MAXCLOUD - Intel 2 Core 4 GB Ram - Intel Xeon Standar
Comprehensive VPS benchmark results from Indonesia tested on Oct 20, 2025. Learn our methodology.
System Specifications
Additional Benchmarks
UnixBench
System Performance Index
WordPress Bench
Web Application Performance
Benchmark Steps
| # | Suite | Run At | Raw Output |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Bench
|
Oct 18, 2025 19:07 |
View Raw Output-------------------- A Bench.sh Script By Teddysun ------------------- Version : v2025-05-08 Usage : wget -qO- bench.sh | bash ---------------------------------------------------------------------- CPU Model : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2698 v4 @ 2.20GHz CPU Cores : 2 @ 2199.996 MHz CPU Cache : 16384 KB AES-NI : ✓ Enabled VM-x/AMD-V : ✓ Enabled Total Disk : 58.1 GB (1.7 GB Used) Total Mem : 3.8 GB (181.0 MB Used) System uptime : 0 days, 0 hour 4 min Load average : 0.07, 0.18, 0.09 OS : Ubuntu 22.04.5 LTS Arch : x86_64 (64 Bit) Kernel : 5.15.0-126-generic TCP CC : cubic Virtualization : KVM IPv4/IPv6 : ✓ Online / ✗ Offline Organization : AS151000 PT Awan Data Indonesia Location : South Tangerang / ID Region : Banten ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I/O Speed(1st run) : 271 MB/s I/O Speed(2nd run) : 668 MB/s I/O Speed(3rd run) : 508 MB/s I/O Speed(average) : 482.3 MB/s ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Node Name Upload Speed Download Speed Latency Speedtest.net 3372.83 Mbps 1988.38 Mbps 0.88 ms Paris, FR 254.68 Mbps 760.88 Mbps 169.75 ms Amsterdam, NL 260.59 Mbps 487.79 Mbps 172.42 ms Shanghai, CN 48.62 Mbps 675.97 Mbps 358.60 ms Hong Kong, CN 521.78 Mbps 751.15 Mbps 53.39 ms Singapore, SG 259.50 Mbps 623.34 Mbps 47.50 ms Tokyo, JP 466.87 Mbps 844.16 Mbps 81.85 ms ---------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| 2 |
Benchy
|
Oct 18, 2025 19:07 |
View Raw OutputServer Insight Hardware Information --------------------- --------------------- OS : Ubuntu 22.04.5 LTS Model : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2698 v4 @ 2.20GHz Location : Indonesia Core : 2 @ 2199.996 MHz Kernel : 5.15.0-126-generic AES-NI : ✔ Enabled Uptime : 0 days, 0 hrs, 18 mins, 57 secs VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled Virt : kvm Swap : 0.0 KiB Disk & Memory Usage Network Information --------------------- --------------------- Disk (1) : 58.0 GiB ASN : AS151000 Disk Usage : 1.8 GiB (3% Used) ISP : PT Awan Data Indonesia Mem : 3.8 GiB IPv4 : ✔ Enabled Mem Usage : 0.2 GiB (6% Used) IPv6 : ❌ Disabled Disk Performance Check (ext4 on /dev/vda1) (R: Read, W: Write, T: Total) +---------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Size | Read | Write | Total | IOPS (R,W,T) | +===========================================================================+ | 4k | 39.09 MB/s | 39.18 MB/s | 78.28 MB/s | 10.0k | 10.0k | 20.0k | | 64k | 293.77 MB/s | 295.32 MB/s | 589.09 MB/s | 4.7k | 4.7k | 9.4k | | 512k | 307.58 MB/s | 323.92 MB/s | 631.51 MB/s | 0.6k | 0.6k | 1.3k | | 1m | 347.59 MB/s | 370.74 MB/s | 718.34 MB/s | 0.3k | 0.4k | 0.7k | +---------------------------------------------------------------------------+ |
| 3 |
PassMark
|
Oct 18, 2025 19:07 |
View Raw OutputPassMark PerformanceTest Linux (11.0.1002) Intel Xeon CPU E5-2698 v4 @ 2.20GHz (x86_64) 2 cores @ 0 MHz | 3.8 GiB RAM Number of Processes: 2 | Test Iterations: 1 | Test Duration: Medium -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CPU Mark: 710 Integer Math 1724 Million Operations/s Floating Point Math 1411 Million Operations/s Prime Numbers 6.5 Million Primes/s Sorting 1266 Thousand Strings/s Encryption 180 MB/s Compression 9537 KB/s CPU Single Threaded 1905 Million Operations/s Physics 118 Frames/s Extended Instructions (SSE) 670 Million Matrices/s Memory Mark: 933 Database Operations 435 Thousand Operations/s Memory Read Cached 19669 MB/s Memory Read Uncached 7182 MB/s Memory Write 6458 MB/s Available RAM 1174 Megabytes Memory Latency 71 Nanoseconds Memory Threaded 6722 MB/s -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| 4 |
UnixBench
|
Oct 18, 2025 19:07 |
View Raw OutputDhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 34878489.5 2988.7
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 7316.4 1330.2
Execl Throughput 43.0 2655.6 617.6
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 673451.2 1700.6
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 175988.5 1063.4
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 2215966.7 3820.6
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 751240.7 603.9
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 18105.0 45.3
Process Creation 126.0 2546.4 202.1
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 3460.3 816.1
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 427.0 711.7
System Call Overhead 15000.0 425944.0 284.0
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 706.5
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Sat Oct 18 2025 19:07:04 - 19:34:55
2 CPUs in system; running 2 parallel copies of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 17922048.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 3905.3 MWIPS (8.0 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 1164.3 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 295521.2 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 84537.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1090046.6 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 382887.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 90820.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 3301.4 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 3306.2 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 505.5 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 213239.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 17922048.4 1535.7
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 3905.3 710.1
Execl Throughput 43.0 1164.3 270.8
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 295521.2 746.3
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 84537.8 510.8
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1090046.6 1879.4
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 382887.8 307.8
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 90820.2 227.1
Process Creation 126.0 3301.4 262.0
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 3306.2 779.8
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 505.5 842.5
System Call Overhead 15000.0 213239.1 142.2
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 516.7
|
| 5 |
Speedtest Global
|
Oct 19, 2025 07:39 |
View Raw OutputSpeedtest.net (Region: GLOBAL) --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Location Latency Loss DL Speed UP Speed Server ISP: PT Awan Data Indonesia Nearest 0.98 ms 0.0% 659.24 Mbps 1340.67 Mbps PT. Mitra Visioner Pratama Bangalore, IN 63.60 ms 0.0% 635.01 Mbps 476.35 Mbps Bharti Airtel Ltd - Bangalore Chennai, IN 59.28 ms 0.0% 726.86 Mbps 655.55 Mbps RailTel Corporation of India Ltd - Chennai Mumbai, IN 66.23 ms 0.0% 795.93 Mbps 403.17 Mbps Melbicom - Mumbai Seattle, US 253.89 ms N/A 4.70 Mbps 239.12 Mbps Comcast - Seattle, WA Los Angeles, US 216.34 ms 0.0% 581.57 Mbps 192.03 Mbps ReliableSite Hosting - Los Angeles, CA Dallas, US 223.29 ms 0.7% 370.42 Mbps 86.95 Mbps Hivelocity - Dallas, TX Miami, US 253.52 ms 0.0% 755.78 Mbps 194.91 Mbps Frontier - Miami, FL New York, US 250.91 ms 0.0% 711.26 Mbps 221.91 Mbps GSL Networks - New York, NY Toronto, CA 239.47 ms 0.0% 634.94 Mbps 239.49 Mbps Rogers - Toronto, ON Mexico City, MX 232.20 ms N/A 679.16 Mbps 210.23 Mbps INFINITUM - Ciudad de México London, UK 167.72 ms 0.0% 770.00 Mbps 251.76 Mbps VeloxServ Communications - London Amsterdam, NL 172.00 ms 0.0% 782.77 Mbps 280.16 Mbps 31173 Services AB - Amsterdam Paris, FR 170.54 ms 0.0% 707.65 Mbps 265.56 Mbps Scaleway - Paris Frankfurt, DE 169.55 ms 0.0% 674.57 Mbps 301.66 Mbps Clouvider Ltd - Frankfurt am Main Warsaw, PL 183.73 ms 0.0% 782.16 Mbps 251.37 Mbps Play - Warszawa Bucharest, RO 212.91 ms 0.0% 9.74 Mbps 4.39 Mbps Vodafone Romania Mobile - Bucharest - Bucharest Moscow, RU 205.75 ms 0.0% 803.35 Mbps 223.24 Mbps Misaka Network, Inc. - Moscow Jeddah, SA 171.50 ms 0.0% 746.36 Mbps 245.67 Mbps Saudi Telecom Company Dubai, AE 88.09 ms N/A 791.11 Mbps 327.18 Mbps e& UAE - Dubai Istanbul, TR 204.09 ms 0.0% 818.36 Mbps 252.96 Mbps Turkcell - Istanbul Tehran, IR 246.18 ms 0.0% 699.09 Mbps 199.88 Mbps Irancell - Tehran Cairo, EG 291.36 ms 0.3% 699.49 Mbps 154.28 Mbps Telecom Egypt - Cairo Tokyo, JP 89.08 ms 0.5% 520.06 Mbps 503.85 Mbps fdcservers.net - Tokyo Shanghai, CU-CN 334.53 ms N/A 655.23 Mbps 166.85 Mbps China Unicom 5G - Shanghai Hong Kong, CN 178.61 ms 0.0% 510.50 Mbps 59.87 Mbps Misaka Network, Inc. - Hong Kong Singapore, SG 13.89 ms 0.0% 774.66 Mbps 936.83 Mbps ViewQwest - Singapore Jakarta, ID 1.27 ms 0.0% 1918.70 Mbps 4285.45 Mbps PT Solnet Indonesia - Jakarta Sydney, AU 339.63 ms 0.0% 571.56 Mbps 91.52 Mbps Aussie Broadband - Sydney --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Avg DL Speed : 682.43 Mbps Avg UL Speed : 450.44 Mbps Total DL Data : 28.55 GB Total UL Data : 16.88 GB Total Data : 45.43 GB --------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| 6 |
Speedtest Lokal
|
Oct 20, 2025 07:39 |
View Raw OutputSpeedtest.net (Region: INDONESIA) --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Location Latency Loss DL Speed UP Speed Server ISP: PT Awan Data Indonesia Nearest 0.79 ms 0.0% 2028.79 Mbps 3812.17 Mbps PT. Jinom Network Indonesia - Jakarta - Jakarta Jakarta 3.00 ms 0.0% 134.36 Mbps 124.95 Mbps PT. Telekomunikasi Indonesia - Jakarta Jakarta 1.94 ms 0.0% 2256.08 Mbps 1319.71 Mbps PT. Indosat Tbk - Jakarta Bekasi 1.76 ms 0.0% 1502.31 Mbps 3129.86 Mbps PT Lintas Jaringan Nusantara - Bekasi Bogor FAILED Malang 12.41 ms 0.0% 190.02 Mbps 573.48 Mbps GlobalXtreme - Malang Semarang 0.78 ms 0.0% 1179.93 Mbps 1757.35 Mbps Global Media Data Prima - Semarang Surabaya 14.55 ms 0.0% 620.70 Mbps 933.32 Mbps MyRepublic Indonesia - Surabaya Yogyakarta 16.88 ms 0.0% 471.43 Mbps 380.44 Mbps PT Union Routelink Communication - Yogyakarta Banda Aceh FAILED Medan 29.37 ms 0.0% 164.94 Mbps 516.32 Mbps WIZNET - Medan Palembang 9.55 ms 0.0% 576.54 Mbps 655.12 Mbps PT. Java Digital Nusantara - Palembang Pekanbaru 21.14 ms 0.0% 502.91 Mbps 1095.32 Mbps BertuahIX - Pekanbaru Makassar 23.01 ms 0.0% 873.23 Mbps 1354.50 Mbps PT Medialink Global Mandiri - Makassar Depok 1.30 ms 0.0% 608.89 Mbps 615.37 Mbps PT ADI - Jakarta Tangerang 1.09 ms 0.0% 561.72 Mbps 932.83 Mbps PT. Java Medianet Tekhnologi - Tangerang --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Avg DL Speed : 833.70 Mbps Avg UL Speed : 1228.61 Mbps Total DL Data : 10.53 GB Total UL Data : 22.38 GB Total Data : 32.91 GB --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Result : https://result.nws.sh/r/1760860334_8QH23A_INDONESIA.txt --------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
Onidel Cloud VPS
Performance-first cloud hosting for teams that need consistent benchmarks and transparent pricing.
- 99.99% uptime SLA
- Proven availability for critical workloads
- Plans from $4.95/month
- Predictable pricing and simple scaling
- AMD EPYC + NVMe stack
- Modern hardware with built-in DDoS protection
- 5 global regions
- Singapore, Sydney, Amsterdam, Ho Chi Minh City, more coming soon
Ideal for: demanding SaaS workloads, managed hosting agencies, and teams migrating off legacy VPS providers.
Launch faster with concierge onboarding
Start 14-day TrialCPU Performance (Geekbench)
CPU benchmarks measure processing power for compute-intensive tasks. Learn how we test CPU performance.
I/O Speed Summary (dd)
IOPS Performance by Block Size
Combined IOPS Performance
Total IOPS across all block sizes (4K, 64K, 512K, 1M)
FIO Benchmark Details
Detailed I/O performance test results
Test 1 - Block Size: 4k (mixed_rw_50_50)
Test 2 - Block Size: 64k (mixed_rw_50_50)
Test 3 - Block Size: 512k (mixed_rw_50_50)
Test 4 - Block Size: 1m (mixed_rw_50_50)
Detailed I/O Benchmark (FIO)
IOPS Performance by Block Size
Bandwidth Performance by Block Size
Detailed Test Results
| Block Size | Read IOPS | Write IOPS | Read MB/s | Write MB/s |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4k | 9,900 | 10,000 | 40.0 | 40.1 |
| 64k | 4,800 | 4,800 | 310.0 | 311.6 |
| 512k | 580 | 611 | 297.1 | 312.9 |
| 1m | 367 | 392 | 376.4 | 401.5 |
Related Resources
Browse More Benchmarks
Explore comprehensive VPS benchmarks across providers and locations.
Compare Providers
View aggregated performance metrics across all VPS providers.
Performance Dashboard
Access real-time statistics, top performers, and latest results.
Testing Methodology
Learn about our comprehensive testing procedures and tools.
Understanding VPS Benchmark Results
This comprehensive benchmark report provides detailed performance analysis for MAXCLOUD Intel 2 Core 4 GB Ram - Intel Xeon Standar VPS in Indonesia. Our standardized testing methodology measures CPU performance, disk I/O operations, network bandwidth, and real-world application performance to give you complete insights into VPS capabilities. Browse more VPS benchmarks to compare performance across providers.
Each benchmark metric serves a specific purpose in evaluating VPS performance. CPU benchmarks reveal processing power for applications, disk I/O tests measure storage performance for databases and file operations, network tests show bandwidth capacity for content delivery, and application benchmarks demonstrate real-world hosting performance. Together, these metrics provide a complete performance profile. Use our VPS comparison tool to analyze multiple plans side-by-side.
Benchmark Metrics & Features
Performance Analysis Use Cases
- Evaluating VPS CPU performance for compute-intensive applications
- Testing disk I/O performance for database workloads
- Comparing VPS performance across different providers
- Analyzing WordPress site performance on specific VPS plans
- Assessing value-for-money based on performance and pricing
- Checking real-world application performance metrics
- Understanding geographic performance variations by location
- Reviewing detailed benchmark metrics before VPS purchase
- Comparing single-core vs multi-core CPU performance
- Validating provider performance claims with actual data
- Making informed hosting decisions based on comprehensive benchmarks
How to Interpret Benchmark Results
1. CPU Performance (Geekbench)
Geekbench measures CPU performance through single-core and multi-core scores. Single-core scores (typically 800-2000) indicate performance for single-threaded applications and general responsiveness. Multi-core scores (1500-8000) show performance when all CPU cores are utilized for parallel processing. Higher scores mean better performance. Visit our testing methodology to learn more about CPU benchmarks.
2. Disk I/O Performance (FIO)
FIO benchmarks measure disk performance through IOPS (Input/Output Operations Per Second) and bandwidth (MB/s). High IOPS (10,000+ for NVMe, 5,000-10,000 for SSD) is crucial for database workloads with many small operations. High bandwidth is important for large file transfers and media applications. Compare disk performance across different providers in our database.
3. Application Performance
Real-world application benchmarks (WordPress, UnixBench) show how the VPS handles typical web workloads including PHP processing, database queries, and static file serving. These results measured in requests per second and page load times directly apply to web hosting scenarios. Need help choosing the right VPS? Visit about us to learn more about VPSMetrics.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I interpret the Geekbench single-core and multi-core scores?
Geekbench single-core scores indicate CPU performance for single-threaded applications, important for general responsiveness and web applications. Multi-core scores show performance when all CPU cores are utilized, crucial for parallel processing and multi-threaded applications. Higher scores indicate better performance. Modern VPS typically score 800-2000 (single) and 1500-8000 (multi) depending on the plan.
What do IOPS numbers mean in disk I/O benchmarks?
IOPS (Input/Output Operations Per Second) measures how many read/write operations your disk can handle per second. Higher IOPS means better performance for database operations and applications with many small file operations. NVMe SSD VPS typically delivers 10,000+ IOPS, while traditional SSD offers 5,000-10,000 IOPS.
What is UnixBench and why does it matter?
UnixBench is a comprehensive system-level benchmark suite that tests various aspects of Unix-like system performance including process creation, file operations, and system calls. It provides a holistic view of overall system performance beyond just CPU or disk metrics. Higher UnixBench scores indicate better overall system efficiency.
How reliable are WordPress benchmark results?
WordPress benchmarks provide real-world application performance metrics by testing actual WordPress installations. These results show how the VPS handles typical web application workloads including PHP processing, database queries, and static file serving. Results are measured in requests per second and page load times, directly applicable to web hosting scenarios.
Can I trust these benchmark results for my use case?
Our benchmarks provide standardized, reproducible test results using industry-standard tools. While they offer excellent performance indicators, your actual experience may vary based on your specific workload, application optimization, and usage patterns. Use these benchmarks as a reliable starting point for comparison between providers.
Why do benchmark results vary by location?
Different data center locations may have different hardware configurations, CPU generations, storage types, and network infrastructure. Providers often upgrade facilities at different rates across regions. Location-specific benchmarks help you choose a VPS in the right region with the best performance for your target audience.
Making Informed VPS Decisions
Use these comprehensive benchmark results to make data-driven hosting decisions. Compare multiple metrics together rather than focusing on a single aspect - a balanced VPS performs well across CPU, disk, and network benchmarks. Consider your specific workload requirements: CPU-intensive applications need high Geekbench scores, database-heavy applications require high IOPS, and content delivery services benefit from high network bandwidth.
Our benchmarks provide standardized, reproducible test results using industry-standard tools. While they offer excellent performance indicators, your actual experience may vary based on specific workload patterns and application optimization. Use these benchmarks as a reliable starting point for comparison between providers and configurations.
Compare More VPS Options
Explore additional benchmarks, compare multiple VPS plans side-by-side, and discover the best performing options for your specific requirements and budget.