Warnahost - Intel Xeon Platinum 2 Core 2 GB Ram ID
Comprehensive VPS benchmark results from Indonesia tested on Aug 12, 2023. Learn our methodology.
System Specifications
Additional Benchmarks
UnixBench
System Performance Index
WordPress Bench
Web Application Performance
Benchmark Steps
| # | Suite | Run At | Raw Output |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Benchy
|
Aug 12, 2023 10:39 |
View Raw Output# # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Benchy v2.7 # # https://github.com/L1so/benchy # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # 12 Aug 2023 10:39 UTC # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Server Insight Hardware Information --------------------- --------------------- OS : Ubuntu 22.04.3 LTS Model : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2680 v4 @ 2.40GHz Location : Indonesia Core : 2 @ 2399.996 MHz Kernel : 5.15.0-78-generic AES-NI : ✔ Enabled Uptime : 0 days, 1 hrs, 25 mins, 58 secs VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled Virt : kvm Swap : 2.0 GiB Disk & Memory Usage Network Information --------------------- --------------------- Disk (1) : 38.6 GiB ASN : AS141120 Disk Usage : 5.2 GiB (13% Used) ISP : PT Warna Data Multimedia Mem : 1.9 GiB IPv4 : ✔ Enabled Mem Usage : 0.2 GiB (9% Used) IPv6 : ❌ Disabled Network Performance Test (Region: Asia) +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Prot. | Provider | Location | Send | Receive | Latency | +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | IPv4 | Uztelecom | Tashkent, UZ | 446.0 Mb/s | 455.1 Mb/s | 278.2 ms | | | Biznet | Jakarta, ID | 897.5 Mb/s | 893.3 Mb/s | 1.5 ms | +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ Ookla Network Speedtest (Region: Asia) +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Provider | Location | Download | Upload | Data Used | Latency | +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Biznet | Jakarta, ID | 850.7 Mb/s | 828.6 Mb/s | 1.1 GB | 1.6 ms | | U Mobile | Kuala Lumpur, MY | 756.1 Mb/s | 848.9 Mb/s | 1.8 GB | 19.5 ms | | MyRepublic | Singapore, SG | 622.8 Mb/s | 825.2 Mb/s | 2.2 GB | 13.9 ms | | SCM Tech | Nonthaburi, TH | 863.3 Mb/s | 825.1 Mb/s | 2.4 GB | 40.7 ms | | Tata Play | Bangalore, IN | 653.9 Mb/s | 601.1 Mb/s | 1.6 GB | 51.5 ms | +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ |
| 2 |
PassMark
|
Aug 12, 2023 10:39 |
View Raw OutputPassMark PerformanceTest Linux Intel Xeon CPU E5-2680 v4 @ 2.40GHz (x86_64) 2 cores @ 0 MHz | 1.9 GiB RAM Number of Processes: 2 | Test Iterations: 2 | Test Duration: Very Long - CPU Mark: 2692 Integer Math 7031 Million Operations/s Floating Point Math 6009 Million Operations/s Prime Numbers 25.2 Million Primes/s Sorting 5097 Thousand Strings/s Encryption 662 MB/s Compression 36694 KB/s CPU Single Threaded 1890 Million Operations/s Physics 402 Frames/s Extended Instructions (SSE) 2330 Million Matrices/s Memory Mark: 1380 Database Operations 1281 Thousand Operations/s Memory Read Cached 21795 MB/s Memory Read Uncached 9746 MB/s Memory Write 6927 MB/s Available RAM 1486 Megabytes Memory Latency 54 Nanoseconds Memory Threaded 18692 MB/s |
| 3 |
UnixBench
|
Aug 12, 2023 10:54 |
View Raw Output------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Sat Aug 12 2023 10:54:01 - 11:22:02
2 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 35003028.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 6313.6 MWIPS (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 2621.5 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 580448.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 147801.2 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1912769.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 700300.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 45640.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 5812.3 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 8563.4 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1837.4 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 395000.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 35003028.2 2999.4
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 6313.6 1147.9
Execl Throughput 43.0 2621.5 609.6
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 580448.8 1465.8
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 147801.2 893.1
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1912769.4 3297.9
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 700300.3 562.9
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 45640.1 114.1
Process Creation 126.0 5812.3 461.3
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 8563.4 2019.7
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1837.4 3062.3
System Call Overhead 15000.0 395000.6 263.3
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 933.4
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Sat Aug 12 2023 11:22:02 - 11:50:04
2 CPUs in system; running 2 parallel copies of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 67934641.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 12505.3 MWIPS (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 5046.1 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1167503.2 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 296735.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 3048610.7 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 1397644.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 288280.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 14180.7 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 13819.3 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1875.3 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 772980.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 67934641.3 5821.3
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 12505.3 2273.7
Execl Throughput 43.0 5046.1 1173.5
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 1167503.2 2948.2
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 296735.8 1793.0
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 3048610.7 5256.2
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1397644.2 1123.5
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 288280.6 720.7
Process Creation 126.0 14180.7 1125.5
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 13819.3 3259.3
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1875.3 3125.5
System Call Overhead 15000.0 772980.4 515.3
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 1889.0
|
| 4 |
Bench
|
Aug 12, 2023 11:12 |
View Raw Output-------------------- A Bench.sh Script By Teddysun ------------------- Version : v2023-06-10 Usage : wget -qO- bench.sh | bash ---------------------------------------------------------------------- CPU Model : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2680 v4 @ 2.40GHz CPU Cores : 2 @ 2399.996 MHz CPU Cache : 16384 KB AES-NI : Enabled VM-x/AMD-V : Enabled Total Disk : 38.7 GB (5.2 GB Used) Total Mem : 1.9 GB (176.3 MB Used) Total Swap : 2.0 GB (0 Used) System uptime : 0 days, 1 hour 6 min Load average : 0.37, 0.88, 1.06 OS : Ubuntu 22.04.3 LTS Arch : x86_64 (64 Bit) Kernel : 5.15.0-78-generic TCP CC : bbr Virtualization : KVM IPv4/IPv6 : Online / Offline Organization : AS141120 PT Warna Data Multimedia Location : Jakarta / ID Region : Jakarta ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I/O Speed(1st run) : 1.0 GB/s I/O Speed(2nd run) : 1.2 GB/s I/O Speed(3rd run) : 1.2 GB/s I/O Speed(average) : 1160.5 MB/s ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Node Name Upload Speed Download Speed Latency Speedtest.net 890.70 Mbps 890.14 Mbps 1.32 ms Los Angeles, US 369.96 Mbps 360.05 Mbps 182.01 ms Dallas, US 352.03 Mbps 345.69 Mbps 217.04 ms Montreal, CA 262.86 Mbps 534.75 Mbps 255.11 ms Paris, FR 256.63 Mbps 771.35 Mbps 268.66 ms Amsterdam, NL 457.47 Mbps 374.86 Mbps 185.69 ms Shanghai, CN 271.42 Mbps 0.78 Mbps 252.98 ms Nanjing, CN 265.51 Mbps 418.34 Mbps 224.60 ms Hongkong, CN 734.58 Mbps 927.60 Mbps 49.01 ms Singapore, SG 834.81 Mbps 540.44 Mbps 14.01 ms Tokyo, JP 344.05 Mbps 88.07 Mbps 85.61 ms ---------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| 5 |
Speedtest Lokal
|
Aug 12, 2023 12:56 |
View Raw Output---------------------------- network-speed.xyz ----------------------------
A simple script to test network performance using speedtest-cli
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Version : v2023.07.24
Global Speedtest : wget -qO- network-speed.xyz | bash
Region Speedtest : wget -qO- network-speed.xyz | bash -s -- -r <region>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Basic System Info
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
CPU Model : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2680 v4 @ 2.40GHz
CPU Cores : 2 @ 2399.996 MHz
CPU Cache : 16384 KB
AES-NI : ✔ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
Total Disk : 38.7 GB (5.3 GB Used)
Total RAM : 1.9 GB (198.2 MB Used)
Total Swap : 2.0 GB (0 Used)
System uptime : 0 days, 3 hour 32 min
Load average : 24.71, 13.04, 6.53
OS : Ubuntu 22.04.3 LTS
Arch : x86_64 (64 Bit)
Kernel : 5.15.0-78-generic
Virtualization : KVM
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Basic Network Info
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Primary Network : IPv4
ISP : PT Warna Data Multimedia
ASN : AS141120 PT Warna Data Multimedia
Host : PT Warna Data Multimedia
Location : Palu, Central Sulawesi-ST, Indonesia
Location (IPv4) : Jakarta, Jakarta, ID
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Speedtest.net (Region: ASIA)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Location Latency Loss DL Speed UP Speed Server
ISP: PT Warna Data Multimedia
Nearest 1.30 ms 0.0% 788.73 Mbps 850.11 Mbps HYPERNET - Jakarta
Mumbai, IN 74.70 ms 0.0% 534.53 Mbps 588.51 Mbps i3D.net - Mumbai
Chennai, IN 55.56 ms 0.4% 419.73 Mbps 620.51 Mbps Airconnect Fibernet - Chennai
Bangalore, IN 53.79 ms 0.0% 706.32 Mbps 648.69 Mbps Bharti Airtel Ltd - Bangalore
Singapore, SG 13.39 ms 0.0% 513.70 Mbps 831.39 Mbps MyRepublic Singapore - Singapore
Singapore, SG 14.13 ms N/A 646.80 Mbps 804.93 Mbps StarHub Ltd - Singapore
Tokyo, JP 88.20 ms 0.7% 496.73 Mbps 548.48 Mbps Rakuten Mobile, Inc - Tokyo
China Unicom 285.68 ms 5.4% 45.02 Mbps 188.99 Mbps China Unicom 5G - ShangHai
China Telecom FAILED
China Mobile FAILED
Hong Kong, CN 49.31 ms 0.4% 377.08 Mbps 633.17 Mbps i3D.net - Hong Kong
Karachi, PK 90.25 ms 1.4% 16.11 Mbps 403.07 Mbps JAZZ - Karachi
Islamabad, PK 113.33 ms N/A 587.87 Mbps 537.07 Mbps Telenor Pakistan - Islamabad
Kathmandu, NP 78.12 ms N/A 451.70 Mbps 567.80 Mbps Nepal Telecom - Hetauda
Colombo, SL 54.07 ms N/A 560.30 Mbps 632.28 Mbps Airtel Lanka - Colombo
Dhaka, BD 63.19 ms N/A 392.91 Mbps 604.95 Mbps Grameenphone Ltd - Dhaka
Bangkok, TH 37.46 ms 0.0% 495.72 Mbps 727.79 Mbps 3BB - Bangkok
Ho Chi Minh, VN 45.23 ms 0.0% 501.31 Mbps 619.91 Mbps Viettel Network - Ho Chi Minh
Hanoi, VN 138.79 ms 23.0% 412.04 Mbps 2.35 Mbps Vietnamobile - Hanoi
Manila, PH 64.81 ms 0.4% 453.27 Mbps 616.60 Mbps PLDT - Manila
Tapei, TW 65.71 ms N/A 896.00 Mbps 648.35 Mbps Chunghwa Mobile - Taipei
Jakarta, ID 1.45 ms 0.0% 847.35 Mbps 842.78 Mbps Biznet Networks - Jakarta
Surabaya, ID FAILED
Kuala Lum, MY 23.46 ms 0.9% 491.71 Mbps 773.17 Mbps Telekom Malaysia Berhad - Kuala Lumpur
Novosibirsk, RU 259.36 ms 0.0% 419.41 Mbps 255.51 Mbps MegaFon - Novosibirsk
Istanbul, TR 303.72 ms 0.7% 446.52 Mbps 229.24 Mbps Turkcell - Istanbul
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Avg DL Speed : 500.03 Mbps
Avg UL Speed : 572.86 Mbps
Total DL Data : 15.01 GB
Total UL Data : 16.59 GB
Total Data : 31.60 GB
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Duration : 10 min 51 sec
System Time : 12/08/2023 - 12:56:58 UTC
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Result : https://paste.kangserver.id/view/5TM2C80
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| 6 |
Speedtest Global
|
Aug 12, 2023 14:41 |
View Raw Output---------------------------- network-speed.xyz ----------------------------
A simple script to test network performance using speedtest-cli
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Version : v2023.07.24
Global Speedtest : wget -qO- network-speed.xyz | bash
Region Speedtest : wget -qO- network-speed.xyz | bash -s -- -r <region>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Basic System Info
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
CPU Model : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2680 v4 @ 2.40GHz
CPU Cores : 2 @ 2399.996 MHz
CPU Cache : 16384 KB
AES-NI : ✔ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
Total Disk : 38.7 GB (6.3 GB Used)
Total RAM : 1.9 GB (533.7 MB Used)
Total Swap : 2.0 GB (0 Used)
System uptime : 0 days, 0 hour 56 min
Load average : 0.00, 0.05, 0.14
OS : Ubuntu 22.04.3 LTS
Arch : x86_64 (64 Bit)
Kernel : 5.15.0-78-generic
Virtualization : KVM
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Basic Network Info
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Primary Network : IPv4
ISP : PT Warna Data Multimedia
ASN : AS141120 PT Warna Data Multimedia
Host : PT Warna Data Multimedia
Location : Palu, Central Sulawesi-ST, Indonesia
Location (IPv4) : Jakarta, Jakarta, ID
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Speedtest.net (Region: GLOBAL)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Location Latency Loss DL Speed UP Speed Server
ISP: PT Warna Data Multimedia
Nearest 1.28 ms 0.0% 451.36 Mbps 521.48 Mbps CBN - Jakarta
Kochi, IN 62.98 ms 1.1% 489.95 Mbps 588.12 Mbps Asianet Broadband - Cochin
Bangalore, IN 51.95 ms 0.8% 360.00 Mbps 564.28 Mbps Bharti Airtel Ltd - Bangalore
Chennai, IN 46.05 ms 0.0% 549.31 Mbps 648.24 Mbps Tata Play Fiber - Chennai
Mumbai, IN 74.35 ms 0.0% 458.56 Mbps 527.37 Mbps i3D.net - Mumbai
Delhi, IN 87.35 ms 0.0% 380.96 Mbps 540.24 Mbps Tata Teleservices Ltd - New Delhi
Seattle, US 204.95 ms 0.0% 357.59 Mbps 284.12 Mbps DediPath - Seattle, WA
Los Angeles, US 181.51 ms 0.0% 435.99 Mbps 352.22 Mbps ReliableSite Hosting - Los Angeles, CA
Dallas, US 222.16 ms 0.3% 397.54 Mbps 496.74 Mbps Hivelocity - Dallas, TX
Miami, US 246.15 ms 0.3% 389.51 Mbps 361.18 Mbps AT&T - Miami, FL
New York, US 256.73 ms 0.0% 241.14 Mbps 298.55 Mbps Clouvider Ltd - New York, NY
Toronto, CA 254.81 ms 0.7% 369.27 Mbps 296.92 Mbps Rogers - Toronto, ON
London, UK 239.43 ms 0.3% 522.98 Mbps 494.68 Mbps VeloxServ Communications - London
Amsterdam, NL 208.83 ms 0.5% 387.77 Mbps 413.66 Mbps Clouvider Ltd - Amsterdam
Paris, FR 206.30 ms N/A 666.38 Mbps 529.54 Mbps Axione - Paris
Frankfurt, DE 182.80 ms 0.3% 494.93 Mbps 393.38 Mbps 23M GmbH - Frankfurt Am Main
Warsaw, PL 266.46 ms 0.3% 319.08 Mbps 280.08 Mbps UPC Polska - Warszawa
Bucharest, RO 199.89 ms 0.3% 326.87 Mbps 383.36 Mbps Vodafone Romania Fixed - Bucharest - Bucharest
Jeddah, KSA 202.05 ms 0.0% 502.71 Mbps 450.73 Mbps Saudi Telecom Company
Dubai, AE 207.65 ms 0.0% 452.91 Mbps 457.65 Mbps du - Dubai
Fujairah, AE 89.40 ms 0.3% 880.14 Mbps 706.05 Mbps ETISALAT-UAE - Fujairah
Tokyo, JP 106.87 ms N/A 457.23 Mbps 670.20 Mbps fdcservers.net - Tokyo
Shanghai, CU-CN 384.80 ms 6.7% 351.16 Mbps 216.98 Mbps China Unicom 5G - ShangHai
Nanjing, CT-CN 323.93 ms 0.0% 391.92 Mbps 223.41 Mbps China Telecom JiangSu 5G - Nanjing
Hong Kong, HKG 102.88 ms N/A 519.15 Mbps 474.19 Mbps STC - Hong Kong
Singapore, SG 14.56 ms 0.0% 557.99 Mbps 794.84 Mbps i3D.net - Singapore
Jakarta, ID 2.72 ms 0.0% 752.37 Mbps 860.59 Mbps PT. Telekomunikasi Indonesia - Jakarta
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Avg DL Speed : 461.66 Mbps
Avg UL Speed : 475.14 Mbps
Total DL Data : 17.17 GB
Total UL Data : 17.09 GB
Total Data : 34.26 GB
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Duration : 14 min 13 sec
System Time : 12/08/2023 - 14:41:16 UTC
Total Script Runs : 20781
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Result : https://paste.kangserver.id/view/pUSEMBw
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
Onidel Cloud VPS
Performance-first cloud hosting for teams that need consistent benchmarks and transparent pricing.
- 99.99% uptime SLA
- Proven availability for critical workloads
- Plans from $4.95/month
- Predictable pricing and simple scaling
- AMD EPYC + NVMe stack
- Modern hardware with built-in DDoS protection
- 5 global regions
- Singapore, Sydney, Amsterdam, Ho Chi Minh City, more coming soon
Ideal for: demanding SaaS workloads, managed hosting agencies, and teams migrating off legacy VPS providers.
Launch faster with concierge onboarding
Start 14-day TrialCPU Performance (Geekbench)
CPU benchmarks measure processing power for compute-intensive tasks. Learn how we test CPU performance.
I/O Speed Summary (dd)
IOPS Performance by Block Size
Combined IOPS Performance
Total IOPS across all block sizes (4K, 64K, 512K, 1M)
FIO Benchmark Details
Detailed I/O performance test results
Test 1 - Block Size: 4k (mixed_rw_50_50)
Test 2 - Block Size: 64k (mixed_rw_50_50)
Test 3 - Block Size: 512k (mixed_rw_50_50)
Test 4 - Block Size: 1m (mixed_rw_50_50)
Detailed I/O Benchmark (FIO)
IOPS Performance by Block Size
Bandwidth Performance by Block Size
Detailed Test Results
| Block Size | Read IOPS | Write IOPS | Read MB/s | Write MB/s |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4k | 63,300 | 63,500 | 253.4 | 254.0 |
| 64k | 25,000 | 25,100 | 1,600.0 | 1,610.0 |
| 512k | 3,700 | 3,900 | 1,930.0 | 2,030.0 |
| 1m | 2,000 | 2,200 | 2,120.0 | 2,260.0 |
Related Resources
Browse More Benchmarks
Explore comprehensive VPS benchmarks across providers and locations.
Compare Providers
View aggregated performance metrics across all VPS providers.
Performance Dashboard
Access real-time statistics, top performers, and latest results.
Testing Methodology
Learn about our comprehensive testing procedures and tools.
Understanding VPS Benchmark Results
This comprehensive benchmark report provides detailed performance analysis for Warnahost Intel Xeon Platinum 2 Core 2 GB Ram ID VPS in Indonesia. Our standardized testing methodology measures CPU performance, disk I/O operations, network bandwidth, and real-world application performance to give you complete insights into VPS capabilities. Browse more VPS benchmarks to compare performance across providers.
Each benchmark metric serves a specific purpose in evaluating VPS performance. CPU benchmarks reveal processing power for applications, disk I/O tests measure storage performance for databases and file operations, network tests show bandwidth capacity for content delivery, and application benchmarks demonstrate real-world hosting performance. Together, these metrics provide a complete performance profile. Use our VPS comparison tool to analyze multiple plans side-by-side.
Benchmark Metrics & Features
Performance Analysis Use Cases
- Evaluating VPS CPU performance for compute-intensive applications
- Testing disk I/O performance for database workloads
- Comparing VPS performance across different providers
- Analyzing WordPress site performance on specific VPS plans
- Assessing value-for-money based on performance and pricing
- Checking real-world application performance metrics
- Understanding geographic performance variations by location
- Reviewing detailed benchmark metrics before VPS purchase
- Comparing single-core vs multi-core CPU performance
- Validating provider performance claims with actual data
- Making informed hosting decisions based on comprehensive benchmarks
How to Interpret Benchmark Results
1. CPU Performance (Geekbench)
Geekbench measures CPU performance through single-core and multi-core scores. Single-core scores (typically 800-2000) indicate performance for single-threaded applications and general responsiveness. Multi-core scores (1500-8000) show performance when all CPU cores are utilized for parallel processing. Higher scores mean better performance. Visit our testing methodology to learn more about CPU benchmarks.
2. Disk I/O Performance (FIO)
FIO benchmarks measure disk performance through IOPS (Input/Output Operations Per Second) and bandwidth (MB/s). High IOPS (10,000+ for NVMe, 5,000-10,000 for SSD) is crucial for database workloads with many small operations. High bandwidth is important for large file transfers and media applications. Compare disk performance across different providers in our database.
3. Application Performance
Real-world application benchmarks (WordPress, UnixBench) show how the VPS handles typical web workloads including PHP processing, database queries, and static file serving. These results measured in requests per second and page load times directly apply to web hosting scenarios. Need help choosing the right VPS? Visit about us to learn more about VPSMetrics.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I interpret the Geekbench single-core and multi-core scores?
Geekbench single-core scores indicate CPU performance for single-threaded applications, important for general responsiveness and web applications. Multi-core scores show performance when all CPU cores are utilized, crucial for parallel processing and multi-threaded applications. Higher scores indicate better performance. Modern VPS typically score 800-2000 (single) and 1500-8000 (multi) depending on the plan.
What do IOPS numbers mean in disk I/O benchmarks?
IOPS (Input/Output Operations Per Second) measures how many read/write operations your disk can handle per second. Higher IOPS means better performance for database operations and applications with many small file operations. NVMe SSD VPS typically delivers 10,000+ IOPS, while traditional SSD offers 5,000-10,000 IOPS.
What is UnixBench and why does it matter?
UnixBench is a comprehensive system-level benchmark suite that tests various aspects of Unix-like system performance including process creation, file operations, and system calls. It provides a holistic view of overall system performance beyond just CPU or disk metrics. Higher UnixBench scores indicate better overall system efficiency.
How reliable are WordPress benchmark results?
WordPress benchmarks provide real-world application performance metrics by testing actual WordPress installations. These results show how the VPS handles typical web application workloads including PHP processing, database queries, and static file serving. Results are measured in requests per second and page load times, directly applicable to web hosting scenarios.
Can I trust these benchmark results for my use case?
Our benchmarks provide standardized, reproducible test results using industry-standard tools. While they offer excellent performance indicators, your actual experience may vary based on your specific workload, application optimization, and usage patterns. Use these benchmarks as a reliable starting point for comparison between providers.
Why do benchmark results vary by location?
Different data center locations may have different hardware configurations, CPU generations, storage types, and network infrastructure. Providers often upgrade facilities at different rates across regions. Location-specific benchmarks help you choose a VPS in the right region with the best performance for your target audience.
Making Informed VPS Decisions
Use these comprehensive benchmark results to make data-driven hosting decisions. Compare multiple metrics together rather than focusing on a single aspect - a balanced VPS performs well across CPU, disk, and network benchmarks. Consider your specific workload requirements: CPU-intensive applications need high Geekbench scores, database-heavy applications require high IOPS, and content delivery services benefit from high network bandwidth.
Our benchmarks provide standardized, reproducible test results using industry-standard tools. While they offer excellent performance indicators, your actual experience may vary based on specific workload patterns and application optimization. Use these benchmarks as a reliable starting point for comparison between providers and configurations.
Compare More VPS Options
Explore additional benchmarks, compare multiple VPS plans side-by-side, and discover the best performing options for your specific requirements and budget.