OrangeVPS - AMD EPYC 2 Core 4 GB Ram - BASIC-KCMO
Comprehensive VPS benchmark results from United States tested on Nov 17, 2025. Learn our methodology.
System Specifications
Additional Benchmarks
UnixBench
System Performance Index
WordPress Bench
Web Application Performance
Benchmark Steps
| # | Suite | Run At | Raw Output |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Bench
|
Nov 17, 2025 01:16 |
View Raw Output-------------------- A Bench.sh Script By Teddysun ------------------- Version : v2025-05-08 Usage : wget -qO- bench.sh | bash ---------------------------------------------------------------------- CPU Model : AMD EPYC 7B13 64-Core Processor CPU Cores : 2 @ 2249.986 MHz CPU Cache : 512 KB AES-NI : ✓ Enabled VM-x/AMD-V : ✓ Enabled Total Disk : 40.0 GB (4.3 GB Used) Total Mem : 3.8 GB (243.9 MB Used) System uptime : 6 days, 7 hour 21 min Load average : 0.14, 0.12, 0.06 OS : AlmaLinux release 8.10 (Cerulean Leopard) Arch : x86_64 (64 Bit) Kernel : 4.18.0-513.5.1.el8_9.x86_64 TCP CC : cubic Virtualization : KVM IPv4/IPv6 : ✓ Online / ✗ Offline Organization : AS134677 Dromatics Systems Pte Ltd Location : Kansas City / US Region : Missouri ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I/O Speed(1st run) : 1.2 GB/s I/O Speed(2nd run) : 1.2 GB/s I/O Speed(3rd run) : 1.2 GB/s I/O Speed(average) : 1228.8 MB/s ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Node Name Upload Speed Download Speed Latency Speedtest.net 873.47 Mbps 675.63 Mbps 0.44 ms Paris, FR 292.69 Mbps 780.80 Mbps 99.40 ms Shanghai, CN 177.78 Mbps 800.87 Mbps 211.04 ms Singapore, SG 55.84 Mbps 581.73 Mbps 219.65 ms Tokyo, JP 204.73 Mbps 968.64 Mbps 139.42 ms ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Finished in : 2 min 26 sec Timestamp : 2025-11-17 01:16:17 UTC ---------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| 2 |
PassMark
|
Nov 17, 2025 01:16 |
View Raw OutputPassMark PerformanceTest Linux (11.0.1004) AMD EPYC 7B13 64-Core Processor (x86_64) 2 cores @ 2249 MHz | 3.8 GiB RAM Number of Processes: 2 | Test Iterations: 1 | Test Duration: Medium -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CPU Mark: 4083 Integer Math 9317 Million Operations/s Floating Point Math 7647 Million Operations/s Prime Numbers 30.2 Million Primes/s Sorting 5994 Thousand Strings/s Encryption 1981 MB/s Compression 39886 KB/s CPU Single Threaded 2173 Million Operations/s Physics 517 Frames/s Extended Instructions (SSE) 3275 Million Matrices/s Memory Mark: 1579 Database Operations 1614 Thousand Operations/s Memory Read Cached 21131 MB/s Memory Read Uncached 16073 MB/s Memory Write 15017 MB/s Available RAM 1818 Megabytes Memory Latency 72 Nanoseconds Memory Threaded 31257 MB/s -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| 3 |
UnixBench
|
Nov 17, 2025 02:09 |
View Raw OutputBenchmark Run: Mon Nov 17 2025 02:09:34 - 02:37:22
2 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 44273991.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 7573.4 MWIPS (8.8 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 4507.5 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1080182.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 282259.7 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 2958051.1 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 1771899.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 100302.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 12476.9 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 8397.7 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1705.5 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 2367778.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 44273991.9 3793.8
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 7573.4 1377.0
Execl Throughput 43.0 4507.5 1048.2
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 1080182.8 2727.7
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 282259.7 1705.5
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 2958051.1 5100.1
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1771899.8 1424.4
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 100302.8 250.8
Process Creation 126.0 12476.9 990.2
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 8397.7 1980.6
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1705.5 2842.5
System Call Overhead 15000.0 2367778.8 1578.5
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 1650.4
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Mon Nov 17 2025 02:37:22 - 03:05:10
2 CPUs in system; running 2 parallel copies of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 89080827.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 15132.3 MWIPS (8.8 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 7635.2 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 2086378.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 557540.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5656576.3 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 3551177.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 622794.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 22096.3 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 12336.0 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1694.5 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 4742287.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 89080827.0 7633.3
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 15132.3 2751.3
Execl Throughput 43.0 7635.2 1775.6
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 2086378.4 5268.6
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 557540.0 3368.8
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 5656576.3 9752.7
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 3551177.8 2854.6
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 622794.6 1557.0
Process Creation 126.0 22096.3 1753.7
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 12336.0 2909.4
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1694.5 2824.2
System Call Overhead 15000.0 4742287.0 3161.5
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 3233.6
|
| 4 |
Speedtest Global
|
Nov 17, 2025 04:42 |
View Raw OutputSpeedtest.net (Region: GLOBAL) --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Location Latency Loss DL Speed UP Speed Server ISP: Dromatics Systems Pte Nearest 0.33 ms 0.0% 842.08 Mbps 790.09 Mbps Advin Services LLC - Kansas City, MO Bangalore, IN 241.69 ms 0.0% 841.71 Mbps 162.46 Mbps Bharti Airtel Ltd - Bangalore Chennai, IN 246.82 ms 0.0% 848.62 Mbps 155.79 Mbps RailTel Corporation of India Ltd - Chennai Mumbai, IN 234.76 ms 2.3% 804.57 Mbps 136.70 Mbps Melbicom - Mumbai Seattle, US 53.99 ms N/A 916.56 Mbps 133.34 Mbps Comcast - Seattle, WA Los Angeles, US 45.79 ms 0.0% 936.57 Mbps 432.98 Mbps ReliableSite Hosting - Los Angeles, CA Dallas, US 11.39 ms 0.0% 638.56 Mbps 806.79 Mbps Hivelocity - Dallas, TX Miami, US 49.88 ms 0.0% 747.78 Mbps 440.84 Mbps Frontier - Miami, FL New York, US 36.39 ms 0.0% 657.22 Mbps 416.06 Mbps GSL Networks - New York, NY Toronto, CA 23.30 ms 0.0% 772.18 Mbps 606.69 Mbps Rogers - Toronto, ON Mexico City, MX 164.49 ms N/A 808.96 Mbps 259.22 Mbps INFINITUM - Ciudad de México London, UK 103.02 ms 0.0% 789.89 Mbps 244.21 Mbps VeloxServ Communications - London Amsterdam, NL 103.60 ms 0.0% 711.90 Mbps 258.57 Mbps 31173 Services AB - Amsterdam Paris, FR 100.35 ms 0.0% 703.53 Mbps 255.59 Mbps Scaleway - Paris Frankfurt, DE 108.24 ms 0.0% 737.12 Mbps 228.24 Mbps Clouvider Ltd - Frankfurt am Main Warsaw, PL 122.63 ms 0.0% 816.97 Mbps 301.78 Mbps Play - Warszawa Bucharest, RO 139.15 ms 0.0% 672.42 Mbps 255.37 Mbps Digi Moscow, RU 145.89 ms 0.0% 808.93 Mbps 228.17 Mbps Misaka Network, Inc. - Moscow Jeddah, SA 178.15 ms 0.0% 823.99 Mbps 199.10 Mbps Saudi Telecom Company Dubai, AE 203.05 ms 0.0% 767.24 Mbps 166.29 Mbps e& UAE - Dubai Istanbul, TR 147.39 ms 0.0% 943.00 Mbps 241.41 Mbps Turkcell - Istanbul Tehran, IR FAILED Cairo, EG 159.97 ms 0.0% 677.40 Mbps 146.74 Mbps Telecom Egypt - Cairo Tokyo, JP 176.08 ms 8.4% 835.33 Mbps 213.09 Mbps fdcservers.net - Tokyo Shanghai, CU-CN 234.57 ms N/A 750.10 Mbps 27.26 Mbps China Unicom 5G - Shanghai Hong Kong, CN 180.37 ms 0.0% 786.95 Mbps 32.98 Mbps Misaka Network, Inc. - Hong Kong Singapore, SG 202.61 ms 0.0% 779.98 Mbps 116.41 Mbps ViewQwest - Singapore Jakarta, ID 226.48 ms 0.0% 694.86 Mbps 134.63 Mbps PT Solnet Indonesia - Jakarta Sydney, AU 186.12 ms 0.0% 811.78 Mbps 147.78 Mbps Aussie Broadband - Sydney --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Avg DL Speed : 783.08 Mbps Avg UL Speed : 269.24 Mbps Total DL Data : 31.96 GB Total UL Data : 9.36 GB Total Data : 41.32 GB --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Duration : 13 min 54 sec System Time : 17/11/2025 - 04:42:08 UTC Total Script Runs : 508912 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Result : https://result.nws.sh/r/1763353615_6776XB_GLOBAL.txt --------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
Onidel Cloud VPS
Performance-first cloud hosting for teams that need consistent benchmarks and transparent pricing.
- 99.99% uptime SLA
- Proven availability for critical workloads
- Plans from $4.95/month
- Predictable pricing and simple scaling
- AMD EPYC + NVMe stack
- Modern hardware with built-in DDoS protection
- 5 global regions
- Singapore, Sydney, Amsterdam, Ho Chi Minh City, more coming soon
Ideal for: demanding SaaS workloads, managed hosting agencies, and teams migrating off legacy VPS providers.
Launch faster with concierge onboarding
Start 14-day TrialCPU Performance (Geekbench)
CPU benchmarks measure processing power for compute-intensive tasks. Learn how we test CPU performance.
I/O Speed Summary (dd)
IOPS Performance by Block Size
Combined IOPS Performance
Total IOPS across all block sizes (4K, 64K, 512K, 1M)
FIO Benchmark Details
Detailed I/O performance test results
Test 1 - Block Size: 4k (mixed_rw_50_50)
Test 2 - Block Size: 64k (mixed_rw_50_50)
Test 3 - Block Size: 512k (mixed_rw_50_50)
Test 4 - Block Size: 1m (mixed_rw_50_50)
Detailed I/O Benchmark (FIO)
IOPS Performance by Block Size
Bandwidth Performance by Block Size
Detailed Test Results
| Block Size | Read IOPS | Write IOPS | Read MB/s | Write MB/s |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4k | 51,900 | 52,000 | 207.8 | 208.4 |
| 64k | 17,000 | 17,100 | 1,080.0 | 1,090.0 |
| 512k | 2,100 | 2,200 | 1,080.0 | 1,130.0 |
| 1m | 1,000 | 1,000 | 1,050.0 | 1,120.0 |
Related Resources
Browse More Benchmarks
Explore comprehensive VPS benchmarks across providers and locations.
Compare Providers
View aggregated performance metrics across all VPS providers.
Performance Dashboard
Access real-time statistics, top performers, and latest results.
Testing Methodology
Learn about our comprehensive testing procedures and tools.
Understanding VPS Benchmark Results
This comprehensive benchmark report provides detailed performance analysis for OrangeVPS AMD EPYC 2 Core 4 GB Ram - BASIC-KCMO VPS in United States. Our standardized testing methodology measures CPU performance, disk I/O operations, network bandwidth, and real-world application performance to give you complete insights into VPS capabilities. Browse more VPS benchmarks to compare performance across providers.
Each benchmark metric serves a specific purpose in evaluating VPS performance. CPU benchmarks reveal processing power for applications, disk I/O tests measure storage performance for databases and file operations, network tests show bandwidth capacity for content delivery, and application benchmarks demonstrate real-world hosting performance. Together, these metrics provide a complete performance profile. Use our VPS comparison tool to analyze multiple plans side-by-side.
Benchmark Metrics & Features
Performance Analysis Use Cases
- Evaluating VPS CPU performance for compute-intensive applications
- Testing disk I/O performance for database workloads
- Comparing VPS performance across different providers
- Analyzing WordPress site performance on specific VPS plans
- Assessing value-for-money based on performance and pricing
- Checking real-world application performance metrics
- Understanding geographic performance variations by location
- Reviewing detailed benchmark metrics before VPS purchase
- Comparing single-core vs multi-core CPU performance
- Validating provider performance claims with actual data
- Making informed hosting decisions based on comprehensive benchmarks
How to Interpret Benchmark Results
1. CPU Performance (Geekbench)
Geekbench measures CPU performance through single-core and multi-core scores. Single-core scores (typically 800-2000) indicate performance for single-threaded applications and general responsiveness. Multi-core scores (1500-8000) show performance when all CPU cores are utilized for parallel processing. Higher scores mean better performance. Visit our testing methodology to learn more about CPU benchmarks.
2. Disk I/O Performance (FIO)
FIO benchmarks measure disk performance through IOPS (Input/Output Operations Per Second) and bandwidth (MB/s). High IOPS (10,000+ for NVMe, 5,000-10,000 for SSD) is crucial for database workloads with many small operations. High bandwidth is important for large file transfers and media applications. Compare disk performance across different providers in our database.
3. Application Performance
Real-world application benchmarks (WordPress, UnixBench) show how the VPS handles typical web workloads including PHP processing, database queries, and static file serving. These results measured in requests per second and page load times directly apply to web hosting scenarios. Need help choosing the right VPS? Visit about us to learn more about VPSMetrics.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I interpret the Geekbench single-core and multi-core scores?
Geekbench single-core scores indicate CPU performance for single-threaded applications, important for general responsiveness and web applications. Multi-core scores show performance when all CPU cores are utilized, crucial for parallel processing and multi-threaded applications. Higher scores indicate better performance. Modern VPS typically score 800-2000 (single) and 1500-8000 (multi) depending on the plan.
What do IOPS numbers mean in disk I/O benchmarks?
IOPS (Input/Output Operations Per Second) measures how many read/write operations your disk can handle per second. Higher IOPS means better performance for database operations and applications with many small file operations. NVMe SSD VPS typically delivers 10,000+ IOPS, while traditional SSD offers 5,000-10,000 IOPS.
What is UnixBench and why does it matter?
UnixBench is a comprehensive system-level benchmark suite that tests various aspects of Unix-like system performance including process creation, file operations, and system calls. It provides a holistic view of overall system performance beyond just CPU or disk metrics. Higher UnixBench scores indicate better overall system efficiency.
How reliable are WordPress benchmark results?
WordPress benchmarks provide real-world application performance metrics by testing actual WordPress installations. These results show how the VPS handles typical web application workloads including PHP processing, database queries, and static file serving. Results are measured in requests per second and page load times, directly applicable to web hosting scenarios.
Can I trust these benchmark results for my use case?
Our benchmarks provide standardized, reproducible test results using industry-standard tools. While they offer excellent performance indicators, your actual experience may vary based on your specific workload, application optimization, and usage patterns. Use these benchmarks as a reliable starting point for comparison between providers.
Why do benchmark results vary by location?
Different data center locations may have different hardware configurations, CPU generations, storage types, and network infrastructure. Providers often upgrade facilities at different rates across regions. Location-specific benchmarks help you choose a VPS in the right region with the best performance for your target audience.
Making Informed VPS Decisions
Use these comprehensive benchmark results to make data-driven hosting decisions. Compare multiple metrics together rather than focusing on a single aspect - a balanced VPS performs well across CPU, disk, and network benchmarks. Consider your specific workload requirements: CPU-intensive applications need high Geekbench scores, database-heavy applications require high IOPS, and content delivery services benefit from high network bandwidth.
Our benchmarks provide standardized, reproducible test results using industry-standard tools. While they offer excellent performance indicators, your actual experience may vary based on specific workload patterns and application optimization. Use these benchmarks as a reliable starting point for comparison between providers and configurations.
Compare More VPS Options
Explore additional benchmarks, compare multiple VPS plans side-by-side, and discover the best performing options for your specific requirements and budget.
