ReviveHost - Intel Core i9 - 2 Core 4 GB Ram US
Comprehensive VPS benchmark results from USA tested on May 13, 2023. Learn our methodology.
System Specifications
Additional Benchmarks
UnixBench
System Performance Index
WordPress Bench
Web Application Performance
Benchmark Steps
| # | Suite | Run At | Raw Output |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Bench
|
May 13, 2023 13:33 |
View Raw Output-------------------- A Bench.sh Script By Teddysun ------------------- Version : v2022-06-01 Usage : wget -qO- bench.sh | bash ---------------------------------------------------------------------- CPU Model : Intel(R) Core(TM) i9-7980XE CPU @ 2.60GHz CPU Cores : 2 @ 2591.998 MHz CPU Cache : 25344 KB AES-NI : Enabled VM-x/AMD-V : Disabled Total Disk : 77.7 GB (3.7 GB Used) Total Mem : 3.8 GB (99.5 MB Used) Total Swap : 1024.0 MB (0 Used) System uptime : 0 days, 0 hour 10 min Load average : 0.07, 0.03, 0.01 OS : Ubuntu 20.04.6 LTS Arch : x86_64 (64 Bit) Kernel : 5.4.0-148-generic TCP CC : bbr Virtualization : KVM Organization : AS31916 ReviveHost Location : Miami / US Region : Florida ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I/O Speed(1st run) : 1.7 GB/s I/O Speed(2nd run) : 1.7 GB/s I/O Speed(3rd run) : 1.7 GB/s I/O Speed(average) : 1740.8 MB/s ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Node Name Upload Speed Download Speed Latency Speedtest.net 195.69 Mbps 200.79 Mbps 107.76 ms Los Angeles, US 199.69 Mbps 188.44 Mbps 74.39 ms Dallas, US 200.14 Mbps 183.23 Mbps 76.79 ms Montreal, CA 200.96 Mbps 169.58 Mbps 100.52 ms Paris, FR 190.45 Mbps 195.60 Mbps 110.60 ms Amsterdam, NL 194.42 Mbps 188.38 Mbps 115.28 ms Shanghai, CN 102.63 Mbps 193.88 Mbps 279.50 ms Guangzhou, CN 9.05 Mbps 84.51 Mbps 223.33 ms Hongkong, CN 5.39 Mbps 5.41 Mbps 284.46 ms Singapore, SG 125.34 Mbps 188.81 Mbps 247.86 ms Tokyo, JP 158.66 Mbps 196.12 Mbps 167.18 ms ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Finished in : 5 min 52 sec Timestamp : 2023-05-13 13:33:04 CEST ---------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| 2 |
Benchy
|
May 13, 2023 14:10 |
View Raw Output# # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Benchy v2.6 # # https://github.com/L1so/benchy # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # 13 May 2023 14:10 CEST # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Server Insight Hardware Information --------------------- --------------------- OS : Ubuntu 20.04.6 LTS Model : Intel(R) Core(TM) i9-7980XE CPU @ 2.60GHz Location : United States Core : 2 @ 2591.998 MHz Kernel : 5.4.0-148-generic AES-NI : ✔ Enabled Uptime : 0 days, 0 hrs, 13 mins, 59 secs VM-x/AMD-V : ❌ Disabled Virt : kvm Swap : 1024.0 MiB Disk & Memory Usage Network Information --------------------- --------------------- Disk (1) : 77.7 GiB ASN : AS20473 Disk Usage : 3.8 GiB (5% Used) ISP : The Constant Company, LLC Mem : 3.8 GiB IPv4 : ❌ Disabled Mem Usage : 0.1 GiB (3% Used) IPv6 : ❌ Disabled Ookla Network Speedtest (Region: North America) +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Provider | Location | Download | Upload | Data Used | Latency | +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Comcast | Houston, US | 180.3 Mb/s | 168.8 Mb/s | 0.5 GB | 41.4 ms | | Spectrum | New York, US | 180.2 Mb/s | 183.8 Mb/s | 0.7 GB | 48.3 ms | | Telus | Edmonton, CA | 178.1 Mb/s | 145.6 Mb/s | 0.4 GB | 94.2 ms | | Airstream | Wisconsin, US | 179.4 Mb/s | 176.4 Mb/s | 0.4 GB | 68.2 ms | | Hivelocity | Dallas, US | 163.3 Mb/s | 184.4 Mb/s | 0.4 GB | 46.9 ms | +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ Network Performance Test (Region: North America) +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Prot. | Provider | Location | Send | Receive | Latency | +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | IPv4 | Airstream | Wisconsin, US | 195.1 Mb/s | 175.1 Mb/s | 73.9 ms | | | Clouvider | Dallas, US | 186.8 Mb/s | 195.1 Mb/s | 40.9 ms | | | Clouvider | Phoenix, US | 193.2 Mb/s | 186.3 Mb/s | 65.3 ms | | | Clouvider | Los Angeles, US | 195.1 Mb/s | 171.2 Mb/s | 69.5 ms | +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ |
| 3 |
PassMark
|
May 13, 2023 14:10 |
View Raw OutputPassMark PerformanceTest Linux Intel Core i9-7980XE CPU @ 2.60GHz (x86_64) 2 cores @ 2591 MHz | 3.8 GiB RAM Number of Processes: 2 | Test Iterations: 2 | Test Duration: Very Long -------------------------------------------------------------------------- CPU Mark: 3696 Integer Math 8939 Million Operations/s Floating Point Math 7477 Million Operations/s Prime Numbers 27.9 Million Primes/s Sorting 5598 Thousand Strings/s Encryption 1153 MB/s Compression 45723 KB/s CPU Single Threaded 2319 Million Operations/s Physics 468 Frames/s Extended Instructions (SSE) 3519 Million Matrices/s Memory Mark: 1762 Database Operations 1620 Thousand Operations/s Memory Read Cached 26512 MB/s Memory Read Uncached 10334 MB/s Memory Write 12676 MB/s Available RAM 2791 Megabytes Memory Latency 58 Nanoseconds Memory Threaded 19872 MB/s -------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| 4 |
Speedtest Global
|
May 13, 2023 16:33 |
View Raw Output---------------------------- network-speed.xyz ----------------------------
A simple script to test network performance using speedtest-cli
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Version : v2023.05.12
Global Speedtest : wget -qO- network-speed.xyz | bash
Region Speedtest : wget -qO- network-speed.xyz | bash -s -- -r <region>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Basic System Info
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
CPU Model : Intel(R) Core(TM) i9-7980XE CPU @ 2.60GHz
CPU Cores : 2 @ 2591.998 MHz
CPU Cache : 25344 KB
AES-NI : ✔ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ❌ Disabled
Total Disk : 77.7 GB (3.7 GB Used)
Total RAM : 3.8 GB (103.5 MB Used)
Total Swap : 1024.0 MB (0 Used)
System uptime : 0 days, 0 hour 20 min
Load average : 0.00, 0.04, 0.01
OS : Ubuntu 20.04.6 LTS
Arch : x86_64 (64 Bit)
Kernel : 5.4.0-148-generic
Virtualization : KVM
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Basic Network Info
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Primary Network : IPv4
ISP : The Constant Company, LLC
ASN : AS20473 The Constant Company, LLC
Host : ReviveHost
Location : Miami, Florida-FL, United States
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Speedtest.net (Region: GLOBAL)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Location Latency Loss DL Speed UP Speed Server
ISP: Choopa, LLC
Nearest 103.20 ms 0.8% 186.89 Mbps 195.78 Mbps Custodian DataCentre - Maidstone
Kochi, IN 266.18 ms 0.0% 185.28 Mbps 140.27 Mbps Asianet Broadband - Cochin
Bangalore, IN 270.92 ms 0.0% 180.76 Mbps 127.48 Mbps Bharti Airtel Ltd - Bangalore
Chennai, IN 256.26 ms N/A 192.15 Mbps 155.63 Mbps Jio - Chennai
Mumbai, IN 255.38 ms 0.0% 193.35 Mbps 130.64 Mbps i3D.net - Mumbai
Delhi, IN 307.18 ms 0.0% 184.29 Mbps 124.39 Mbps Tata Play Fiber - New Delhi
Los Angeles, US 67.45 ms 0.0% 190.84 Mbps 199.05 Mbps ReliableSite Hosting - Los Angeles, CA
Dallas, US 38.23 ms 0.0% 190.21 Mbps 198.22 Mbps Hivelocity - Dallas, TX
New York, US 36.69 ms 0.0% 188.74 Mbps 197.79 Mbps Clouvider Ltd - New York, NY
Seattle, US 84.28 ms N/A 188.81 Mbps 197.21 Mbps Comcast - Seattle, WA
Miami, US 52.02 ms 0.0% 190.48 Mbps 200.40 Mbps AT&T - Miami, FL
Toronto, CA 49.26 ms 0.5% 190.84 Mbps 199.97 Mbps Rogers - Toronto, ON
Paris, FR 118.17 ms 0.0% 194.63 Mbps 199.78 Mbps ORANGE FRANCE - Paris
Amsterdam, NL 107.87 ms 0.0% 184.53 Mbps 194.90 Mbps Clouvider Ltd - Amsterdam
Warsaw, PL 143.16 ms 0.0% 191.98 Mbps 179.26 Mbps UPC Polska - Warszawa
London, UK 103.41 ms 0.0% 200.41 Mbps 201.92 Mbps VeloxServ Communications - London
Frankfurt, DE 123.82 ms 0.0% 193.32 Mbps 193.26 Mbps 23M GmbH - Frankfurt Am Main
Dubai, AE 284.84 ms 0.0% 201.56 Mbps 116.64 Mbps du - Dubai
Fujairah, AE 324.09 ms 0.0% 211.14 Mbps 127.56 Mbps ETISALAT-UAE - Fujairah
Jeddah, KSA 182.35 ms 0.0% 193.70 Mbps 176.55 Mbps Saudi Telecom Company
Shanghai, CU-CN 282.06 ms N/A 176.52 Mbps 71.22 Mbps China Unicom 5G - ShangHai
Nanjing, CT-CN FAILED
Hong Kong, HKG 259.59 ms N/A 197.43 Mbps 110.44 Mbps STC - Hong Kong
Singapore, SG 253.09 ms 0.0% 194.27 Mbps 133.45 Mbps i3D.net - Singapore
Jakarta, ID 290.84 ms 0.3% 194.77 Mbps 88.79 Mbps PT Indosat Tbk - Jakarta
Tokyo, JP 167.82 ms N/A 194.74 Mbps 165.17 Mbps fdcservers.net - Tokyo
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Avg DL Speed : 191.67 Mbps
Avg UL Speed : 161.03 Mbps
Total DL Data : 6.82 GB
Total UL Data : 5.52 GB
Total Data : 12.35 GB
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Duration : 13 min 6 sec
System Time : 13/05/2023 - 16:33:21 CEST
Total Script Runs : 2319
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Result : https://cdn1.frocdn.ch/k1xBErCrU9DHFcc.txt
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| 5 |
UnixBench
|
May 13, 2023 16:44 |
View Raw Output------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Sat May 13 2023 16:41:03 - 17:09:03
2 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 47252990.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 8020.3 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 3572.6 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 485326.2 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 125183.6 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1647530.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 601557.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 79572.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 9504.5 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 10591.2 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 2151.3 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 335149.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 47252990.5 4049.1
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 8020.3 1458.2
Execl Throughput 43.0 3572.6 830.8
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 485326.2 1225.6
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 125183.6 756.4
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1647530.5 2840.6
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 601557.8 483.6
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 79572.6 198.9
Process Creation 126.0 9504.5 754.3
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 10591.2 2497.9
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 2151.3 3585.5
System Call Overhead 15000.0 335149.7 223.4
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 1053.8
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Sat May 13 2023 17:09:03 - 17:37:04
2 CPUs in system; running 2 parallel copies of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 93739785.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 15970.8 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 6536.2 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 887885.7 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 230175.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 2852900.3 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 1184981.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 292802.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 15885.5 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 14498.4 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 2197.5 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 660420.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 93739785.3 8032.5
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 15970.8 2903.8
Execl Throughput 43.0 6536.2 1520.0
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 887885.7 2242.1
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 230175.9 1390.8
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 2852900.3 4918.8
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1184981.6 952.6
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 292802.7 732.0
Process Creation 126.0 15885.5 1260.8
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 14498.4 3419.4
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 2197.5 3662.5
System Call Overhead 15000.0 660420.8 440.3
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 1927.9
|
Onidel Cloud VPS
Performance-first cloud hosting for teams that need consistent benchmarks and transparent pricing.
- 99.99% uptime SLA
- Proven availability for critical workloads
- Plans from $4.95/month
- Predictable pricing and simple scaling
- AMD EPYC + NVMe stack
- Modern hardware with built-in DDoS protection
- 5 global regions
- Singapore, Sydney, Amsterdam, Ho Chi Minh City, more coming soon
Ideal for: demanding SaaS workloads, managed hosting agencies, and teams migrating off legacy VPS providers.
Launch faster with concierge onboarding
Start 14-day TrialCPU Performance (Geekbench)
CPU benchmarks measure processing power for compute-intensive tasks. Learn how we test CPU performance.
I/O Speed Summary (dd)
IOPS Performance by Block Size
Combined IOPS Performance
Total IOPS across all block sizes (4K, 64K, 512K, 1M)
FIO Benchmark Details
Detailed I/O performance test results
Test 1 - Block Size: 4k (mixed_rw_50_50)
Test 2 - Block Size: 64k (mixed_rw_50_50)
Test 3 - Block Size: 512k (mixed_rw_50_50)
Test 4 - Block Size: 1m (mixed_rw_50_50)
Detailed I/O Benchmark (FIO)
IOPS Performance by Block Size
Bandwidth Performance by Block Size
Detailed Test Results
| Block Size | Read IOPS | Write IOPS | Read MB/s | Write MB/s |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4k | 70,300 | 70,500 | 281.5 | 282.3 |
| 64k | 6,000 | 6,000 | 386.3 | 388.3 |
| 512k | 1,300 | 1,400 | 696.5 | 733.5 |
| 1m | 903 | 963 | 925.5 | 987.1 |
Related Resources
Browse More Benchmarks
Explore comprehensive VPS benchmarks across providers and locations.
Compare Providers
View aggregated performance metrics across all VPS providers.
Performance Dashboard
Access real-time statistics, top performers, and latest results.
Testing Methodology
Learn about our comprehensive testing procedures and tools.
Understanding VPS Benchmark Results
This comprehensive benchmark report provides detailed performance analysis for ReviveHost Intel Core i9 - 2 Core 4 GB Ram US VPS in USA. Our standardized testing methodology measures CPU performance, disk I/O operations, network bandwidth, and real-world application performance to give you complete insights into VPS capabilities. Browse more VPS benchmarks to compare performance across providers.
Each benchmark metric serves a specific purpose in evaluating VPS performance. CPU benchmarks reveal processing power for applications, disk I/O tests measure storage performance for databases and file operations, network tests show bandwidth capacity for content delivery, and application benchmarks demonstrate real-world hosting performance. Together, these metrics provide a complete performance profile. Use our VPS comparison tool to analyze multiple plans side-by-side.
Benchmark Metrics & Features
Performance Analysis Use Cases
- Evaluating VPS CPU performance for compute-intensive applications
- Testing disk I/O performance for database workloads
- Comparing VPS performance across different providers
- Analyzing WordPress site performance on specific VPS plans
- Assessing value-for-money based on performance and pricing
- Checking real-world application performance metrics
- Understanding geographic performance variations by location
- Reviewing detailed benchmark metrics before VPS purchase
- Comparing single-core vs multi-core CPU performance
- Validating provider performance claims with actual data
- Making informed hosting decisions based on comprehensive benchmarks
How to Interpret Benchmark Results
1. CPU Performance (Geekbench)
Geekbench measures CPU performance through single-core and multi-core scores. Single-core scores (typically 800-2000) indicate performance for single-threaded applications and general responsiveness. Multi-core scores (1500-8000) show performance when all CPU cores are utilized for parallel processing. Higher scores mean better performance. Visit our testing methodology to learn more about CPU benchmarks.
2. Disk I/O Performance (FIO)
FIO benchmarks measure disk performance through IOPS (Input/Output Operations Per Second) and bandwidth (MB/s). High IOPS (10,000+ for NVMe, 5,000-10,000 for SSD) is crucial for database workloads with many small operations. High bandwidth is important for large file transfers and media applications. Compare disk performance across different providers in our database.
3. Application Performance
Real-world application benchmarks (WordPress, UnixBench) show how the VPS handles typical web workloads including PHP processing, database queries, and static file serving. These results measured in requests per second and page load times directly apply to web hosting scenarios. Need help choosing the right VPS? Visit about us to learn more about VPSMetrics.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I interpret the Geekbench single-core and multi-core scores?
Geekbench single-core scores indicate CPU performance for single-threaded applications, important for general responsiveness and web applications. Multi-core scores show performance when all CPU cores are utilized, crucial for parallel processing and multi-threaded applications. Higher scores indicate better performance. Modern VPS typically score 800-2000 (single) and 1500-8000 (multi) depending on the plan.
What do IOPS numbers mean in disk I/O benchmarks?
IOPS (Input/Output Operations Per Second) measures how many read/write operations your disk can handle per second. Higher IOPS means better performance for database operations and applications with many small file operations. NVMe SSD VPS typically delivers 10,000+ IOPS, while traditional SSD offers 5,000-10,000 IOPS.
What is UnixBench and why does it matter?
UnixBench is a comprehensive system-level benchmark suite that tests various aspects of Unix-like system performance including process creation, file operations, and system calls. It provides a holistic view of overall system performance beyond just CPU or disk metrics. Higher UnixBench scores indicate better overall system efficiency.
How reliable are WordPress benchmark results?
WordPress benchmarks provide real-world application performance metrics by testing actual WordPress installations. These results show how the VPS handles typical web application workloads including PHP processing, database queries, and static file serving. Results are measured in requests per second and page load times, directly applicable to web hosting scenarios.
Can I trust these benchmark results for my use case?
Our benchmarks provide standardized, reproducible test results using industry-standard tools. While they offer excellent performance indicators, your actual experience may vary based on your specific workload, application optimization, and usage patterns. Use these benchmarks as a reliable starting point for comparison between providers.
Why do benchmark results vary by location?
Different data center locations may have different hardware configurations, CPU generations, storage types, and network infrastructure. Providers often upgrade facilities at different rates across regions. Location-specific benchmarks help you choose a VPS in the right region with the best performance for your target audience.
Making Informed VPS Decisions
Use these comprehensive benchmark results to make data-driven hosting decisions. Compare multiple metrics together rather than focusing on a single aspect - a balanced VPS performs well across CPU, disk, and network benchmarks. Consider your specific workload requirements: CPU-intensive applications need high Geekbench scores, database-heavy applications require high IOPS, and content delivery services benefit from high network bandwidth.
Our benchmarks provide standardized, reproducible test results using industry-standard tools. While they offer excellent performance indicators, your actual experience may vary based on specific workload patterns and application optimization. Use these benchmarks as a reliable starting point for comparison between providers and configurations.
Compare More VPS Options
Explore additional benchmarks, compare multiple VPS plans side-by-side, and discover the best performing options for your specific requirements and budget.