OneVirt - Intel Xeon Silver 2 Core 4 GB Ram NL
Comprehensive VPS benchmark results from Netherlands tested on May 29, 2023. Learn our methodology.
System Specifications
Additional Benchmarks
UnixBench
System Performance Index
WordPress Bench
Web Application Performance
Benchmark Steps
| # | Suite | Run At | Raw Output |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Bench
|
May 29, 2023 14:30 |
View Raw Output-------------------- A Bench.sh Script By Teddysun ------------------- Version : v2022-06-01 Usage : wget -qO- bench.sh | bash ---------------------------------------------------------------------- CPU Model : Common KVM processor CPU Cores : 4 @ 2100.000 MHz CPU Cache : 16384 KB AES-NI : Enabled VM-x/AMD-V : Disabled Total Disk : 98.4 GB (2.0 GB Used) Total Mem : 3.8 GB (67.6 MB Used) System uptime : 0 days, 1 hour 57 min Load average : 0.00, 0.00, 0.11 OS : Debian GNU/Linux 11 Arch : x86_64 (64 Bit) Kernel : 5.10.0-23-cloud-amd64 TCP CC : bbr Virtualization : KVM Organization : AS50673 Serverius Location : Dronten / NL Region : Flevoland ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I/O Speed(1st run) : 246 MB/s I/O Speed(2nd run) : 237 MB/s I/O Speed(3rd run) : 234 MB/s I/O Speed(average) : 239.0 MB/s ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Node Name Upload Speed Download Speed Latency Speedtest.net 632.91 Mbps 865.02 Mbps 137.59 ms Los Angeles, US 557.01 Mbps 921.33 Mbps 139.37 ms Dallas, US 687.52 Mbps 892.10 Mbps 111.29 ms Montreal, CA 455.83 Mbps 878.62 Mbps 82.03 ms Paris, FR 892.60 Mbps 929.00 Mbps 17.84 ms Amsterdam, NL 923.05 Mbps 941.89 Mbps 2.89 ms Shanghai, CN 448.71 Mbps 836.26 Mbps 198.58 ms Nanjing, CN 67.48 Mbps 640.69 Mbps 238.08 ms Guangzhou, CN 0.48 Mbps 137.16 Mbps 284.26 ms Hongkong, CN 306.93 Mbps 842.99 Mbps 260.96 ms Singapore, SG 503.64 Mbps 784.41 Mbps 162.49 ms Tokyo, JP 157.98 Mbps 695.83 Mbps 230.30 ms ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Finished in : 6 min 18 sec Timestamp : 2023-05-29 14:30:06 UTC ---------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| 2 |
Speedtest Global
|
May 29, 2023 14:52 |
View Raw Output---------------------------- network-speed.xyz ----------------------------
A simple script to test network performance using speedtest-cli
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Version : v2023.05.28
Global Speedtest : wget -qO- network-speed.xyz | bash
Region Speedtest : wget -qO- network-speed.xyz | bash -s -- -r <region>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Basic System Info
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
CPU Model : Common KVM processor
CPU Cores : 4 @ 2100.000 MHz
CPU Cache : 16384 KB
AES-NI : ✔ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ❌ Disabled
Total Disk : 98.4 GB (2.0 GB Used)
Total RAM : 3.8 GB (71.3 MB Used)
System uptime : 0 days, 2 hour 13 min
Load average : 0.06, 0.08, 0.11
OS : Debian GNU/Linux 11
Arch : x86_64 (64 Bit)
Kernel : 5.10.0-23-cloud-amd64
Virtualization : KVM
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Basic Network Info
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Primary Network : IPv6
ISP : Serverius Holding B.V.
ASN : AS50673 Serverius
Host : In Viridweb1
Location : Amsterdam, North Holland-NH, Netherlands
Location (IPv4) : Dronten, Flevoland, NL
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Speedtest.net (Region: GLOBAL)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Location Latency Loss DL Speed UP Speed Server
ISP: Serverius Holding B.V.
Nearest 139.42 ms 0.0% 887.95 Mbps 623.23 Mbps RailTel Corporation of India, Ltd - Nagpur
Kochi, IN 232.14 ms 0.0% 662.74 Mbps 456.15 Mbps Asianet Broadband - Cochin
Bangalore, IN 146.16 ms 0.0% 880.08 Mbps 588.88 Mbps Bharti Airtel Ltd - Bangalore
Chennai, IN 144.66 ms N/A 763.32 Mbps 537.71 Mbps Jio - Chennai
Mumbai, IN 124.72 ms 0.0% 889.23 Mbps 620.96 Mbps i3D.net - Mumbai
Delhi, IN 139.47 ms 0.0% 875.17 Mbps 547.51 Mbps Tata Play Fiber - New Delhi
Los Angeles, US 138.79 ms 0.0% 922.08 Mbps 581.58 Mbps ReliableSite Hosting - Los Angeles, CA
Dallas, US 112.89 ms 0.0% 710.36 Mbps 721.07 Mbps Hivelocity - Dallas, TX
New York, US 77.25 ms 0.0% 32.55 Mbps 879.45 Mbps Clouvider Ltd - New York, NY
Seattle, US 157.30 ms 0.0% 477.84 Mbps 506.14 Mbps DediPath - Seattle, WA
Miami, US 115.24 ms 0.0% 851.54 Mbps 675.40 Mbps AT&T - Miami, FL
Toronto, CA 86.71 ms 0.0% 937.33 Mbps 853.94 Mbps Rogers - Toronto, ON
Paris, FR 17.66 ms 0.0% 929.74 Mbps 890.59 Mbps ORANGE FRANCE - Paris
Amsterdam, NL 1.94 ms 0.0% 928.76 Mbps 926.85 Mbps Clouvider Ltd - Amsterdam
Warsaw, PL 23.24 ms 0.0% 929.48 Mbps 915.38 Mbps UPC Polska - Warszawa
London, UK 6.78 ms 0.0% 927.41 Mbps 927.40 Mbps VeloxServ Communications - London
Frankfurt, DE 7.79 ms 0.0% 927.94 Mbps 927.21 Mbps 23M GmbH - Frankfurt Am Main
Bucharest, RO 40.92 ms 0.0% 945.26 Mbps 902.94 Mbps Vodafone Romania Fixed - Bucharest - Bucharest
Dubai, AE 120.43 ms 0.0% 945.70 Mbps 551.15 Mbps du - Dubai
Fujairah, AE 121.70 ms 0.0% 946.92 Mbps 695.30 Mbps ETISALAT-UAE - Fujairah
Jeddah, KSA 79.40 ms 0.0% 941.11 Mbps 881.32 Mbps Saudi Telecom Company
Shanghai, CU-CN 168.69 ms 0.0% 782.75 Mbps 448.39 Mbps China Unicom 5G - ShangHai
Nanjing, CT-CN 228.63 ms 4.8% 591.88 Mbps 39.57 Mbps China Telecom JiangSu 5G - Nanjing
Hong Kong, HKG 160.21 ms N/A 876.60 Mbps 497.84 Mbps STC - Hong Kong
Singapore, SG 157.61 ms 0.0% 845.57 Mbps 512.86 Mbps i3D.net - Singapore
Jakarta, ID 188.32 ms 0.0% 695.12 Mbps 426.84 Mbps PT. Telekomunikasi Indonesia - Jakarta
Tokyo, JP 252.40 ms N/A 728.35 Mbps 185.22 Mbps fdcservers.net - Tokyo
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Avg DL Speed : 808.62 Mbps
Avg UL Speed : 641.51 Mbps
Total DL Data : 30.91 GB
Total UL Data : 22.01 GB
Total Data : 52.92 GB
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Duration : 13 min 2 sec
System Time : 29/05/2023 - 14:52:31 UTC
Total Script Runs : 2853
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Result : https://cdn1.frocdn.ch/Lc6u8GML6n4aNeM.txt
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| 3 |
Benchy
|
May 29, 2023 15:05 |
View Raw Output# # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Benchy v2.6 # # https://github.com/L1so/benchy # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # 29 May 2023 15:05 UTC # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Server Insight Hardware Information --------------------- --------------------- OS : Debian GNU/Linux 11 (bullseye) Model : Common KVM processor Location : Netherlands Core : 2 @ 2100.000 MHz Kernel : 5.10.0-23-cloud-amd64 AES-NI : ✔ Enabled Uptime : 0 days, 2 hrs, 38 mins, 44 secs VM-x/AMD-V : ❌ Disabled Virt : kvm Swap : 0.0 KiB Disk & Memory Usage Network Information --------------------- --------------------- Disk (1) : 98.3 GiB ASN : AS50673 Disk Usage : 2.0 GiB (2% Used) ISP : Serverius Mem : 3.8 GiB IPv4 : ✔ Enabled Mem Usage : 0.1 GiB (2% Used) IPv6 : ✔ Enabled Ookla Network Speedtest (Region: Europe) +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Provider | Location | Download | Upload | Data Used | Latency | +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | TestDebit | Marseille, FR | 934.0 Mb/s | 906.0 Mb/s | 2.4 GB | 22.2 ms | | Vancis | Amsterdam, NL | 888.2 Mb/s | 823.0 Mb/s | 2.5 GB | 2.5 ms | | CoreIX | London, GB | 941.4 Mb/s | 933.0 Mb/s | 2.2 GB | 8.5 ms | | Skynet | Warsaw, PL | 928.7 Mb/s | 919.5 Mb/s | 2.1 GB | 18.5 ms | | Vodafone | Milan, IT | 956.1 Mb/s | 909.2 Mb/s | 2.4 GB | 16.2 ms | +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ Network Performance Test (Region: Europe) +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Prot. | Provider | Location | Send | Receive | Latency | +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | IPv4 | FiberBy | Copenhagen, DK | 936.4 Mb/s | 952.6 Mb/s | 11.5 ms | | | WOBCOM | Wolfsburg, DE | 946.3 Mb/s | 966.8 Mb/s | 10.9 ms | | | Novogara | Amsterdam, NL | 939.2 Mb/s | 950.4 Mb/s | 3.7 ms | | | Sasag | Schaff, CH | 944.0 Mb/s | 955.5 Mb/s | 13.9 ms | | | Alwyzon | Vienna, AT | 941.2 Mb/s | 951.3 Mb/s | 22.0 ms | +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | IPv6 | FiberBy | Copenhagen, DK | 926.3 Mb/s | 939.1 Mb/s | 11.6 ms | | | WOBCOM | Wolfsburg, DE | 931.0 Mb/s | 955.3 Mb/s | 10.9 ms | | | Novogara | Amsterdam, NL | 927.0 Mb/s | 938.2 Mb/s | 3.7 ms | | | Sasag | Schaff, CH | 927.9 Mb/s | 938.7 Mb/s | 13.9 ms | | | Alwyzon | Vienna, AT | 928.2 Mb/s | 936.9 Mb/s | 22.1 ms | +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ |
| 4 |
PassMark
|
May 29, 2023 15:05 |
View Raw OutputPassMark PerformanceTest Linux Common KVM processor (x86_64) 2 cores @ 2100 MHz | 3.8 GiB RAM Number of Processes: 2 | Test Iterations: 2 | Test Duration: Very Long -------------------------------------------------------------------------- CPU Mark: 2572 Integer Math 6726 Million Operations/s Floating Point Math 5549 Million Operations/s Prime Numbers 23.8 Million Primes/s Sorting 4948 Thousand Strings/s Encryption 884 MB/s Compression 35761 KB/s CPU Single Threaded 1861 Million Operations/s Physics 354 Frames/s Extended Instructions (SSE) 1201 Million Matrices/s Memory Mark: 1641 Database Operations 1359 Thousand Operations/s Memory Read Cached 20650 MB/s Memory Read Uncached 12035 MB/s Memory Write 6974 MB/s Available RAM 2852 Megabytes Memory Latency 53 Nanoseconds Memory Threaded 17057 MB/s -------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| 5 |
UnixBench
|
May 29, 2023 15:54 |
View Raw Output------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Mon May 29 2023 15:54:07 - 16:22:10
2 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 36004796.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 5055.3 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 3459.8 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 405804.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 105629.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1269196.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 556487.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 40379.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 6849.1 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 9678.7 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 2059.8 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 320706.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 36004796.2 3085.2
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 5055.3 919.1
Execl Throughput 43.0 3459.8 804.6
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 405804.0 1024.8
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 105629.4 638.2
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1269196.0 2188.3
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 556487.4 447.3
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 40379.9 100.9
Process Creation 126.0 6849.1 543.6
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 9678.7 2282.7
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 2059.8 3433.0
System Call Overhead 15000.0 320706.8 213.8
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 845.9
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Mon May 29 2023 16:22:10 - 16:50:13
2 CPUs in system; running 2 parallel copies of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 71766408.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 10139.4 MWIPS (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 6353.0 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 762990.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 195127.2 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 2340271.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 1132309.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 279668.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 15507.2 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 15333.8 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 2106.8 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 647948.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 71766408.8 6149.6
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 10139.4 1843.5
Execl Throughput 43.0 6353.0 1477.4
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 762990.8 1926.7
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 195127.2 1179.0
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 2340271.8 4035.0
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1132309.8 910.2
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 279668.9 699.2
Process Creation 126.0 15507.2 1230.7
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 15333.8 3616.5
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 2106.8 3511.3
System Call Overhead 15000.0 647948.0 432.0
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 1717.7
|
Onidel Cloud VPS
Performance-first cloud hosting for teams that need consistent benchmarks and transparent pricing.
- 99.99% uptime SLA
- Proven availability for critical workloads
- Plans from $4.95/month
- Predictable pricing and simple scaling
- AMD EPYC + NVMe stack
- Modern hardware with built-in DDoS protection
- 5 global regions
- Singapore, Sydney, Amsterdam, Ho Chi Minh City, more coming soon
Ideal for: demanding SaaS workloads, managed hosting agencies, and teams migrating off legacy VPS providers.
Launch faster with concierge onboarding
Start 14-day TrialCPU Performance (Geekbench)
CPU benchmarks measure processing power for compute-intensive tasks. Learn how we test CPU performance.
I/O Speed Summary (dd)
IOPS Performance by Block Size
Combined IOPS Performance
Total IOPS across all block sizes (4K, 64K, 512K, 1M)
FIO Benchmark Details
Detailed I/O performance test results
Test 1 - Block Size: 4k (mixed_rw_50_50)
Test 2 - Block Size: 64k (mixed_rw_50_50)
Test 3 - Block Size: 512k (mixed_rw_50_50)
Test 4 - Block Size: 1m (mixed_rw_50_50)
Detailed I/O Benchmark (FIO)
IOPS Performance by Block Size
Bandwidth Performance by Block Size
Detailed Test Results
| Block Size | Read IOPS | Write IOPS | Read MB/s | Write MB/s |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4k | 18,200 | 18,200 | 72.8 | 73.0 |
| 64k | 2,300 | 2,300 | 149.7 | 150.5 |
| 512k | 343 | 361 | 175.9 | 185.3 |
| 1m | 187 | 200 | 192.1 | 204.9 |
Related Resources
Browse More Benchmarks
Explore comprehensive VPS benchmarks across providers and locations.
Compare Providers
View aggregated performance metrics across all VPS providers.
Performance Dashboard
Access real-time statistics, top performers, and latest results.
Testing Methodology
Learn about our comprehensive testing procedures and tools.
Understanding VPS Benchmark Results
This comprehensive benchmark report provides detailed performance analysis for OneVirt Intel Xeon Silver 2 Core 4 GB Ram NL VPS in Netherlands. Our standardized testing methodology measures CPU performance, disk I/O operations, network bandwidth, and real-world application performance to give you complete insights into VPS capabilities. Browse more VPS benchmarks to compare performance across providers.
Each benchmark metric serves a specific purpose in evaluating VPS performance. CPU benchmarks reveal processing power for applications, disk I/O tests measure storage performance for databases and file operations, network tests show bandwidth capacity for content delivery, and application benchmarks demonstrate real-world hosting performance. Together, these metrics provide a complete performance profile. Use our VPS comparison tool to analyze multiple plans side-by-side.
Benchmark Metrics & Features
Performance Analysis Use Cases
- Evaluating VPS CPU performance for compute-intensive applications
- Testing disk I/O performance for database workloads
- Comparing VPS performance across different providers
- Analyzing WordPress site performance on specific VPS plans
- Assessing value-for-money based on performance and pricing
- Checking real-world application performance metrics
- Understanding geographic performance variations by location
- Reviewing detailed benchmark metrics before VPS purchase
- Comparing single-core vs multi-core CPU performance
- Validating provider performance claims with actual data
- Making informed hosting decisions based on comprehensive benchmarks
How to Interpret Benchmark Results
1. CPU Performance (Geekbench)
Geekbench measures CPU performance through single-core and multi-core scores. Single-core scores (typically 800-2000) indicate performance for single-threaded applications and general responsiveness. Multi-core scores (1500-8000) show performance when all CPU cores are utilized for parallel processing. Higher scores mean better performance. Visit our testing methodology to learn more about CPU benchmarks.
2. Disk I/O Performance (FIO)
FIO benchmarks measure disk performance through IOPS (Input/Output Operations Per Second) and bandwidth (MB/s). High IOPS (10,000+ for NVMe, 5,000-10,000 for SSD) is crucial for database workloads with many small operations. High bandwidth is important for large file transfers and media applications. Compare disk performance across different providers in our database.
3. Application Performance
Real-world application benchmarks (WordPress, UnixBench) show how the VPS handles typical web workloads including PHP processing, database queries, and static file serving. These results measured in requests per second and page load times directly apply to web hosting scenarios. Need help choosing the right VPS? Visit about us to learn more about VPSMetrics.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I interpret the Geekbench single-core and multi-core scores?
Geekbench single-core scores indicate CPU performance for single-threaded applications, important for general responsiveness and web applications. Multi-core scores show performance when all CPU cores are utilized, crucial for parallel processing and multi-threaded applications. Higher scores indicate better performance. Modern VPS typically score 800-2000 (single) and 1500-8000 (multi) depending on the plan.
What do IOPS numbers mean in disk I/O benchmarks?
IOPS (Input/Output Operations Per Second) measures how many read/write operations your disk can handle per second. Higher IOPS means better performance for database operations and applications with many small file operations. NVMe SSD VPS typically delivers 10,000+ IOPS, while traditional SSD offers 5,000-10,000 IOPS.
What is UnixBench and why does it matter?
UnixBench is a comprehensive system-level benchmark suite that tests various aspects of Unix-like system performance including process creation, file operations, and system calls. It provides a holistic view of overall system performance beyond just CPU or disk metrics. Higher UnixBench scores indicate better overall system efficiency.
How reliable are WordPress benchmark results?
WordPress benchmarks provide real-world application performance metrics by testing actual WordPress installations. These results show how the VPS handles typical web application workloads including PHP processing, database queries, and static file serving. Results are measured in requests per second and page load times, directly applicable to web hosting scenarios.
Can I trust these benchmark results for my use case?
Our benchmarks provide standardized, reproducible test results using industry-standard tools. While they offer excellent performance indicators, your actual experience may vary based on your specific workload, application optimization, and usage patterns. Use these benchmarks as a reliable starting point for comparison between providers.
Why do benchmark results vary by location?
Different data center locations may have different hardware configurations, CPU generations, storage types, and network infrastructure. Providers often upgrade facilities at different rates across regions. Location-specific benchmarks help you choose a VPS in the right region with the best performance for your target audience.
Making Informed VPS Decisions
Use these comprehensive benchmark results to make data-driven hosting decisions. Compare multiple metrics together rather than focusing on a single aspect - a balanced VPS performs well across CPU, disk, and network benchmarks. Consider your specific workload requirements: CPU-intensive applications need high Geekbench scores, database-heavy applications require high IOPS, and content delivery services benefit from high network bandwidth.
Our benchmarks provide standardized, reproducible test results using industry-standard tools. While they offer excellent performance indicators, your actual experience may vary based on specific workload patterns and application optimization. Use these benchmarks as a reliable starting point for comparison between providers and configurations.
Compare More VPS Options
Explore additional benchmarks, compare multiple VPS plans side-by-side, and discover the best performing options for your specific requirements and budget.