NUSA - Intel Core Processor 2 Core 4 GB Ram - Medan
Comprehensive VPS benchmark results from Indonesia tested on Oct 14, 2025. Learn our methodology.
System Specifications
Additional Benchmarks
UnixBench
System Performance Index
WordPress Bench
Web Application Performance
Benchmark Steps
# | Suite | Run At | Raw Output |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
Bench
|
Oct 14, 2025 11:22 |
View Raw Output-------------------- A Bench.sh Script By Teddysun ------------------- Version : v2025-05-08 Usage : wget -qO- bench.sh | bash ---------------------------------------------------------------------- CPU Model : Intel Core Processor (Broadwell, IBRS) CPU Cores : 2 @ 2299.996 MHz CPU Cache : 16384 KB AES-NI : ✓ Enabled VM-x/AMD-V : ✓ Enabled Total Disk : 78.7 GB (2.7 GB Used) Total Mem : 3.8 GB (431.9 MB Used) System uptime : 3 days, 19 hour 10 min Load average : 0.01, 0.01, 0.00 OS : Ubuntu 24.04.3 LTS Arch : x86_64 (64 Bit) Kernel : 6.8.0-79-generic TCP CC : cubic Virtualization : KVM IPv4/IPv6 : ✓ Online / ✓ Online Organization : AS23679 PT. Media Antar Nusa Location : Medan / ID Region : North Sumatra ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I/O Speed(1st run) : 574 MB/s I/O Speed(2nd run) : 641 MB/s I/O Speed(3rd run) : 669 MB/s I/O Speed(average) : 628.0 MB/s ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Node Name Upload Speed Download Speed Latency Speedtest.net 224.58 Mbps 269.70 Mbps 23.77 ms Paris, FR 410.99 Mbps 1081.97 Mbps 155.61 ms Amsterdam, NL 564.82 Mbps 636.35 Mbps 171.62 ms Shanghai, CN 346.71 Mbps 560.05 Mbps 215.70 ms Hong Kong, CN 730.11 Mbps 879.72 Mbps 51.66 ms Singapore, SG 737.67 Mbps 832.95 Mbps 12.88 ms Tokyo, JP 1065.94 Mbps 860.77 Mbps 79.76 ms ---------------------------------------------------------------------- |
2 |
Benchy
|
Oct 14, 2025 11:22 |
View Raw OutputKernel : 6.8.0-79-generic AES-NI : ✔ Enabled Uptime : 3 days, 19 hrs, 28 mins, 18 secs VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled Virt : kvm Swap : 0.0 KiB Disk & Memory Usage Network Information --------------------- --------------------- Disk (1) : 78.5 GiB ASN : AS23679 Disk Usage : 5.3 GiB (7% Used) ISP : PT. Media Antar Nusa Mem : 3.8 GiB IPv4 : ✔ Enabled Mem Usage : 0.4 GiB (12% Used) IPv6 : ✔ Enabled Disk Performance Check (ext4 on /dev/sda3) (R: Read, W: Write, T: Total) +---------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Size | Read | Write | Total | IOPS (R,W,T) | +===========================================================================+ | 4k | 95.95 MB/s | 96.20 MB/s | 192.15 MB/s | 24.6k | 24.6k | 49.2k | | 64k | 245.65 MB/s | 246.94 MB/s | 492.60 MB/s | 3.9k | 4.0k | 7.9k | | 512k | 842.48 MB/s | 887.24 MB/s | 1.68 GB/s | 1.7k | 1.8k | 3.5k | | 1m | 888.78 MB/s | 947.98 MB/s | 1.79 GB/s | 0.9k | 0.9k | 1.8k | +---------------------------------------------------------------------------+ Network Performance Test (Region: Mixed) +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Prot. | Provider | Location | Send | Receive | Latency | +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | IPv4 | Airstream | Wisconsin, US | 310.4 Mb/s | 796.2 Mb/s | 205.4 ms | | | Uztelecom | Tashkent, UZ | 1.1 Gb/s | 1.1 Gb/s | 249.3 ms | | | Novogara | Amsterdam, NL | 764.0 Mb/s | 1.0 Gb/s | 173.9 ms | | | FiberBy | Copenhagen, DK | 104.4 Mb/s | 891.8 Mb/s | 180.9 ms | +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | IPv6 | Airstream | Wisconsin, US | 219.9 Mb/s | 936.3 Mb/s | 205.1 ms | | | Uztelecom | Tashkent, UZ | 358.1 Mb/s | busy | 249.3 ms | | | Novogara | Amsterdam, NL | 280.4 Mb/s | 924.5 Mb/s | 173.9 ms | | | FiberBy | Copenhagen, DK | 297.6 Mb/s | 1.1 Gb/s | 181.0 ms | +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ |
3 |
PassMark
|
Oct 14, 2025 11:22 |
View Raw OutputPassMark PerformanceTest Linux (11.0.1002) Intel Core Processor (Broadwell, IBRS) (x86_64) 2 cores @ 0 MHz | 3.8 GiB RAM Number of Processes: 2 | Test Iterations: 1 | Test Duration: Medium -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CPU Mark: 2272 Integer Math 6204 Million Operations/s Floating Point Math 5338 Million Operations/s Prime Numbers 22.2 Million Primes/s Sorting 4162 Thousand Strings/s Encryption 583 MB/s Compression 30256 KB/s CPU Single Threaded 1653 Million Operations/s Physics 293 Frames/s Extended Instructions (SSE) 1681 Million Matrices/s Memory Mark: 1332 Database Operations 969 Thousand Operations/s Memory Read Cached 17947 MB/s Memory Read Uncached 7375 MB/s Memory Write 6363 MB/s Available RAM 2496 Megabytes Memory Latency 63 Nanoseconds Memory Threaded 13666 MB/s -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
4 |
UnixBench
|
Oct 14, 2025 11:22 |
View Raw OutputFile Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1036001.1 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 383651.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 36733.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 1145.9 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 5738.4 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1263.8 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 248348.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 31661462.2 2713.1 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 5573.2 1013.3 Execl Throughput 43.0 1625.1 377.9 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 457170.5 1154.5 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 103574.4 625.8 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1036001.1 1786.2 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 383651.6 308.4 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 36733.4 91.8 Process Creation 126.0 1145.9 90.9 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 5738.4 1353.4 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1263.8 2106.3 System Call Overhead 15000.0 248348.7 165.6 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 585.7 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Benchmark Run: Tue Oct 14 2025 11:22:38 - 11:50:42 2 CPUs in system; running 2 parallel copies of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 65293676.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 11269.5 MWIPS (10.0 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 3610.7 lps (29.9 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 997949.7 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 256597.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 2633252.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 1302497.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 212265.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 9499.6 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 9793.5 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1292.0 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 719173.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 65293676.2 5595.0 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 11269.5 2049.0 Execl Throughput 43.0 3610.7 839.7 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 997949.7 2520.1 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 256597.8 1550.4 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 2633252.4 4540.1 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1302497.4 1047.0 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 212265.9 530.7 Process Creation 126.0 9499.6 753.9 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 9793.5 2309.8 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1292.0 2153.3 System Call Overhead 15000.0 719173.5 479.4 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 1534.6 |
5 |
Speedtest Global
|
Oct 14, 2025 14:38 |
View Raw OutputSpeedtest.net (Region: GLOBAL) --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Location Latency Loss DL Speed UP Speed Server ISP: PT. Media Antar Nusa Nearest 23.38 ms 0.0% 348.89 Mbps 385.23 Mbps GlobalXtreme - Jakarta Bangalore, IN 60.03 ms 0.0% 3058.05 Mbps 528.53 Mbps Bharti Airtel Ltd - Bangalore Chennai, IN 55.13 ms 0.0% 1691.72 Mbps 462.47 Mbps RailTel Corporation of India Ltd - Chennai Mumbai, IN 81.95 ms 0.0% 364.69 Mbps 457.42 Mbps Melbicom - Mumbai Seattle, US 168.57 ms N/A 307.09 Mbps 386.11 Mbps Comcast - Seattle, WA Los Angeles, US 206.91 ms 0.3% 2416.26 Mbps 152.26 Mbps ReliableSite Hosting - Los Angeles, CA Dallas, US FAILED Miami, US 317.18 ms 0.0% 2263.63 Mbps 168.41 Mbps Frontier - Miami, FL New York, US 254.32 ms 0.0% 405.33 Mbps 365.72 Mbps GSL Networks - New York, NY Toronto, CA 239.87 ms 0.0% 1565.31 Mbps 350.10 Mbps Rogers - Toronto, ON Mexico City, MX 262.60 ms N/A 338.26 Mbps 198.63 Mbps INFINITUM - Ciudad de México London, UK 166.11 ms 0.0% 949.25 Mbps 376.81 Mbps VeloxServ Communications - London Amsterdam, NL 170.26 ms 0.0% 605.37 Mbps 441.36 Mbps 31173 Services AB - Amsterdam Paris, FR 157.51 ms 0.0% 887.56 Mbps 402.55 Mbps Scaleway - Paris Frankfurt, DE 172.47 ms 0.0% 1007.64 Mbps 375.52 Mbps Clouvider Ltd - Frankfurt am Main Warsaw, PL 176.18 ms 0.0% 1124.73 Mbps 403.10 Mbps Play - Warszawa Bucharest, RO 285.08 ms 0.0% 5.59 Mbps 3.36 Mbps Vodafone Romania Mobile - Bucharest - Bucharest Moscow, RU 192.54 ms 0.0% 1185.67 Mbps 273.64 Mbps Misaka Network, Inc. - Moscow Jeddah, SA 245.39 ms 0.0% 1020.40 Mbps 297.15 Mbps Saudi Telecom Company Dubai, AE 89.52 ms N/A 334.81 Mbps 1063.48 Mbps e& UAE - Dubai Istanbul, TR 197.26 ms 0.0% 366.06 Mbps 383.29 Mbps Turkcell - Istanbul Tehran, IR 275.41 ms 0.0% 682.18 Mbps 329.91 Mbps Irancell - Tehran Cairo, EG 176.35 ms 0.0% 1247.79 Mbps 312.35 Mbps Telecom Egypt - Cairo Tokyo, JP 79.39 ms 2.2% 1334.40 Mbps 474.99 Mbps fdcservers.net - Tokyo Shanghai, CU-CN 215.56 ms N/A 654.71 Mbps 346.45 Mbps China Unicom 5G - Shanghai Hong Kong, CN 54.80 ms N/A 1006.15 Mbps 430.93 Mbps Misaka Network, Inc. - Hong Kong Singapore, SG 14.16 ms 0.0% 322.83 Mbps 544.15 Mbps ViewQwest - Singapore Jakarta, ID 26.87 ms 0.0% 307.25 Mbps 363.72 Mbps PT Solnet Indonesia - Jakarta Sydney, AU 227.22 ms 0.0% 405.58 Mbps 355.51 Mbps Aussie Broadband - Sydney --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Avg DL Speed : 935.98 Mbps Avg UL Speed : 379.75 Mbps Total DL Data : 35.78 GB Total UL Data : 15.11 GB Total Data : 50.89 GB --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Duration : 14 min 26 sec System Time : 14/10/2025 - 14:38:52 WIB Total Script Runs : 410754 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Result : https://result.nws.sh/r/1760426726_MI1ICC_GLOBAL.txt --------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
6 |
Speedtest Lokal
|
Oct 14, 2025 23:57 |
View Raw OutputSpeedtest.net (Region: INDONESIA) --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Location Latency Loss DL Speed UP Speed Server ISP: PT. Media Antar Nusa Nearest 24.91 ms 0.0% 316.24 Mbps 428.40 Mbps PT. Mora Telematika Indonesia - Jakarta Jakarta FAILED Jakarta FAILED Jakarta 25.15 ms 0.0% 298.54 Mbps 470.75 Mbps PT. Telekomunikasi Indonesia - Jakarta Jakarta 34.59 ms 0.0% 820.03 Mbps 462.22 Mbps PT. Indosat Tbk - Jakarta Jakarta FAILED Bandung FAILED Bekasi 24.67 ms 0.0% 354.69 Mbps 960.70 Mbps PT Lintas Jaringan Nusantara - Bekasi Bogor FAILED Malang 38.37 ms 0.0% 198.41 Mbps 994.81 Mbps GlobalXtreme - Malang Semarang 24.18 ms 0.0% 303.07 Mbps 447.38 Mbps Global Media Data Prima - Semarang Surabaya 36.11 ms 0.0% 346.12 Mbps 373.10 Mbps MyRepublic Indonesia - Surabaya Yogyakarta 47.54 ms 0.0% 490.23 Mbps 178.83 Mbps PT Union Routelink Communication - Yogyakarta Banda Aceh FAILED Medan 26.89 ms 0.0% 347.42 Mbps 316.85 Mbps WIZNET - Medan Palembang 33.63 ms 0.0% 508.20 Mbps 334.79 Mbps PT. Java Digital Nusantara - Palembang Pekanbaru 42.92 ms 0.0% 350.70 Mbps 393.32 Mbps BertuahIX - Pekanbaru Makassar 48.75 ms 0.0% 496.16 Mbps 947.41 Mbps PT Medialink Global Mandiri - Makassar Depok 25.05 ms 0.0% 264.78 Mbps 540.06 Mbps PT ADI - Jakarta Tangerang 25.40 ms 0.0% 346.24 Mbps 538.00 Mbps PT. Java Medianet Tekhnologi - Tangerang --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Avg DL Speed : 388.63 Mbps Avg UL Speed : 527.62 Mbps Total DL Data : 6.77 GB Total UL Data : 10.31 GB Total Data : 17.08 GB --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Duration : 6 min 17 sec System Time : 14/10/2025 - 23:57:01 WIB Total Script Runs : 410797 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Result : https://result.nws.sh/r/1760460215_XYT5W8_INDONESIA.txt --------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
Onidel Cloud VPS
Performance-first cloud hosting for teams that need consistent benchmarks and transparent pricing.
- 99.99% uptime SLA
- Proven availability for critical workloads
- Plans from $4.95/month
- Predictable pricing and simple scaling
- AMD EPYC + NVMe stack
- Modern hardware with built-in DDoS protection
- 5 global regions
- Singapore, Sydney, Amsterdam, Ho Chi Minh City, more coming soon
Ideal for: demanding SaaS workloads, managed hosting agencies, and teams migrating off legacy VPS providers.
Launch faster with concierge onboarding
Start 14-day TrialCPU Performance (Geekbench)
CPU benchmarks measure processing power for compute-intensive tasks. Learn how we test CPU performance.
I/O Speed Summary (dd)
IOPS Performance by Block Size
Combined IOPS Performance
Total IOPS across all block sizes (4K, 64K, 512K, 1M)
FIO Benchmark Details
Detailed I/O performance test results
Test 1 - Block Size: 4k (mixed_rw_50_50)
Test 2 - Block Size: 64k (mixed_rw_50_50)
Test 3 - Block Size: 512k (mixed_rw_50_50)
Test 4 - Block Size: 1m (mixed_rw_50_50)
Detailed I/O Benchmark (FIO)
IOPS Performance by Block Size
Bandwidth Performance by Block Size
Detailed Test Results
Block Size | Read IOPS | Write IOPS | Read MB/s | Write MB/s |
---|---|---|---|---|
4k | 25,700 | 25,700 | 102.9 | 103.2 |
64k | 1,300 | 1,300 | 852.7 | 857.2 |
512k | 1,300 | 1,400 | 698.2 | 735.3 |
1m | 883 | 942 | 904.4 | 964.7 |
Related Resources
Browse More Benchmarks
Explore comprehensive VPS benchmarks across providers and locations.
Compare Providers
View aggregated performance metrics across all VPS providers.
Performance Dashboard
Access real-time statistics, top performers, and latest results.
Testing Methodology
Learn about our comprehensive testing procedures and tools.
Understanding VPS Benchmark Results
This comprehensive benchmark report provides detailed performance analysis for NUSA Intel Core Processor 2 Core 4 GB Ram - Medan VPS in Indonesia. Our standardized testing methodology measures CPU performance, disk I/O operations, network bandwidth, and real-world application performance to give you complete insights into VPS capabilities. Browse more VPS benchmarks to compare performance across providers.
Each benchmark metric serves a specific purpose in evaluating VPS performance. CPU benchmarks reveal processing power for applications, disk I/O tests measure storage performance for databases and file operations, network tests show bandwidth capacity for content delivery, and application benchmarks demonstrate real-world hosting performance. Together, these metrics provide a complete performance profile. Use our VPS comparison tool to analyze multiple plans side-by-side.
Benchmark Metrics & Features
Performance Analysis Use Cases
- Evaluating VPS CPU performance for compute-intensive applications
- Testing disk I/O performance for database workloads
- Comparing VPS performance across different providers
- Analyzing WordPress site performance on specific VPS plans
- Assessing value-for-money based on performance and pricing
- Checking real-world application performance metrics
- Understanding geographic performance variations by location
- Reviewing detailed benchmark metrics before VPS purchase
- Comparing single-core vs multi-core CPU performance
- Validating provider performance claims with actual data
- Making informed hosting decisions based on comprehensive benchmarks
How to Interpret Benchmark Results
1. CPU Performance (Geekbench)
Geekbench measures CPU performance through single-core and multi-core scores. Single-core scores (typically 800-2000) indicate performance for single-threaded applications and general responsiveness. Multi-core scores (1500-8000) show performance when all CPU cores are utilized for parallel processing. Higher scores mean better performance. Visit our testing methodology to learn more about CPU benchmarks.
2. Disk I/O Performance (FIO)
FIO benchmarks measure disk performance through IOPS (Input/Output Operations Per Second) and bandwidth (MB/s). High IOPS (10,000+ for NVMe, 5,000-10,000 for SSD) is crucial for database workloads with many small operations. High bandwidth is important for large file transfers and media applications. Compare disk performance across different providers in our database.
3. Application Performance
Real-world application benchmarks (WordPress, UnixBench) show how the VPS handles typical web workloads including PHP processing, database queries, and static file serving. These results measured in requests per second and page load times directly apply to web hosting scenarios. Need help choosing the right VPS? Visit about us to learn more about VPSMetrics.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I interpret the Geekbench single-core and multi-core scores?
Geekbench single-core scores indicate CPU performance for single-threaded applications, important for general responsiveness and web applications. Multi-core scores show performance when all CPU cores are utilized, crucial for parallel processing and multi-threaded applications. Higher scores indicate better performance. Modern VPS typically score 800-2000 (single) and 1500-8000 (multi) depending on the plan.
What do IOPS numbers mean in disk I/O benchmarks?
IOPS (Input/Output Operations Per Second) measures how many read/write operations your disk can handle per second. Higher IOPS means better performance for database operations and applications with many small file operations. NVMe SSD VPS typically delivers 10,000+ IOPS, while traditional SSD offers 5,000-10,000 IOPS.
What is UnixBench and why does it matter?
UnixBench is a comprehensive system-level benchmark suite that tests various aspects of Unix-like system performance including process creation, file operations, and system calls. It provides a holistic view of overall system performance beyond just CPU or disk metrics. Higher UnixBench scores indicate better overall system efficiency.
How reliable are WordPress benchmark results?
WordPress benchmarks provide real-world application performance metrics by testing actual WordPress installations. These results show how the VPS handles typical web application workloads including PHP processing, database queries, and static file serving. Results are measured in requests per second and page load times, directly applicable to web hosting scenarios.
Can I trust these benchmark results for my use case?
Our benchmarks provide standardized, reproducible test results using industry-standard tools. While they offer excellent performance indicators, your actual experience may vary based on your specific workload, application optimization, and usage patterns. Use these benchmarks as a reliable starting point for comparison between providers.
Why do benchmark results vary by location?
Different data center locations may have different hardware configurations, CPU generations, storage types, and network infrastructure. Providers often upgrade facilities at different rates across regions. Location-specific benchmarks help you choose a VPS in the right region with the best performance for your target audience.
Making Informed VPS Decisions
Use these comprehensive benchmark results to make data-driven hosting decisions. Compare multiple metrics together rather than focusing on a single aspect - a balanced VPS performs well across CPU, disk, and network benchmarks. Consider your specific workload requirements: CPU-intensive applications need high Geekbench scores, database-heavy applications require high IOPS, and content delivery services benefit from high network bandwidth.
Our benchmarks provide standardized, reproducible test results using industry-standard tools. While they offer excellent performance indicators, your actual experience may vary based on specific workload patterns and application optimization. Use these benchmarks as a reliable starting point for comparison between providers and configurations.
Compare More VPS Options
Explore additional benchmarks, compare multiple VPS plans side-by-side, and discover the best performing options for your specific requirements and budget.