Php-friends - AMD EPYC 2 Core 10 GB Ram DE
Comprehensive VPS benchmark results from Germany tested on Sep 19, 2025. Learn our methodology.
System Specifications
Additional Benchmarks
UnixBench
System Performance Index
WordPress Bench
Web Application Performance
Benchmark Steps
| # | Suite | Run At | Raw Output |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Bench
|
Apr 09, 2023 11:06 |
View Raw Output-------------------- A Bench.sh Script By Teddysun ------------------- Version : v2022-06-01 Usage : wget -qO- bench.sh | bash ---------------------------------------------------------------------- CPU Model : AMD EPYC 7452 32-Core Processor CPU Cores : 2 @ 2349.998 MHz CPU Cache : 512 KB AES-NI : Enabled VM-x/AMD-V : Enabled Total Disk : 77.8 GB (5.4 GB Used) Total Mem : 9.7 GB (95.5 MB Used) Total Swap : 1024.0 MB (0 Used) System uptime : 0 days, 14 hour 57 min Load average : 0.42, 0.12, 0.15 OS : Ubuntu 20.04.6 LTS Arch : x86_64 (64 Bit) Kernel : 5.4.0-146-generic TCP CC : cubic Virtualization : KVM Organization : AS58212 dataforest GmbH Location : Frankfurt am Main / DE Region : Hesse ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I/O Speed(1st run) : 941 MB/s I/O Speed(2nd run) : 921 MB/s I/O Speed(3rd run) : 1.1 GB/s I/O Speed(average) : 996.1 MB/s ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Node Name Upload Speed Download Speed Latency Speedtest.net 7220.61 Mbps 6594.45 Mbps 3.03 ms Los Angeles, US 624.77 Mbps 3398.64 Mbps 144.52 ms Dallas, US 698.89 Mbps 4887.72 Mbps 116.59 ms Montreal, CA 921.89 Mbps 5081.36 Mbps 87.90 ms Paris, FR 3475.07 Mbps 7077.42 Mbps 23.83 ms Amsterdam, NL 3411.64 Mbps 7911.53 Mbps 7.51 ms Luzern, CH 6145.33 Mbps 8815.17 Mbps 7.07 ms London, UK 5082.46 Mbps 8291.46 Mbps 15.90 ms Singapore, SG 450.09 Mbps 4056.06 Mbps 157.90 ms Tokyo, JP 317.57 Mbps 2905.05 Mbps 214.90 ms ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Finished in : 3 min 38 sec Timestamp : 2023-04-09 11:06:29 CEST ---------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| 2 |
Benchy
|
Apr 09, 2023 11:22 |
View Raw Output# # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Benchy v2.6 # # https://github.com/L1so/benchy # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # 09 Apr 2023 11:22 CEST # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Server Insight Hardware Information --------------------- --------------------- OS : Ubuntu 20.04.6 LTS Model : AMD EPYC 7452 32-Core Processor Location : Germany Core : 2 @ 2349.998 MHz Kernel : 5.4.0-146-generic AES-NI : ✔ Enabled Uptime : 0 days, 1 hrs, 4 mins, 51 secs VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled Virt : kvm Swap : 1024.0 MiB Disk & Memory Usage Network Information --------------------- --------------------- Disk (1) : 77.8 GiB ASN : AS58212 Disk Usage : 5.4 GiB (7% Used) ISP : dataforest GmbH Mem : 9.7 GiB IPv4 : ✔ Enabled Mem Usage : 0.1 GiB (1% Used) IPv6 : ✔ Enabled Ookla Network Speedtest (Region: Europe) +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Provider | Location | Download | Upload | Data Used | Latency | +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | TestDebit | Marseille, FR | 8.9 Gb/s | 3.9 Gb/s | 16.0 GB | 19.1 ms | | Vancis | Amsterdam, NL | 8.3 Gb/s | 3.5 Gb/s | 17.7 GB | 6.3 ms | | CoreIX | London, GB | Failed | To | Get | Data | | Skynet | Warsaw, PL | 5.9 Gb/s | 4.2 Gb/s | 11.5 GB | 19.5 ms | | Vodafone | Milan, IT | Failed | To | Get | Data | +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ Network Performance Test (Region: Europe) +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Prot. | Provider | Location | Send | Receive | Latency | +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | IPv6 | FiberBy | Copenhagen, DK | 3.5 Gb/s | 5.8 Gb/s | 17.5 ms | | | WOBCOM | Wolfsburg, DE | 7.1 Gb/s | 5.9 Gb/s | 7.8 ms | | | Novogara | Amsterdam, NL | 7.7 Gb/s | 8.4 Gb/s | 7.8 ms | | | Sasag | Schaff, CH | 6.4 Gb/s | 6.4 Gb/s | 7.2 ms | | | Alwyzon | Vienna, AT | 5.7 Gb/s | 5.7 Gb/s | 11.5 ms | +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ |
| 3 |
PassMark
|
Apr 09, 2023 11:22 |
View Raw OutputPassMark PerformanceTest Linux AMD EPYC 7452 32-Core Processor (x86_64) 2 cores @ 2349 MHz | 9.7 GiB RAM Number of Processes: 2 | Test Iterations: 3 | Test Duration: Very Long -------------------------------------------------------------------------- CPU Mark: 3855 Integer Math 9035 Million Operations/s Floating Point Math 6420 Million Operations/s Prime Numbers 29.3 Million Primes/s Sorting 4926 Thousand Strings/s Encryption 2200 MB/s Compression 38633 KB/s CPU Single Threaded 1969 Million Operations/s Physics 424 Frames/s Extended Instructions (SSE) 3228 Million Matrices/s Memory Mark: 1517 Database Operations 1251 Thousand Operations/s Memory Read Cached 21333 MB/s Memory Read Uncached 10414 MB/s Memory Write 8772 MB/s Available RAM 8268 Megabytes Memory Latency 100 Nanoseconds Memory Threaded 20650 MB/s -------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| 4 |
UnixBench
|
Apr 09, 2023 12:07 |
View Raw Output------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Sun Apr 09 2023 12:07:06 - 12:51:56
2 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 38415919.5 lps (10.0 s, 10 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 6888.6 MWIPS (9.9 s, 10 samples)
Execl Throughput 4989.4 lps (29.9 s, 4 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1047672.3 KBps (30.0 s, 4 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 291155.8 KBps (30.0 s, 4 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 2589686.9 KBps (30.0 s, 4 samples)
Pipe Throughput 1720901.9 lps (10.0 s, 10 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 101820.8 lps (10.0 s, 10 samples)
Process Creation 13893.9 lps (30.0 s, 4 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 11643.7 lpm (60.0 s, 4 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 2420.5 lpm (60.0 s, 4 samples)
System Call Overhead 2492338.7 lps (10.0 s, 10 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 38415919.5 3291.9
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 6888.6 1252.5
Execl Throughput 43.0 4989.4 1160.3
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 1047672.3 2645.6
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 291155.8 1759.2
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 2589686.9 4465.0
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1720901.9 1383.4
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 101820.8 254.6
Process Creation 126.0 13893.9 1102.7
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 11643.7 2746.2
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 2420.5 4034.1
System Call Overhead 15000.0 2492338.7 1661.6
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 1728.4
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Sun Apr 09 2023 12:51:56 - 13:36:45
2 CPUs in system; running 2 parallel copies of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 75746977.8 lps (10.0 s, 10 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 13796.3 MWIPS (9.9 s, 10 samples)
Execl Throughput 8124.2 lps (29.8 s, 4 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1541357.7 KBps (30.0 s, 4 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 410459.6 KBps (30.0 s, 4 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 4177698.9 KBps (30.0 s, 4 samples)
Pipe Throughput 3468548.2 lps (10.0 s, 10 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 409371.7 lps (10.0 s, 10 samples)
Process Creation 19894.2 lps (30.0 s, 4 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 16025.8 lpm (60.0 s, 4 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 2327.9 lpm (60.0 s, 4 samples)
System Call Overhead 4984486.3 lps (10.0 s, 10 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 75746977.8 6490.7
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 13796.3 2508.4
Execl Throughput 43.0 8124.2 1889.3
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 1541357.7 3892.3
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 410459.6 2480.1
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 4177698.9 7202.9
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 3468548.2 2788.2
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 409371.7 1023.4
Process Creation 126.0 19894.2 1578.9
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 16025.8 3779.7
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 2327.9 3879.8
System Call Overhead 15000.0 4984486.3 3323.0
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 2969.2
|
| 5 |
Speedtest Global
|
Sep 19, 2025 07:08 |
View Raw Output---------------------------- network-speed.xyz ----------------------------
A simple script to test network performance using speedtest-cli
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Version : v2023.04.08
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Basic System Info
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
CPU Model : AMD EPYC 7452 32-Core Processor
CPU Cores : 2 @ 2349.998 MHz
CPU Cache : 512 KB
AES-NI : ✔ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
Total Disk : 77.8 GB (5.4 GB Used)
Total RAM : 9.7 GB (93.2 MB Used)
Total Swap : 1024.0 MB (0 Used)
System uptime : 0 days, 0 hour 56 min
Load average : 0.22, 0.41, 0.37
OS : Ubuntu 20.04.6 LTS
Arch : x86_64 (64 Bit)
Kernel : 5.4.0-146-generic
Virtualization : KVM
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Basic Network Info
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Primary Network : IPv6
ISP : dataforest GmbH
ASN : AS58212 dataforest GmbH
Host : dataforest GmbH
Location : Frankfurt am Main, Hesse-HE, Germany
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Speedtest.net (Region: GLOBAL)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Location Latency Loss DL Speed UP Speed Server
ISP: dataforest GmbH
Nearest 3.06 ms 0.0% 6488.03 Mbps 6653.88 Mbps Netcom Kassel Gesellschaft für Telekommunikation mbH - Kassel
Kochi, IN FAILED
Bangalore, IN 137.87 ms 0.0% 4503.34 Mbps 598.58 Mbps Bharti Airtel Ltd - Bangalore
Chennai, IN FAILED
Mumbai, IN 167.04 ms 0.0% 4772.71 Mbps 499.99 Mbps i3D.net - Mumbai
Delhi, IN FAILED
Los Angeles, US 141.59 ms 0.0% 3864.09 Mbps 580.25 Mbps ReliableSite Hosting - Los Angeles, CA
Dallas, US 116.94 ms 0.0% 4938.94 Mbps 694.36 Mbps Hivelocity - Dallas, TX
New York, US FAILED
Seattle, US 136.02 ms N/A 5667.36 Mbps 584.31 Mbps Comcast - Seattle, WA
Miami, US FAILED
Toronto, CA 90.74 ms 0.0% 4281.95 Mbps 909.05 Mbps Rogers - Toronto, ON
Paris, FR 23.79 ms 0.0% 8089.76 Mbps 3439.30 Mbps ORANGE FRANCE - Paris
Amsterdam, NL 6.24 ms 0.0% 8582.42 Mbps 6854.17 Mbps Clouvider Ltd - Amsterdam
Warsaw, PL 20.42 ms 0.0% 5902.68 Mbps 4000.11 Mbps UPC Polska - Warszawa
London, UK 10.86 ms 0.0% 8948.80 Mbps 7081.41 Mbps VeloxServ Communications - London
Frankfurt, DE 0.73 ms 0.0% 6418.77 Mbps 6810.69 Mbps 23M GmbH - Frankfurt Am Main
Dubai, AE FAILED
Fujairah, AE FAILED
Jeddah, KSA 84.05 ms 0.0% 5763.53 Mbps 974.38 Mbps Saudi Telecom Company
Shanghai, CU-CN 243.47 ms 0.0% 2959.91 Mbps 261.81 Mbps China Unicom 5G - ShangHai
Nanjing, CT-CN FAILED
Hong Kong, HKG FAILED
Singapore, SG 146.03 ms 0.0% 5059.31 Mbps 541.16 Mbps i3D.net - Singapore
Jakarta, ID 157.23 ms 0.0% 3468.00 Mbps 292.38 Mbps PT Indosat Tbk - Jakarta
Tokyo, JP FAILED
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Avg DL Speed : 5606.85 Mbps
Avg UL Speed : 2548.49 Mbps
Total DL Data : 112.30 GB
Total UL Data : 37.42 GB
Total Data : 149.72 GB
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Duration : 7 min 47 sec
System Time : 09/04/2023 - 11:22:12 CEST
Total Script Runs : 830
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
Onidel Cloud VPS
Performance-first cloud hosting for teams that need consistent benchmarks and transparent pricing.
- 99.99% uptime SLA
- Proven availability for critical workloads
- Plans from $4.95/month
- Predictable pricing and simple scaling
- AMD EPYC + NVMe stack
- Modern hardware with built-in DDoS protection
- 5 global regions
- Singapore, Sydney, Amsterdam, Ho Chi Minh City, more coming soon
Ideal for: demanding SaaS workloads, managed hosting agencies, and teams migrating off legacy VPS providers.
Launch faster with concierge onboarding
Start 14-day TrialCPU Performance (Geekbench)
CPU benchmarks measure processing power for compute-intensive tasks. Learn how we test CPU performance.
I/O Speed Summary (dd)
IOPS Performance by Block Size
Combined IOPS Performance
Total IOPS across all block sizes (4K, 64K, 512K, 1M)
FIO Benchmark Details
Detailed I/O performance test results
Test 1 - Block Size: 4k (mixed_rw_50_50)
Test 2 - Block Size: 64k (mixed_rw_50_50)
Test 3 - Block Size: 512k (mixed_rw_50_50)
Test 4 - Block Size: 1m (mixed_rw_50_50)
Detailed I/O Benchmark (FIO)
IOPS Performance by Block Size
Bandwidth Performance by Block Size
Detailed Test Results
| Block Size | Read IOPS | Write IOPS | Read MB/s | Write MB/s |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4k | 62,200 | 62,400 | 249.0 | 249.7 |
| 64k | 54,100 | 54,400 | 3,460.0 | 3,480.0 |
| 512k | 16,400 | 17,300 | 8,440.0 | 8,890.0 |
| 1m | 7,800 | 8,400 | 8,080.0 | 8,620.0 |
Related Resources
Browse More Benchmarks
Explore comprehensive VPS benchmarks across providers and locations.
Compare Providers
View aggregated performance metrics across all VPS providers.
Performance Dashboard
Access real-time statistics, top performers, and latest results.
Testing Methodology
Learn about our comprehensive testing procedures and tools.
Understanding VPS Benchmark Results
This comprehensive benchmark report provides detailed performance analysis for Php-friends AMD EPYC 2 Core 10 GB Ram DE VPS in Germany . Our standardized testing methodology measures CPU performance, disk I/O operations, network bandwidth, and real-world application performance to give you complete insights into VPS capabilities. Browse more VPS benchmarks to compare performance across providers.
Each benchmark metric serves a specific purpose in evaluating VPS performance. CPU benchmarks reveal processing power for applications, disk I/O tests measure storage performance for databases and file operations, network tests show bandwidth capacity for content delivery, and application benchmarks demonstrate real-world hosting performance. Together, these metrics provide a complete performance profile. Use our VPS comparison tool to analyze multiple plans side-by-side.
Benchmark Metrics & Features
Performance Analysis Use Cases
- Evaluating VPS CPU performance for compute-intensive applications
- Testing disk I/O performance for database workloads
- Comparing VPS performance across different providers
- Analyzing WordPress site performance on specific VPS plans
- Assessing value-for-money based on performance and pricing
- Checking real-world application performance metrics
- Understanding geographic performance variations by location
- Reviewing detailed benchmark metrics before VPS purchase
- Comparing single-core vs multi-core CPU performance
- Validating provider performance claims with actual data
- Making informed hosting decisions based on comprehensive benchmarks
How to Interpret Benchmark Results
1. CPU Performance (Geekbench)
Geekbench measures CPU performance through single-core and multi-core scores. Single-core scores (typically 800-2000) indicate performance for single-threaded applications and general responsiveness. Multi-core scores (1500-8000) show performance when all CPU cores are utilized for parallel processing. Higher scores mean better performance. Visit our testing methodology to learn more about CPU benchmarks.
2. Disk I/O Performance (FIO)
FIO benchmarks measure disk performance through IOPS (Input/Output Operations Per Second) and bandwidth (MB/s). High IOPS (10,000+ for NVMe, 5,000-10,000 for SSD) is crucial for database workloads with many small operations. High bandwidth is important for large file transfers and media applications. Compare disk performance across different providers in our database.
3. Application Performance
Real-world application benchmarks (WordPress, UnixBench) show how the VPS handles typical web workloads including PHP processing, database queries, and static file serving. These results measured in requests per second and page load times directly apply to web hosting scenarios. Need help choosing the right VPS? Visit about us to learn more about VPSMetrics.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I interpret the Geekbench single-core and multi-core scores?
Geekbench single-core scores indicate CPU performance for single-threaded applications, important for general responsiveness and web applications. Multi-core scores show performance when all CPU cores are utilized, crucial for parallel processing and multi-threaded applications. Higher scores indicate better performance. Modern VPS typically score 800-2000 (single) and 1500-8000 (multi) depending on the plan.
What do IOPS numbers mean in disk I/O benchmarks?
IOPS (Input/Output Operations Per Second) measures how many read/write operations your disk can handle per second. Higher IOPS means better performance for database operations and applications with many small file operations. NVMe SSD VPS typically delivers 10,000+ IOPS, while traditional SSD offers 5,000-10,000 IOPS.
What is UnixBench and why does it matter?
UnixBench is a comprehensive system-level benchmark suite that tests various aspects of Unix-like system performance including process creation, file operations, and system calls. It provides a holistic view of overall system performance beyond just CPU or disk metrics. Higher UnixBench scores indicate better overall system efficiency.
How reliable are WordPress benchmark results?
WordPress benchmarks provide real-world application performance metrics by testing actual WordPress installations. These results show how the VPS handles typical web application workloads including PHP processing, database queries, and static file serving. Results are measured in requests per second and page load times, directly applicable to web hosting scenarios.
Can I trust these benchmark results for my use case?
Our benchmarks provide standardized, reproducible test results using industry-standard tools. While they offer excellent performance indicators, your actual experience may vary based on your specific workload, application optimization, and usage patterns. Use these benchmarks as a reliable starting point for comparison between providers.
Why do benchmark results vary by location?
Different data center locations may have different hardware configurations, CPU generations, storage types, and network infrastructure. Providers often upgrade facilities at different rates across regions. Location-specific benchmarks help you choose a VPS in the right region with the best performance for your target audience.
Making Informed VPS Decisions
Use these comprehensive benchmark results to make data-driven hosting decisions. Compare multiple metrics together rather than focusing on a single aspect - a balanced VPS performs well across CPU, disk, and network benchmarks. Consider your specific workload requirements: CPU-intensive applications need high Geekbench scores, database-heavy applications require high IOPS, and content delivery services benefit from high network bandwidth.
Our benchmarks provide standardized, reproducible test results using industry-standard tools. While they offer excellent performance indicators, your actual experience may vary based on specific workload patterns and application optimization. Use these benchmarks as a reliable starting point for comparison between providers and configurations.
Compare More VPS Options
Explore additional benchmarks, compare multiple VPS plans side-by-side, and discover the best performing options for your specific requirements and budget.