PQ Hosting - Intel Xeon 2 Core 2 GB Ram IE
Comprehensive VPS benchmark results from Ireland tested on Sep 19, 2025. Learn our methodology.
System Specifications
Additional Benchmarks
UnixBench
System Performance Index
WordPress Bench
Web Application Performance
Benchmark Steps
| # | Suite | Run At | Raw Output |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Bench
|
Apr 02, 2023 16:38 |
View Raw Output-------------------- A Bench.sh Script By Teddysun ------------------- Version : v2022-06-01 Usage : wget -qO- bench.sh | bash ---------------------------------------------------------------------- CPU Model : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2697A v4 @ 2.60GHz CPU Cores : 2 @ 2596.990 MHz CPU Cache : 16384 KB AES-NI : Enabled VM-x/AMD-V : Disabled Total Disk : 29.4 GB (3.9 GB Used) Total Mem : 1.9 GB (82.5 MB Used) Total Swap : 228.4 MB (4.3 MB Used) System uptime : 0 days, 1 hour 25 min Load average : 0.09, 0.55, 1.04 OS : Ubuntu 20.04.6 LTS Arch : x86_64 (64 Bit) Kernel : 5.4.0-146-generic TCP CC : bbr Virtualization : KVM Organization : AS44477 STARK INDUSTRIES SOLUTIONS LTD Location : Dublin / IE Region : Leinster ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I/O Speed(1st run) : 445 MB/s I/O Speed(2nd run) : 447 MB/s I/O Speed(3rd run) : 449 MB/s I/O Speed(average) : 447.0 MB/s ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Node Name Upload Speed Download Speed Latency Speedtest.net 2670.67 Mbps 1921.71 Mbps 1.36 ms Los Angeles, US 577.28 Mbps 1194.75 Mbps 132.28 ms Dallas, US 643.38 Mbps 2030.25 Mbps 106.49 ms Montreal, CA 512.96 Mbps 906.12 Mbps 78.95 ms Paris, FR 2334.46 Mbps 2197.39 Mbps 21.17 ms Amsterdam, NL 2323.17 Mbps 1729.55 Mbps 17.24 ms Shanghai, CN 140.55 Mbps 1009.07 Mbps 202.93 ms Nanjing, CN 310.78 Mbps 1544.77 Mbps 220.53 ms Hongkong, CN 350.47 Mbps 1593.68 Mbps 196.38 ms Singapore, SG 289.22 Mbps 285.82 Mbps 224.75 ms Tokyo, JP 353.10 Mbps 1132.90 Mbps 213.83 ms ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Finished in : 5 min 28 sec Timestamp : 2023-04-02 16:38:32 IST ---------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| 2 |
Benchy
|
Apr 02, 2023 17:22 |
View Raw Output# # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Benchy v2.6 # # https://github.com/L1so/benchy # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # 02 Apr 2023 17:22 IST # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Server Insight Hardware Information --------------------- --------------------- OS : Ubuntu 20.04.6 LTS Model : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2697A v4 @ 2.60GH Location : Ireland Core : 2 @ 2596.990 MHz Kernel : 5.4.0-146-generic AES-NI : Enabled Uptime : 0 days, 2 hrs, 15 mins, 24 secs VM-x/AMD-V : Disabled Virt : KVM Swap : 228.4 MiB Disk & Memory Usage Network Information --------------------- --------------------- Disk (1) : 29.4 GiB ASN : AS44477 Disk Usage : 3.9 GiB (13% Used) ISP : STARK INDUSTRIES SOLUTIONS LTD Mem : 1.9 GiB IPv4 : Enabled Mem Usage : 0.1 GiB (4% Used) IPv6 : Disabled Ookla Network Speedtest (Region: Europe) +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Provider | Location | Download | Upload | Data Used | Latency | +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | TestDebit | Marseille, FR | 2.0 Gb/s | 1.8 Gb/s | 4.1 GB | 28.9 ms | | Vancis | Amsterdam, NL | 1.4 Gb/s | 1.0 Gb/s | 2.8 GB | 17.3 ms | | CoreIX | London, GB | 869.2 Mb/s | 921.0 Mb/s | 2.7 GB | 12.3 ms | | Skynet | Warsaw, PL | 1.1 Gb/s | 1.5 Gb/s | 3.8 GB | 31.9 ms | | Vodafone | Milan, IT | 2.2 Gb/s | 1.4 Gb/s | 5.9 GB | 32.6 ms | +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ Network Performance Test (Region: Europe) +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Prot. | Provider | Location | Send | Receive | Latency | +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | IPv4 | FiberBy | Copenhagen, DK | 2.3 Gb/s | 1.3 Gb/s | 25.8 ms | | | WOBCOM | Wolfsburg, DE | 2.2 Gb/s | 2.2 Gb/s | 26.4 ms | | | Novogara | Amsterdam, NL | 2.8 Gb/s | 610.3 Mb/s | 14.9 ms | | | Sasag | Schaff, CH | 2.2 Gb/s | 969.2 Mb/s | 34.9 ms | | | Alwyzon | Vienna, AT | 2.1 Gb/s | 1.2 Gb/s | 32.1 ms | +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ |
| 3 |
PassMark
|
Apr 02, 2023 17:22 |
View Raw OutputPassMark PerformanceTest Linux Intel Xeon CPU E5-2697A v4 @ 2.60GHz (x86_64) 2 cores @ 2596 MHz | 1.9 GiB RAM Number of Processes: 2 | Test Iterations: 3 | Test Duration: Very Long -------------------------------------------------------------------------- CPU Mark: 1731 Integer Math 5329 Million Operations/s Floating Point Math 3768 Million Operations/s Prime Numbers 9.4 Million Primes/s Sorting 3355 Thousand Strings/s Encryption 477 MB/s Compression 21870 KB/s CPU Single Threaded 1182 Million Operations/s Physics 172 Frames/s Extended Instructions (SSE) 1287 Million Matrices/s Memory Mark: 973 Database Operations 747 Thousand Operations/s Memory Read Cached 13470 MB/s Memory Read Uncached 5993 MB/s Memory Write 5071 MB/s Available RAM 1558 Megabytes Memory Latency 92 Nanoseconds Memory Threaded 11514 MB/s -------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| 4 |
Speedtest Global
|
Sep 19, 2025 08:03 |
View Raw Output---------------------------- network-speed.xyz ----------------------------
A simple script to test network performance using speedtest-cli
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Version : v2023.03.25
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Basic System Info
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
CPU Model : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2697A v4 @ 2.60GHz
CPU Cores : 2 @ 2596.990 MHz
CPU Cache : 16384 KB
AES-NI : ߅nabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ߄isabled
Total Disk : 29.4 GB (3.9 GB Used)
Total RAM : 1.9 GB (84.5 MB Used)
Total Swap : 228.4 MB (4.3 MB Used)
System uptime : 0 days, 1 hour 35 min
Load average : 0.20, 0.35, 0.70
OS : Ubuntu 20.04.6 LTS
Arch : x86_64 (64 Bit)
Kernel : 5.4.0-146-generic
Virtualization : KVM
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Basic Network Info
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Primary Network : IPv4
ISP : Stark Industries Solutions LTD
ASN : AS44477 STARK INDUSTRIES SOLUTIONS LTD
Host : Stark Industries Solutions LTD
Location : Dublin, Leinster-L, Ireland
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Speedtest.net
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Location Latency Loss DL Speed UP Speed Server
ISP: Stark Industries Solutions Ltd
Nearest 1.12 ms 0.0% 804.77 Mbps 797.05 Mbps IP Telecom - Dublin
Kochi, IN 164.30 ms 0.3% 1286.72 Mbps 413.77 Mbps Asianet Broadband - Cochin
Bangalore, IN FAILED
Chennai, IN 150.04 ms N/A 1854.33 Mbps 448.69 Mbps Jio - Chennai
Mumbai, IN 128.72 ms 0.0% 1172.82 Mbps 509.76 Mbps i3D.net - Mumbai
Delhi, IN 185.32 ms 0.0% 1776.06 Mbps 391.30 Mbps Tata Play Fiber - New Delhi
Los Angeles, US 119.87 ms 0.0% 1568.58 Mbps 595.50 Mbps ReliableSite Hosting - Los Angeles, CA
Dallas, US 98.18 ms 0.0% 947.82 Mbps 700.18 Mbps Hivelocity - Dallas, TX
New York, US 62.31 ms 0.0% 1173.49 Mbps 974.86 Mbps Clouvider Ltd - New York, NY
Seattle, US 151.92 ms N/A 966.00 Mbps 475.63 Mbps Comcast - Seattle, WA
Miami, US 152.35 ms 0.3% 1015.04 Mbps 468.63 Mbps AT&T - Miami, FL
Toronto, CA 75.19 ms 0.0% 1463.58 Mbps 846.91 Mbps Rogers - Toronto, ON
Paris, FR 21.14 ms 0.0% 1788.48 Mbps 2250.72 Mbps ORANGE FRANCE - Paris
Amsterdam, NL 19.02 ms 0.0% 850.03 Mbps 1986.68 Mbps Clouvider Ltd - Amsterdam
Warsaw, PL 38.85 ms 0.0% 1335.95 Mbps 1410.23 Mbps UPC Polska - Warszawa
London, UK 11.08 ms 0.0% 2011.94 Mbps 2624.87 Mbps VeloxServ Communications - London
Frankfurt, DE 20.79 ms 0.3% 2159.77 Mbps 623.12 Mbps 23M GmbH - Frankfurt Am Main
Dubai, AE 136.07 ms 0.3% 1923.50 Mbps 532.43 Mbps du - Dubai
Fujairah, AE 255.56 ms 0.0% 1563.30 Mbps 271.07 Mbps ETISALAT-UAE - Fujairah
Jeddah, KSA 188.82 ms 0.0% 1892.42 Mbps 487.08 Mbps Saudi Telecom Company
Shanghai, CU-CN 210.75 ms 7.7% 766.54 Mbps 154.07 Mbps China Unicom 5G - ShangHai
Nanjing, CT-CN 227.44 ms 0.0% 1292.79 Mbps 263.48 Mbps China Telecom JiangSu 5G - Nanjing
Hong Kong, HKG 195.29 ms N/A 1393.02 Mbps 226.68 Mbps STC - Hong Kong
Singapore, SG 178.46 ms 0.7% 1514.33 Mbps 377.56 Mbps i3D.net - Singapore
Jakarta, ID 196.00 ms 0.3% 1426.35 Mbps 212.42 Mbps PT Indosat Tbk - Jakarta
Tokyo, JP 200.85 ms N/A 986.89 Mbps 295.64 Mbps fdcservers.net - Tokyo
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Avg DL Speed : 1397.38 Mbps
Avg UL Speed : 733.54 Mbps
Total DL Data : 48.51 GB
Total UL Data : 23.07 GB
Total Data : 71.58 GB
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Duration : 12 min 12 sec
System Time : 02/04/2023 - 16:55:01 IST
Total Script Runs : 721
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Result : https://cdn1.frocdn.ch/zGNQwboDt2oPneo.txt
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| 5 |
UnixBench
|
Sep 19, 2025 08:03 |
View Raw Output------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Sun Apr 02 2023 22:20:49 - 23:05:37
2 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 25530515.7 lps (10.0 s, 10 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 5481.6 MWIPS (9.1 s, 10 samples)
Execl Throughput 2116.0 lps (29.8 s, 4 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 312587.7 KBps (30.0 s, 4 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 85357.4 KBps (30.0 s, 4 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 788464.6 KBps (30.0 s, 4 samples)
Pipe Throughput 497725.6 lps (10.0 s, 10 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 45386.1 lps (10.0 s, 10 samples)
Process Creation 2407.8 lps (30.0 s, 4 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 2975.6 lpm (60.0 s, 4 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 778.6 lpm (60.1 s, 4 samples)
System Call Overhead 318048.0 lps (10.0 s, 10 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 25530515.7 2187.7
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 5481.6 996.6
Execl Throughput 43.0 2116.0 492.1
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 312587.7 789.4
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 85357.4 515.8
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 788464.6 1359.4
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 497725.6 400.1
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 45386.1 113.5
Process Creation 126.0 2407.8 191.1
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 2975.6 701.8
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 778.6 1297.6
System Call Overhead 15000.0 318048.0 212.0
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 562.1
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Sun Apr 02 2023 23:05:37 - 23:50:37
2 CPUs in system; running 2 parallel copies of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 47306489.0 lps (10.0 s, 10 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 10588.8 MWIPS (9.6 s, 10 samples)
Execl Throughput 3871.9 lps (29.8 s, 4 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 541317.4 KBps (30.0 s, 4 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 160831.5 KBps (30.0 s, 4 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1647796.1 KBps (30.0 s, 4 samples)
Pipe Throughput 997028.1 lps (10.0 s, 10 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 192154.7 lps (10.0 s, 10 samples)
Process Creation 4109.6 lps (30.0 s, 4 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 4707.0 lpm (60.0 s, 4 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1104.6 lpm (60.0 s, 4 samples)
System Call Overhead 630355.7 lps (10.0 s, 10 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 47306489.0 4053.7
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 10588.8 1925.2
Execl Throughput 43.0 3871.9 900.4
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 541317.4 1367.0
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 160831.5 971.8
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1647796.1 2841.0
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 997028.1 801.5
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 192154.7 480.4
Process Creation 126.0 4109.6 326.2
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 4707.0 1110.1
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1104.6 1841.1
System Call Overhead 15000.0 630355.7 420.2
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 1091.5
|
Onidel Cloud VPS
Performance-first cloud hosting for teams that need consistent benchmarks and transparent pricing.
- 99.99% uptime SLA
- Proven availability for critical workloads
- Plans from $4.95/month
- Predictable pricing and simple scaling
- AMD EPYC + NVMe stack
- Modern hardware with built-in DDoS protection
- 5 global regions
- Singapore, Sydney, Amsterdam, Ho Chi Minh City, more coming soon
Ideal for: demanding SaaS workloads, managed hosting agencies, and teams migrating off legacy VPS providers.
Launch faster with concierge onboarding
Start 14-day TrialCPU Performance (Geekbench)
CPU benchmarks measure processing power for compute-intensive tasks. Learn how we test CPU performance.
I/O Speed Summary (dd)
IOPS Performance by Block Size
Combined IOPS Performance
Total IOPS across all block sizes (4K, 64K, 512K, 1M)
FIO Benchmark Details
Detailed I/O performance test results
Test 1 - Block Size: 4k (mixed_rw_50_50)
Test 2 - Block Size: 64k (mixed_rw_50_50)
Test 3 - Block Size: 512k (mixed_rw_50_50)
Test 4 - Block Size: 1m (mixed_rw_50_50)
Detailed I/O Benchmark (FIO)
IOPS Performance by Block Size
Bandwidth Performance by Block Size
Detailed Test Results
| Block Size | Read IOPS | Write IOPS | Read MB/s | Write MB/s |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4k | 746 | 751 | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| 64k | 746 | 750 | 47.7 | 48.0 |
| 512k | 607 | 639 | 311.0 | 327.5 |
| 1m | 548 | 584 | 561.4 | 598.8 |
Related Resources
Browse More Benchmarks
Explore comprehensive VPS benchmarks across providers and locations.
Compare Providers
View aggregated performance metrics across all VPS providers.
Performance Dashboard
Access real-time statistics, top performers, and latest results.
Testing Methodology
Learn about our comprehensive testing procedures and tools.
Understanding VPS Benchmark Results
This comprehensive benchmark report provides detailed performance analysis for PQ Hosting Intel Xeon 2 Core 2 GB Ram IE VPS in Ireland . Our standardized testing methodology measures CPU performance, disk I/O operations, network bandwidth, and real-world application performance to give you complete insights into VPS capabilities. Browse more VPS benchmarks to compare performance across providers.
Each benchmark metric serves a specific purpose in evaluating VPS performance. CPU benchmarks reveal processing power for applications, disk I/O tests measure storage performance for databases and file operations, network tests show bandwidth capacity for content delivery, and application benchmarks demonstrate real-world hosting performance. Together, these metrics provide a complete performance profile. Use our VPS comparison tool to analyze multiple plans side-by-side.
Benchmark Metrics & Features
Performance Analysis Use Cases
- Evaluating VPS CPU performance for compute-intensive applications
- Testing disk I/O performance for database workloads
- Comparing VPS performance across different providers
- Analyzing WordPress site performance on specific VPS plans
- Assessing value-for-money based on performance and pricing
- Checking real-world application performance metrics
- Understanding geographic performance variations by location
- Reviewing detailed benchmark metrics before VPS purchase
- Comparing single-core vs multi-core CPU performance
- Validating provider performance claims with actual data
- Making informed hosting decisions based on comprehensive benchmarks
How to Interpret Benchmark Results
1. CPU Performance (Geekbench)
Geekbench measures CPU performance through single-core and multi-core scores. Single-core scores (typically 800-2000) indicate performance for single-threaded applications and general responsiveness. Multi-core scores (1500-8000) show performance when all CPU cores are utilized for parallel processing. Higher scores mean better performance. Visit our testing methodology to learn more about CPU benchmarks.
2. Disk I/O Performance (FIO)
FIO benchmarks measure disk performance through IOPS (Input/Output Operations Per Second) and bandwidth (MB/s). High IOPS (10,000+ for NVMe, 5,000-10,000 for SSD) is crucial for database workloads with many small operations. High bandwidth is important for large file transfers and media applications. Compare disk performance across different providers in our database.
3. Application Performance
Real-world application benchmarks (WordPress, UnixBench) show how the VPS handles typical web workloads including PHP processing, database queries, and static file serving. These results measured in requests per second and page load times directly apply to web hosting scenarios. Need help choosing the right VPS? Visit about us to learn more about VPSMetrics.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I interpret the Geekbench single-core and multi-core scores?
Geekbench single-core scores indicate CPU performance for single-threaded applications, important for general responsiveness and web applications. Multi-core scores show performance when all CPU cores are utilized, crucial for parallel processing and multi-threaded applications. Higher scores indicate better performance. Modern VPS typically score 800-2000 (single) and 1500-8000 (multi) depending on the plan.
What do IOPS numbers mean in disk I/O benchmarks?
IOPS (Input/Output Operations Per Second) measures how many read/write operations your disk can handle per second. Higher IOPS means better performance for database operations and applications with many small file operations. NVMe SSD VPS typically delivers 10,000+ IOPS, while traditional SSD offers 5,000-10,000 IOPS.
What is UnixBench and why does it matter?
UnixBench is a comprehensive system-level benchmark suite that tests various aspects of Unix-like system performance including process creation, file operations, and system calls. It provides a holistic view of overall system performance beyond just CPU or disk metrics. Higher UnixBench scores indicate better overall system efficiency.
How reliable are WordPress benchmark results?
WordPress benchmarks provide real-world application performance metrics by testing actual WordPress installations. These results show how the VPS handles typical web application workloads including PHP processing, database queries, and static file serving. Results are measured in requests per second and page load times, directly applicable to web hosting scenarios.
Can I trust these benchmark results for my use case?
Our benchmarks provide standardized, reproducible test results using industry-standard tools. While they offer excellent performance indicators, your actual experience may vary based on your specific workload, application optimization, and usage patterns. Use these benchmarks as a reliable starting point for comparison between providers.
Why do benchmark results vary by location?
Different data center locations may have different hardware configurations, CPU generations, storage types, and network infrastructure. Providers often upgrade facilities at different rates across regions. Location-specific benchmarks help you choose a VPS in the right region with the best performance for your target audience.
Making Informed VPS Decisions
Use these comprehensive benchmark results to make data-driven hosting decisions. Compare multiple metrics together rather than focusing on a single aspect - a balanced VPS performs well across CPU, disk, and network benchmarks. Consider your specific workload requirements: CPU-intensive applications need high Geekbench scores, database-heavy applications require high IOPS, and content delivery services benefit from high network bandwidth.
Our benchmarks provide standardized, reproducible test results using industry-standard tools. While they offer excellent performance indicators, your actual experience may vary based on specific workload patterns and application optimization. Use these benchmarks as a reliable starting point for comparison between providers and configurations.
Compare More VPS Options
Explore additional benchmarks, compare multiple VPS plans side-by-side, and discover the best performing options for your specific requirements and budget.