Vebble - AMD EPYC Milan 8 Core 16 GB Ram SG
Comprehensive VPS benchmark results from Singapore tested on Jan 20, 2024. Learn our methodology.
System Specifications
Additional Benchmarks
UnixBench
System Performance Index
WordPress Bench
Web Application Performance
Benchmark Steps
| # | Suite | Run At | Raw Output |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Bench
|
Jan 20, 2024 11:31 |
View Raw Output-------------------- A Bench.sh Script By Teddysun ------------------- Version : v2023-10-15 Usage : wget -qO- bench.sh | bash ---------------------------------------------------------------------- CPU Model : AMD EPYC-Milan Processor CPU Cores : 8 @ 2245.780 MHz CPU Cache : 512 KB AES-NI : ✓ Enabled VM-x/AMD-V : ✗ Disabled Total Disk : 232.5 GB (3.2 GB Used) Total Mem : 15.6 GB (479.4 MB Used) System uptime : 2 days, 20 hour 33 min Load average : 1.03, 2.23, 2.40 OS : Ubuntu 22.04.3 LTS Arch : x86_64 (64 Bit) Kernel : 5.15.0-91-generic TCP CC : bbr Virtualization : Dedicated IPv4/IPv6 : ✓ Online / ✗ Offline Organization : AS149020 WebHorizon Internet Services Location : Singapore / SG Region : Singapore ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I/O Speed(1st run) : 904 MB/s I/O Speed(2nd run) : 933 MB/s I/O Speed(3rd run) : 1.0 GB/s I/O Speed(average) : 953.7 MB/s ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Node Name Upload Speed Download Speed Latency Speedtest.net 316.58 Mbps 2492.21 Mbps 254.25 ms Los Angeles, US 457.08 Mbps 1623.19 Mbps 174.49 ms Dallas, US 387.25 Mbps 3.43 Mbps 202.58 ms Montreal, CA 331.92 Mbps 916.98 Mbps 240.97 ms Paris, FR 256.35 Mbps 2081.22 Mbps 321.77 ms Amsterdam, NL 350.58 Mbps 1244.68 Mbps 225.67 ms Hongkong, CN 417.08 Mbps 5862.77 Mbps 128.31 ms Mumbai, IN 188.92 Mbps 2419.54 Mbps 209.23 ms Singapore, SG 886.07 Mbps 4424.31 Mbps 96.69 ms Tokyo, JP 274.96 Mbps 2063.56 Mbps 75.56 ms ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Finished in : 5 min 42 sec Timestamp : 2024-01-20 11:31:48 WIB ---------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| 2 |
Speedtest Global
|
Jan 20, 2024 11:58 |
View Raw Output---------------------------- network-speed.xyz ----------------------------
A simple script to test network performance using speedtest-cli
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Version : v2023.12.28
Global Speedtest : wget -qO- network-speed.xyz | bash
Region Speedtest : wget -qO- network-speed.xyz | bash -s -- -r <region>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Basic System Info
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
CPU Model : AMD EPYC-Milan Processor
CPU Cores : 8 @ 2245.780 MHz
CPU Cache : 512 KB
AES-NI : ✔ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ❌ Disabled
Total Disk : 232.5 GB (3.2 GB Used)
Total RAM : 15.6 GB (493.7 MB Used)
System uptime : 2 days, 20 hour 44 min
Load average : 0.04, 0.35, 1.25
OS : Ubuntu 22.04.3 LTS
Arch : x86_64 (64 Bit)
Kernel : 5.15.0-91-generic
Virtualization : KVM
TCP Control : bbr
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Basic Network Info
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Primary Network : IPv4
IPv6 Access : ❌ Offline
IPv4 Access : ✔ Online
ISP : Zappie Host LLC
ASN : Unknown
ASN (IPv4) : AS149020 WebHorizon Internet Services
Host : Zappie Host LLC
Location : Falkenstein, Saxony-SN, Germany
Location (IPv4) : Singapore, Singapore, SG
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Speedtest.net (Region: GLOBAL)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Location Latency Loss DL Speed UP Speed Server
ISP: WebHorizon Internet Services
Nearest 254.07 ms 0.0% 2905.47 Mbps 310.74 Mbps CITUX GmbH - Dresden
Kochi, IN 124.28 ms 0.0% 3652.35 Mbps 672.78 Mbps Asianet Broadband - Cochin
Bangalore, IN 105.79 ms 0.0% 2720.68 Mbps 681.62 Mbps Bharti Airtel Ltd - Bangalore
Chennai, IN 36.77 ms N/A 4766.94 Mbps 2319.89 Mbps Jio - Chennai
Mumbai, IN 138.97 ms 0.0% 3840.16 Mbps 588.08 Mbps i3D.net - Mumbai
Delhi, IN 221.17 ms 0.0% 2591.04 Mbps 275.78 Mbps Tata Play Fiber - New Delhi
Seattle, US 225.96 ms N/A 1675.39 Mbps 289.09 Mbps Comcast - Seattle, WA
Los Angeles, US 173.84 ms 0.0% 1862.52 Mbps 451.40 Mbps ReliableSite Hosting - Los Angeles, CA
Dallas, US 205.69 ms 0.0% 3001.28 Mbps 371.35 Mbps Hivelocity - Dallas, TX
Miami, US 248.82 ms 0.0% 1010.23 Mbps 312.25 Mbps AT&T - Miami, FL
New York, US 221.57 ms 0.0% 3327.59 Mbps 159.47 Mbps GSL Networks - New York, NY
Toronto, CA 239.37 ms 0.0% 1498.15 Mbps 333.04 Mbps Rogers - Toronto, ON
Mexico City, MX 224.57 ms N/A 1343.11 Mbps 356.53 Mbps INFINITUM - Mexico City
London, UK 234.33 ms 0.0% 3279.39 Mbps 343.08 Mbps VeloxServ Communications - London
Amsterdam, NL 245.20 ms 0.0% 3300.53 Mbps 326.66 Mbps 31173 Services AB - Amsterdam
Paris, FR 319.78 ms N/A 2496.61 Mbps 241.08 Mbps Axione - Paris
Frankfurt, DE 246.41 ms 0.0% 2483.87 Mbps 323.54 Mbps 23M GmbH - Frankfurt am Main
Warsaw, PL 335.63 ms 0.0% 2270.53 Mbps 232.58 Mbps Play - Warszawa
Bucharest, RO 258.29 ms 0.0% 1467.86 Mbps 307.56 Mbps Vodafone Romania Fixed - Bucharest - Bucharest
Moscow, RU 282.68 ms 0.0% 2827.78 Mbps 285.31 Mbps MegaFon - Moscow
Jeddah, SA 252.41 ms 0.0% 3309.18 Mbps 287.31 Mbps Saudi Telecom Company
Dubai, AE 270.60 ms 0.0% 2940.38 Mbps 293.05 Mbps du - Dubai
Fujairah, AE 177.55 ms 0.0% 4130.17 Mbps 373.35 Mbps ETISALAT-UAE - Fujairah
Istanbul, TR 350.81 ms 0.0% 2191.18 Mbps 225.63 Mbps Turkcell - Istanbul
Tehran, IR 311.99 ms 0.0% 2443.02 Mbps 249.22 Mbps Asiatech - Tehran
Tokyo, JP 215.04 ms N/A 2287.08 Mbps 332.33 Mbps fdcservers.net - Tokyo
Shanghai, CU-CN FAILED
Nanjing, CT-CN 189.34 ms 0.3% 3286.02 Mbps 36.61 Mbps China Telecom JiangSu 5G - Nanjing
Hong Kong, CN 126.23 ms N/A 2490.57 Mbps 248.83 Mbps STC - Hong Kong
Singapore, SG 1.08 ms 0.0% 5350.22 Mbps 9297.54 Mbps i3D.net - Singapore
Jakarta, ID FAILED
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Avg DL Speed : xxx Mbps
Avg UL Speed : xxx Mbps
Total DL Data : xxx GB
Total UL Data : xxx GB
Total Data : xxx GB
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Duration : x min x sec
System Time : 20/01/2024 - 11:58:08 WIB
Total Script Runs : 34261
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Result : https://paste.kangserver.id/view/ko6uJQs
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| 3 |
Benchy
|
Jan 20, 2024 12:13 |
View Raw Output# # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Benchy v2.7 # # https://github.com/L1so/benchy # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # 20 Jan 2024 12:13 WIB # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Server Insight Hardware Information --------------------- --------------------- OS : Ubuntu 22.04.3 LTS Model : AMD EPYC-Milan Processor Location : Germany Core : 8 @ 2245.780 MHz Kernel : 5.15.0-91-generic AES-NI : ✔ Enabled Uptime : 0 days, 0 hrs, 21 mins, 54 secs VM-x/AMD-V : ❌ Disabled Virt : kvm Swap : 0.0 KiB Disk & Memory Usage Network Information --------------------- --------------------- Disk (1) : 232.4 GiB ASN : Disk Usage : 3.3 GiB (1% Used) ISP : Mem : 15.6 GiB IPv4 : ✔ Enabled Mem Usage : 0.4 GiB (3% Used) IPv6 : ❌ Disabled Ookla Network Speedtest (Region: Asia) +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Provider | Location | Download | Upload | Data Used | Latency | +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Biznet | Jakarta, ID | Failed | To | Get | Data | | U Mobile | Kuala Lumpur, MY | 4.7 Gb/s | 420.5 Mb/s | 5.5 GB | 87.2 ms | | MyRepublic | Singapore, SG | 4.9 Gb/s | 6.3 Gb/s | 9.1 GB | 1.3 ms | | CAT TELECOM | Hatyai, TH | Failed | To | Get | Data | | Airtel | Chennai, IN | Failed | To | Get | Data | +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ Network Performance Test (Region: Asia) +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Prot. | Provider | Location | Send | Receive | Latency | +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | IPv4 | Uztelecom | Tashkent, UZ | 305.6 Mb/s | 481.3 Mb/s | 261.5 ms | | | Biznet | Jakarta, ID | busy | busy | 11.8 ms | +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ |
| 4 |
PassMark
|
Jan 20, 2024 12:13 |
View Raw OutputPassMark PerformanceTest Linux (11.0.1002) AMD EPYC-Milan Processor (x86_64) 8 cores @ 0 MHz | 15.6 GiB RAM Number of Processes: 8 | Test Iterations: 2 | Test Duration: Very Long - CPU Mark: 18459 Integer Math 45355 Million Operations/s Floating Point Math 36672 Million Operations/s Prime Numbers 147 Million Primes/s Sorting 27269 Thousand Strings/s Encryption 9881 MB/s Compression 194525 KB/s CPU Single Threaded 2597 Million Operations/s Physics 2557 Frames/s Extended Instructions (SSE) 17198 Million Matrices/s Memory Mark: 2639 Database Operations 7187 Thousand Operations/s Memory Read Cached 26594 MB/s Memory Read Uncached 18628 MB/s Memory Write 17086 MB/s Available RAM 13419 Megabytes Memory Latency 60 Nanoseconds Memory Threaded 41726 MB/s |
| 5 |
UnixBench
|
Jan 20, 2024 12:33 |
View Raw Output------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Sat Jan 20 2024 12:33:10 - 13:01:08
8 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 47523133.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 8488.4 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 4919.1 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1405520.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 366835.6 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 4342353.1 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 2078176.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 104469.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 12833.3 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 10108.3 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 8221.0 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 1809942.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 47523133.2 4072.2
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 8488.4 1543.3
Execl Throughput 43.0 4919.1 1144.0
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 1405520.9 3549.3
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 366835.6 2216.5
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 4342353.1 7486.8
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 2078176.0 1670.6
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 104469.6 261.2
Process Creation 126.0 12833.3 1018.5
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 10108.3 2384.0
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 8221.0 13701.6
System Call Overhead 15000.0 1809942.1 1206.6
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 2101.5
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Sat Jan 20 2024 13:01:08 - 13:29:08
8 CPUs in system; running 8 parallel copies of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 381576277.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 67879.4 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 20935.6 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 10512290.7 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 2882661.1 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 27030874.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 16207315.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 1005649.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 43936.3 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 65096.0 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 9371.3 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 14465790.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 381576277.2 32697.2
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 67879.4 12341.7
Execl Throughput 43.0 20935.6 4868.7
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 10512290.7 26546.2
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 2882661.1 17417.9
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 27030874.4 46605.0
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 16207315.5 13028.4
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 1005649.0 2514.1
Process Creation 126.0 43936.3 3487.0
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 65096.0 15352.8
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 9371.3 15618.8
System Call Overhead 15000.0 14465790.9 9643.9
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 12228.7
|
Onidel Cloud VPS
Performance-first cloud hosting for teams that need consistent benchmarks and transparent pricing.
- 99.99% uptime SLA
- Proven availability for critical workloads
- Plans from $4.95/month
- Predictable pricing and simple scaling
- AMD EPYC + NVMe stack
- Modern hardware with built-in DDoS protection
- 5 global regions
- Singapore, Sydney, Amsterdam, Ho Chi Minh City, more coming soon
Ideal for: demanding SaaS workloads, managed hosting agencies, and teams migrating off legacy VPS providers.
Launch faster with concierge onboarding
Start 14-day TrialCPU Performance (Geekbench)
CPU benchmarks measure processing power for compute-intensive tasks. Learn how we test CPU performance.
I/O Speed Summary (dd)
IOPS Performance by Block Size
Combined IOPS Performance
Total IOPS across all block sizes (4K, 64K, 512K, 1M)
FIO Benchmark Details
Detailed I/O performance test results
Test 1 - Block Size: 4k (mixed_rw_50_50)
Test 2 - Block Size: 64k (mixed_rw_50_50)
Test 3 - Block Size: 512k (mixed_rw_50_50)
Test 4 - Block Size: 1m (mixed_rw_50_50)
Detailed I/O Benchmark (FIO)
IOPS Performance by Block Size
Bandwidth Performance by Block Size
Detailed Test Results
| Block Size | Read IOPS | Write IOPS | Read MB/s | Write MB/s |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4k | 73,800 | 74,000 | 295.5 | 296.3 |
| 64k | 47,500 | 47,800 | 3,040.0 | 3,060.0 |
| 512k | 7,500 | 7,900 | 3,840.0 | 4,050.0 |
| 1m | 2,400 | 2,600 | 25,300.0 | 2,690.0 |
Related Resources
Browse More Benchmarks
Explore comprehensive VPS benchmarks across providers and locations.
Compare Providers
View aggregated performance metrics across all VPS providers.
Performance Dashboard
Access real-time statistics, top performers, and latest results.
Testing Methodology
Learn about our comprehensive testing procedures and tools.
Understanding VPS Benchmark Results
This comprehensive benchmark report provides detailed performance analysis for Vebble AMD EPYC Milan 8 Core 16 GB Ram SG VPS in Singapore. Our standardized testing methodology measures CPU performance, disk I/O operations, network bandwidth, and real-world application performance to give you complete insights into VPS capabilities. Browse more VPS benchmarks to compare performance across providers.
Each benchmark metric serves a specific purpose in evaluating VPS performance. CPU benchmarks reveal processing power for applications, disk I/O tests measure storage performance for databases and file operations, network tests show bandwidth capacity for content delivery, and application benchmarks demonstrate real-world hosting performance. Together, these metrics provide a complete performance profile. Use our VPS comparison tool to analyze multiple plans side-by-side.
Benchmark Metrics & Features
Performance Analysis Use Cases
- Evaluating VPS CPU performance for compute-intensive applications
- Testing disk I/O performance for database workloads
- Comparing VPS performance across different providers
- Analyzing WordPress site performance on specific VPS plans
- Assessing value-for-money based on performance and pricing
- Checking real-world application performance metrics
- Understanding geographic performance variations by location
- Reviewing detailed benchmark metrics before VPS purchase
- Comparing single-core vs multi-core CPU performance
- Validating provider performance claims with actual data
- Making informed hosting decisions based on comprehensive benchmarks
How to Interpret Benchmark Results
1. CPU Performance (Geekbench)
Geekbench measures CPU performance through single-core and multi-core scores. Single-core scores (typically 800-2000) indicate performance for single-threaded applications and general responsiveness. Multi-core scores (1500-8000) show performance when all CPU cores are utilized for parallel processing. Higher scores mean better performance. Visit our testing methodology to learn more about CPU benchmarks.
2. Disk I/O Performance (FIO)
FIO benchmarks measure disk performance through IOPS (Input/Output Operations Per Second) and bandwidth (MB/s). High IOPS (10,000+ for NVMe, 5,000-10,000 for SSD) is crucial for database workloads with many small operations. High bandwidth is important for large file transfers and media applications. Compare disk performance across different providers in our database.
3. Application Performance
Real-world application benchmarks (WordPress, UnixBench) show how the VPS handles typical web workloads including PHP processing, database queries, and static file serving. These results measured in requests per second and page load times directly apply to web hosting scenarios. Need help choosing the right VPS? Visit about us to learn more about VPSMetrics.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I interpret the Geekbench single-core and multi-core scores?
Geekbench single-core scores indicate CPU performance for single-threaded applications, important for general responsiveness and web applications. Multi-core scores show performance when all CPU cores are utilized, crucial for parallel processing and multi-threaded applications. Higher scores indicate better performance. Modern VPS typically score 800-2000 (single) and 1500-8000 (multi) depending on the plan.
What do IOPS numbers mean in disk I/O benchmarks?
IOPS (Input/Output Operations Per Second) measures how many read/write operations your disk can handle per second. Higher IOPS means better performance for database operations and applications with many small file operations. NVMe SSD VPS typically delivers 10,000+ IOPS, while traditional SSD offers 5,000-10,000 IOPS.
What is UnixBench and why does it matter?
UnixBench is a comprehensive system-level benchmark suite that tests various aspects of Unix-like system performance including process creation, file operations, and system calls. It provides a holistic view of overall system performance beyond just CPU or disk metrics. Higher UnixBench scores indicate better overall system efficiency.
How reliable are WordPress benchmark results?
WordPress benchmarks provide real-world application performance metrics by testing actual WordPress installations. These results show how the VPS handles typical web application workloads including PHP processing, database queries, and static file serving. Results are measured in requests per second and page load times, directly applicable to web hosting scenarios.
Can I trust these benchmark results for my use case?
Our benchmarks provide standardized, reproducible test results using industry-standard tools. While they offer excellent performance indicators, your actual experience may vary based on your specific workload, application optimization, and usage patterns. Use these benchmarks as a reliable starting point for comparison between providers.
Why do benchmark results vary by location?
Different data center locations may have different hardware configurations, CPU generations, storage types, and network infrastructure. Providers often upgrade facilities at different rates across regions. Location-specific benchmarks help you choose a VPS in the right region with the best performance for your target audience.
Making Informed VPS Decisions
Use these comprehensive benchmark results to make data-driven hosting decisions. Compare multiple metrics together rather than focusing on a single aspect - a balanced VPS performs well across CPU, disk, and network benchmarks. Consider your specific workload requirements: CPU-intensive applications need high Geekbench scores, database-heavy applications require high IOPS, and content delivery services benefit from high network bandwidth.
Our benchmarks provide standardized, reproducible test results using industry-standard tools. While they offer excellent performance indicators, your actual experience may vary based on specific workload patterns and application optimization. Use these benchmarks as a reliable starting point for comparison between providers and configurations.
Compare More VPS Options
Explore additional benchmarks, compare multiple VPS plans side-by-side, and discover the best performing options for your specific requirements and budget.