IDCloudhost - Intel 2 Core 2 GM Ram - Intel Pro
Comprehensive VPS benchmark results from Singapore tested on Oct 01, 2025. Learn our methodology.
System Specifications
Additional Benchmarks
UnixBench
System Performance Index
WordPress Bench
Web Application Performance
Benchmark Steps
# | Suite | Run At | Raw Output |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
Bench
|
Oct 01, 2025 05:52 |
View Raw Output-------------------- A Bench.sh Script By Teddysun ------------------- Version : v2025-05-08 Usage : wget -qO- bench.sh | bash ---------------------------------------------------------------------- CPU Model : Intel Core Processor (Broadwell, IBRS) CPU Cores : 2 @ 2199.996 MHz CPU Cache : 16384 KB AES-NI : ✓ Enabled VM-x/AMD-V : ✗ Disabled Total Disk : 19.9 GB (1.9 GB Used) Total Mem : 1.7 GB (398.4 MB Used) System uptime : 0 days, 1 hour 14 min Load average : 0.00, 0.03, 0.12 OS : AlmaLinux release 9.6 (Sage Margay) Arch : x86_64 (64 Bit) Kernel : 5.14.0-503.35.1.el9_5.x86_64 TCP CC : cubic Virtualization : KVM IPv4/IPv6 : ✓ Online / ✗ Offline Organization : AS138608 Cloud Host Pte Ltd Location : Singapore / SG Region : Singapore ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I/O Speed(1st run) : 655 MB/s I/O Speed(2nd run) : 673 MB/s I/O Speed(3rd run) : 724 MB/s I/O Speed(average) : 684.0 MB/s ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Node Name Upload Speed Download Speed Latency Speedtest.net 87.86 Mbps 564.45 Mbps 13.39 ms Paris, FR 296.72 Mbps 599.28 Mbps 292.30 ms Amsterdam, NL 27.44 Mbps 974.01 Mbps 158.53 ms Shanghai, CN 218.79 Mbps 604.23 Mbps 370.60 ms Hong Kong, CN 548.68 Mbps 544.04 Mbps 32.78 ms Singapore, SG 39.17 Mbps 462.21 Mbps 35.66 ms Tokyo, JP 496.71 Mbps 666.63 Mbps 67.86 ms ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Finished in : 4 min 16 sec Timestamp : 2025-10-01 05:19:09 UTC ---------------------------------------------------------------------- |
2 |
UnixBench
|
Oct 01, 2025 05:52 |
View Raw OutputDouble-Precision Whetstone 55.0 5760.2 1047.3 Execl Throughput 43.0 2224.7 517.4 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 422627.3 1067.2 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 117780.9 711.7 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1179210.1 2033.1 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 633106.8 508.9 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 67344.3 168.4 Process Creation 126.0 5593.2 443.9 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 4814.6 1135.5 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1054.6 1757.6 System Call Overhead 15000.0 371660.8 247.8 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 769.7 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Benchmark Run: Wed Oct 01 2025 05:52:41 - 06:20:43 2 CPUs in system; running 2 parallel copies of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 65939576.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 11790.7 MWIPS (10.0 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 4419.5 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 852333.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 238665.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 2179055.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 1266687.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 287718.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 12902.9 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 8008.2 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1094.2 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 744837.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 65939576.8 5650.3 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 11790.7 2143.8 Execl Throughput 43.0 4419.5 1027.8 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 852333.5 2152.4 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 238665.0 1442.1 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 2179055.4 3757.0 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1266687.1 1018.2 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 287718.6 719.3 Process Creation 126.0 12902.9 1024.0 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 8008.2 1888.7 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1094.2 1823.6 System Call Overhead 15000.0 744837.5 496.6 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 1545.9 |
3 |
Benchy
|
Oct 01, 2025 08:46 |
View Raw Output# Benchy v2.8 # # https://github.com/L1so/benchy # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # 01 Oct 2025 08:46 UTC # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Server Insight Hardware Information --------------------- --------------------- OS : AlmaLinux 9.6 (Sage Margay) Model : Intel Core Processor (Broadwell, IBRS) Location : Singapore Core : 2 @ 2199.996 MHz Kernel : 5.14.0-503.35.1.el9_5.x86_64 AES-NI : ✔ Enabled Uptime : 0 days, 4 hrs, 45 mins, 42 secs VM-x/AMD-V : ❌ Disabled Virt : kvm Swap : 0.0 KiB Disk & Memory Usage Network Information --------------------- --------------------- Disk (2) : 19.7 GiB ASN : AS138608 Disk Usage : 5.6 GiB (28% Used) ISP : Cloud Host Pte Ltd Mem : 1.7 GiB IPv4 : ❌ Disabled Mem Usage : 0.7 GiB (38% Used) IPv6 : ❌ Disabled Disk Performance Check (xfs on /dev/vda4) (R: Read, W: Write, T: Total) +---------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Size | Read | Write | Total | IOPS (R,W,T) | +===========================================================================+ | 4k | 58.54 MB/s | 58.66 MB/s | 117.21 MB/s | 15.0k | 15.0k | 30.0k | | 64k | 354.74 MB/s | 356.61 MB/s | 711.35 MB/s | 5.7k | 5.7k | 11.4k | | 512k | 344.85 MB/s | 363.17 MB/s | 708.03 MB/s | 0.7k | 0.7k | 1.4k | | 1m | 343.20 MB/s | 366.06 MB/s | 709.26 MB/s | 0.3k | 0.4k | 0.7k | +---------------------------------------------------------------------------+ |
4 |
PassMark
|
Oct 01, 2025 08:46 |
View Raw OutputPassMark PerformanceTest Linux (11.0.1002) Intel Core Processor (Broadwell, IBRS) (x86_64) 2 cores @ 0 MHz | 1.7 GiB RAM Number of Processes: 2 | Test Iterations: 1 | Test Duration: Medium -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CPU Mark: 2374 Integer Math 6565 Million Operations/s Floating Point Math 5569 Million Operations/s Prime Numbers 20.7 Million Primes/s Sorting 4410 Thousand Strings/s Encryption 571 MB/s Compression 32934 KB/s CPU Single Threaded 1601 Million Operations/s Physics 350 Frames/s Extended Instructions (SSE) 1953 Million Matrices/s Memory Mark: 917 Database Operations 1059 Thousand Operations/s Memory Read Cached 19083 MB/s Memory Read Uncached 7015 MB/s Memory Write 5749 MB/s Available RAM 766 Megabytes Memory Latency 79 Nanoseconds Memory Threaded 14228 MB/s -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
5 |
Speedtest Global
|
Oct 01, 2025 09:22 |
View Raw Output--------------------------------------------------------------------------- Speedtest.net (Region: INDONESIA) --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Location Latency Loss DL Speed UP Speed Server ISP: Cloud Host Pte Nearest 13.43 ms 0.0% 481.07 Mbps 494.33 Mbps CBN - Jakarta Jakarta 19.39 ms 0.0% 456.23 Mbps 104.97 Mbps DomaiNesia - Jakarta Jakarta 15.65 ms 0.0% 425.33 Mbps 478.75 Mbps PT. Telekomunikasi Indonesia - Jakarta Jakarta 200.18 ms 0.0% 627.81 Mbps 204.30 Mbps PT. Indosat Tbk - Jakarta Bekasi 15.36 ms 0.0% 424.06 Mbps 406.92 Mbps PT Lintas Jaringan Nusantara - Bekasi Bogor FAILED Malang 27.74 ms 0.0% 196.29 Mbps 294.71 Mbps GlobalXtreme - Malang Semarang 14.53 ms 0.0% 503.23 Mbps 446.47 Mbps Global Media Data Prima - Semarang Surabaya 27.55 ms 0.0% 534.90 Mbps 456.65 Mbps MyRepublic Indonesia - Surabaya Yogyakarta 25.13 ms 0.3% 267.49 Mbps 68.47 Mbps PT Union Routelink Communication - Yogyakarta Medan 15.78 ms 0.0% 434.19 Mbps 93.05 Mbps WIZNET - Medan Palembang 17.81 ms 0.0% 67.13 Mbps 422.20 Mbps PT. Java Digital Nusantara - Palembang Pekanbaru 11.31 ms 0.0% 555.92 Mbps 451.72 Mbps BertuahIX - Pekanbaru Makassar 40.81 ms 0.0% 324.09 Mbps 176.57 Mbps PT Medialink Global Mandiri - Makassar Depok 27.83 ms 0.3% 503.91 Mbps 383.39 Mbps PT ADI - Jakarta Tangerang 13.88 ms 0.0% 290.53 Mbps 212.95 Mbps PT. Java Medianet Tekhnologi - Tangerang --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Avg DL Speed : 406.15 Mbps Avg UL Speed : 313.03 Mbps Total DL Data : 8.34 GB Total UL Data : 5.74 GB Total Data : 14.08 GB --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Duration : 7 min 54 sec System Time : 01/10/2025 - 09:02:22 UTC Total Script Runs : 409528 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Result : https://result.nws.sh/r/1759308581_5KPJQG_INDONESIA.txt --------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
Onidel Cloud VPS
Performance-first cloud hosting for teams that need consistent benchmarks and transparent pricing.
- 99.99% uptime SLA
- Proven availability for critical workloads
- Plans from $4.95/month
- Predictable pricing and simple scaling
- AMD EPYC + NVMe stack
- Modern hardware with built-in DDoS protection
- 5 global regions
- Singapore, Sydney, Amsterdam, Ho Chi Minh City, more coming soon
Ideal for: demanding SaaS workloads, managed hosting agencies, and teams migrating off legacy VPS providers.
Launch faster with concierge onboarding
Start 14-day TrialCPU Performance (Geekbench)
CPU benchmarks measure processing power for compute-intensive tasks. Learn how we test CPU performance.
I/O Speed Summary (dd)
IOPS Performance by Block Size
Combined IOPS Performance
Total IOPS across all block sizes (4K, 64K, 512K, 1M)
FIO Benchmark Details
Detailed I/O performance test results
Test 1 - Block Size: 4k (mixed_rw_50_50)
Test 2 - Block Size: 64k (mixed_rw_50_50)
Test 3 - Block Size: 512k (mixed_rw_50_50)
Test 4 - Block Size: 1m (mixed_rw_50_50)
Detailed I/O Benchmark (FIO)
IOPS Performance by Block Size
Bandwidth Performance by Block Size
Detailed Test Results
Block Size | Read IOPS | Write IOPS | Read MB/s | Write MB/s |
---|---|---|---|---|
4k | 15,000 | 15,000 | 60.1 | 60.3 |
64k | 5,600 | 5,700 | 363.2 | 365.1 |
512k | 692 | 729 | 354.7 | 373.6 |
1m | 342 | 364 | 350.2 | 373.6 |
Related Resources
Browse More Benchmarks
Explore comprehensive VPS benchmarks across providers and locations.
Compare Providers
View aggregated performance metrics across all VPS providers.
Performance Dashboard
Access real-time statistics, top performers, and latest results.
Testing Methodology
Learn about our comprehensive testing procedures and tools.
Understanding VPS Benchmark Results
This comprehensive benchmark report provides detailed performance analysis for IDCloudhost Intel 2 Core 2 GM Ram - Intel Pro VPS in Singapore. Our standardized testing methodology measures CPU performance, disk I/O operations, network bandwidth, and real-world application performance to give you complete insights into VPS capabilities. Browse more VPS benchmarks to compare performance across providers.
Each benchmark metric serves a specific purpose in evaluating VPS performance. CPU benchmarks reveal processing power for applications, disk I/O tests measure storage performance for databases and file operations, network tests show bandwidth capacity for content delivery, and application benchmarks demonstrate real-world hosting performance. Together, these metrics provide a complete performance profile. Use our VPS comparison tool to analyze multiple plans side-by-side.
Benchmark Metrics & Features
Performance Analysis Use Cases
- Evaluating VPS CPU performance for compute-intensive applications
- Testing disk I/O performance for database workloads
- Comparing VPS performance across different providers
- Analyzing WordPress site performance on specific VPS plans
- Assessing value-for-money based on performance and pricing
- Checking real-world application performance metrics
- Understanding geographic performance variations by location
- Reviewing detailed benchmark metrics before VPS purchase
- Comparing single-core vs multi-core CPU performance
- Validating provider performance claims with actual data
- Making informed hosting decisions based on comprehensive benchmarks
How to Interpret Benchmark Results
1. CPU Performance (Geekbench)
Geekbench measures CPU performance through single-core and multi-core scores. Single-core scores (typically 800-2000) indicate performance for single-threaded applications and general responsiveness. Multi-core scores (1500-8000) show performance when all CPU cores are utilized for parallel processing. Higher scores mean better performance. Visit our testing methodology to learn more about CPU benchmarks.
2. Disk I/O Performance (FIO)
FIO benchmarks measure disk performance through IOPS (Input/Output Operations Per Second) and bandwidth (MB/s). High IOPS (10,000+ for NVMe, 5,000-10,000 for SSD) is crucial for database workloads with many small operations. High bandwidth is important for large file transfers and media applications. Compare disk performance across different providers in our database.
3. Application Performance
Real-world application benchmarks (WordPress, UnixBench) show how the VPS handles typical web workloads including PHP processing, database queries, and static file serving. These results measured in requests per second and page load times directly apply to web hosting scenarios. Need help choosing the right VPS? Visit about us to learn more about VPSMetrics.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I interpret the Geekbench single-core and multi-core scores?
Geekbench single-core scores indicate CPU performance for single-threaded applications, important for general responsiveness and web applications. Multi-core scores show performance when all CPU cores are utilized, crucial for parallel processing and multi-threaded applications. Higher scores indicate better performance. Modern VPS typically score 800-2000 (single) and 1500-8000 (multi) depending on the plan.
What do IOPS numbers mean in disk I/O benchmarks?
IOPS (Input/Output Operations Per Second) measures how many read/write operations your disk can handle per second. Higher IOPS means better performance for database operations and applications with many small file operations. NVMe SSD VPS typically delivers 10,000+ IOPS, while traditional SSD offers 5,000-10,000 IOPS.
What is UnixBench and why does it matter?
UnixBench is a comprehensive system-level benchmark suite that tests various aspects of Unix-like system performance including process creation, file operations, and system calls. It provides a holistic view of overall system performance beyond just CPU or disk metrics. Higher UnixBench scores indicate better overall system efficiency.
How reliable are WordPress benchmark results?
WordPress benchmarks provide real-world application performance metrics by testing actual WordPress installations. These results show how the VPS handles typical web application workloads including PHP processing, database queries, and static file serving. Results are measured in requests per second and page load times, directly applicable to web hosting scenarios.
Can I trust these benchmark results for my use case?
Our benchmarks provide standardized, reproducible test results using industry-standard tools. While they offer excellent performance indicators, your actual experience may vary based on your specific workload, application optimization, and usage patterns. Use these benchmarks as a reliable starting point for comparison between providers.
Why do benchmark results vary by location?
Different data center locations may have different hardware configurations, CPU generations, storage types, and network infrastructure. Providers often upgrade facilities at different rates across regions. Location-specific benchmarks help you choose a VPS in the right region with the best performance for your target audience.
Making Informed VPS Decisions
Use these comprehensive benchmark results to make data-driven hosting decisions. Compare multiple metrics together rather than focusing on a single aspect - a balanced VPS performs well across CPU, disk, and network benchmarks. Consider your specific workload requirements: CPU-intensive applications need high Geekbench scores, database-heavy applications require high IOPS, and content delivery services benefit from high network bandwidth.
Our benchmarks provide standardized, reproducible test results using industry-standard tools. While they offer excellent performance indicators, your actual experience may vary based on specific workload patterns and application optimization. Use these benchmarks as a reliable starting point for comparison between providers and configurations.
Compare More VPS Options
Explore additional benchmarks, compare multiple VPS plans side-by-side, and discover the best performing options for your specific requirements and budget.