COIN.HOST - Intel Xeon Platinum 2 Core 2 GB Ram CH
Comprehensive VPS benchmark results from Switzerland tested on Jun 01, 2023. Learn our methodology.
Benchmark Steps
| # | Suite | Run At | Raw Output |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Bench
v1
|
Jun 01, 2023 16:52 |
View Raw Output-------------------- A Bench.sh Script By Teddysun ------------------- Version : v2022-06-01 Usage : wget -qO- bench.sh | bash ---------------------------------------------------------------------- CPU Model : Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 8168 CPU @ 2.70GHz CPU Cores : 2 @ 2700.000 MHz CPU Cache : 33792 KB AES-NI : Enabled VM-x/AMD-V : Disabled Total Disk : 37.3 GB (6.5 GB Used) Total Mem : 1.9 GB (159.7 MB Used) Total Swap : 3.9 GB (15.5 MB Used) System uptime : 0 days, 1 hour 7 min Load average : 0.69, 0.44, 0.70 OS : Ubuntu 20.04.6 LTS Arch : x86_64 (64 Bit) Kernel : 5.4.0-150-generic TCP CC : bbr Virtualization : VMware Organization : AS197988 Solar Communications GmbH Location : La Chaux-de-Fonds / CH Region : Neuchâtel ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I/O Speed(1st run) : 354 MB/s I/O Speed(2nd run) : 313 MB/s I/O Speed(3rd run) : 328 MB/s I/O Speed(average) : 331.7 MB/s ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Node Name Upload Speed Download Speed Latency Speedtest.net 8340.92 Mbps 7696.22 Mbps 0.65 ms Los Angeles, US 448.33 Mbps 1531.23 Mbps 148.84 ms Dallas, US 535.96 Mbps 2363.19 Mbps 120.75 ms Montreal, CA 539.99 Mbps 932.07 Mbps 92.74 ms Paris, FR 3547.70 Mbps 7405.93 Mbps 20.75 ms Amsterdam, NL 4359.53 Mbps 7452.60 Mbps 12.04 ms Shanghai, CN 172.25 Mbps 38.35 Mbps 255.75 ms Nanjing, CN 286.00 Mbps 3139.79 Mbps 254.12 ms Guangzhou, CN 1.29 Mbps 344.49 Mbps 211.46 ms Hongkong, CN 299.53 Mbps 896.64 Mbps 122.19 ms Singapore, SG 63.01 Mbps 373.33 Mbps 322.89 ms Tokyo, JP 280.84 Mbps 802.21 Mbps 240.23 ms ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Finished in : 6 min 22 sec Timestamp : 2023-06-01 16:52:34 CEST ---------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| 2 |
Speedtest Global
v1
|
Jun 01, 2023 17:14 |
View Raw Output---------------------------- network-speed.xyz ----------------------------
A simple script to test network performance using speedtest-cli
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Version : v2023.05.28
Global Speedtest : wget -qO- network-speed.xyz | bash
Region Speedtest : wget -qO- network-speed.xyz | bash -s -- -r <region>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Basic System Info
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
CPU Model : Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 8168 CPU @ 2.70GHz
CPU Cores : 2 @ 2700.000 MHz
CPU Cache : 33792 KB
AES-NI : ✔ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ❌ Disabled
Total Disk : 37.3 GB (6.5 GB Used)
Total RAM : 1.9 GB (160.3 MB Used)
Total Swap : 3.9 GB (16.8 MB Used)
System uptime : 0 days, 1 hour 22 min
Load average : 0.11, 0.23, 0.45
OS : Ubuntu 20.04.6 LTS
Arch : x86_64 (64 Bit)
Kernel : 5.4.0-150-generic
Virtualization : VMWARE
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Basic Network Info
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Primary Network : IPv4
ISP : Solar Communications GmbH
ASN : AS197988 Solar Communications GmbH
Host : Solar Communications GmbH
Location : Zurich, Zurich-ZH, Switzerland
Location (IPv4) : La Chaux-de-Fonds, Neuchâtel, CH
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Speedtest.net (Region: GLOBAL)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Location Latency Loss DL Speed UP Speed Server
ISP: Solar Communications GmbH
Nearest 0.69 ms 0.0% 7727.30 Mbps 8202.80 Mbps SWITCH - Zurich
Kochi, IN 189.06 ms 0.3% 2364.84 Mbps 373.34 Mbps Asianet Broadband - Cochin
Bangalore, IN 149.06 ms 0.0% 2916.48 Mbps 467.78 Mbps Bharti Airtel Ltd - Bangalore
Chennai, IN 171.05 ms N/A 3109.74 Mbps 452.77 Mbps Jio - Chennai
Mumbai, IN 142.71 ms 0.0% 2695.99 Mbps 487.81 Mbps i3D.net - Mumbai
Delhi, IN 152.51 ms 0.0% 3141.62 Mbps 475.23 Mbps Tata Play Fiber - New Delhi
Los Angeles, US 147.58 ms 0.3% 1848.98 Mbps 465.16 Mbps ReliableSite Hosting - Los Angeles, CA
Dallas, US 117.22 ms 0.0% 4514.93 Mbps 627.15 Mbps Hivelocity - Dallas, TX
New York, US 85.49 ms 0.0% 1796.34 Mbps 794.47 Mbps Clouvider Ltd - New York, NY
Seattle, US 168.20 ms 0.0% 8.78 Mbps 445.61 Mbps DediPath - Seattle, WA
Miami, US 139.49 ms 0.0% 2716.74 Mbps 544.79 Mbps AT&T - Miami, FL
Toronto, CA 98.53 ms 0.0% 2170.66 Mbps 744.04 Mbps Rogers - Toronto, ON
Paris, FR 20.56 ms 0.0% 7591.37 Mbps 3698.24 Mbps ORANGE FRANCE - Paris
Amsterdam, NL 16.83 ms 0.0% 5321.42 Mbps 3518.67 Mbps Clouvider Ltd - Amsterdam
Warsaw, PL 27.56 ms 0.0% 5646.63 Mbps 2636.31 Mbps UPC Polska - Warszawa
London, UK 17.46 ms 0.0% 7888.62 Mbps 4001.41 Mbps VeloxServ Communications - London
Frankfurt, DE 6.30 ms 0.0% 7477.42 Mbps 4698.18 Mbps 23M GmbH - Frankfurt Am Main
Bucharest, RO 33.59 ms 0.0% 5443.54 Mbps 2037.02 Mbps Vodafone Romania Fixed - Bucharest - Bucharest
Dubai, AE 139.88 ms 0.7% 3449.22 Mbps 466.11 Mbps du - Dubai
Fujairah, AE 114.86 ms 0.0% 6681.20 Mbps 617.78 Mbps ETISALAT-UAE - Fujairah
Jeddah, KSA 71.04 ms 0.0% 4858.92 Mbps 1113.38 Mbps Saudi Telecom Company
Shanghai, CU-CN 269.20 ms 5.0% 66.83 Mbps 158.08 Mbps China Unicom 5G - ShangHai
Nanjing, CT-CN 259.62 ms 1.4% 2925.21 Mbps 264.10 Mbps China Telecom JiangSu 5G - Nanjing
Hong Kong, HKG 254.23 ms N/A 2088.68 Mbps 275.86 Mbps STC - Hong Kong
Singapore, SG 163.65 ms 0.0% 695.50 Mbps 431.39 Mbps i3D.net - Singapore
Jakarta, ID 194.11 ms 0.0% 2543.61 Mbps 364.88 Mbps PT. Telekomunikasi Indonesia - Jakarta
Tokyo, JP 267.05 ms N/A 2877.98 Mbps 267.41 Mbps fdcservers.net - Tokyo
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Avg DL Speed : 3724.74 Mbps
Avg UL Speed : 1430.73 Mbps
Total DL Data : 135.20 GB
Total UL Data : 40.31 GB
Total Data : 175.51 GB
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Duration : 13 min 7 sec
System Time : 01/06/2023 - 17:14:32 CEST
Total Script Runs : 2987
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Result : https://cdn1.frocdn.ch/0ppBHmW4OAZfz4s.txt
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| 3 |
Benchy
v1
|
Jun 01, 2023 17:28 |
View Raw Output# # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Benchy v2.6 # # https://github.com/L1so/benchy # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # 01 Jun 2023 17:28 CEST # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Server Insight Hardware Information --------------------- --------------------- OS : Ubuntu 20.04.6 LTS Model : Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 8168 CPU @ 2.70 Location : Switzerland Core : 2 @ 2700.000 MHz Kernel : 5.4.0-150-generic AES-NI : ✔ Enabled Uptime : 0 days, 1 hrs, 49 mins, 8 secs VM-x/AMD-V : ❌ Disabled Virt : VMware Disk & Memory Usage Network Information --------------------- --------------------- Disk (2) : 37.3 GiB ASN : AS197988 Disk Usage : 6.5 GiB (17% Used) ISP : Solar Communications GmbH Mem : 1.9 GiB IPv4 : ✔ Enabled Mem Usage : 0.2 GiB (8% Used) IPv6 : ❌ Disabled Swap : 3.9 GiB Ookla Network Speedtest (Region: Europe) +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Provider | Location | Download | Upload | Data Used | Latency | +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | TestDebit | Marseille, FR | 7.8 Gb/s | 2.8 Gb/s | 13.4 GB | 24.7 ms | | Vancis | Amsterdam, NL | 5.0 Gb/s | 2.7 Gb/s | 12.4 GB | 13.6 ms | | Swish Fibre | London, GB | 7.6 Gb/s | 3.6 Gb/s | 12.4 GB | 17.5 ms | | Skynet | Warsaw, PL | 5.9 Gb/s | 2.5 Gb/s | 11.8 GB | 25.5 ms | | Vodafone | Milan, IT | 7.7 Gb/s | 4.6 Gb/s | 15.1 GB | 14.8 ms | +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ Network Performance Test (Region: Europe) +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Prot. | Provider | Location | Send | Receive | Latency | +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | IPv4 | FiberBy | Copenhagen, DK | 4.5 Gb/s | 3.8 Gb/s | 0.0 ms | | | WOBCOM | Wolfsburg, DE | 5.5 Gb/s | 4.3 Gb/s | 0.0 ms | | | Novogara | Amsterdam, NL | 5.9 Gb/s | 4.5 Gb/s | 0.0 ms | | | Sasag | Schaff, CH | 8.0 Gb/s | 7.8 Gb/s | 0.0 ms | | | Alwyzon | Vienna, AT | 5.3 Gb/s | 7.3 Gb/s | 0.0 ms | +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ |
| 4 |
PassMark
v1
|
Jun 01, 2023 17:28 |
View Raw OutputPassMark PerformanceTest Linux Intel Xeon Platinum 8168 CPU @ 2.70GHz (x86_64) 2 cores @ 2700 MHz | 1.9 GiB RAM Number of Processes: 2 | Test Iterations: 2 | Test Duration: Very Long -------------------------------------------------------------------------- CPU Mark: 3302 Integer Math 8153 Million Operations/s Floating Point Math 6826 Million Operations/s Prime Numbers 24.5 Million Primes/s Sorting 5047 Thousand Strings/s Encryption 1050 MB/s Compression 41714 KB/s CPU Single Threaded 2096 Million Operations/s Physics 403 Frames/s Extended Instructions (SSE) 2733 Million Matrices/s Memory Mark: 1429 Database Operations 1458 Thousand Operations/s Memory Read Cached 24258 MB/s Memory Read Uncached 10658 MB/s Memory Write 9765 MB/s Available RAM 1352 Megabytes Memory Latency 55 Nanoseconds Memory Threaded 20233 MB/s -------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| 5 |
UnixBench
v1
|
Jun 01, 2023 18:38 |
View Raw Output------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Thu Jun 01 2023 18:38:39 - 19:06:41
2 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 42927628.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 7263.4 MWIPS (9.8 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 3442.0 lps (29.8 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 445660.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 116121.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1377525.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 551735.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 48367.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 7679.6 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 9129.5 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1872.0 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 303538.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 42927628.0 3678.5
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 7263.4 1320.6
Execl Throughput 43.0 3442.0 800.5
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 445660.0 1125.4
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 116121.8 701.6
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1377525.9 2375.0
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 551735.0 443.5
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 48367.0 120.9
Process Creation 126.0 7679.6 609.5
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 9129.5 2153.2
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1872.0 3120.0
System Call Overhead 15000.0 303538.3 202.4
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 910.4
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Thu Jun 01 2023 19:06:41 - 19:34:43
2 CPUs in system; running 2 parallel copies of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 86352723.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 14506.3 MWIPS (9.8 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 6189.9 lps (29.9 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 842428.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 219340.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 2554869.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 1100594.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 268787.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 14217.1 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 13686.9 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 2060.7 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 609531.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 86352723.1 7399.5
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 14506.3 2637.5
Execl Throughput 43.0 6189.9 1439.5
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 842428.8 2127.3
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 219340.5 1325.3
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 2554869.0 4404.9
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1100594.0 884.7
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 268787.7 672.0
Process Creation 126.0 14217.1 1128.3
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 13686.9 3228.0
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 2060.7 3434.5
System Call Overhead 15000.0 609531.8 406.4
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 1786.1
|
System Specifications
Additional Benchmarks
Comprehensive performance metrics from specialized benchmark tools
UnixBench
System Performance Index
WordPress Bench
Web Application Performance
🌟 Recommended VPS Provider
Onidel Cloud VPS
CPU Performance (Geekbench)
CPU benchmarks measure processing power for compute-intensive tasks. Learn how we test CPU performance.
I/O Speed Summary (dd)
IOPS Performance by Block Size
FIO Benchmark Details
Detailed I/O performance test results
fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):
---------------------------------
Block Size | 4k (IOPS) | 64k (IOPS)
------ | --- ---- | ---- ----
Read | 10.30 MB/s (2.5k) | 84.19 MB/s (1.3k)
Write | 10.33 MB/s (2.5k) | 84.63 MB/s (1.3k)
Total | 20.63 MB/s (5.1k) | 168.82 MB/s (2.6k)
| |
Block Size | 512k (IOPS) | 1m (IOPS)
------ | --- ---- | ---- ----
Read | 80.97 MB/s (158) | 79.43 MB/s (77)
Write | 85.27 MB/s (166) | 84.72 MB/s (82)
Total | 166.24 MB/s (324) | 164.16 MB/s (159)
Test 1 - Block Size: 4k (mixed_rw_50_50)
Test 2 - Block Size: 64k (mixed_rw_50_50)
Test 3 - Block Size: 512k (mixed_rw_50_50)
Test 4 - Block Size: 1m (mixed_rw_50_50)
Related Resources
Browse More Benchmarks
Explore comprehensive VPS benchmarks across providers and locations.
Compare Providers
View aggregated performance metrics across all VPS providers.
Performance Dashboard
Access real-time statistics, top performers, and latest results.
Testing Methodology
Learn about our comprehensive testing procedures and tools.
Understanding VPS Benchmark Results
This comprehensive benchmark report provides detailed performance analysis for COIN.HOST Intel Xeon Platinum 2 Core 2 GB Ram CH VPS in Switzerland. Our standardized testing methodology measures CPU performance, disk I/O operations, network bandwidth, and real-world application performance to give you complete insights into VPS capabilities. Browse more VPS benchmarks to compare performance across providers.
Each benchmark metric serves a specific purpose in evaluating VPS performance. CPU benchmarks reveal processing power for applications, disk I/O tests measure storage performance for databases and file operations, network tests show bandwidth capacity for content delivery, and application benchmarks demonstrate real-world hosting performance. Together, these metrics provide a complete performance profile. Use our VPS comparison tool to analyze multiple plans side-by-side.
Benchmark Metrics & Features
Detailed Geekbench CPU performance scores (single & multi-core)
FIO disk I/O benchmarks with IOPS and bandwidth metrics
Network bandwidth testing with iPerf (download & upload speeds)
UnixBench system performance comprehensive results
WordPress real-world application performance tests
Sequential disk performance with DiskSeq benchmarks
Complete VPS specifications (CPU, RAM, storage details)
Provider and plan pricing information
Data center location and geographic details
Benchmark execution date and freshness indicators
Historical benchmark data for performance trends
AI-powered performance analysis and insights (for logged-in users)
Performance Analysis Use Cases
Evaluating VPS CPU performance for compute-intensive applications
Testing disk I/O performance for database workloads
Measuring network bandwidth for media streaming services
Comparing VPS performance across different providers
Analyzing WordPress site performance on specific VPS plans
Assessing value-for-money based on performance and pricing
Checking real-world application performance metrics
Understanding geographic performance variations by location
Reviewing detailed benchmark metrics before VPS purchase
Comparing single-core vs multi-core CPU performance
Validating provider performance claims with actual data
Making informed hosting decisions based on comprehensive benchmarks
How to Interpret Benchmark Results
1. CPU Performance (Geekbench)
Geekbench measures CPU performance through single-core and multi-core scores. Single-core scores (typically 800-2000) indicate performance for single-threaded applications and general responsiveness. Multi-core scores (1500-8000) show performance when all CPU cores are utilized for parallel processing. Higher scores mean better performance. Visit our testing methodology to learn more about CPU benchmarks.
2. Disk I/O Performance (FIO)
FIO benchmarks measure disk performance through IOPS (Input/Output Operations Per Second) and bandwidth (MB/s). High IOPS (10,000+ for NVMe, 5,000-10,000 for SSD) is crucial for database workloads with many small operations. High bandwidth is important for large file transfers and media applications. Compare disk performance across different providers in our database.
3. Network Bandwidth (iPerf)
Network tests measure download (incoming) and upload (outgoing) bandwidth capacity. Most modern VPS offers 1-10 Gbps connectivity. Download speed affects data ingestion, while upload speed determines content delivery performance to users. Consider your application's data transfer patterns when evaluating network metrics. Check our performance dashboard for network performance statistics.
4. Application Performance
Real-world application benchmarks (WordPress, UnixBench) show how the VPS handles typical web workloads including PHP processing, database queries, and static file serving. These results measured in requests per second and page load times directly apply to web hosting scenarios. Need help choosing the right VPS? Contact our team or visit about us to learn more about VPSMetrics.
Looking for more resources? Explore our free developer tools including SSL checkers, DNS lookup, WHOIS lookup, and server diagnostics to help you manage your VPS infrastructure effectively.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I interpret the Geekbench single-core and multi-core scores?
Geekbench single-core scores indicate CPU performance for single-threaded applications, important for general responsiveness and web applications. Multi-core scores show performance when all CPU cores are utilized, crucial for parallel processing and multi-threaded applications. Higher scores indicate better performance. Modern VPS typically score 800-2000 (single) and 1500-8000 (multi) depending on the plan. Learn more about our comprehensive testing methodology for CPU benchmarks.
What do IOPS numbers mean in disk I/O benchmarks?
IOPS (Input/Output Operations Per Second) measures how many read/write operations your disk can handle per second. Higher IOPS means better performance for database operations and applications with many small file operations. NVMe SSD VPS typically delivers 10,000+ IOPS, while traditional SSD offers 5,000-10,000 IOPS. HDD-based storage usually provides under 1,000 IOPS. Visit our How We Test page to understand disk performance metrics in detail.
How important are network speed benchmarks?
Network bandwidth (measured by iPerf) is crucial for applications serving content, APIs, or media streaming. Download speeds affect how fast your server receives data, while upload speeds determine content delivery to users. Most modern VPS offers 1-10 Gbps network connectivity. Consider your application's data transfer requirements when evaluating network performance. Compare network speeds across different VPS providers in our database.
What is UnixBench and why does it matter?
UnixBench is a comprehensive system-level benchmark suite that tests various aspects of Unix-like system performance including process creation, file operations, and system calls. It provides a holistic view of overall system performance beyond just CPU or disk metrics. Higher UnixBench scores indicate better overall system efficiency. Browse all VPS benchmarks to compare UnixBench scores across providers and plans.
How reliable are WordPress benchmark results?
WordPress benchmarks provide real-world application performance metrics by testing actual WordPress installations. These results show how the VPS handles typical web application workloads including PHP processing, database queries, and static file serving. Results are measured in requests per second and page load times, directly applicable to web hosting scenarios. Check our performance dashboard to see which VPS plans excel at WordPress hosting.
Can I trust these benchmark results for my use case?
Our benchmarks provide standardized, reproducible test results using industry-standard tools. While they offer excellent performance indicators, your actual experience may vary based on your specific workload, application optimization, and usage patterns. Use these benchmarks as a reliable starting point for comparison between providers. Read about our methodology to understand how we ensure accuracy and consistency.
Why do benchmark results vary by location?
Different data center locations may have different hardware configurations, CPU generations, storage types, and network infrastructure. Providers often upgrade facilities at different rates across regions. Location-specific benchmarks help you choose a VPS in the right region with the best performance for your target audience. Use our benchmark filters to narrow down by location and compare provider performance across geographic regions.
How current are these benchmark results?
Each benchmark displays its execution date. We continuously add new benchmarks and re-test providers to capture infrastructure changes and upgrades. Check the benchmark date to ensure data freshness. Providers may upgrade CPUs, storage, or network capacity over time, affecting performance. Visit our dashboard to see the latest benchmark results and recent additions to our database.
What should I prioritize: CPU, disk, or network performance?
Priority depends on your workload. CPU-intensive applications (video processing, rendering) need high Geekbench scores. Database-heavy applications require high IOPS. Content delivery and API services benefit from high network bandwidth. Web applications typically need balanced performance across all metrics. Use our VPS comparison tool to analyze multiple plans side-by-side and find the best match for your requirements.
How do I use AI Summary for benchmark analysis?
The AI Summary feature (available for logged-in users) analyzes benchmark results and provides insights about performance strengths, weaknesses, and use case recommendations. It considers all benchmark metrics together to give you a comprehensive understanding of the VPS performance profile in plain language. Need help? Contact our support team or explore our free developer tools for additional VPS management utilities.
Making Informed VPS Decisions
Use these comprehensive benchmark results to make data-driven hosting decisions. Compare multiple metrics together rather than focusing on a single aspect - a balanced VPS performs well across CPU, disk, and network benchmarks. Consider your specific workload requirements: CPU-intensive applications need high Geekbench scores, database-heavy applications require high IOPS, and content delivery services benefit from high network bandwidth.
Our benchmarks provide standardized, reproducible test results using industry-standard tools. While they offer excellent performance indicators, your actual experience may vary based on specific workload patterns and application optimization. Use these benchmarks as a reliable starting point for comparison between providers and configurations.
Check the benchmark execution date to ensure data freshness - providers may upgrade infrastructure over time. Compare results from the same time period for fair evaluation. For the most comprehensive analysis, review multiple benchmarks from the same provider and location to understand performance consistency.
Compare More VPS Options
Explore additional benchmarks, compare multiple VPS plans side-by-side, and discover the best performing options for your specific requirements and budget.