RoyaleHosting - Intel Xeon Gold 2 Core 4 GB Ram NL
Comprehensive VPS benchmark results from Netherlands tested on Jul 18, 2023. Learn our methodology.
System Specifications
Additional Benchmarks
UnixBench
System Performance Index
WordPress Bench
Web Application Performance
Benchmark Steps
| # | Suite | Run At | Raw Output |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Bench
|
Jul 18, 2023 14:34 |
View Raw Output-------------------- A Bench.sh Script By Teddysun ------------------- Version : v2023-06-10 Usage : wget -qO- bench.sh | bash ---------------------------------------------------------------------- CPU Model : Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6248R CPU @ 3.00GHz CPU Cores : 2 @ 2992.968 MHz CPU Cache : 16384 KB AES-NI : Enabled VM-x/AMD-V : Enabled Total Disk : 40.8 GB (2.5 GB Used) Total Mem : 3.8 GB (197.9 MB Used) System uptime : 0 days, 1 hour 1 min Load average : 0.04, 0.15, 0.51 OS : Ubuntu 22.04.2 LTS Arch : x86_64 (64 Bit) Kernel : 5.15.0-76-generic TCP CC : bbr Virtualization : KVM IPv4/IPv6 : Online / Offline Organization : AS212477 RoyaleHosting BV Location : Amsterdam / NL Region : North Holland ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I/O Speed(1st run) : 530 MB/s I/O Speed(2nd run) : 530 MB/s I/O Speed(3rd run) : 532 MB/s I/O Speed(average) : 530.7 MB/s ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Node Name Upload Speed Download Speed Latency Speedtest.net 1060.67 Mbps 1027.12 Mbps 0.37 ms Los Angeles, US 511.68 Mbps 958.66 Mbps 134.41 ms Dallas, US 633.25 Mbps 983.32 Mbps 107.48 ms Montreal, CA 557.56 Mbps 890.55 Mbps 84.72 ms Paris, FR 1070.57 Mbps 1001.10 Mbps 15.65 ms Amsterdam, NL 1069.51 Mbps 1026.99 Mbps 6.53 ms Shanghai, CN 322.99 Mbps 834.02 Mbps 245.59 ms Hongkong, CN 423.40 Mbps 793.13 Mbps 187.48 ms Singapore, SG 337.22 Mbps 746.53 Mbps 224.00 ms Tokyo, JP 347.75 Mbps 1030.36 Mbps 231.35 ms ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Finished in : 4 min 44 sec Timestamp : 2023-07-18 14:34:23 UTC ---------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| 2 |
Speedtest Global
|
Jul 18, 2023 14:51 |
View Raw Output---------------------------- network-speed.xyz ----------------------------
A simple script to test network performance using speedtest-cli
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Version : v2023.07.14
Global Speedtest : wget -qO- network-speed.xyz | bash
Region Speedtest : wget -qO- network-speed.xyz | bash -s -- -r <region>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Basic System Info
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
CPU Model : Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6248R CPU @ 3.00GHz
CPU Cores : 2 @ 2992.968 MHz
CPU Cache : 16384 KB
AES-NI : ✔ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
Total Disk : 40.8 GB (2.5 GB Used)
Total RAM : 3.8 GB (158.9 MB Used)
System uptime : 0 days, 1 hour 10 min
Load average : 0.08, 0.19, 0.37
OS : Ubuntu 22.04.2 LTS
Arch : x86_64 (64 Bit)
Kernel : 5.15.0-76-generic
Virtualization : KVM
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Basic Network Info
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Primary Network : IPv4
ISP : RoyaleHosting BV
ASN : AS212477 RoyaleHosting BV
Host : RoyaleHosting BV
Location : Amsterdam, North Holland-NH, Netherlands
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Speedtest.net (Region: GLOBAL)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Location Latency Loss DL Speed UP Speed Server
ISP: RoyaleHosting BV
Nearest 0.37 ms 0.0% 1023.77 Mbps 1062.62 Mbps T-Mobile Netherlands B.V. - Amsterdam
Kochi, IN 182.14 ms 0.0% 1019.09 Mbps 405.11 Mbps Asianet Broadband - Cochin
Bangalore, IN 201.05 ms 0.0% 1026.65 Mbps 322.48 Mbps Bharti Airtel Ltd - Bangalore
Chennai, IN 194.81 ms 0.0% 1035.10 Mbps 407.83 Mbps Tata Play Fiber - Chennai
Mumbai, IN 180.77 ms 0.3% 1039.32 Mbps 348.76 Mbps i3D.net - Mumbai
Delhi, IN 188.76 ms 0.0% 1032.94 Mbps 425.86 Mbps Tata Teleservices Ltd - New Delhi
Seattle, US 158.51 ms 0.0% 949.33 Mbps 472.71 Mbps DediPath - Seattle, WA
Los Angeles, US 131.24 ms 0.0% 997.53 Mbps 599.28 Mbps ReliableSite Hosting - Los Angeles, CA
Dallas, US 106.72 ms 0.0% 845.72 Mbps 755.34 Mbps Hivelocity - Dallas, TX
Miami, US 118.01 ms 0.0% 971.82 Mbps 668.84 Mbps AT&T - Miami, FL
New York, US 73.38 ms 0.0% 489.69 Mbps 709.90 Mbps Clouvider Ltd - New York, NY
Toronto, CA 93.92 ms 0.0% 1025.47 Mbps 900.89 Mbps Rogers - Toronto, ON
London, UK 5.62 ms 0.0% 1023.74 Mbps 1067.86 Mbps VeloxServ Communications - London
Amsterdam, NL 5.55 ms 0.0% 1026.08 Mbps 1068.94 Mbps Clouvider Ltd - Amsterdam
Paris, FR 16.05 ms N/A 919.50 Mbps 1069.23 Mbps Axione - Paris
Frankfurt, DE 6.19 ms 0.0% 1024.06 Mbps 1067.18 Mbps 23M GmbH - Frankfurt Am Main
Warsaw, PL 23.42 ms 0.0% 1002.80 Mbps 1068.11 Mbps UPC Polska - Warszawa
Bucharest, RO 34.10 ms 0.0% 1023.77 Mbps 1025.28 Mbps Vodafone Romania Fixed - Bucharest - Bucharest
Jeddah, KSA 139.04 ms 0.4% 1033.51 Mbps 825.82 Mbps Saudi Telecom Company
Dubai, AE 122.42 ms 0.0% 978.09 Mbps 567.31 Mbps du - Dubai
Fujairah, AE 130.32 ms 0.3% 1049.76 Mbps 583.63 Mbps ETISALAT-UAE - Fujairah
Tokyo, JP 230.97 ms N/A 668.92 Mbps 357.48 Mbps fdcservers.net - Tokyo
Shanghai, CU-CN 267.22 ms 0.0% 748.45 Mbps 318.29 Mbps China Unicom 5G - ShangHai
Nanjing, CT-CN 325.82 ms 14.0% 690.64 Mbps 26.86 Mbps China Telecom JiangSu 5G - Nanjing
Hong Kong, HKG 187.21 ms N/A 1038.22 Mbps 532.10 Mbps STC - Hong Kong
Singapore, SG 156.85 ms 0.0% 1033.42 Mbps 416.60 Mbps i3D.net - Singapore
Jakarta, ID 173.04 ms 0.3% 1030.11 Mbps 322.64 Mbps PT. Telekomunikasi Indonesia - Jakarta
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Avg DL Speed : 953.61 Mbps
Avg UL Speed : 644.33 Mbps
Total DL Data : 32.90 GB
Total UL Data : 20.94 GB
Total Data : 53.83 GB
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Duration : 13 min 6 sec
System Time : 18/07/2023 - 14:51:49 UTC
Total Script Runs : 10198
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Result : https://paste.kangserver.id/view/z75Nws8
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| 3 |
Benchy
|
Jul 18, 2023 15:04 |
View Raw Output# # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Benchy v2.7 # # https://github.com/L1so/benchy # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # 18 Jul 2023 15:04 UTC # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Server Insight Hardware Information --------------------- --------------------- OS : Ubuntu 22.04.2 LTS Model : Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6248R CPU @ 3.00GHz Location : Netherlands Core : 2 @ 2992.968 MHz Kernel : 5.15.0-76-generic AES-NI : ✔ Enabled Uptime : 0 days, 1 hrs, 36 mins, 32 secs VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled Virt : kvm Swap : 0.0 KiB Disk & Memory Usage Network Information --------------------- --------------------- Disk (1) : 40.7 GiB ASN : AS212477 Disk Usage : 2.5 GiB (6% Used) ISP : RoyaleHosting BV Mem : 3.8 GiB IPv4 : ✔ Enabled Mem Usage : 0.2 GiB (4% Used) IPv6 : ❌ Disabled Ookla Network Speedtest (Region: Europe) +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Provider | Location | Download | Upload | Data Used | Latency | +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | TestDebit | Marseille, FR | 865.6 Mb/s | 1.1 Gb/s | 2.4 GB | 19.1 ms | | Vancis | Amsterdam, NL | 1.0 Gb/s | 951.0 Mb/s | 1.9 GB | 1.7 ms | | Vox | London, GB | 1.0 Gb/s | 1.1 Gb/s | 1.6 GB | 6.7 ms | | Skynet | Warsaw, PL | 1.0 Gb/s | 1.0 Gb/s | 3.2 GB | 22.8 ms | | Vodafone | Milan, IT | 862.5 Mb/s | 1.1 Gb/s | 2.3 GB | 23.0 ms | +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ Network Performance Test (Region: Europe) +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Prot. | Provider | Location | Send | Receive | Latency | +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | IPv4 | FiberBy | Copenhagen, DK | 1.0 Gb/s | 858.4 Mb/s | 14.5 ms | | | WOBCOM | Wolfsburg, DE | 1.0 Gb/s | 909.5 Mb/s | 11.3 ms | | | Novogara | Amsterdam, NL | 1.1 Gb/s | 822.7 Mb/s | 1.1 ms | | | Sasag | Schaff, CH | 1.1 Gb/s | 845.5 Mb/s | 13.0 ms | | | Alwyzon | Vienna, AT | 1.1 Gb/s | 800.8 Mb/s | 18.4 ms | +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ |
| 4 |
PassMark
|
Jul 18, 2023 15:04 |
View Raw OutputPassMark PerformanceTest Linux Intel Xeon Gold 6248R CPU @ 3.00GHz (x86_64) 2 cores @ 0 MHz | 3.8 GiB RAM Number of Processes: 2 | Test Iterations: 2 | Test Duration: Very Long - CPU Mark: 3442 Integer Math 8637 Million Operations/s Floating Point Math 6153 Million Operations/s Prime Numbers 27.3 Million Primes/s Sorting 5487 Thousand Strings/s Encryption 1115 MB/s Compression 43992 KB/s CPU Single Threaded 2156 Million Operations/s Physics 465 Frames/s Extended Instructions (SSE) 2858 Million Matrices/s Memory Mark: 1392 Database Operations 1362 Thousand Operations/s Memory Read Cached 25070 MB/s Memory Read Uncached 5908 MB/s Memory Write 6059 MB/s Available RAM 2999 Megabytes Memory Latency 59 Nanoseconds Memory Threaded 11776 MB/s |
| 5 |
UnixBench
|
Jul 18, 2023 15:41 |
View Raw Output------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Tue Jul 18 2023 15:41:37 - 16:09:37
2 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 45118758.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 7692.9 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 3968.2 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1502730.1 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 411879.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 4040932.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 2314404.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 59790.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 8422.9 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 12157.9 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 2605.2 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 2312494.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 45118758.3 3866.2
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 7692.9 1398.7
Execl Throughput 43.0 3968.2 922.8
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 1502730.1 3794.8
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 411879.9 2488.7
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 4040932.4 6967.1
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 2314404.1 1860.5
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 59790.2 149.5
Process Creation 126.0 8422.9 668.5
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 12157.9 2867.4
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 2605.2 4342.0
System Call Overhead 15000.0 2312494.4 1541.7
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 1801.9
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Tue Jul 18 2023 16:09:37 - 16:37:37
2 CPUs in system; running 2 parallel copies of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 89931796.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 15367.1 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 6739.0 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 2994291.3 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 825882.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 6905233.1 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 4629181.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 510618.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 19717.4 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 18819.8 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 2658.3 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 4615970.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 89931796.5 7706.2
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 15367.1 2794.0
Execl Throughput 43.0 6739.0 1567.2
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 2994291.3 7561.3
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 825882.0 4990.2
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 6905233.1 11905.6
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 4629181.3 3721.2
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 510618.6 1276.5
Process Creation 126.0 19717.4 1564.9
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 18819.8 4438.6
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 2658.3 4430.5
System Call Overhead 15000.0 4615970.1 3077.3
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 3710.9
|
Onidel Cloud VPS
Performance-first cloud hosting for teams that need consistent benchmarks and transparent pricing.
- 99.99% uptime SLA
- Proven availability for critical workloads
- Plans from $4.95/month
- Predictable pricing and simple scaling
- AMD EPYC + NVMe stack
- Modern hardware with built-in DDoS protection
- 5 global regions
- Singapore, Sydney, Amsterdam, Ho Chi Minh City, more coming soon
Ideal for: demanding SaaS workloads, managed hosting agencies, and teams migrating off legacy VPS providers.
Launch faster with concierge onboarding
Start 14-day TrialCPU Performance (Geekbench)
CPU benchmarks measure processing power for compute-intensive tasks. Learn how we test CPU performance.
I/O Speed Summary (dd)
IOPS Performance by Block Size
Combined IOPS Performance
Total IOPS across all block sizes (4K, 64K, 512K, 1M)
FIO Benchmark Details
Detailed I/O performance test results
Test 1 - Block Size: 4k (mixed_rw_50_50)
Test 2 - Block Size: 64k (mixed_rw_50_50)
Test 3 - Block Size: 512k (mixed_rw_50_50)
Test 4 - Block Size: 1m (mixed_rw_50_50)
Detailed I/O Benchmark (FIO)
IOPS Performance by Block Size
Bandwidth Performance by Block Size
Detailed Test Results
| Block Size | Read IOPS | Write IOPS | Read MB/s | Write MB/s |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4k | 91,400 | 91,600 | 365.8 | 366.8 |
| 64k | 8,100 | 8,100 | 522.0 | 524.7 |
| 512k | 972 | 1,000 | 498.0 | 524.5 |
| 1m | 480 | 512 | 491.7 | 524.4 |
Related Resources
Browse More Benchmarks
Explore comprehensive VPS benchmarks across providers and locations.
Compare Providers
View aggregated performance metrics across all VPS providers.
Performance Dashboard
Access real-time statistics, top performers, and latest results.
Testing Methodology
Learn about our comprehensive testing procedures and tools.
Understanding VPS Benchmark Results
This comprehensive benchmark report provides detailed performance analysis for RoyaleHosting Intel Xeon Gold 2 Core 4 GB Ram NL VPS in Netherlands. Our standardized testing methodology measures CPU performance, disk I/O operations, network bandwidth, and real-world application performance to give you complete insights into VPS capabilities. Browse more VPS benchmarks to compare performance across providers.
Each benchmark metric serves a specific purpose in evaluating VPS performance. CPU benchmarks reveal processing power for applications, disk I/O tests measure storage performance for databases and file operations, network tests show bandwidth capacity for content delivery, and application benchmarks demonstrate real-world hosting performance. Together, these metrics provide a complete performance profile. Use our VPS comparison tool to analyze multiple plans side-by-side.
Benchmark Metrics & Features
Performance Analysis Use Cases
- Evaluating VPS CPU performance for compute-intensive applications
- Testing disk I/O performance for database workloads
- Comparing VPS performance across different providers
- Analyzing WordPress site performance on specific VPS plans
- Assessing value-for-money based on performance and pricing
- Checking real-world application performance metrics
- Understanding geographic performance variations by location
- Reviewing detailed benchmark metrics before VPS purchase
- Comparing single-core vs multi-core CPU performance
- Validating provider performance claims with actual data
- Making informed hosting decisions based on comprehensive benchmarks
How to Interpret Benchmark Results
1. CPU Performance (Geekbench)
Geekbench measures CPU performance through single-core and multi-core scores. Single-core scores (typically 800-2000) indicate performance for single-threaded applications and general responsiveness. Multi-core scores (1500-8000) show performance when all CPU cores are utilized for parallel processing. Higher scores mean better performance. Visit our testing methodology to learn more about CPU benchmarks.
2. Disk I/O Performance (FIO)
FIO benchmarks measure disk performance through IOPS (Input/Output Operations Per Second) and bandwidth (MB/s). High IOPS (10,000+ for NVMe, 5,000-10,000 for SSD) is crucial for database workloads with many small operations. High bandwidth is important for large file transfers and media applications. Compare disk performance across different providers in our database.
3. Application Performance
Real-world application benchmarks (WordPress, UnixBench) show how the VPS handles typical web workloads including PHP processing, database queries, and static file serving. These results measured in requests per second and page load times directly apply to web hosting scenarios. Need help choosing the right VPS? Visit about us to learn more about VPSMetrics.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I interpret the Geekbench single-core and multi-core scores?
Geekbench single-core scores indicate CPU performance for single-threaded applications, important for general responsiveness and web applications. Multi-core scores show performance when all CPU cores are utilized, crucial for parallel processing and multi-threaded applications. Higher scores indicate better performance. Modern VPS typically score 800-2000 (single) and 1500-8000 (multi) depending on the plan.
What do IOPS numbers mean in disk I/O benchmarks?
IOPS (Input/Output Operations Per Second) measures how many read/write operations your disk can handle per second. Higher IOPS means better performance for database operations and applications with many small file operations. NVMe SSD VPS typically delivers 10,000+ IOPS, while traditional SSD offers 5,000-10,000 IOPS.
What is UnixBench and why does it matter?
UnixBench is a comprehensive system-level benchmark suite that tests various aspects of Unix-like system performance including process creation, file operations, and system calls. It provides a holistic view of overall system performance beyond just CPU or disk metrics. Higher UnixBench scores indicate better overall system efficiency.
How reliable are WordPress benchmark results?
WordPress benchmarks provide real-world application performance metrics by testing actual WordPress installations. These results show how the VPS handles typical web application workloads including PHP processing, database queries, and static file serving. Results are measured in requests per second and page load times, directly applicable to web hosting scenarios.
Can I trust these benchmark results for my use case?
Our benchmarks provide standardized, reproducible test results using industry-standard tools. While they offer excellent performance indicators, your actual experience may vary based on your specific workload, application optimization, and usage patterns. Use these benchmarks as a reliable starting point for comparison between providers.
Why do benchmark results vary by location?
Different data center locations may have different hardware configurations, CPU generations, storage types, and network infrastructure. Providers often upgrade facilities at different rates across regions. Location-specific benchmarks help you choose a VPS in the right region with the best performance for your target audience.
Making Informed VPS Decisions
Use these comprehensive benchmark results to make data-driven hosting decisions. Compare multiple metrics together rather than focusing on a single aspect - a balanced VPS performs well across CPU, disk, and network benchmarks. Consider your specific workload requirements: CPU-intensive applications need high Geekbench scores, database-heavy applications require high IOPS, and content delivery services benefit from high network bandwidth.
Our benchmarks provide standardized, reproducible test results using industry-standard tools. While they offer excellent performance indicators, your actual experience may vary based on specific workload patterns and application optimization. Use these benchmarks as a reliable starting point for comparison between providers and configurations.
Compare More VPS Options
Explore additional benchmarks, compare multiple VPS plans side-by-side, and discover the best performing options for your specific requirements and budget.