WebHorizon - AMD EPYC 5 Core 10 GB Ram SG
Comprehensive VPS benchmark results from Singapore tested on Apr 25, 2023. Learn our methodology.
System Specifications
Additional Benchmarks
UnixBench
System Performance Index
WordPress Bench
Web Application Performance
Benchmark Steps
| # | Suite | Run At | Raw Output |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Bench
|
Apr 25, 2023 21:51 |
View Raw Output-------------------- A Bench.sh Script By Teddysun ------------------- Version : v2022-06-01 Usage : wget -qO- bench.sh | bash ---------------------------------------------------------------------- CPU Model : AMD EPYC Processor CPU Cores : 5 @ 2849.998 MHz CPU Cache : 512 KB AES-NI : Enabled VM-x/AMD-V : Disabled Total Disk : 145.3 GB (2.8 GB Used) Total Mem : 9.7 GB (176.6 MB Used) System uptime : 0 days, 1 hour 47 min Load average : 0.33, 1.53, 1.87 OS : Ubuntu 20.04.6 LTS Arch : x86_64 (64 Bit) Kernel : 5.4.0-147-generic TCP CC : bbr Virtualization : KVM Organization : AS149020 WebHorizon Internet Services Location : Singapore / SG Region : Singapore ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I/O Speed(1st run) : 718 MB/s I/O Speed(2nd run) : 715 MB/s I/O Speed(3rd run) : 725 MB/s I/O Speed(average) : 719.3 MB/s ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Node Name Upload Speed Download Speed Latency Speedtest.net 4851.14 Mbps 6223.03 Mbps 0.28 ms Los Angeles, US 448.71 Mbps 4149.65 Mbps 194.11 ms Dallas, US 388.30 Mbps 3696.52 Mbps 198.84 ms Montreal, CA 315.47 Mbps 891.28 Mbps 244.32 ms Paris, FR 508.80 Mbps 3950.30 Mbps 152.40 ms Amsterdam, NL 314.27 Mbps 702.95 Mbps 160.22 ms Shanghai, CN 18.57 Mbps 1423.11 Mbps 214.79 ms Hongkong, CN 2129.08 Mbps 6184.53 Mbps 34.35 ms Singapore, SG 7445.00 Mbps 7916.61 Mbps 1.25 ms Tokyo, JP 1110.66 Mbps 5644.20 Mbps 66.70 ms ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Finished in : 5 min 29 sec Timestamp : 2023-04-25 21:51:33 WIB ---------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| 2 |
Speedtest Global
|
Apr 25, 2023 22:11 |
View Raw Output---------------------------- network-speed.xyz ----------------------------
A simple script to test network performance using speedtest-cli
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Version : v2023.04.25
Global Speedtest : wget -qO- network-speed.xyz | bash
Region Speedtest : wget -qO- network-speed.xyz | bash -s -- -r <region>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Basic System Info
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
CPU Model : AMD EPYC Processor
CPU Cores : 5 @ 2849.998 MHz
CPU Cache : 512 KB
AES-NI : ✔ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ❌ Disabled
Total Disk : 145.3 GB (2.8 GB Used)
Total RAM : 9.7 GB (178.4 MB Used)
System uptime : 0 days, 2 hour 0 min
Load average : 0.01, 0.22, 0.91
OS : Ubuntu 20.04.6 LTS
Arch : x86_64 (64 Bit)
Kernel : 5.4.0-147-generic
Virtualization : KVM
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Basic Network Info
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Primary Network : IPv6
ISP : Soon Keat Neo
ASN : AS149020 WebHorizon Internet Services
Host : WebHorizon
Location : Singapore, North East-02, Singapore
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Speedtest.net (Region: GLOBAL)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Location Latency Loss DL Speed UP Speed Server
ISP: WebHorizon Internet Services
Nearest 0.24 ms 0.0% 5815.08 Mbps 4701.78 Mbps PT FirstMedia - Singapore
Kochi, IN 46.43 ms 0.0% 5445.76 Mbps 1790.09 Mbps Asianet Broadband - Cochin
Bangalore, IN 156.80 ms 0.0% 4473.89 Mbps 485.37 Mbps Bharti Airtel Ltd - Bangalore
Chennai, IN 33.19 ms N/A 6161.31 Mbps 2360.97 Mbps Jio - Chennai
Mumbai, IN 67.30 ms 0.0% 5759.29 Mbps 1346.48 Mbps i3D.net - Mumbai
Delhi, IN 70.84 ms 0.0% 4635.73 Mbps 1104.43 Mbps Tata Play Fiber - New Delhi
Los Angeles, US 182.58 ms 0.0% 4203.87 Mbps 443.46 Mbps ReliableSite Hosting - Los Angeles, CA
Dallas, US 229.00 ms 0.0% 3454.69 Mbps 349.29 Mbps Hivelocity - Dallas, TX
New York, US 259.76 ms 0.0% 1359.71 Mbps 314.37 Mbps Clouvider Ltd - New York, NY
Seattle, US 183.56 ms N/A 3906.38 Mbps 431.36 Mbps Comcast - Seattle, WA
Miami, US 237.64 ms 0.0% 1556.92 Mbps 338.98 Mbps AT&T - Miami, FL
Toronto, CA 231.65 ms 0.0% 3296.07 Mbps 341.50 Mbps Rogers - Toronto, ON
Paris, FR 166.26 ms 0.0% 4039.04 Mbps 526.21 Mbps ORANGE FRANCE - Paris
Amsterdam, NL 244.03 ms 0.0% 1881.59 Mbps 312.52 Mbps Clouvider Ltd - Amsterdam
Warsaw, PL 269.59 ms 0.0% 2603.64 Mbps 282.42 Mbps UPC Polska - Warszawa
London, UK 153.98 ms 0.0% 4241.83 Mbps 522.85 Mbps VeloxServ Communications - London
Frankfurt, DE 152.59 ms 0.0% 3910.82 Mbps 534.14 Mbps 23M GmbH - Frankfurt Am Main
Dubai, AE 80.58 ms 0.0% 6089.74 Mbps 1020.74 Mbps du - Dubai
Fujairah, AE 77.03 ms 0.0% 5110.35 Mbps 1074.20 Mbps ETISALAT-UAE - Fujairah
Jeddah, KSA 170.20 ms 0.0% 3954.64 Mbps 490.05 Mbps Saudi Telecom Company
Shanghai, CU-CN 214.89 ms N/A 1789.04 Mbps 20.48 Mbps China Unicom 5G - ShangHai
Nanjing, CT-CN 409.43 ms 5.0% 976.41 Mbps 29.09 Mbps China Telecom JiangSu 5G - Nanjing
Hong Kong, HKG FAILED
Singapore, SG 1.35 ms 0.0% 8093.86 Mbps 7675.85 Mbps i3D.net - Singapore
Jakarta, ID 13.25 ms 0.0% 7209.09 Mbps 3677.96 Mbps PT Indosat Tbk - Jakarta
Tokyo, JP 87.98 ms N/A 4162.29 Mbps 854.81 Mbps fdcservers.net - Tokyo
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Avg DL Speed : 4165.24 Mbps
Avg UL Speed : 1241.18 Mbps
Total DL Data : 138.30 GB
Total UL Data : 29.92 GB
Total Data : 168.22 GB
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Duration : 12 min 45 sec
System Time : 25/04/2023 - 22:11:14 WIB
Total Script Runs : 1048
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Result : https://cdn1.frocdn.ch/toc5rhmRk9oiBN8.txt
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| 3 |
Benchy
|
Apr 25, 2023 22:29 |
View Raw Output# # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Benchy v2.6 # # https://github.com/L1so/benchy # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # 25 Apr 2023 22:29 WIB # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Server Insight Hardware Information --------------------- --------------------- OS : Ubuntu 20.04.6 LTS Model : AMD EPYC Processor Location : Singapore Core : 5 @ 2849.998 MHz Kernel : 5.4.0-147-generic AES-NI : ✔ Enabled Uptime : 0 days, 2 hrs, 31 mins, 26 secs VM-x/AMD-V : ❌ Disabled Virt : kvm Swap : 0.0 KiB Disk & Memory Usage Network Information --------------------- --------------------- Disk (1) : 145.2 GiB ASN : AS149020 Disk Usage : 2.8 GiB (2% Used) ISP : WebHorizon Internet Services Mem : 9.7 GiB IPv4 : ✔ Enabled Mem Usage : 0.2 GiB (2% Used) IPv6 : ✔ Enabled Ookla Network Speedtest (Region: Asia) +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Provider | Location | Download | Upload | Data Used | Latency | +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Biznet | Jakarta, ID | 5.6 Gb/s | 4.8 Gb/s | 13.5 GB | 12.3 ms | | YTL Broad. | Kuala Lumpur, MY | 5.1 Gb/s | 2.6 Gb/s | 9.9 GB | 7.3 ms | | SingTel | Singapore, SG | 8.1 Gb/s | 3.0 Gb/s | 17.5 GB | 1.9 ms | | GLBB | Tokyo, JP | 4.7 Gb/s | 1.0 Gb/s | 8.2 GB | 82.9 ms | | Airtel | Chennai, IN | 5.2 Gb/s | 2.4 Gb/s | 10.6 GB | 35.3 ms | +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ Network Performance Test (Region: Asia) +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Prot. | Provider | Location | Send | Receive | Latency | +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | IPv4 | Uztelecom | Tashkent, UZ | 1.6 Gb/s | 1.4 Gb/s | 179.3 ms | | | MyRepublic | Jakarta, ID | 6.9 Gb/s | 6.9 Gb/s | 12.3 ms | +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | IPv6 | Uztelecom | Tashkent, UZ | 1.1 Gb/s | 1.1 Gb/s | 179.3 ms | | | Biznet | Jakarta, ID | busy | busy | 0.0 ms | +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ |
| 4 |
PassMark
|
Apr 25, 2023 22:29 |
View Raw OutputPassMark PerformanceTest Linux AMD EPYC Processor (x86_64) 5 cores @ 2849 MHz | 9.7 GiB RAM Number of Processes: 5 | Test Iterations: 3 | Test Duration: Very Long -------------------------------------------------------------------------- CPU Mark: 11231 Integer Math 29293 Million Operations/s Floating Point Math 22519 Million Operations/s Prime Numbers 79.9 Million Primes/s Sorting 14310 Thousand Strings/s Encryption 6269 MB/s Compression 113279 KB/s CPU Single Threaded 2541 Million Operations/s Physics 1234 Frames/s Extended Instructions (SSE) 8849 Million Matrices/s Memory Mark: 1915 Database Operations 3708 Thousand Operations/s Memory Read Cached 22725 MB/s Memory Read Uncached 13657 MB/s Memory Write 10211 MB/s Available RAM 9055 Megabytes Memory Latency 87 Nanoseconds Memory Threaded 48490 MB/s -------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| 5 |
UnixBench
|
Apr 25, 2023 22:46 |
View Raw Output------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Tue Apr 25 2023 22:46:35 - 23:31:18
5 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 51811984.7 lps (10.0 s, 10 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 8928.6 MWIPS (9.9 s, 10 samples)
Execl Throughput 5827.3 lps (29.8 s, 4 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1354580.4 KBps (30.0 s, 4 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 376390.5 KBps (30.0 s, 4 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 2985821.0 KBps (30.0 s, 4 samples)
Pipe Throughput 2374378.7 lps (10.0 s, 10 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 171148.8 lps (10.0 s, 10 samples)
Process Creation 13675.6 lps (30.0 s, 4 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 12093.5 lpm (60.0 s, 4 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 4586.6 lpm (60.0 s, 4 samples)
System Call Overhead 3467731.9 lps (10.0 s, 10 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 51811984.7 4439.8
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 8928.6 1623.4
Execl Throughput 43.0 5827.3 1355.2
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 1354580.4 3420.7
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 376390.5 2274.3
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 2985821.0 5148.0
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 2374378.7 1908.7
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 171148.8 427.9
Process Creation 126.0 13675.6 1085.4
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 12093.5 2852.3
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 4586.6 7644.3
System Call Overhead 15000.0 3467731.9 2311.8
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 2257.0
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Tue Apr 25 2023 23:31:18 - 00:16:05
5 CPUs in system; running 5 parallel copies of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 244703598.1 lps (10.0 s, 10 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 44102.4 MWIPS (9.7 s, 10 samples)
Execl Throughput 16650.1 lps (30.0 s, 4 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 2777906.1 KBps (30.0 s, 4 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 692495.9 KBps (30.0 s, 4 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 9225819.8 KBps (30.0 s, 4 samples)
Pipe Throughput 11387932.9 lps (10.0 s, 10 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 947586.4 lps (10.0 s, 10 samples)
Process Creation 33788.3 lps (30.0 s, 4 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 33424.6 lpm (60.0 s, 4 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 5264.7 lpm (60.0 s, 4 samples)
System Call Overhead 16503645.7 lps (10.0 s, 10 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 244703598.1 20968.6
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 44102.4 8018.6
Execl Throughput 43.0 16650.1 3872.1
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 2777906.1 7014.9
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 692495.9 4184.3
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 9225819.8 15906.6
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 11387932.9 9154.3
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 947586.4 2369.0
Process Creation 126.0 33788.3 2681.6
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 33424.6 7883.2
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 5264.7 8774.4
System Call Overhead 15000.0 16503645.7 11002.4
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 6983.4
|
Onidel Cloud VPS
Performance-first cloud hosting for teams that need consistent benchmarks and transparent pricing.
- 99.99% uptime SLA
- Proven availability for critical workloads
- Plans from $4.95/month
- Predictable pricing and simple scaling
- AMD EPYC + NVMe stack
- Modern hardware with built-in DDoS protection
- 5 global regions
- Singapore, Sydney, Amsterdam, Ho Chi Minh City, more coming soon
Ideal for: demanding SaaS workloads, managed hosting agencies, and teams migrating off legacy VPS providers.
Launch faster with concierge onboarding
Start 14-day TrialCPU Performance (Geekbench)
CPU benchmarks measure processing power for compute-intensive tasks. Learn how we test CPU performance.
I/O Speed Summary (dd)
IOPS Performance by Block Size
Combined IOPS Performance
Total IOPS across all block sizes (4K, 64K, 512K, 1M)
FIO Benchmark Details
Detailed I/O performance test results
Test 1 - Block Size: 64k (mixed_rw_50_50)
Test 2 - Block Size: 512k (mixed_rw_50_50)
Test 3 - Block Size: 1m (mixed_rw_50_50)
Test 4 - Block Size: 4k (mixed_rw_50_50)
Detailed I/O Benchmark (FIO)
IOPS Performance by Block Size
Bandwidth Performance by Block Size
Detailed Test Results
| Block Size | Read IOPS | Write IOPS | Read MB/s | Write MB/s |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 64k | 16,900 | 17,000 | 1,080.0 | 1,090.0 |
| 512k | 3,100 | 3,300 | 1,600.0 | 1,690.0 |
| 1m | 2,000 | 2,100 | 2,050.0 | 2,190.0 |
| 4k | 47,000 | 47,100 | 188.1 | 188.6 |
Related Resources
Browse More Benchmarks
Explore comprehensive VPS benchmarks across providers and locations.
Compare Providers
View aggregated performance metrics across all VPS providers.
Performance Dashboard
Access real-time statistics, top performers, and latest results.
Testing Methodology
Learn about our comprehensive testing procedures and tools.
Understanding VPS Benchmark Results
This comprehensive benchmark report provides detailed performance analysis for WebHorizon AMD EPYC 5 Core 10 GB Ram SG VPS in Singapore. Our standardized testing methodology measures CPU performance, disk I/O operations, network bandwidth, and real-world application performance to give you complete insights into VPS capabilities. Browse more VPS benchmarks to compare performance across providers.
Each benchmark metric serves a specific purpose in evaluating VPS performance. CPU benchmarks reveal processing power for applications, disk I/O tests measure storage performance for databases and file operations, network tests show bandwidth capacity for content delivery, and application benchmarks demonstrate real-world hosting performance. Together, these metrics provide a complete performance profile. Use our VPS comparison tool to analyze multiple plans side-by-side.
Benchmark Metrics & Features
Performance Analysis Use Cases
- Evaluating VPS CPU performance for compute-intensive applications
- Testing disk I/O performance for database workloads
- Comparing VPS performance across different providers
- Analyzing WordPress site performance on specific VPS plans
- Assessing value-for-money based on performance and pricing
- Checking real-world application performance metrics
- Understanding geographic performance variations by location
- Reviewing detailed benchmark metrics before VPS purchase
- Comparing single-core vs multi-core CPU performance
- Validating provider performance claims with actual data
- Making informed hosting decisions based on comprehensive benchmarks
How to Interpret Benchmark Results
1. CPU Performance (Geekbench)
Geekbench measures CPU performance through single-core and multi-core scores. Single-core scores (typically 800-2000) indicate performance for single-threaded applications and general responsiveness. Multi-core scores (1500-8000) show performance when all CPU cores are utilized for parallel processing. Higher scores mean better performance. Visit our testing methodology to learn more about CPU benchmarks.
2. Disk I/O Performance (FIO)
FIO benchmarks measure disk performance through IOPS (Input/Output Operations Per Second) and bandwidth (MB/s). High IOPS (10,000+ for NVMe, 5,000-10,000 for SSD) is crucial for database workloads with many small operations. High bandwidth is important for large file transfers and media applications. Compare disk performance across different providers in our database.
3. Application Performance
Real-world application benchmarks (WordPress, UnixBench) show how the VPS handles typical web workloads including PHP processing, database queries, and static file serving. These results measured in requests per second and page load times directly apply to web hosting scenarios. Need help choosing the right VPS? Visit about us to learn more about VPSMetrics.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I interpret the Geekbench single-core and multi-core scores?
Geekbench single-core scores indicate CPU performance for single-threaded applications, important for general responsiveness and web applications. Multi-core scores show performance when all CPU cores are utilized, crucial for parallel processing and multi-threaded applications. Higher scores indicate better performance. Modern VPS typically score 800-2000 (single) and 1500-8000 (multi) depending on the plan.
What do IOPS numbers mean in disk I/O benchmarks?
IOPS (Input/Output Operations Per Second) measures how many read/write operations your disk can handle per second. Higher IOPS means better performance for database operations and applications with many small file operations. NVMe SSD VPS typically delivers 10,000+ IOPS, while traditional SSD offers 5,000-10,000 IOPS.
What is UnixBench and why does it matter?
UnixBench is a comprehensive system-level benchmark suite that tests various aspects of Unix-like system performance including process creation, file operations, and system calls. It provides a holistic view of overall system performance beyond just CPU or disk metrics. Higher UnixBench scores indicate better overall system efficiency.
How reliable are WordPress benchmark results?
WordPress benchmarks provide real-world application performance metrics by testing actual WordPress installations. These results show how the VPS handles typical web application workloads including PHP processing, database queries, and static file serving. Results are measured in requests per second and page load times, directly applicable to web hosting scenarios.
Can I trust these benchmark results for my use case?
Our benchmarks provide standardized, reproducible test results using industry-standard tools. While they offer excellent performance indicators, your actual experience may vary based on your specific workload, application optimization, and usage patterns. Use these benchmarks as a reliable starting point for comparison between providers.
Why do benchmark results vary by location?
Different data center locations may have different hardware configurations, CPU generations, storage types, and network infrastructure. Providers often upgrade facilities at different rates across regions. Location-specific benchmarks help you choose a VPS in the right region with the best performance for your target audience.
Making Informed VPS Decisions
Use these comprehensive benchmark results to make data-driven hosting decisions. Compare multiple metrics together rather than focusing on a single aspect - a balanced VPS performs well across CPU, disk, and network benchmarks. Consider your specific workload requirements: CPU-intensive applications need high Geekbench scores, database-heavy applications require high IOPS, and content delivery services benefit from high network bandwidth.
Our benchmarks provide standardized, reproducible test results using industry-standard tools. While they offer excellent performance indicators, your actual experience may vary based on specific workload patterns and application optimization. Use these benchmarks as a reliable starting point for comparison between providers and configurations.
Compare More VPS Options
Explore additional benchmarks, compare multiple VPS plans side-by-side, and discover the best performing options for your specific requirements and budget.