v6Node - AMD EPYC 4 Core 8 GB Ram DE
Comprehensive VPS benchmark results from Germany tested on Jun 05, 2023. Learn our methodology.
System Specifications
Additional Benchmarks
UnixBench
System Performance Index
WordPress Bench
Web Application Performance
Benchmark Steps
| # | Suite | Run At | Raw Output |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Bench
|
Jun 05, 2023 15:01 |
View Raw Output-------------------- A Bench.sh Script By Teddysun ------------------- Version : v2022-06-01 Usage : wget -qO- bench.sh | bash ---------------------------------------------------------------------- CPU Model : AMD EPYC 7542 32-Core Processor CPU Cores : 4 @ 2900.000 MHz CPU Cache : 512 KB AES-NI : Enabled VM-x/AMD-V : Enabled Total Disk : 68.9 GB (1.9 GB Used) Total Mem : 7.8 GB (74.0 MB Used) System uptime : 0 days, 0 hour 40 min Load average : 0.09, 0.73, 1.26 OS : Debian GNU/Linux 11 Arch : x86_64 (64 Bit) Kernel : 5.10.0-23-cloud-amd64 TCP CC : bbr Virtualization : KVM Organization : AS200461 Ian David Klemm Location : Frankfurt am Main / DE Region : Hesse ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I/O Speed(1st run) : 1.0 GB/s I/O Speed(2nd run) : 1.0 GB/s I/O Speed(3rd run) : 1.1 GB/s I/O Speed(average) : 1058.1 MB/s ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Node Name Upload Speed Download Speed Latency Speedtest.net 283.16 Mbps 197.20 Mbps 6.68 ms Los Angeles, US 570.33 Mbps 3359.33 Mbps 141.12 ms Dallas, US 699.35 Mbps 4482.23 Mbps 115.58 ms Montreal, CA 559.98 Mbps 861.14 Mbps 90.53 ms Paris, FR 4661.82 Mbps 5572.07 Mbps 11.01 ms Amsterdam, NL 5529.72 Mbps 5244.82 Mbps 6.95 ms Shanghai, CN 294.17 Mbps 2557.91 Mbps 269.37 ms Nanjing, CN 196.68 Mbps 3133.35 Mbps 226.05 ms Hongkong, CN 414.79 Mbps 4099.17 Mbps 195.12 ms Singapore, SG 322.52 Mbps 284.44 Mbps 156.12 ms Tokyo, JP 373.97 Mbps 3309.05 Mbps 214.38 ms ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Finished in : 5 min 6 sec Timestamp : 2023-06-05 15:01:10 UTC ---------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| 2 |
Speedtest Global
|
Jun 05, 2023 15:21 |
View Raw Output---------------------------- network-speed.xyz ----------------------------
A simple script to test network performance using speedtest-cli
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Version : v2023.05.28
Global Speedtest : wget -qO- network-speed.xyz | bash
Region Speedtest : wget -qO- network-speed.xyz | bash -s -- -r <region>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Basic System Info
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
CPU Model : AMD EPYC 7542 32-Core Processor
CPU Cores : 4 @ 2900.000 MHz
CPU Cache : 512 KB
AES-NI : ✔ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
Total Disk : 68.9 GB (1.9 GB Used)
Total RAM : 7.8 GB (78.6 MB Used)
System uptime : 0 days, 0 hour 53 min
Load average : 0.16, 0.26, 0.70
OS : Debian GNU/Linux 11
Arch : x86_64 (64 Bit)
Kernel : 5.10.0-23-cloud-amd64
Virtualization : KVM
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Basic Network Info
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Primary Network : IPv6
ISP : Ian David Klemm
ASN : AS200461 Ian David Klemm
Host : Ian David Klemm
Location : Rotterdam, South Holland-ZH, Netherlands
Location (IPv4) : Frankfurt am Main, Hesse, DE
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Speedtest.net (Region: GLOBAL)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Location Latency Loss DL Speed UP Speed Server
ISP: The Mastermind Holding B.V.
Nearest 6.70 ms 0.0% 195.33 Mbps 276.79 Mbps Korton Group BV - Nieuw-Vennep
Kochi, IN 174.92 ms 0.0% 2444.43 Mbps 462.28 Mbps Asianet Broadband - Cochin
Bangalore, IN 127.65 ms 0.0% 5804.18 Mbps 92.77 Mbps Bharti Airtel Ltd - Bangalore
Chennai, IN 171.88 ms N/A 4270.18 Mbps 466.62 Mbps Jio - Chennai
Mumbai, IN 164.55 ms 0.0% 4621.67 Mbps 499.52 Mbps i3D.net - Mumbai
Delhi, IN 149.70 ms 0.0% 4001.60 Mbps 551.33 Mbps Tata Play Fiber - New Delhi
Los Angeles, US 140.11 ms 0.0% 3584.78 Mbps 95.18 Mbps ReliableSite Hosting - Los Angeles, CA
Dallas, US 116.57 ms 0.0% 4507.23 Mbps 91.09 Mbps Hivelocity - Dallas, TX
New York, US 81.48 ms 0.0% 1407.38 Mbps 986.16 Mbps Clouvider Ltd - New York, NY
Seattle, US 138.30 ms 0.0% 1017.64 Mbps 567.83 Mbps DediPath - Seattle, WA
Miami, US 111.68 ms 0.0% 3373.13 Mbps 729.31 Mbps AT&T - Miami, FL
Toronto, CA 91.57 ms 0.0% 4142.05 Mbps 90.26 Mbps Rogers - Toronto, ON
Paris, FR 11.04 ms 0.0% 5717.97 Mbps 4409.08 Mbps ORANGE FRANCE - Paris
Amsterdam, NL 6.20 ms 0.0% 5268.47 Mbps 4518.40 Mbps Clouvider Ltd - Amsterdam
Warsaw, PL 20.94 ms 0.0% 5957.10 Mbps 3726.41 Mbps UPC Polska - Warszawa
London, UK 12.99 ms 0.0% 6478.59 Mbps 3968.41 Mbps VeloxServ Communications - London
Frankfurt, DE 1.14 ms 0.0% 5651.85 Mbps 6054.63 Mbps 23M GmbH - Frankfurt Am Main
Bucharest, RO 28.97 ms 0.0% 5280.12 Mbps 2796.94 Mbps Vodafone Romania Fixed - Bucharest
Dubai, AE 124.48 ms 0.0% 4228.70 Mbps 652.94 Mbps du - Dubai
Fujairah, AE 110.24 ms 0.0% 4280.46 Mbps 739.95 Mbps ETISALAT-UAE - Fujairah
Jeddah, KSA 77.70 ms 0.0% 5259.03 Mbps 883.19 Mbps Saudi Telecom Company
Shanghai, CU-CN 270.07 ms 0.0% 2597.19 Mbps 293.76 Mbps China Unicom 5G - ShangHai
Nanjing, CT-CN 225.99 ms 0.0% 3273.17 Mbps 341.08 Mbps China Telecom JiangSu 5G - Nanjing
Hong Kong, HKG 159.39 ms N/A 1867.77 Mbps 499.23 Mbps STC - Hong Kong
Singapore, SG 148.15 ms 0.0% 3080.33 Mbps 546.94 Mbps i3D.net - Singapore
Jakarta, ID 165.35 ms 0.0% 3191.65 Mbps 487.76 Mbps PT. Telekomunikasi Indonesia - Jakarta
Tokyo, JP FAILED
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Avg DL Speed : 3903.92 Mbps
Avg UL Speed : 1339.53 Mbps
Total DL Data : 140.20 GB
Total UL Data : 37.28 GB
Total Data : 177.49 GB
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Duration : 12 min 11 sec
System Time : 05/06/2023 - 15:21:08 UTC
Total Script Runs : 3131
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Result : https://cdn1.frocdn.ch/YLP4BVTl6r8ji4d.txt
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| 3 |
Benchy
|
Jun 05, 2023 15:44 |
View Raw Output# # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Benchy v2.6 # # https://github.com/L1so/benchy # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # 05 Jun 2023 15:44 UTC # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Server Insight Hardware Information --------------------- --------------------- OS : Debian GNU/Linux 11 (bullseye) Model : AMD EPYC 7542 32-Core Processor Location : Germany Core : 4 @ 2900.000 MHz Kernel : 5.10.0-23-cloud-amd64 AES-NI : ✔ Enabled Uptime : 0 days, 0 hrs, 3 mins, 29 secs VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled Virt : kvm Swap : 0.0 KiB Disk & Memory Usage Network Information --------------------- --------------------- Disk (1) : 68.7 GiB ASN : AS200461 Disk Usage : 1.9 GiB (3% Used) ISP : Ian David Klemm Mem : 7.8 GiB IPv4 : ✔ Enabled Mem Usage : 0.1 GiB (1% Used) IPv6 : ✔ Enabled Ookla Network Speedtest (Region: Europe) +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Provider | Location | Download | Upload | Data Used | Latency | +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | TestDebit | Marseille, FR | 6.4 Gb/s | 3.7 Gb/s | 12.6 GB | 19.5 ms | | NovoServe | Amsterdam, NL | 6.9 Gb/s | 6.0 Gb/s | 14.0 GB | 8.3 ms | | Hyperoptic | London, GB | 6.7 Gb/s | 4.3 Gb/s | 14.2 GB | 12.4 ms | | SWITCH | Zurich, CH | 5.3 Gb/s | 5.0 Gb/s | 10.8 GB | 7.5 ms | | Vodafone | Milan, IT | 7.0 Gb/s | 7.0 Gb/s | 16.2 GB | 9.9 ms | +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ Network Performance Test (Region: Europe) +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Prot. | Provider | Location | Send | Receive | Latency | +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | IPv4 | FiberBy | Copenhagen, DK | 5.2 Gb/s | 5.7 Gb/s | 16.1 ms | | | WOBCOM | Wolfsburg, DE | 7.8 Gb/s | 6.2 Gb/s | 13.2 ms | | | Novogara | Amsterdam, NL | 5.5 Gb/s | 6.8 Gb/s | 8.2 ms | | | Sasag | Schaff, CH | 6.8 Gb/s | 6.6 Gb/s | 7.7 ms | | | Alwyzon | Vienna, AT | 5.8 Gb/s | 5.2 Gb/s | 11.7 ms | +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | IPv6 | FiberBy | Copenhagen, DK | 5.0 Gb/s | 5.8 Gb/s | 16.2 ms | | | WOBCOM | Wolfsburg, DE | 6.2 Gb/s | 5.9 Gb/s | 13.2 ms | | | Novogara | Amsterdam, NL | 5.3 Gb/s | 6.4 Gb/s | 8.2 ms | | | Sasag | Schaff, CH | 6.6 Gb/s | 6.8 Gb/s | 7.8 ms | | | Alwyzon | Vienna, AT | 6.0 Gb/s | 6.5 Gb/s | 11.8 ms | +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ |
| 4 |
PassMark
|
Jun 05, 2023 15:44 |
View Raw OutputPassMark PerformanceTest Linux AMD EPYC 7542 32-Core Processor (x86_64) 4 cores @ 2900 MHz | 7.8 GiB RAM Number of Processes: 4 | Test Iterations: 2 | Test Duration: Very Long -------------------------------------------------------------------------- CPU Mark: 8394 Integer Math 19197 Million Operations/s Floating Point Math 14000 Million Operations/s Prime Numbers 68.1 Million Primes/s Sorting 11626 Thousand Strings/s Encryption 4682 MB/s Compression 86525 KB/s CPU Single Threaded 2195 Million Operations/s Physics 1161 Frames/s Extended Instructions (SSE) 7653 Million Matrices/s Memory Mark: 2345 Database Operations 2879 Thousand Operations/s Memory Read Cached 25182 MB/s Memory Read Uncached 11679 MB/s Memory Write 12767 MB/s Available RAM 7311 Megabytes Memory Latency 53 Nanoseconds Memory Threaded 49712 MB/s -------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| 5 |
UnixBench
|
Jun 05, 2023 15:58 |
View Raw Output------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Mon Jun 05 2023 15:58:57 - 16:26:55
4 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 42094635.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 7203.2 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 5719.0 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1084632.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 288921.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 3272009.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 1785580.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 47335.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 11967.8 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 14603.3 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 4713.5 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 2012557.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 42094635.0 3607.1
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 7203.2 1309.7
Execl Throughput 43.0 5719.0 1330.0
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 1084632.9 2739.0
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 288921.8 1745.8
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 3272009.0 5641.4
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1785580.7 1435.4
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 47335.1 118.3
Process Creation 126.0 11967.8 949.8
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 14603.3 3444.2
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 4713.5 7855.9
System Call Overhead 15000.0 2012557.3 1341.7
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 1777.2
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Mon Jun 05 2023 16:26:55 - 16:54:53
4 CPUs in system; running 4 parallel copies of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 170992689.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 28932.4 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 13813.9 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 2154817.6 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 545913.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 7515669.6 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 7177205.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 804644.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 32667.2 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 34334.2 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 5030.3 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 8077613.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 170992689.3 14652.3
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 28932.4 5260.4
Execl Throughput 43.0 13813.9 3212.5
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 2154817.6 5441.5
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 545913.9 3298.6
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 7515669.6 12958.1
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 7177205.1 5769.5
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 804644.4 2011.6
Process Creation 126.0 32667.2 2592.6
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 34334.2 8097.7
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 5030.3 8383.8
System Call Overhead 15000.0 8077613.0 5385.1
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 5413.5
|
Onidel Cloud VPS
Performance-first cloud hosting for teams that need consistent benchmarks and transparent pricing.
- 99.99% uptime SLA
- Proven availability for critical workloads
- Plans from $4.95/month
- Predictable pricing and simple scaling
- AMD EPYC + NVMe stack
- Modern hardware with built-in DDoS protection
- 5 global regions
- Singapore, Sydney, Amsterdam, Ho Chi Minh City, more coming soon
Ideal for: demanding SaaS workloads, managed hosting agencies, and teams migrating off legacy VPS providers.
Launch faster with concierge onboarding
Start 14-day TrialCPU Performance (Geekbench)
CPU benchmarks measure processing power for compute-intensive tasks. Learn how we test CPU performance.
I/O Speed Summary (dd)
IOPS Performance by Block Size
Combined IOPS Performance
Total IOPS across all block sizes (4K, 64K, 512K, 1M)
FIO Benchmark Details
Detailed I/O performance test results
Test 1 - Block Size: 4k (mixed_rw_50_50)
Test 2 - Block Size: 64k (mixed_rw_50_50)
Test 3 - Block Size: 512k (mixed_rw_50_50)
Test 4 - Block Size: 1m (mixed_rw_50_50)
Detailed I/O Benchmark (FIO)
IOPS Performance by Block Size
Bandwidth Performance by Block Size
Detailed Test Results
| Block Size | Read IOPS | Write IOPS | Read MB/s | Write MB/s |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4k | 69,500 | 69,700 | 278.1 | 278.9 |
| 64k | 49,500 | 49,700 | 3,160.0 | 3,180.0 |
| 512k | 9,200 | 9,700 | 4,710.0 | 4,960.0 |
| 1m | 8,000 | 8,600 | 8,280.0 | 8,830.0 |
Related Resources
Browse More Benchmarks
Explore comprehensive VPS benchmarks across providers and locations.
Compare Providers
View aggregated performance metrics across all VPS providers.
Performance Dashboard
Access real-time statistics, top performers, and latest results.
Testing Methodology
Learn about our comprehensive testing procedures and tools.
Understanding VPS Benchmark Results
This comprehensive benchmark report provides detailed performance analysis for v6Node AMD EPYC 4 Core 8 GB Ram DE VPS in Germany . Our standardized testing methodology measures CPU performance, disk I/O operations, network bandwidth, and real-world application performance to give you complete insights into VPS capabilities. Browse more VPS benchmarks to compare performance across providers.
Each benchmark metric serves a specific purpose in evaluating VPS performance. CPU benchmarks reveal processing power for applications, disk I/O tests measure storage performance for databases and file operations, network tests show bandwidth capacity for content delivery, and application benchmarks demonstrate real-world hosting performance. Together, these metrics provide a complete performance profile. Use our VPS comparison tool to analyze multiple plans side-by-side.
Benchmark Metrics & Features
Performance Analysis Use Cases
- Evaluating VPS CPU performance for compute-intensive applications
- Testing disk I/O performance for database workloads
- Comparing VPS performance across different providers
- Analyzing WordPress site performance on specific VPS plans
- Assessing value-for-money based on performance and pricing
- Checking real-world application performance metrics
- Understanding geographic performance variations by location
- Reviewing detailed benchmark metrics before VPS purchase
- Comparing single-core vs multi-core CPU performance
- Validating provider performance claims with actual data
- Making informed hosting decisions based on comprehensive benchmarks
How to Interpret Benchmark Results
1. CPU Performance (Geekbench)
Geekbench measures CPU performance through single-core and multi-core scores. Single-core scores (typically 800-2000) indicate performance for single-threaded applications and general responsiveness. Multi-core scores (1500-8000) show performance when all CPU cores are utilized for parallel processing. Higher scores mean better performance. Visit our testing methodology to learn more about CPU benchmarks.
2. Disk I/O Performance (FIO)
FIO benchmarks measure disk performance through IOPS (Input/Output Operations Per Second) and bandwidth (MB/s). High IOPS (10,000+ for NVMe, 5,000-10,000 for SSD) is crucial for database workloads with many small operations. High bandwidth is important for large file transfers and media applications. Compare disk performance across different providers in our database.
3. Application Performance
Real-world application benchmarks (WordPress, UnixBench) show how the VPS handles typical web workloads including PHP processing, database queries, and static file serving. These results measured in requests per second and page load times directly apply to web hosting scenarios. Need help choosing the right VPS? Visit about us to learn more about VPSMetrics.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I interpret the Geekbench single-core and multi-core scores?
Geekbench single-core scores indicate CPU performance for single-threaded applications, important for general responsiveness and web applications. Multi-core scores show performance when all CPU cores are utilized, crucial for parallel processing and multi-threaded applications. Higher scores indicate better performance. Modern VPS typically score 800-2000 (single) and 1500-8000 (multi) depending on the plan.
What do IOPS numbers mean in disk I/O benchmarks?
IOPS (Input/Output Operations Per Second) measures how many read/write operations your disk can handle per second. Higher IOPS means better performance for database operations and applications with many small file operations. NVMe SSD VPS typically delivers 10,000+ IOPS, while traditional SSD offers 5,000-10,000 IOPS.
What is UnixBench and why does it matter?
UnixBench is a comprehensive system-level benchmark suite that tests various aspects of Unix-like system performance including process creation, file operations, and system calls. It provides a holistic view of overall system performance beyond just CPU or disk metrics. Higher UnixBench scores indicate better overall system efficiency.
How reliable are WordPress benchmark results?
WordPress benchmarks provide real-world application performance metrics by testing actual WordPress installations. These results show how the VPS handles typical web application workloads including PHP processing, database queries, and static file serving. Results are measured in requests per second and page load times, directly applicable to web hosting scenarios.
Can I trust these benchmark results for my use case?
Our benchmarks provide standardized, reproducible test results using industry-standard tools. While they offer excellent performance indicators, your actual experience may vary based on your specific workload, application optimization, and usage patterns. Use these benchmarks as a reliable starting point for comparison between providers.
Why do benchmark results vary by location?
Different data center locations may have different hardware configurations, CPU generations, storage types, and network infrastructure. Providers often upgrade facilities at different rates across regions. Location-specific benchmarks help you choose a VPS in the right region with the best performance for your target audience.
Making Informed VPS Decisions
Use these comprehensive benchmark results to make data-driven hosting decisions. Compare multiple metrics together rather than focusing on a single aspect - a balanced VPS performs well across CPU, disk, and network benchmarks. Consider your specific workload requirements: CPU-intensive applications need high Geekbench scores, database-heavy applications require high IOPS, and content delivery services benefit from high network bandwidth.
Our benchmarks provide standardized, reproducible test results using industry-standard tools. While they offer excellent performance indicators, your actual experience may vary based on specific workload patterns and application optimization. Use these benchmarks as a reliable starting point for comparison between providers and configurations.
Compare More VPS Options
Explore additional benchmarks, compare multiple VPS plans side-by-side, and discover the best performing options for your specific requirements and budget.