Netcup - ARM Ampere 6 Core 8 GB Ram AT
Comprehensive VPS benchmark results from Austria tested on Sep 18, 2025. Learn our methodology.
System Specifications
Additional Benchmarks
UnixBench
System Performance Index
WordPress Bench
Web Application Performance
Benchmark Steps
| # | Suite | Run At | Raw Output |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Bench
|
Mar 10, 2024 18:11 |
View Raw Output-------------------- A Bench.sh Script By Teddysun ------------------- Version : v2023-10-15 Usage : wget -qO- bench.sh | bash ---------------------------------------------------------------------- CPU Model : CPU model not detected CPU Cores : 6 AES-NI : ✓ Enabled VM-x/AMD-V : ✗ Disabled Total Disk : 251.8 GB (5.2 GB Used) Total Mem : 7.7 GB (187.6 MB Used) System uptime : 0 days, 0 hour 17 min Load average : 0.80, 1.81, 1.68 OS : Ubuntu 22.04.4 LTS Arch : aarch64 (64 Bit) Kernel : 5.15.0-100-generic TCP CC : bbr Virtualization : KVM IPv4/IPv6 : ✓ Online / ✓ Online Organization : AS197540 netcup GmbH Location : Vienna / AT Region : Vienna ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I/O Speed(1st run) : 638 MB/s I/O Speed(2nd run) : 752 MB/s I/O Speed(3rd run) : 670 MB/s I/O Speed(average) : 686.7 MB/s ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Node Name Upload Speed Download Speed Latency Speedtest.net 2313.15 Mbps 2288.12 Mbps 0.51 ms Los Angeles, US 549.04 Mbps 955.41 Mbps 162.60 ms Dallas, US 677.73 Mbps 1861.94 Mbps 134.70 ms Montreal, CA 588.05 Mbps 895.21 Mbps 99.71 ms Paris, FR 2534.27 Mbps 2282.40 Mbps 19.63 ms Amsterdam, NL 2532.67 Mbps 2169.86 Mbps 18.62 ms Shanghai, CN 529.96 Mbps 1409.53 Mbps 258.26 ms Mumbai, IN 940.86 Mbps 2243.98 Mbps 144.95 ms Singapore, SG 2179.39 Mbps 2435.25 Mbps 191.36 ms Tokyo, JP 347.80 Mbps 1942.44 Mbps 235.62 ms ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Finished in : 5 min 14 sec Timestamp : 2024-03-10 18:11:30 CET ---------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| 2 |
Speedtest Global
|
Mar 10, 2024 18:33 |
View Raw Output---------------------------- network-speed.xyz ----------------------------
A simple script to test network performance using speedtest-cli
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Version : v2024.03.07
Global Speedtest : wget -qO- network-speed.xyz | bash
Region Speedtest : wget -qO- network-speed.xyz | bash -s -- -r <region>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Basic System Info
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
CPU Model : CPU model not detected
CPU Cores : 6
AES-NI : ✔ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ❌ Disabled
Total Disk : 251.8 GB (5.0 GB Used)
Total RAM : 7.7 GB (197.9 MB Used)
System uptime : 0 days, 12 hour 57 min
Load average : 0.31, 0.21, 0.17
OS : Ubuntu 22.04.4 LTS
Arch : aarch64 (64 Bit)
Kernel : 5.15.0-100-generic
Virtualization : KVM
TCP Control : bbr
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Basic Network Info
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Primary Network : IPv6
IPv6 Access : ✔ Online
IPv4 Access : ✔ Online
ISP : netcup GmbH
ASN : AS197540 netcup GmbH
Host : De Netcup KVM VIE
Location : Vienna, Vienna-9, Austria
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Speedtest.net (Region: GLOBAL)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Location Latency Loss DL Speed UP Speed Server
ISP: netcup
Nearest 0.39 ms 0.0% 2154.92 Mbps 2296.81 Mbps Ba-Lu IT Service - Vienna
Kochi, IN 250.71 ms 0.7% 1070.41 Mbps 350.53 Mbps Asianet Broadband - Cochin
Bangalore, IN 138.60 ms 0.0% 2056.20 Mbps 628.41 Mbps Bharti Airtel Ltd - Bangalore
Chennai, IN 212.48 ms N/A 1998.39 Mbps 672.63 Mbps Jio - Chennai
Mumbai, IN 187.68 ms 0.0% 2180.11 Mbps 436.59 Mbps i3D.net - Mumbai
Delhi, IN 153.55 ms 0.0% 2110.42 Mbps 558.61 Mbps Tata Play Fiber - New Delhi
Seattle, US 162.33 ms N/A 2176.32 Mbps 557.75 Mbps Comcast - Seattle, WA
Los Angeles, US 151.73 ms 0.0% 1814.43 Mbps 602.33 Mbps ReliableSite Hosting - Los Angeles, CA
Dallas, US 123.99 ms 0.0% 2037.45 Mbps 2489.97 Mbps Hivelocity - Dallas, TX
Miami, US FAILED
New York, US FAILED
Toronto, CA 102.82 ms 0.0% 1722.72 Mbps 859.73 Mbps Rogers - Toronto, ON
Mexico City, MX 183.99 ms N/A 1661.55 Mbps 494.97 Mbps INFINITUM - Mexico City
London, UK 36.69 ms 0.0% 2230.90 Mbps 2568.70 Mbps VeloxServ Communications - London
Amsterdam, NL 20.22 ms 0.0% 2313.43 Mbps 2498.60 Mbps 31173 Services AB - Amsterdam
Paris, FR 20.53 ms N/A 2285.52 Mbps 2523.13 Mbps Axione - Paris
Frankfurt, DE 12.04 ms 0.0% 2190.17 Mbps 2507.97 Mbps Clouvider Ltd - Frankfurt am Main
Warsaw, PL 28.90 ms 0.0% 2237.58 Mbps 2594.76 Mbps Play - Warszawa
Bucharest, RO 17.03 ms 0.0% 2298.76 Mbps 2508.47 Mbps Vodafone Romania Fixed - Bucharest - Bucharest
Moscow, RU 51.94 ms 0.0% 2300.25 Mbps 2635.14 Mbps MegaFon - Moscow
Jeddah, SA 81.78 ms 0.0% 2323.90 Mbps 2518.29 Mbps Saudi Telecom Company
Dubai, AE 165.27 ms 0.0% 2466.43 Mbps 1134.91 Mbps du - Dubai
Fujairah, AE 123.62 ms 0.0% 2365.29 Mbps 2570.85 Mbps ETISALAT-UAE - Fujairah
Istanbul, TR 55.23 ms 0.0% 2272.84 Mbps 2797.18 Mbps Turkcell - Istanbul
Tehran, IR 93.56 ms 0.0% 1806.03 Mbps 912.19 Mbps Asiatech - Tehran
Tokyo, JP 288.01 ms N/A 1906.24 Mbps 693.36 Mbps fdcservers.net - Tokyo
Shanghai, CU-CN 270.04 ms 0.0% 1450.92 Mbps 540.23 Mbps China Unicom 5G - Shanghai
Nanjing, CT-CN FAILED
Hong Kong, CN 176.43 ms N/A 2081.32 Mbps 340.12 Mbps STC - Hong Kong
Singapore, SG 146.56 ms 0.0% 2069.52 Mbps 568.75 Mbps i3D.net - Singapore
Jakarta, ID 237.98 ms 988.33 Mbps FAILED PT. Telekomunikasi Indonesia - Jakarta
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Avg DL Speed : 2020.37 Mbps
Avg UL Speed : 1423.61 Mbps
Total DL Data : 78.10 GB
Total UL Data : 50.99 GB
Total Data : 129.09 GB
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Duration : 13 min 43 sec
System Time : 10/03/2024 - 18:33:41 CET
Total Script Runs : 37455
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Result : https://paste.kangserver.id/view/VezMQdg
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| 3 |
Benchy
|
Mar 10, 2024 18:47 |
View Raw Output# # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Benchy v2.7 # # https://github.com/L1so/benchy # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # 10 Mar 2024 18:47 CET # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Server Insight Hardware Information --------------------- --------------------- OS : Ubuntu 22.04.4 LTS Model : Neoverse-N1 Location : Austria Core : 6 Kernel : 5.15.0-100-generic AES-NI : ✔ Enabled Uptime : 0 days, 13 hrs, 24 mins, 23 secs VM-x/AMD-V : ❌ Disabled Virt : kvm Swap : 0.0 KiB Disk & Memory Usage Network Information --------------------- --------------------- Disk (2) : 251.6 GiB ASN : AS197540 Disk Usage : 5.0 GiB (2% Used) ISP : netcup GmbH Mem : 7.7 GiB IPv4 : ✔ Enabled Mem Usage : 0.2 GiB (3% Used) IPv6 : ✔ Enabled Ookla Network Speedtest (Region: Europe) +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Provider | Location | Download | Upload | Data Used | Latency | +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | TestDebit | Marseille, FR | Failed | To | Get | Data | | Vancis | Amsterdam, NL | 1.1 Gb/s | 2.5 Gb/s | 3.2 GB | 25.4 ms | | Vox | London, GB | 2.2 Gb/s | 2.5 Mb/s | 4.8 GB | 26.5 ms | | Skynet | Warsaw, PL | 1.6 Gb/s | 2.5 Gb/s | 3.7 GB | 28.7 ms | | Vodafone | Milan, IT | 2.3 Gb/s | 2.5 Gb/s | 4.4 GB | 20.6 ms | +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ Network Performance Test (Region: Europe) +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Prot. | Provider | Location | Send | Receive | Latency | +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | IPv4 | FiberBy | Copenhagen, DK | 2.6 Gb/s | 1.7 Gb/s | 22.4 ms | | | WOBCOM | Wolfsburg, DE | 2.8 Gb/s | 2.4 Gb/s | 30.0 ms | | | Novogara | Amsterdam, NL | 2.8 Gb/s | 1.1 Gb/s | 18.0 ms | | | Sasag | Schaff, CH | busy | 2.2 Gb/s | 16.5 ms | | | Alwyzon | Vienna, AT | 2.8 Gb/s | 2.3 Gb/s | 1.0 ms | +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | IPv6 | FiberBy | Copenhagen, DK | 2.6 Gb/s | 1.5 Gb/s | 22.3 ms | | | WOBCOM | Wolfsburg, DE | 2.9 Gb/s | 2.3 Gb/s | 30.0 ms | | | Novogara | Amsterdam, NL | 2.8 Gb/s | 1.0 Gb/s | 17.8 ms | | | Sasag | Schaff, CH | 2.9 Gb/s | 1.9 Gb/s | 15.2 ms | | | Alwyzon | Vienna, AT | 2.8 Gb/s | 2.3 Gb/s | 0.9 ms | +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ |
| 4 |
PassMark
|
Mar 10, 2024 18:47 |
View Raw OutputPassMark PerformanceTest Linux (11.0.1002) Neoverse-N1 (aarch64) 6 cores @ 0 MHz | 7.7 GiB RAM Number of Processes: 6 | Test Iterations: 2 | Test Duration: Very Long - CPU Mark: 4645 Integer Math 28148 Million Operations/s Floating Point Math 21281 Million Operations/s Prime Numbers 29.7 Million Primes/s Sorting 19233 Thousand Strings/s Encryption 983 MB/s Compression 34123 KB/s CPU Single Threaded 1287 Million Operations/s Physics 648 Frames/s Extended Instructions (NEON) 4457 Million Matrices/s Memory Mark: 1629 Database Operations 4048 Thousand Operations/s Memory Read Cached 10995 MB/s Memory Read Uncached 8122 MB/s Memory Write 14663 MB/s Available RAM 7416 Megabytes Memory Latency 77 Nanoseconds Memory Threaded 43948 MB/s |
| 5 |
UnixBench
|
Sep 18, 2025 07:27 |
View Raw Output------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Mon Mar 11 2024 05:08:04 - 05:36:03
6 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 46830292.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 8587.0 MWIPS (9.8 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 3716.7 lps (29.5 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 841670.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 267490.6 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1764680.1 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 1542306.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 95317.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 2761.9 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 3548.2 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 3490.3 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 1080220.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 46830292.5 4012.9
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 8587.0 1561.3
Execl Throughput 43.0 3716.7 864.4
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 841670.0 2125.4
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 267490.6 1616.3
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1764680.1 3042.6
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1542306.7 1239.8
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 95317.4 238.3
Process Creation 126.0 2761.9 219.2
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 3548.2 836.8
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 3490.3 5817.1
System Call Overhead 15000.0 1080220.2 720.1
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 1237.1
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Mon Mar 11 2024 05:36:03 - 06:04:03
6 CPUs in system; running 6 parallel copies of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 280377227.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 51382.0 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 13834.5 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 4986167.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1601601.7 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 10101166.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 9299756.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 978501.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 32445.4 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 31050.2 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 4347.8 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 6486954.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 280377227.3 24025.5
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 51382.0 9342.2
Execl Throughput 43.0 13834.5 3217.3
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 4986167.4 12591.3
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 1601601.7 9677.4
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 10101166.0 17415.8
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 9299756.0 7475.7
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 978501.8 2446.3
Process Creation 126.0 32445.4 2575.0
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 31050.2 7323.2
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 4347.8 7246.4
System Call Overhead 15000.0 6486954.3 4324.6
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 7105.4
|
Onidel Cloud VPS
Performance-first cloud hosting for teams that need consistent benchmarks and transparent pricing.
- 99.99% uptime SLA
- Proven availability for critical workloads
- Plans from $4.95/month
- Predictable pricing and simple scaling
- AMD EPYC + NVMe stack
- Modern hardware with built-in DDoS protection
- 5 global regions
- Singapore, Sydney, Amsterdam, Ho Chi Minh City, more coming soon
Ideal for: demanding SaaS workloads, managed hosting agencies, and teams migrating off legacy VPS providers.
Launch faster with concierge onboarding
Start 14-day TrialCPU Performance (Geekbench)
CPU benchmarks measure processing power for compute-intensive tasks. Learn how we test CPU performance.
I/O Speed Summary (dd)
IOPS Performance by Block Size
Combined IOPS Performance
Total IOPS across all block sizes (4K, 64K, 512K, 1M)
FIO Benchmark Details
Detailed I/O performance test results
Test 1 - Block Size: 4k (mixed_rw_50_50)
Test 2 - Block Size: 64k (mixed_rw_50_50)
Test 3 - Block Size: 512k (mixed_rw_50_50)
Test 4 - Block Size: 1m (mixed_rw_50_50)
Detailed I/O Benchmark (FIO)
IOPS Performance by Block Size
Bandwidth Performance by Block Size
Detailed Test Results
| Block Size | Read IOPS | Write IOPS | Read MB/s | Write MB/s |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4k | 37,800 | 37,800 | 151.3 | 151.2 |
| 64k | 4,100 | 4,200 | 265.5 | 273.4 |
| 512k | 638 | 693 | 326.9 | 354.9 |
| 1m | 417 | 465 | 427.6 | 477.1 |
Related Resources
Browse More Benchmarks
Explore comprehensive VPS benchmarks across providers and locations.
Compare Providers
View aggregated performance metrics across all VPS providers.
Performance Dashboard
Access real-time statistics, top performers, and latest results.
Testing Methodology
Learn about our comprehensive testing procedures and tools.
Understanding VPS Benchmark Results
This comprehensive benchmark report provides detailed performance analysis for Netcup ARM Ampere 6 Core 8 GB Ram AT VPS in Austria . Our standardized testing methodology measures CPU performance, disk I/O operations, network bandwidth, and real-world application performance to give you complete insights into VPS capabilities. Browse more VPS benchmarks to compare performance across providers.
Each benchmark metric serves a specific purpose in evaluating VPS performance. CPU benchmarks reveal processing power for applications, disk I/O tests measure storage performance for databases and file operations, network tests show bandwidth capacity for content delivery, and application benchmarks demonstrate real-world hosting performance. Together, these metrics provide a complete performance profile. Use our VPS comparison tool to analyze multiple plans side-by-side.
Benchmark Metrics & Features
Performance Analysis Use Cases
- Evaluating VPS CPU performance for compute-intensive applications
- Testing disk I/O performance for database workloads
- Comparing VPS performance across different providers
- Analyzing WordPress site performance on specific VPS plans
- Assessing value-for-money based on performance and pricing
- Checking real-world application performance metrics
- Understanding geographic performance variations by location
- Reviewing detailed benchmark metrics before VPS purchase
- Comparing single-core vs multi-core CPU performance
- Validating provider performance claims with actual data
- Making informed hosting decisions based on comprehensive benchmarks
How to Interpret Benchmark Results
1. CPU Performance (Geekbench)
Geekbench measures CPU performance through single-core and multi-core scores. Single-core scores (typically 800-2000) indicate performance for single-threaded applications and general responsiveness. Multi-core scores (1500-8000) show performance when all CPU cores are utilized for parallel processing. Higher scores mean better performance. Visit our testing methodology to learn more about CPU benchmarks.
2. Disk I/O Performance (FIO)
FIO benchmarks measure disk performance through IOPS (Input/Output Operations Per Second) and bandwidth (MB/s). High IOPS (10,000+ for NVMe, 5,000-10,000 for SSD) is crucial for database workloads with many small operations. High bandwidth is important for large file transfers and media applications. Compare disk performance across different providers in our database.
3. Application Performance
Real-world application benchmarks (WordPress, UnixBench) show how the VPS handles typical web workloads including PHP processing, database queries, and static file serving. These results measured in requests per second and page load times directly apply to web hosting scenarios. Need help choosing the right VPS? Visit about us to learn more about VPSMetrics.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I interpret the Geekbench single-core and multi-core scores?
Geekbench single-core scores indicate CPU performance for single-threaded applications, important for general responsiveness and web applications. Multi-core scores show performance when all CPU cores are utilized, crucial for parallel processing and multi-threaded applications. Higher scores indicate better performance. Modern VPS typically score 800-2000 (single) and 1500-8000 (multi) depending on the plan.
What do IOPS numbers mean in disk I/O benchmarks?
IOPS (Input/Output Operations Per Second) measures how many read/write operations your disk can handle per second. Higher IOPS means better performance for database operations and applications with many small file operations. NVMe SSD VPS typically delivers 10,000+ IOPS, while traditional SSD offers 5,000-10,000 IOPS.
What is UnixBench and why does it matter?
UnixBench is a comprehensive system-level benchmark suite that tests various aspects of Unix-like system performance including process creation, file operations, and system calls. It provides a holistic view of overall system performance beyond just CPU or disk metrics. Higher UnixBench scores indicate better overall system efficiency.
How reliable are WordPress benchmark results?
WordPress benchmarks provide real-world application performance metrics by testing actual WordPress installations. These results show how the VPS handles typical web application workloads including PHP processing, database queries, and static file serving. Results are measured in requests per second and page load times, directly applicable to web hosting scenarios.
Can I trust these benchmark results for my use case?
Our benchmarks provide standardized, reproducible test results using industry-standard tools. While they offer excellent performance indicators, your actual experience may vary based on your specific workload, application optimization, and usage patterns. Use these benchmarks as a reliable starting point for comparison between providers.
Why do benchmark results vary by location?
Different data center locations may have different hardware configurations, CPU generations, storage types, and network infrastructure. Providers often upgrade facilities at different rates across regions. Location-specific benchmarks help you choose a VPS in the right region with the best performance for your target audience.
Making Informed VPS Decisions
Use these comprehensive benchmark results to make data-driven hosting decisions. Compare multiple metrics together rather than focusing on a single aspect - a balanced VPS performs well across CPU, disk, and network benchmarks. Consider your specific workload requirements: CPU-intensive applications need high Geekbench scores, database-heavy applications require high IOPS, and content delivery services benefit from high network bandwidth.
Our benchmarks provide standardized, reproducible test results using industry-standard tools. While they offer excellent performance indicators, your actual experience may vary based on specific workload patterns and application optimization. Use these benchmarks as a reliable starting point for comparison between providers and configurations.
Compare More VPS Options
Explore additional benchmarks, compare multiple VPS plans side-by-side, and discover the best performing options for your specific requirements and budget.