workload patterns and application optimization. Use these benchmarks as a reliable starting point for comparison between providers and configurations.

Check the benchmark execution date to ensure data freshness - providers may upgrade infrastructure over time. Compare results from the same time period for fair evaluation. For the most comprehensive analysis, review multiple benchmarks from the same provider and location to understand performance consistency.

Compare More VPS Options

Explore additional benchmarks, compare multiple VPS plans side-by-side, and discover the best performing options for your specific requirements and budget.