OrangeVPS - Intel Xeon 2 Core 4 GB Ram SG
Comprehensive VPS benchmark results from Singapore tested on Aug 09, 2024. Learn our methodology.
System Specifications
Additional Benchmarks
UnixBench
System Performance Index
WordPress Bench
Web Application Performance
Benchmark Steps
| # | Suite | Run At | Raw Output |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Bench
|
Aug 09, 2024 17:56 |
View Raw Output-------------------- A Bench.sh Script By Teddysun ------------------- Version : v2023-10-15 Usage : wget -qO- bench.sh | bash ---------------------------------------------------------------------- CPU Model : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2699C v4 @ 2.20GHz CPU Cores : 2 @ 2199.996 MHz CPU Cache : 16384 KB AES-NI : ✓ Enabled VM-x/AMD-V : ✓ Enabled Total Disk : 24.1 GB (2.5 GB Used) Total Mem : 3.8 GB (352.6 MB Used) System uptime : 0 days, 1 hour 34 min Load average : 0.01, 0.03, 0.00 OS : Ubuntu 22.04.4 LTS Arch : x86_64 (64 Bit) Kernel : 5.15.0-118-generic TCP CC : bbr Virtualization : KVM IPv4/IPv6 : ✓ Online / ✗ Offline Organization : AS134677 Dromatics Systems Pte Ltd Location : Singapore / SG Region : Singapore ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I/O Speed(1st run) : 825 MB/s I/O Speed(2nd run) : 928 MB/s I/O Speed(3rd run) : 827 MB/s I/O Speed(average) : 860.0 MB/s ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Node Name Upload Speed Download Speed Latency Speedtest.net 941.89 Mbps 937.63 Mbps 1.30 ms Los Angeles, US 343.52 Mbps 938.28 Mbps 234.53 ms Dallas, US 340.86 Mbps 936.74 Mbps 235.45 ms Montreal, CA 360.10 Mbps 934.43 Mbps 226.23 ms Amsterdam, NL 538.70 Mbps 942.85 Mbps 152.06 ms Chongqing, CN 2.35 Mbps 0.07 Mbps 383.12 ms Hongkong, CN 835.94 Mbps 936.29 Mbps 37.35 ms Mumbai, IN 302.47 Mbps 670.94 Mbps 266.63 ms Singapore, SG 91.85 Mbps 18.74 Mbps 209.84 ms Tokyo, JP 619.84 Mbps 935.15 Mbps 67.26 ms ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Finished in : 5 min 0 sec Timestamp : 2024-08-09 17:56:48 UTC ---------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| 2 |
PassMark
|
Aug 09, 2024 17:56 |
View Raw OutputPassMark PerformanceTest Linux (11.0.1002) Intel Xeon CPU E5-2699C v4 @ 2.20GHz (x86_64) 2 cores @ 0 MHz | 3.8 GiB RAM Number of Processes: 2 | Test Iterations: 2 | Test Duration: Very Long -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CPU Mark: 2210 Integer Math 5777 Million Operations/s Floating Point Math 4965 Million Operations/s Prime Numbers 21.5 Million Primes/s Sorting 4205 Thousand Strings/s Encryption 547 MB/s Compression 30297 KB/s CPU Single Threaded 1565 Million Operations/s Physics 333 Frames/s Extended Instructions (SSE) 1817 Million Matrices/s Memory Mark: 1357 Database Operations 1163 Thousand Operations/s Memory Read Cached 17694 MB/s Memory Read Uncached 9651 MB/s Memory Write 5680 MB/s Available RAM 1759 Megabytes Memory Latency 56 Nanoseconds Memory Threaded 18714 MB/s -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| 3 |
UnixBench
|
Aug 09, 2024 18:40 |
View Raw Output------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Fri Aug 09 2024 18:40:07 - 19:08:10
2 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 27938932.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 5254.4 MWIPS (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 2262.9 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 493749.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 128312.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1651284.1 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 624030.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 72436.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 5458.8 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 7129.6 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1550.6 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 342876.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 27938932.1 2394.1
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 5254.4 955.3
Execl Throughput 43.0 2262.9 526.2
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 493749.9 1246.8
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 128312.8 775.3
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1651284.1 2847.0
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 624030.4 501.6
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 72436.4 181.1
Process Creation 126.0 5458.8 433.2
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 7129.6 1681.5
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1550.6 2584.3
System Call Overhead 15000.0 342876.3 228.6
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 843.4
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Fri Aug 09 2024 19:08:10 - 19:36:15
2 CPUs in system; running 2 parallel copies of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 57031136.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 10501.9 MWIPS (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 4287.5 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 987648.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 256318.1 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 3216795.2 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 1243124.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 244340.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 11844.7 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 11686.8 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1583.9 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 687102.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 57031136.9 4887.0
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 10501.9 1909.4
Execl Throughput 43.0 4287.5 997.1
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 987648.8 2494.1
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 256318.1 1548.8
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 3216795.2 5546.2
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1243124.1 999.3
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 244340.3 610.9
Process Creation 126.0 11844.7 940.1
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 11686.8 2756.3
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1583.9 2639.8
System Call Overhead 15000.0 687102.2 458.1
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 1641.0
|
| 4 |
Speedtest Global
|
Aug 09, 2024 20:47 |
View Raw Output---------------------------------- nws.sh ---------------------------------
A simple script to bench network performance using speedtest-cli
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Version : v2024.08.09
Global Speedtest : wget -qO- nws.sh | bash
Region Speedtest : wget -qO- nws.sh | bash -s -- -r <region>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Basic System Info
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
CPU Model : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2699C v4 @ 2.20GHz
CPU Cores : 2 @ 2199.996 MHz
CPU Cache : 16384 KB
AES-NI : ✔ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
Total Disk : 24.1 GB (2.5 GB Used)
Total RAM : 3.8 GB (397.1 MB Used)
System uptime : 0 days, 4 hour 14 min
Load average : 23.82, 13.20, 6.70
OS : Ubuntu 22.04.4 LTS
Arch : x86_64 (64 Bit)
Kernel : 5.15.0-118-generic
Virtualization : KVM
TCP Control : bbr
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Basic Network Info
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Primary Network : IPv4
IPv6 Access : ❌ Offline
IPv4 Access : ✔ Online
ISP : Dromatics Systems Pte Ltd
ASN : AS134677 Dromatics Systems Pte Ltd
Host : Dromatics Systems Pte Ltd
Location : Singapore, Central Singapore-01, Singapore
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Speedtest.net (Region: GLOBAL)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Location Latency Loss DL Speed UP Speed Server
ISP: Dromatics Systems Pte
Nearest 1.26 ms 0.0% 942.27 Mbps 943.03 Mbps PT Indosat Tbk - Singapore
Kochi, IN 170.41 ms 0.0% 933.21 Mbps 463.05 Mbps Asianet Broadband - Cochin
Bangalore, IN 38.55 ms 0.0% 933.83 Mbps 787.83 Mbps Bharti Airtel Ltd - Bangalore
Chennai, IN 36.12 ms N/A 936.59 Mbps 862.16 Mbps Jio - Chennai
Mumbai, IN 262.95 ms 0.3% 626.57 Mbps 267.74 Mbps i3D.net - Mumbai
Delhi, IN 187.82 ms 0.0% 937.88 Mbps 427.03 Mbps Tata Play Fiber - New Delhi
Seattle, US 174.89 ms N/A 935.58 Mbps 445.89 Mbps Comcast - Seattle, WA
Los Angeles, US 176.25 ms 0.0% 939.93 Mbps 447.78 Mbps ReliableSite Hosting - Los Angeles, CA
Dallas, US 238.07 ms 0.0% 934.20 Mbps 340.89 Mbps i3D.net - Dallas, TX
Miami, US 235.07 ms N/A 936.97 Mbps 337.26 Mbps Dish Wireless - Miami, FL
New York, US 234.66 ms 651.09 Mbps FAILED fdcservers.net - New York, NY
Toronto, CA FAILED
Mexico City, MX 225.23 ms N/A 897.80 Mbps 355.70 Mbps INFINITUM - Mexico City
London, UK 156.30 ms 0.0% 933.34 Mbps 511.77 Mbps VeloxServ Communications - London
Amsterdam, NL 153.82 ms 0.0% 932.18 Mbps 532.70 Mbps 31173 Services AB - Amsterdam
Paris, FR 153.58 ms N/A 933.00 Mbps 524.94 Mbps Axione - Paris
Frankfurt, DE 147.35 ms 0.0% 936.79 Mbps 479.69 Mbps Clouvider Ltd - Frankfurt am Main
Warsaw, PL 165.78 ms 0.0% 934.26 Mbps 483.59 Mbps Play - Warszawa
Bucharest, RO 197.01 ms 0.0% 933.23 Mbps 407.64 Mbps Vodafone Romania Fixed - Bucharest - Bucharest
Moscow, RU 182.31 ms 0.0% 936.85 Mbps 438.94 Mbps Rostelecom - Moscow
Jeddah, SA 189.12 ms 0.0% 853.00 Mbps 364.73 Mbps Saudi Telecom Company
Dubai, AE 83.20 ms 0.0% 957.14 Mbps 625.75 Mbps du - Dubai
Fujairah, AE 172.18 ms 0.0% 955.22 Mbps 552.06 Mbps e& UAE - Fujairah
Istanbul, TR 182.51 ms 0.0% 947.96 Mbps 442.38 Mbps Turkcell - Istanbul
Tehran, IR 235.00 ms 0.3% 932.65 Mbps 251.68 Mbps Asiatech - Tehran
Tokyo, JP 68.08 ms 0.0% 943.86 Mbps 624.28 Mbps IPA CyberLab 400G - Tokyo
Shanghai, CU-CN FAILED
Nanjing, CT-CN 316.96 ms 0.0% 934.83 Mbps 19.23 Mbps China Telecom JiangSu 5G - Nanjing
Hong Kong, CN 34.70 ms N/A 939.10 Mbps 807.66 Mbps STC - Hong Kong
Singapore, SG 2.10 ms 0.0% 929.66 Mbps 927.63 Mbps i3D.net - Singapore
Jakarta, ID 14.64 ms 0.0% 929.53 Mbps 928.82 Mbps PT Solnet Indonesia - Jakarta
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Avg DL Speed : 912.71 Mbps
Avg UL Speed : 503.51 Mbps
Total DL Data : 37.25 GB
Total UL Data : 18.29 GB
Total Data : 55.54 GB
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Duration : 14 min 48 sec
System Time : 09/08/2024 - 20:47:11 UTC
Total Script Runs : 77358
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Result : https://result.nws.sh/r/1723236209_42F4YG_GLOBAL.txt
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
Onidel Cloud VPS
Performance-first cloud hosting for teams that need consistent benchmarks and transparent pricing.
- 99.99% uptime SLA
- Proven availability for critical workloads
- Plans from $4.95/month
- Predictable pricing and simple scaling
- AMD EPYC + NVMe stack
- Modern hardware with built-in DDoS protection
- 5 global regions
- Singapore, Sydney, Amsterdam, Ho Chi Minh City, more coming soon
Ideal for: demanding SaaS workloads, managed hosting agencies, and teams migrating off legacy VPS providers.
Launch faster with concierge onboarding
Start 14-day TrialCPU Performance (Geekbench)
CPU benchmarks measure processing power for compute-intensive tasks. Learn how we test CPU performance.
I/O Speed Summary (dd)
IOPS Performance by Block Size
Combined IOPS Performance
Total IOPS across all block sizes (4K, 64K, 512K, 1M)
FIO Benchmark Details
Detailed I/O performance test results
Test 1 - Block Size: 4k (mixed_rw_50_50)
Test 2 - Block Size: 64k (mixed_rw_50_50)
Test 3 - Block Size: 512k (mixed_rw_50_50)
Test 4 - Block Size: 1m (mixed_rw_50_50)
Detailed I/O Benchmark (FIO)
IOPS Performance by Block Size
Bandwidth Performance by Block Size
Detailed Test Results
| Block Size | Read IOPS | Write IOPS | Read MB/s | Write MB/s |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4k | 41,200 | 41,300 | 164.8 | 165.3 |
| 64k | 21,100 | 21,200 | 1,350.0 | 1,360.0 |
| 512k | 2,700 | 2,800 | 1,380.0 | 1,460.0 |
| 1m | 1,400 | 1,500 | 1,510.0 | 1,610.0 |
Related Resources
Browse More Benchmarks
Explore comprehensive VPS benchmarks across providers and locations.
Compare Providers
View aggregated performance metrics across all VPS providers.
Performance Dashboard
Access real-time statistics, top performers, and latest results.
Testing Methodology
Learn about our comprehensive testing procedures and tools.
Understanding VPS Benchmark Results
This comprehensive benchmark report provides detailed performance analysis for OrangeVPS Intel Xeon 2 Core 4 GB Ram SG VPS in Singapore . Our standardized testing methodology measures CPU performance, disk I/O operations, network bandwidth, and real-world application performance to give you complete insights into VPS capabilities. Browse more VPS benchmarks to compare performance across providers.
Each benchmark metric serves a specific purpose in evaluating VPS performance. CPU benchmarks reveal processing power for applications, disk I/O tests measure storage performance for databases and file operations, network tests show bandwidth capacity for content delivery, and application benchmarks demonstrate real-world hosting performance. Together, these metrics provide a complete performance profile. Use our VPS comparison tool to analyze multiple plans side-by-side.
Benchmark Metrics & Features
Performance Analysis Use Cases
- Evaluating VPS CPU performance for compute-intensive applications
- Testing disk I/O performance for database workloads
- Comparing VPS performance across different providers
- Analyzing WordPress site performance on specific VPS plans
- Assessing value-for-money based on performance and pricing
- Checking real-world application performance metrics
- Understanding geographic performance variations by location
- Reviewing detailed benchmark metrics before VPS purchase
- Comparing single-core vs multi-core CPU performance
- Validating provider performance claims with actual data
- Making informed hosting decisions based on comprehensive benchmarks
How to Interpret Benchmark Results
1. CPU Performance (Geekbench)
Geekbench measures CPU performance through single-core and multi-core scores. Single-core scores (typically 800-2000) indicate performance for single-threaded applications and general responsiveness. Multi-core scores (1500-8000) show performance when all CPU cores are utilized for parallel processing. Higher scores mean better performance. Visit our testing methodology to learn more about CPU benchmarks.
2. Disk I/O Performance (FIO)
FIO benchmarks measure disk performance through IOPS (Input/Output Operations Per Second) and bandwidth (MB/s). High IOPS (10,000+ for NVMe, 5,000-10,000 for SSD) is crucial for database workloads with many small operations. High bandwidth is important for large file transfers and media applications. Compare disk performance across different providers in our database.
3. Application Performance
Real-world application benchmarks (WordPress, UnixBench) show how the VPS handles typical web workloads including PHP processing, database queries, and static file serving. These results measured in requests per second and page load times directly apply to web hosting scenarios. Need help choosing the right VPS? Visit about us to learn more about VPSMetrics.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I interpret the Geekbench single-core and multi-core scores?
Geekbench single-core scores indicate CPU performance for single-threaded applications, important for general responsiveness and web applications. Multi-core scores show performance when all CPU cores are utilized, crucial for parallel processing and multi-threaded applications. Higher scores indicate better performance. Modern VPS typically score 800-2000 (single) and 1500-8000 (multi) depending on the plan.
What do IOPS numbers mean in disk I/O benchmarks?
IOPS (Input/Output Operations Per Second) measures how many read/write operations your disk can handle per second. Higher IOPS means better performance for database operations and applications with many small file operations. NVMe SSD VPS typically delivers 10,000+ IOPS, while traditional SSD offers 5,000-10,000 IOPS.
What is UnixBench and why does it matter?
UnixBench is a comprehensive system-level benchmark suite that tests various aspects of Unix-like system performance including process creation, file operations, and system calls. It provides a holistic view of overall system performance beyond just CPU or disk metrics. Higher UnixBench scores indicate better overall system efficiency.
How reliable are WordPress benchmark results?
WordPress benchmarks provide real-world application performance metrics by testing actual WordPress installations. These results show how the VPS handles typical web application workloads including PHP processing, database queries, and static file serving. Results are measured in requests per second and page load times, directly applicable to web hosting scenarios.
Can I trust these benchmark results for my use case?
Our benchmarks provide standardized, reproducible test results using industry-standard tools. While they offer excellent performance indicators, your actual experience may vary based on your specific workload, application optimization, and usage patterns. Use these benchmarks as a reliable starting point for comparison between providers.
Why do benchmark results vary by location?
Different data center locations may have different hardware configurations, CPU generations, storage types, and network infrastructure. Providers often upgrade facilities at different rates across regions. Location-specific benchmarks help you choose a VPS in the right region with the best performance for your target audience.
Making Informed VPS Decisions
Use these comprehensive benchmark results to make data-driven hosting decisions. Compare multiple metrics together rather than focusing on a single aspect - a balanced VPS performs well across CPU, disk, and network benchmarks. Consider your specific workload requirements: CPU-intensive applications need high Geekbench scores, database-heavy applications require high IOPS, and content delivery services benefit from high network bandwidth.
Our benchmarks provide standardized, reproducible test results using industry-standard tools. While they offer excellent performance indicators, your actual experience may vary based on specific workload patterns and application optimization. Use these benchmarks as a reliable starting point for comparison between providers and configurations.
Compare More VPS Options
Explore additional benchmarks, compare multiple VPS plans side-by-side, and discover the best performing options for your specific requirements and budget.