PQ Hosting - Intel Xeon 2 Core 2 GB Ram DE
Comprehensive VPS benchmark results from Germany tested on Sep 19, 2025. Learn our methodology.
System Specifications
Additional Benchmarks
UnixBench
System Performance Index
WordPress Bench
Web Application Performance
Benchmark Steps
| # | Suite | Run At | Raw Output |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
UnixBench
|
Apr 04, 2023 06:43 |
View Raw Output------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Tue Apr 04 2023 06:43:53 - 07:28:50
2 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 30409717.4 lps (10.0 s, 10 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 4972.7 MWIPS (9.9 s, 10 samples)
Execl Throughput 2585.1 lps (29.9 s, 4 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 362617.7 KBps (30.0 s, 4 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 105332.5 KBps (30.0 s, 4 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 945794.8 KBps (30.0 s, 4 samples)
Pipe Throughput 583680.4 lps (10.0 s, 10 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 68330.3 lps (10.0 s, 10 samples)
Process Creation 4940.1 lps (30.0 s, 4 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 4419.1 lpm (60.0 s, 4 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1441.4 lpm (60.0 s, 4 samples)
System Call Overhead 365849.4 lps (10.0 s, 10 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 30409717.4 2605.8
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 4972.7 904.1
Execl Throughput 43.0 2585.1 601.2
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 362617.7 915.7
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 105332.5 636.5
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 945794.8 1630.7
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 583680.4 469.2
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 68330.3 170.8
Process Creation 126.0 4940.1 392.1
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 4419.1 1042.2
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1441.4 2402.4
System Call Overhead 15000.0 365849.4 243.9
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 737.4
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Tue Apr 04 2023 07:28:50 - 08:13:47
2 CPUs in system; running 2 parallel copies of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 61140624.7 lps (10.0 s, 10 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 10133.9 MWIPS (9.9 s, 10 samples)
Execl Throughput 5053.1 lps (30.0 s, 4 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 740432.4 KBps (30.0 s, 4 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 200530.0 KBps (30.0 s, 4 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1915561.4 KBps (30.0 s, 4 samples)
Pipe Throughput 1138124.9 lps (10.0 s, 10 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 184086.4 lps (10.0 s, 10 samples)
Process Creation 8376.4 lps (30.0 s, 4 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 8105.7 lpm (60.0 s, 4 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1350.4 lpm (60.0 s, 4 samples)
System Call Overhead 722662.2 lps (10.0 s, 10 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 61140624.7 5239.1
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 10133.9 1842.5
Execl Throughput 43.0 5053.1 1175.2
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 740432.4 1869.8
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 200530.0 1211.7
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1915561.4 3302.7
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1138124.9 914.9
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 184086.4 460.2
Process Creation 126.0 8376.4 664.8
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 8105.7 1911.7
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1350.4 2250.7
System Call Overhead 15000.0 722662.2 481.8
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 1383.7
|
| 2 |
Benchy
|
Apr 04, 2023 09:54 |
View Raw Output# # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Benchy v2.6 # # https://github.com/L1so/benchy # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # 04 Apr 2023 09:54 CEST # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Server Insight Hardware Information --------------------- --------------------- OS : Ubuntu 20.04.6 LTS Model : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2680 v2 @ 2.80GHz Location : Germany Core : 2 @ 2793.266 MHz Kernel : 5.4.0-146-generic AES-NI : ✔ Enabled Uptime : 0 days, 3 hrs, 11 mins, 6 secs VM-x/AMD-V : ❌ Disabled Virt : kvm Swap : 228.4 MiB Disk & Memory Usage Network Information --------------------- --------------------- Disk (1) : 29.4 GiB ASN : AS52000 Disk Usage : 3.8 GiB (13% Used) ISP : MIRholding B.V. Mem : 1.9 GiB IPv4 : ✔ Enabled Mem Usage : 0.1 GiB (4% Used) IPv6 : ❌ Disabled Ookla Network Speedtest (Region: Europe) +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Provider | Location | Download | Upload | Data Used | Latency | +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | TestDebit | Marseille, FR | 146.1 Mb/s | 152.7 Mb/s | 0.4 GB | 19.0 ms | | Vancis | Amsterdam, NL | 146.1 Mb/s | 151.6 Mb/s | 0.4 GB | 8.7 ms | | CoreIX | London, GB | 145.5 Mb/s | 152.1 Mb/s | 0.4 GB | 13.2 ms | | Skynet | Warsaw, PL | 145.6 Mb/s | 152.8 Mb/s | 0.4 GB | 18.8 ms | | Vodafone | Milan, IT | 141.5 Mb/s | 152.7 Mb/s | 0.3 GB | 12.7 ms | +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ Network Performance Test (Region: Europe) +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Prot. | Provider | Location | Send | Receive | Latency | +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | IPv4 | FiberBy | Copenhagen, DK | 187.0 Mb/s | 138.9 Mb/s | 14.8 ms | | | WOBCOM | Wolfsburg, DE | 186.7 Mb/s | 148.7 Mb/s | 12.7 ms | | | Novogara | Amsterdam, NL | 185.0 Mb/s | 147.9 Mb/s | 6.8 ms | | | Sasag | Schaff, CH | 188.8 Mb/s | 147.6 Mb/s | 10.1 ms | | | Alwyzon | Vienna, AT | 187.0 Mb/s | 146.8 Mb/s | 11.9 ms | +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ |
| 3 |
PassMark
|
Apr 04, 2023 09:54 |
View Raw OutputPassMark PerformanceTest Linux Intel Xeon CPU E5-2680 v2 @ 2.80GHz (x86_64) 2 cores @ 2793 MHz | 1.9 GiB RAM Number of Processes: 2 | Test Iterations: 3 | Test Duration: Very Long -------------------------------------------------------------------------- CPU Mark: 2091 Integer Math 6561 Million Operations/s Floating Point Math 4168 Million Operations/s Prime Numbers 11.6 Million Primes/s Sorting 4234 Thousand Strings/s Encryption 548 MB/s Compression 30198 KB/s CPU Single Threaded 1373 Million Operations/s Physics 264 Frames/s Extended Instructions (SSE) 1444 Million Matrices/s Memory Mark: 1218 Database Operations 887 Thousand Operations/s Memory Read Cached 17023 MB/s Memory Read Uncached 8284 MB/s Memory Write 7139 MB/s Available RAM 1548 Megabytes Memory Latency 67 Nanoseconds Memory Threaded 15765 MB/s -------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| 4 |
Bench
|
Apr 09, 2023 09:38 |
View Raw Output-------------------- A Bench.sh Script By Teddysun ------------------- Version : v2022-06-01 Usage : wget -qO- bench.sh | bash ---------------------------------------------------------------------- CPU Model : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2680 v2 @ 2.80GHz CPU Cores : 2 @ 2793.266 MHz CPU Cache : 16384 KB AES-NI : Enabled VM-x/AMD-V : Disabled Total Disk : 29.4 GB (3.8 GB Used) Total Mem : 1.9 GB (82.8 MB Used) Total Swap : 228.4 MB (5.0 MB Used) System uptime : 0 days, 2 hour 48 min Load average : 0.01, 0.51, 1.07 OS : Ubuntu 20.04.6 LTS Arch : x86_64 (64 Bit) Kernel : 5.4.0-146-generic TCP CC : bbr Virtualization : KVM Organization : AS52000 MIRholding B.V. Location : Frankfurt am Main / DE Region : Hesse ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I/O Speed(1st run) : 194 MB/s I/O Speed(2nd run) : 203 MB/s I/O Speed(3rd run) : 199 MB/s I/O Speed(average) : 198.7 MB/s ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Node Name Upload Speed Download Speed Latency Speedtest.net 152.00 Mbps 138.04 Mbps 0.76 ms Los Angeles, US 166.30 Mbps 136.51 Mbps 146.32 ms Dallas, US 159.14 Mbps 145.40 Mbps 116.50 ms Montreal, CA 162.41 Mbps 138.99 Mbps 86.49 ms Paris, FR 152.47 Mbps 145.24 Mbps 11.49 ms Amsterdam, NL 151.95 Mbps 145.89 Mbps 7.47 ms Nanjing, CN 19.75 Mbps 136.53 Mbps 290.62 ms Hongkong, CN 167.65 Mbps 152.97 Mbps 245.49 ms Singapore, SG 159.85 Mbps 132.66 Mbps 237.74 ms Tokyo, JP 153.03 Mbps 0.88 Mbps 369.84 ms ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Finished in : 5 min 3 sec Timestamp : 2023-04-04 09:38:57 CEST ---------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| 5 |
Speedtest Global
|
Sep 19, 2025 07:47 |
View Raw Output---------------------------- network-speed.xyz ----------------------------
A simple script to test network performance using speedtest-cli
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Version : v2023.03.25
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Basic System Info
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
CPU Model : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2680 v2 @ 2.80GHz
CPU Cores : 2 @ 2793.266 MHz
CPU Cache : 16384 KB
AES-NI : ✔ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ❌ Disabled
Total Disk : 29.4 GB (3.8 GB Used)
Total RAM : 1.9 GB (84.5 MB Used)
Total Swap : 228.4 MB (5.0 MB Used)
System uptime : 0 days, 2 hour 59 min
Load average : 0.19, 0.23, 0.61
OS : Ubuntu 20.04.6 LTS
Arch : x86_64 (64 Bit)
Kernel : 5.4.0-146-generic
Virtualization : KVM
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Basic Network Info
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Primary Network : IPv4
ISP : MIRholding B.V.
ASN : AS52000 MIRholding B.V.
Host : Stark Industries Solutions LTD
Location : Frankfurt am Main, Hesse-HE, Germany
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Speedtest.net
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Location Latency Loss DL Speed UP Speed Server
ISP: Stark Industries Solutions Ltd
Nearest 0.73 ms N/A 146.42 Mbps 151.92 Mbps Netprotect - Frankfurt
Kochi, IN 160.90 ms 0.0% 146.17 Mbps 156.14 Mbps Asianet Broadband - Cochin
Bangalore, IN FAILED
Chennai, IN 145.66 ms N/A 149.02 Mbps 166.28 Mbps Jio - Chennai
Mumbai, IN 194.55 ms 0.0% 125.64 Mbps 160.02 Mbps i3D.net - Mumbai
Delhi, IN 162.49 ms 0.0% 140.03 Mbps 157.01 Mbps Tata Play Fiber - New Delhi
Los Angeles, US 144.69 ms 0.0% 145.71 Mbps 168.30 Mbps ReliableSite Hosting - Los Angeles, CA
Dallas, US 120.98 ms 0.0% 143.35 Mbps 157.59 Mbps Hivelocity - Dallas, TX
New York, US 81.29 ms 0.0% 140.68 Mbps 160.51 Mbps Clouvider Ltd - New York, NY
Seattle, US 156.59 ms N/A 149.24 Mbps 155.94 Mbps Comcast - Seattle, WA
Miami, US 116.77 ms 0.0% 147.37 Mbps 157.79 Mbps AT&T - Miami, FL
Toronto, CA 94.47 ms 0.0% 124.09 Mbps 156.49 Mbps Rogers - Toronto, ON
Paris, FR 11.79 ms 0.0% 134.60 Mbps 152.58 Mbps ORANGE FRANCE - Paris
Amsterdam, NL 11.37 ms 0.0% 139.53 Mbps 152.03 Mbps Clouvider Ltd - Amsterdam
Warsaw, PL 21.62 ms 0.0% 145.85 Mbps 153.20 Mbps UPC Polska - Warszawa
London, UK 12.66 ms 0.0% 145.59 Mbps 152.78 Mbps VeloxServ Communications - London
Frankfurt, DE 0.92 ms 0.0% 146.16 Mbps 151.87 Mbps 23M GmbH - Frankfurt Am Main
Dubai, AE 125.42 ms 0.0% 151.88 Mbps 152.10 Mbps du - Dubai
Fujairah, AE 109.68 ms 0.0% 135.89 Mbps 160.43 Mbps ETISALAT-UAE - Fujairah
Jeddah, KSA 73.60 ms 0.0% 138.77 Mbps 159.54 Mbps Saudi Telecom Company
Shanghai, CU-CN FAILED
Nanjing, CT-CN 280.41 ms 9.9% 135.13 Mbps 26.32 Mbps China Telecom JiangSu 5G - Nanjing
Hong Kong, HKG 172.17 ms N/A 144.30 Mbps 154.14 Mbps STC - Hong Kong
Singapore, SG 279.55 ms 0.0% 7.00 Mbps 159.18 Mbps i3D.net - Singapore
Jakarta, ID 176.58 ms 0.0% 120.77 Mbps 159.41 Mbps PT Indosat Tbk - Jakarta
Tokyo, JP 251.83 ms N/A 141.37 Mbps 168.88 Mbps fdcservers.net - Tokyo
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Avg DL Speed : 135.19 Mbps
Avg UL Speed : 152.10 Mbps
Total DL Data : 4.22 GB
Total UL Data : 4.78 GB
Total Data : 9.00 GB
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Duration : 11 min 8 sec
System Time : 04/04/2023 - 09:54:12 CEST
Total Script Runs : 744
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Result : https://cdn1.frocdn.ch/Xf5JYxupQeJUFYz.txt
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
Onidel Cloud VPS
Performance-first cloud hosting for teams that need consistent benchmarks and transparent pricing.
- 99.99% uptime SLA
- Proven availability for critical workloads
- Plans from $4.95/month
- Predictable pricing and simple scaling
- AMD EPYC + NVMe stack
- Modern hardware with built-in DDoS protection
- 5 global regions
- Singapore, Sydney, Amsterdam, Ho Chi Minh City, more coming soon
Ideal for: demanding SaaS workloads, managed hosting agencies, and teams migrating off legacy VPS providers.
Launch faster with concierge onboarding
Start 14-day TrialCPU Performance (Geekbench)
CPU benchmarks measure processing power for compute-intensive tasks. Learn how we test CPU performance.
I/O Speed Summary (dd)
IOPS Performance by Block Size
Combined IOPS Performance
Total IOPS across all block sizes (4K, 64K, 512K, 1M)
FIO Benchmark Details
Detailed I/O performance test results
Test 1 - Block Size: 4k (mixed_rw_50_50)
Test 2 - Block Size: 64k (mixed_rw_50_50)
Test 3 - Block Size: 512k (mixed_rw_50_50)
Test 4 - Block Size: 1m (mixed_rw_50_50)
Detailed I/O Benchmark (FIO)
IOPS Performance by Block Size
Bandwidth Performance by Block Size
Detailed Test Results
| Block Size | Read IOPS | Write IOPS | Read MB/s | Write MB/s |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4k | 746 | 750 | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| 64k | 745 | 750 | 47.7 | 48.0 |
| 512k | 693 | 730 | 355.0 | 373.9 |
| 1m | 585 | 624 | 599.2 | 639.1 |
Related Resources
Browse More Benchmarks
Explore comprehensive VPS benchmarks across providers and locations.
Compare Providers
View aggregated performance metrics across all VPS providers.
Performance Dashboard
Access real-time statistics, top performers, and latest results.
Testing Methodology
Learn about our comprehensive testing procedures and tools.
Understanding VPS Benchmark Results
This comprehensive benchmark report provides detailed performance analysis for PQ Hosting Intel Xeon 2 Core 2 GB Ram DE VPS in Germany . Our standardized testing methodology measures CPU performance, disk I/O operations, network bandwidth, and real-world application performance to give you complete insights into VPS capabilities. Browse more VPS benchmarks to compare performance across providers.
Each benchmark metric serves a specific purpose in evaluating VPS performance. CPU benchmarks reveal processing power for applications, disk I/O tests measure storage performance for databases and file operations, network tests show bandwidth capacity for content delivery, and application benchmarks demonstrate real-world hosting performance. Together, these metrics provide a complete performance profile. Use our VPS comparison tool to analyze multiple plans side-by-side.
Benchmark Metrics & Features
Performance Analysis Use Cases
- Evaluating VPS CPU performance for compute-intensive applications
- Testing disk I/O performance for database workloads
- Comparing VPS performance across different providers
- Analyzing WordPress site performance on specific VPS plans
- Assessing value-for-money based on performance and pricing
- Checking real-world application performance metrics
- Understanding geographic performance variations by location
- Reviewing detailed benchmark metrics before VPS purchase
- Comparing single-core vs multi-core CPU performance
- Validating provider performance claims with actual data
- Making informed hosting decisions based on comprehensive benchmarks
How to Interpret Benchmark Results
1. CPU Performance (Geekbench)
Geekbench measures CPU performance through single-core and multi-core scores. Single-core scores (typically 800-2000) indicate performance for single-threaded applications and general responsiveness. Multi-core scores (1500-8000) show performance when all CPU cores are utilized for parallel processing. Higher scores mean better performance. Visit our testing methodology to learn more about CPU benchmarks.
2. Disk I/O Performance (FIO)
FIO benchmarks measure disk performance through IOPS (Input/Output Operations Per Second) and bandwidth (MB/s). High IOPS (10,000+ for NVMe, 5,000-10,000 for SSD) is crucial for database workloads with many small operations. High bandwidth is important for large file transfers and media applications. Compare disk performance across different providers in our database.
3. Application Performance
Real-world application benchmarks (WordPress, UnixBench) show how the VPS handles typical web workloads including PHP processing, database queries, and static file serving. These results measured in requests per second and page load times directly apply to web hosting scenarios. Need help choosing the right VPS? Visit about us to learn more about VPSMetrics.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I interpret the Geekbench single-core and multi-core scores?
Geekbench single-core scores indicate CPU performance for single-threaded applications, important for general responsiveness and web applications. Multi-core scores show performance when all CPU cores are utilized, crucial for parallel processing and multi-threaded applications. Higher scores indicate better performance. Modern VPS typically score 800-2000 (single) and 1500-8000 (multi) depending on the plan.
What do IOPS numbers mean in disk I/O benchmarks?
IOPS (Input/Output Operations Per Second) measures how many read/write operations your disk can handle per second. Higher IOPS means better performance for database operations and applications with many small file operations. NVMe SSD VPS typically delivers 10,000+ IOPS, while traditional SSD offers 5,000-10,000 IOPS.
What is UnixBench and why does it matter?
UnixBench is a comprehensive system-level benchmark suite that tests various aspects of Unix-like system performance including process creation, file operations, and system calls. It provides a holistic view of overall system performance beyond just CPU or disk metrics. Higher UnixBench scores indicate better overall system efficiency.
How reliable are WordPress benchmark results?
WordPress benchmarks provide real-world application performance metrics by testing actual WordPress installations. These results show how the VPS handles typical web application workloads including PHP processing, database queries, and static file serving. Results are measured in requests per second and page load times, directly applicable to web hosting scenarios.
Can I trust these benchmark results for my use case?
Our benchmarks provide standardized, reproducible test results using industry-standard tools. While they offer excellent performance indicators, your actual experience may vary based on your specific workload, application optimization, and usage patterns. Use these benchmarks as a reliable starting point for comparison between providers.
Why do benchmark results vary by location?
Different data center locations may have different hardware configurations, CPU generations, storage types, and network infrastructure. Providers often upgrade facilities at different rates across regions. Location-specific benchmarks help you choose a VPS in the right region with the best performance for your target audience.
Making Informed VPS Decisions
Use these comprehensive benchmark results to make data-driven hosting decisions. Compare multiple metrics together rather than focusing on a single aspect - a balanced VPS performs well across CPU, disk, and network benchmarks. Consider your specific workload requirements: CPU-intensive applications need high Geekbench scores, database-heavy applications require high IOPS, and content delivery services benefit from high network bandwidth.
Our benchmarks provide standardized, reproducible test results using industry-standard tools. While they offer excellent performance indicators, your actual experience may vary based on specific workload patterns and application optimization. Use these benchmarks as a reliable starting point for comparison between providers and configurations.
Compare More VPS Options
Explore additional benchmarks, compare multiple VPS plans side-by-side, and discover the best performing options for your specific requirements and budget.