OneVirt - AMD EPYC Rome 2 Core 4 GB Ram NL
Comprehensive VPS benchmark results from Netherlands tested on May 29, 2023. Learn our methodology.
System Specifications
Additional Benchmarks
UnixBench
System Performance Index
WordPress Bench
Web Application Performance
Benchmark Steps
| # | Suite | Run At | Raw Output |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Bench
|
May 28, 2023 14:05 |
View Raw Output-------------------- A Bench.sh Script By Teddysun ------------------- Version : v2022-06-01 Usage : wget -qO- bench.sh | bash ---------------------------------------------------------------------- CPU Model : Common KVM processor CPU Cores : 4 @ 2799.998 MHz CPU Cache : 512 KB AES-NI : Enabled VM-x/AMD-V : Disabled Total Disk : 96.9 GB (4.2 GB Used) Total Mem : 3.8 GB (141.0 MB Used) System uptime : 0 days, 0 hour 11 min Load average : 0.41, 0.26, 0.12 OS : Ubuntu 22.10 Arch : x86_64 (64 Bit) Kernel : 5.19.0-42-generic TCP CC : bbr Virtualization : KVM Organization : AS50673 Serverius Location : Dronten / NL Region : Flevoland ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I/O Speed(1st run) : 274 MB/s I/O Speed(2nd run) : 273 MB/s I/O Speed(3rd run) : 268 MB/s I/O Speed(average) : 271.7 MB/s ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Node Name Upload Speed Download Speed Latency Speedtest.net 615.35 Mbps 5942.04 Mbps 131.94 ms Los Angeles, US 599.06 Mbps 5727.47 Mbps 138.59 ms Dallas, US 709.00 Mbps 6475.74 Mbps 111.09 ms Montreal, CA 550.44 Mbps 681.70 Mbps 82.07 ms Paris, FR 4631.27 Mbps 5768.37 Mbps 17.76 ms Amsterdam, NL 3985.88 Mbps 5769.73 Mbps 2.53 ms Shanghai, CN 444.85 Mbps 4035.64 Mbps 189.86 ms Nanjing, CN 72.30 Mbps 2911.70 Mbps 239.86 ms Hongkong, CN 305.91 Mbps 3054.99 Mbps 108.73 ms Singapore, SG 445.86 Mbps 541.00 Mbps 160.78 ms Tokyo, JP 247.79 Mbps 894.86 Mbps 215.57 ms ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Finished in : 6 min 6 sec Timestamp : 2023-05-28 14:05:10 UTC ---------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| 2 |
Benchy
|
May 28, 2023 14:41 |
View Raw Output# # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Benchy v2.6 # # https://github.com/L1so/benchy # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # 28 May 2023 14:41 UTC # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Server Insight Hardware Information --------------------- --------------------- OS : Ubuntu 22.10 Model : Common KVM processor Location : Netherlands Core : 2 @ 2799.998 MHz Kernel : 5.19.0-42-generic AES-NI : ✔ Enabled Uptime : 0 days, 0 hrs, 54 mins, 28 secs VM-x/AMD-V : ❌ Disabled Virt : kvm Swap : 0.0 KiB Disk & Memory Usage Network Information --------------------- --------------------- Disk (1) : 96.8 GiB ASN : AS50673 Disk Usage : 4.2 GiB (4% Used) ISP : Serverius Mem : 3.8 GiB IPv4 : ✔ Enabled Mem Usage : 0.1 GiB (4% Used) IPv6 : ✔ Enabled Ookla Network Speedtest (Region: Europe) +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Provider | Location | Download | Upload | Data Used | Latency | +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | TestDebit | Marseille, FR | 6.1 Gb/s | 3.7 Gb/s | 13.9 GB | 22.1 ms | | Serverius | Amsterdam, NL | 7.3 Gb/s | 9.4 Gb/s | 19.6 GB | 1.0 ms | | Hyperoptic | London, GB | 6.8 Gb/s | 8.8 Gb/s | 18.9 GB | 6.9 ms | | Skynet | Warsaw, PL | 6.6 Gb/s | 4.4 Gb/s | 13.6 GB | 18.5 ms | | Vodafone | Milan, IT | 6.2 Gb/s | 4.9 Gb/s | 15.5 GB | 16.3 ms | +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ Network Performance Test (Region: Europe) +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Prot. | Provider | Location | Send | Receive | Latency | +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | IPv4 | FiberBy | Copenhagen, DK | 5.1 Gb/s | 6.8 Gb/s | 11.7 ms | | | WOBCOM | Wolfsburg, DE | 8.1 Gb/s | 6.5 Gb/s | 10.6 ms | | | Novogara | Amsterdam, NL | 9.3 Gb/s | 2.1 Gb/s | 3.6 ms | | | Sasag | Schaff, CH | 5.2 Gb/s | 6.3 Gb/s | 13.7 ms | | | Alwyzon | Vienna, AT | 8.7 Gb/s | 5.8 Gb/s | 22.1 ms | +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | IPv6 | FiberBy | Copenhagen, DK | 4.6 Gb/s | 6.5 Gb/s | 11.6 ms | | | WOBCOM | Wolfsburg, DE | 8.1 Gb/s | 7.0 Gb/s | 10.6 ms | | | Novogara | Amsterdam, NL | 7.0 Gb/s | 6.9 Gb/s | 3.6 ms | | | Sasag | Schaff, CH | 5.3 Gb/s | 6.6 Gb/s | 13.6 ms | | | Alwyzon | Vienna, AT | 8.4 Gb/s | 7.6 Gb/s | 22.1 ms | +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ |
| 3 |
PassMark
|
May 28, 2023 14:41 |
View Raw OutputPassMark PerformanceTest Linux Common KVM processor (x86_64) 2 cores @ 0 MHz | 3.8 GiB RAM Number of Processes: 2 | Test Iterations: 2 | Test Duration: Very Long - CPU Mark: 3097 Integer Math 9185 Million Operations/s Floating Point Math 6700 Million Operations/s Prime Numbers 31.8 Million Primes/s Sorting 5489 Thousand Strings/s Encryption 978 MB/s Compression 40584 KB/s CPU Single Threaded 2068 Million Operations/s Physics 550 Frames/s Extended Instructions (SSE) 1510 Million Matrices/s Memory Mark: 1704 Database Operations 1321 Thousand Operations/s Memory Read Cached 23718 MB/s Memory Read Uncached 12498 MB/s Memory Write 7751 MB/s Available RAM 2583 Megabytes Memory Latency 50 Nanoseconds Memory Threaded 18424 MB/s |
| 4 |
UnixBench
|
May 28, 2023 16:02 |
View Raw Output------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Sun May 28 2023 16:02:05 - 16:30:02
2 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 39879361.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 6977.0 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 4518.9 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1227451.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 333927.7 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 3408140.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 1923171.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 54333.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 11906.1 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 13154.3 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 2440.4 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 2184941.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 39879361.0 3417.3
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 6977.0 1268.5
Execl Throughput 43.0 4518.9 1050.9
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 1227451.4 3099.6
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 333927.7 2017.7
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 3408140.8 5876.1
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1923171.3 1546.0
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 54333.2 135.8
Process Creation 126.0 11906.1 944.9
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 13154.3 3102.4
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 2440.4 4067.4
System Call Overhead 15000.0 2184941.4 1456.6
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 1706.7
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Sun May 28 2023 16:30:02 - 16:58:00
2 CPUs in system; running 2 parallel copies of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 79605931.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 13986.5 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 7091.1 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 2411934.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 660312.2 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 6207421.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 3836317.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 430965.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 19837.3 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 18166.1 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 2504.9 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 4340700.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 79605931.1 6821.4
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 13986.5 2543.0
Execl Throughput 43.0 7091.1 1649.1
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 2411934.8 6090.7
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 660312.2 3989.8
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 6207421.5 10702.5
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 3836317.8 3083.9
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 430965.2 1077.4
Process Creation 126.0 19837.3 1574.4
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 18166.1 4284.5
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 2504.9 4174.8
System Call Overhead 15000.0 4340700.8 2893.8
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 3352.3
|
| 5 |
Speedtest Global
|
May 29, 2023 04:49 |
View Raw Output---------------------------- network-speed.xyz ----------------------------
A simple script to test network performance using speedtest-cli
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Version : v2023.05.28
Global Speedtest : wget -qO- network-speed.xyz | bash
Region Speedtest : wget -qO- network-speed.xyz | bash -s -- -r <region>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Basic System Info
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
CPU Model : Common KVM processor
CPU Cores : 4 @ 2799.998 MHz
CPU Cache : 512 KB
AES-NI : ? Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ? Disabled
Total Disk : 96.9 GB (4.2 GB Used)
Total RAM : 3.8 GB (137.9 MB Used)
System uptime : 0 days, 0 hour 28 min
Load average : 0.09, 0.14, 0.16
OS : Ubuntu 22.10
Arch : x86_64 (64 Bit)
Kernel : 5.19.0-42-generic
Virtualization : KVM
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Basic Network Info
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Primary Network : IPv6
ISP : Serverius Holding B.V.
ASN : AS50673 Serverius
Host : In Viridweb1
Location : Amsterdam, North Holland-NH, Netherlands
Location (IPv4) : Dronten, Flevoland, NL
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Speedtest.net (Region: GLOBAL)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Location Latency Loss DL Speed UP Speed Server
ISP: Serverius Holding B.V.
Nearest 137.18 ms 0.0% 926.07 Mbps 645.00 Mbps OneBroadband - Nagpur
Kochi, IN 157.01 ms 0.0% 4976.41 Mbps 549.32 Mbps Asianet Broadband - Cochin
Bangalore, IN 134.29 ms 0.0% 5544.55 Mbps 613.61 Mbps Bharti Airtel Ltd - Bangalore
Chennai, IN 148.12 ms N/A 5605.04 Mbps 845.81 Mbps Jio - Chennai
Mumbai, IN 126.92 ms 0.0% 6179.14 Mbps 703.23 Mbps i3D.net - Mumbai
Delhi, IN 137.89 ms 0.0% 6196.10 Mbps 627.74 Mbps Tata Play Fiber - New Delhi
Los Angeles, US 137.25 ms 0.0% 5658.51 Mbps 626.73 Mbps ReliableSite Hosting - Los Angeles, CA
Dallas, US 113.68 ms 0.0% 4589.85 Mbps 2250.28 Mbps Hivelocity - Dallas, TX
New York, US 76.77 ms 0.0% 5636.50 Mbps 1121.88 Mbps Clouvider Ltd - New York, NY
Seattle, US 156.82 ms 0.0% 1105.87 Mbps 578.97 Mbps DediPath - Seattle, WA
Miami, US 113.77 ms 0.0% 2424.23 Mbps 1557.26 Mbps AT&T - Miami, FL
Toronto, CA 85.92 ms 0.0% 8350.14 Mbps 978.39 Mbps Rogers - Toronto, ON
Paris, FR 17.61 ms 0.0% 6195.39 Mbps 7736.57 Mbps ORANGE FRANCE - Paris
Amsterdam, NL 1.90 ms 0.0% 5797.86 Mbps 8862.28 Mbps Clouvider Ltd - Amsterdam
Warsaw, PL 23.18 ms 0.0% 6668.16 Mbps 3731.74 Mbps UPC Polska - Warszawa
London, UK 6.62 ms 0.0% 5627.49 Mbps 8644.59 Mbps VeloxServ Communications - London
Frankfurt, DE 7.50 ms 0.0% 4015.57 Mbps 3406.15 Mbps 23M GmbH - Frankfurt Am Main
Bucharest, RO 36.09 ms 0.0% 7133.77 Mbps 2259.85 Mbps Vodafone Romania Fixed - Bucharest - Bucharest
Dubai, AE 118.80 ms 0.0% 5756.93 Mbps 866.31 Mbps du - Dubai
Fujairah, AE 127.31 ms 0.0% 5594.06 Mbps 2148.66 Mbps ETISALAT-UAE - Fujairah
Jeddah, KSA 81.99 ms 0.0% 5740.58 Mbps 2995.49 Mbps Saudi Telecom Company
Shanghai, CU-CN 178.65 ms 0.0% 5026.03 Mbps 805.33 Mbps China Unicom 5G - ShangHai
Nanjing, CT-CN 280.65 ms 4.0% 1799.85 Mbps 79.92 Mbps China Telecom JiangSu 5G - Nanjing
Hong Kong, HKG 160.29 ms N/A 1673.57 Mbps 561.75 Mbps STC - Hong Kong
Singapore, SG 157.56 ms 0.0% 5580.49 Mbps 550.75 Mbps i3D.net - Singapore
Jakarta, ID 197.62 ms 0.0% 4663.09 Mbps 490.85 Mbps PT. Telekomunikasi Indonesia - Jakarta
Tokyo, JP 244.05 ms N/A 4689.32 Mbps 959.86 Mbps fdcservers.net - Tokyo
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Avg DL Speed : 4931.67 Mbps
Avg UL Speed : 2044.38 Mbps
Total DL Data : 184.20 GB
Total UL Data : 64.78 GB
Total Data : 248.98 GB
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Duration : 13 min 14 sec
System Time : 29/05/2023 - 04:49:22 UTC
Total Script Runs : 2837
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Result : https://cdn1.frocdn.ch/kA61wNHiEECuxyp.txt
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
Onidel Cloud VPS
Performance-first cloud hosting for teams that need consistent benchmarks and transparent pricing.
- 99.99% uptime SLA
- Proven availability for critical workloads
- Plans from $4.95/month
- Predictable pricing and simple scaling
- AMD EPYC + NVMe stack
- Modern hardware with built-in DDoS protection
- 5 global regions
- Singapore, Sydney, Amsterdam, Ho Chi Minh City, more coming soon
Ideal for: demanding SaaS workloads, managed hosting agencies, and teams migrating off legacy VPS providers.
Launch faster with concierge onboarding
Start 14-day TrialCPU Performance (Geekbench)
CPU benchmarks measure processing power for compute-intensive tasks. Learn how we test CPU performance.
I/O Speed Summary (dd)
IOPS Performance by Block Size
Combined IOPS Performance
Total IOPS across all block sizes (4K, 64K, 512K, 1M)
FIO Benchmark Details
Detailed I/O performance test results
Test 1 - Block Size: 4k (mixed_rw_50_50)
Test 2 - Block Size: 64k (mixed_rw_50_50)
Test 3 - Block Size: 512k (mixed_rw_50_50)
Test 4 - Block Size: 1m (mixed_rw_50_50)
Detailed I/O Benchmark (FIO)
IOPS Performance by Block Size
Bandwidth Performance by Block Size
Detailed Test Results
| Block Size | Read IOPS | Write IOPS | Read MB/s | Write MB/s |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4k | 19,300 | 19,400 | 77.5 | 77.7 |
| 64k | 2,200 | 2,200 | 145.7 | 146.5 |
| 512k | 372 | 392 | 190.8 | 201.0 |
| 1m | 182 | 194 | 186.5 | 198.9 |
Related Resources
Browse More Benchmarks
Explore comprehensive VPS benchmarks across providers and locations.
Compare Providers
View aggregated performance metrics across all VPS providers.
Performance Dashboard
Access real-time statistics, top performers, and latest results.
Testing Methodology
Learn about our comprehensive testing procedures and tools.
Understanding VPS Benchmark Results
This comprehensive benchmark report provides detailed performance analysis for OneVirt AMD EPYC Rome 2 Core 4 GB Ram NL VPS in Netherlands. Our standardized testing methodology measures CPU performance, disk I/O operations, network bandwidth, and real-world application performance to give you complete insights into VPS capabilities. Browse more VPS benchmarks to compare performance across providers.
Each benchmark metric serves a specific purpose in evaluating VPS performance. CPU benchmarks reveal processing power for applications, disk I/O tests measure storage performance for databases and file operations, network tests show bandwidth capacity for content delivery, and application benchmarks demonstrate real-world hosting performance. Together, these metrics provide a complete performance profile. Use our VPS comparison tool to analyze multiple plans side-by-side.
Benchmark Metrics & Features
Performance Analysis Use Cases
- Evaluating VPS CPU performance for compute-intensive applications
- Testing disk I/O performance for database workloads
- Comparing VPS performance across different providers
- Analyzing WordPress site performance on specific VPS plans
- Assessing value-for-money based on performance and pricing
- Checking real-world application performance metrics
- Understanding geographic performance variations by location
- Reviewing detailed benchmark metrics before VPS purchase
- Comparing single-core vs multi-core CPU performance
- Validating provider performance claims with actual data
- Making informed hosting decisions based on comprehensive benchmarks
How to Interpret Benchmark Results
1. CPU Performance (Geekbench)
Geekbench measures CPU performance through single-core and multi-core scores. Single-core scores (typically 800-2000) indicate performance for single-threaded applications and general responsiveness. Multi-core scores (1500-8000) show performance when all CPU cores are utilized for parallel processing. Higher scores mean better performance. Visit our testing methodology to learn more about CPU benchmarks.
2. Disk I/O Performance (FIO)
FIO benchmarks measure disk performance through IOPS (Input/Output Operations Per Second) and bandwidth (MB/s). High IOPS (10,000+ for NVMe, 5,000-10,000 for SSD) is crucial for database workloads with many small operations. High bandwidth is important for large file transfers and media applications. Compare disk performance across different providers in our database.
3. Application Performance
Real-world application benchmarks (WordPress, UnixBench) show how the VPS handles typical web workloads including PHP processing, database queries, and static file serving. These results measured in requests per second and page load times directly apply to web hosting scenarios. Need help choosing the right VPS? Visit about us to learn more about VPSMetrics.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I interpret the Geekbench single-core and multi-core scores?
Geekbench single-core scores indicate CPU performance for single-threaded applications, important for general responsiveness and web applications. Multi-core scores show performance when all CPU cores are utilized, crucial for parallel processing and multi-threaded applications. Higher scores indicate better performance. Modern VPS typically score 800-2000 (single) and 1500-8000 (multi) depending on the plan.
What do IOPS numbers mean in disk I/O benchmarks?
IOPS (Input/Output Operations Per Second) measures how many read/write operations your disk can handle per second. Higher IOPS means better performance for database operations and applications with many small file operations. NVMe SSD VPS typically delivers 10,000+ IOPS, while traditional SSD offers 5,000-10,000 IOPS.
What is UnixBench and why does it matter?
UnixBench is a comprehensive system-level benchmark suite that tests various aspects of Unix-like system performance including process creation, file operations, and system calls. It provides a holistic view of overall system performance beyond just CPU or disk metrics. Higher UnixBench scores indicate better overall system efficiency.
How reliable are WordPress benchmark results?
WordPress benchmarks provide real-world application performance metrics by testing actual WordPress installations. These results show how the VPS handles typical web application workloads including PHP processing, database queries, and static file serving. Results are measured in requests per second and page load times, directly applicable to web hosting scenarios.
Can I trust these benchmark results for my use case?
Our benchmarks provide standardized, reproducible test results using industry-standard tools. While they offer excellent performance indicators, your actual experience may vary based on your specific workload, application optimization, and usage patterns. Use these benchmarks as a reliable starting point for comparison between providers.
Why do benchmark results vary by location?
Different data center locations may have different hardware configurations, CPU generations, storage types, and network infrastructure. Providers often upgrade facilities at different rates across regions. Location-specific benchmarks help you choose a VPS in the right region with the best performance for your target audience.
Making Informed VPS Decisions
Use these comprehensive benchmark results to make data-driven hosting decisions. Compare multiple metrics together rather than focusing on a single aspect - a balanced VPS performs well across CPU, disk, and network benchmarks. Consider your specific workload requirements: CPU-intensive applications need high Geekbench scores, database-heavy applications require high IOPS, and content delivery services benefit from high network bandwidth.
Our benchmarks provide standardized, reproducible test results using industry-standard tools. While they offer excellent performance indicators, your actual experience may vary based on specific workload patterns and application optimization. Use these benchmarks as a reliable starting point for comparison between providers and configurations.
Compare More VPS Options
Explore additional benchmarks, compare multiple VPS plans side-by-side, and discover the best performing options for your specific requirements and budget.