Hybula - AMD EPYC 2 Core 4 GB Ram NL
Comprehensive VPS benchmark results from Netherlands tested on Jul 16, 2023. Learn our methodology.
System Specifications
Additional Benchmarks
UnixBench
System Performance Index
WordPress Bench
Web Application Performance
Benchmark Steps
| # | Suite | Run At | Raw Output |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Bench
|
Jul 16, 2023 18:21 |
View Raw Output-------------------- A Bench.sh Script By Teddysun ------------------- Version : v2023-06-10 Usage : wget -qO- bench.sh | bash ---------------------------------------------------------------------- CPU Model : AMD EPYC 7B13 64-Core Processor CPU Cores : 2 @ 2249.996 MHz CPU Cache : 512 KB AES-NI : Enabled VM-x/AMD-V : Enabled Total Disk : 48.4 GB (2.5 GB Used) Total Mem : 3.8 GB (261.3 MB Used) System uptime : 0 days, 1 hour 6 min Load average : 0.62, 0.93, 0.90 OS : Ubuntu 22.04.2 LTS Arch : x86_64 (64 Bit) Kernel : 5.15.0-76-generic TCP CC : bbr Virtualization : KVM IPv4/IPv6 : Online / Online Organization : AS35133 Hybula B.V. Location : Amsterdam / NL Region : North Holland ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I/O Speed(1st run) : 1.0 GB/s I/O Speed(2nd run) : 979 MB/s I/O Speed(3rd run) : 1.0 GB/s I/O Speed(average) : 1009.0 MB/s ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Node Name Upload Speed Download Speed Latency Speedtest.net 996.86 Mbps 943.88 Mbps 2.37 ms Los Angeles, US 558.14 Mbps 896.31 Mbps 147.09 ms Dallas, US 674.85 Mbps 885.77 Mbps 119.27 ms Montreal, CA 566.31 Mbps 884.61 Mbps 83.96 ms Amsterdam, NL 996.53 Mbps 952.61 Mbps 8.78 ms Shanghai, CN 285.38 Mbps 0.61 Mbps 292.99 ms Nanjing, CN 189.83 Mbps 655.37 Mbps 196.69 ms Hongkong, CN 97.81 Mbps 886.62 Mbps 246.56 ms Singapore, SG 473.14 Mbps 826.10 Mbps 160.98 ms Tokyo, JP 339.31 Mbps 628.71 Mbps 238.61 ms ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Finished in : 5 min 6 sec Timestamp : 2023-07-16 18:21:59 WIB ---------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| 2 |
Speedtest Global
|
Jul 16, 2023 18:43 |
View Raw Output---------------------------- network-speed.xyz ----------------------------
A simple script to test network performance using speedtest-cli
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Version : v2023.07.14
Global Speedtest : wget -qO- network-speed.xyz | bash
Region Speedtest : wget -qO- network-speed.xyz | bash -s -- -r <region>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Basic System Info
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
CPU Model : AMD EPYC 7B13 64-Core Processor
CPU Cores : 2 @ 2249.996 MHz
CPU Cache : 512 KB
AES-NI : ✔ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
Total Disk : 48.4 GB (2.5 GB Used)
Total RAM : 3.8 GB (301.3 MB Used)
System uptime : 0 days, 1 hour 20 min
Load average : 0.00, 0.12, 0.42
OS : Ubuntu 22.04.2 LTS
Arch : x86_64 (64 Bit)
Kernel : 5.15.0-76-generic
Virtualization : KVM
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Basic Network Info
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Primary Network : IPv6
ISP : Hybula B.V.
ASN : AS35133 Hybula B.V.
Host : Hybula B.V
Location : Amsterdam, North Holland-NH, Netherlands
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Speedtest.net (Region: GLOBAL)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Location Latency Loss DL Speed UP Speed Server
ISP: Hybula B.V.
Nearest 2.25 ms N/A 958.38 Mbps 997.57 Mbps Netprotect - Amsterdam
Kochi, IN 165.20 ms 0.0% 723.19 Mbps 405.42 Mbps Asianet Broadband - Cochin
Bangalore, IN 137.31 ms 0.0% 924.81 Mbps 491.96 Mbps Bharti Airtel Ltd - Bangalore
Chennai, IN 152.46 ms 0.0% 929.82 Mbps 456.94 Mbps Tata Play Fiber - Chennai
Mumbai, IN 124.72 ms 0.0% 931.45 Mbps 631.65 Mbps i3D.net - Mumbai
Delhi, IN 147.20 ms 0.0% 837.94 Mbps 550.13 Mbps Tata Teleservices Ltd - New Delhi
Seattle, US 168.75 ms 0.0% 555.96 Mbps 484.52 Mbps DediPath - Seattle, WA
Los Angeles, US 137.90 ms 0.0% 888.08 Mbps 576.32 Mbps ReliableSite Hosting - Los Angeles, CA
Dallas, US 111.46 ms 0.0% 919.68 Mbps 744.42 Mbps Hivelocity - Dallas, TX
Miami, US 126.89 ms 0.0% 845.25 Mbps 675.58 Mbps AT&T - Miami, FL
New York, US 78.09 ms 0.0% 10.92 Mbps 805.02 Mbps Clouvider Ltd - New York, NY
Toronto, CA 94.89 ms 0.0% 935.99 Mbps 863.91 Mbps Rogers - Toronto, ON
London, UK 8.40 ms 0.0% 941.80 Mbps 1000.19 Mbps VeloxServ Communications - London
Amsterdam, NL 3.03 ms 0.0% 942.69 Mbps 997.40 Mbps Clouvider Ltd - Amsterdam
Paris, FR 13.18 ms N/A 958.68 Mbps 999.39 Mbps Axione - Paris
Frankfurt, DE 8.47 ms 0.0% 942.75 Mbps 999.76 Mbps 23M GmbH - Frankfurt Am Main
Warsaw, PL 25.36 ms 0.0% 943.02 Mbps 1005.89 Mbps UPC Polska - Warszawa
Bucharest, RO 36.80 ms 0.0% 935.92 Mbps 1011.17 Mbps Vodafone Romania Fixed - Bucharest - Bucharest
Jeddah, KSA 79.93 ms 0.0% 958.06 Mbps 1046.73 Mbps Saudi Telecom Company
Dubai, AE 125.14 ms 0.0% 959.51 Mbps 638.12 Mbps du - Dubai
Fujairah, AE 120.46 ms 0.0% 974.39 Mbps 668.74 Mbps ETISALAT-UAE - Fujairah
Tokyo, JP 241.95 ms N/A 864.94 Mbps 338.63 Mbps fdcservers.net - Tokyo
Shanghai, CU-CN 245.77 ms 7.0% 699.56 Mbps 350.00 Mbps China Unicom 5G - ShangHai
Nanjing, CT-CN 198.09 ms 2.7% 692.50 Mbps 165.31 Mbps China Telecom JiangSu 5G - Nanjing
Hong Kong, HKG 160.63 ms N/A 848.77 Mbps 438.63 Mbps STC - Hong Kong
Singapore, SG 162.61 ms 0.0% 719.76 Mbps 496.94 Mbps i3D.net - Singapore
Jakarta, ID 199.29 ms 0.0% 651.89 Mbps 410.20 Mbps PT. Telekomunikasi Indonesia - Jakarta
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Avg DL Speed : 833.18 Mbps
Avg UL Speed : 675.94 Mbps
Total DL Data : 30.51 GB
Total UL Data : 26.33 GB
Total Data : 56.84 GB
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Duration : 12 min 52 sec
System Time : 16/07/2023 - 18:43:38 WIB
Total Script Runs : 7380
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Result : https://cdn1.frocdn.ch/ReX7ry3zCEUMC76.txt
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| 3 |
Benchy
|
Jul 16, 2023 18:56 |
View Raw Output# # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Benchy v2.7 # # https://github.com/L1so/benchy # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # 16 Jul 2023 18:56 WIB # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Server Insight Hardware Information --------------------- --------------------- OS : Ubuntu 22.04.2 LTS Model : AMD EPYC 7B13 64-Core Processor Location : Netherlands Core : 2 @ 2249.996 MHz Kernel : 5.15.0-76-generic AES-NI : ✔ Enabled Uptime : 0 days, 1 hrs, 46 mins, 14 secs VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled Virt : kvm Swap : 0.0 KiB Disk & Memory Usage Network Information --------------------- --------------------- Disk (1) : 48.3 GiB ASN : AS35133 Disk Usage : 2.5 GiB (5% Used) ISP : Hybula B.V. Mem : 3.8 GiB IPv4 : ✔ Enabled Mem Usage : 0.3 GiB (7% Used) IPv6 : ✔ Enabled Ookla Network Speedtest (Region: Europe) +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Provider | Location | Download | Upload | Data Used | Latency | +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | TestDebit | Marseille, FR | 950.5 Mb/s | 1.0 Gb/s | 2.6 GB | 22.8 ms | | Vancis | Amsterdam, NL | 942.0 Mb/s | 992.8 Mb/s | 2.3 GB | 3.0 ms | | Box Broad. | London, GB | 922.2 Mb/s | 933.5 Mb/s | 2.2 GB | 8.6 ms | | Skynet | Warsaw, PL | 943.7 Mb/s | 1.0 Gb/s | 2.6 GB | 23.0 ms | | Vodafone | Milan, IT | 973.0 Mb/s | 1.0 Gb/s | 2.7 GB | 21.5 ms | +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ Network Performance Test (Region: Europe) +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Prot. | Provider | Location | Send | Receive | Latency | +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | IPv4 | FiberBy | Copenhagen, DK | 1.1 Gb/s | 962.4 Mb/s | 15.1 ms | | | WOBCOM | Wolfsburg, DE | 1.1 Gb/s | 970.0 Mb/s | 11.4 ms | | | Novogara | Amsterdam, NL | 1.2 Gb/s | 959.9 Mb/s | 4.7 ms | | | Sasag | Schaff, CH | 1.1 Gb/s | 925.4 Mb/s | 17.5 ms | | | Alwyzon | Vienna, AT | 1.1 Gb/s | 918.4 Mb/s | 20.4 ms | +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | IPv6 | FiberBy | Copenhagen, DK | 1.1 Gb/s | 899.0 Mb/s | 15.1 ms | | | WOBCOM | Wolfsburg, DE | 1.1 Gb/s | 960.4 Mb/s | 11.3 ms | | | Novogara | Amsterdam, NL | 1.1 Gb/s | 947.1 Mb/s | 4.8 ms | | | Sasag | Schaff, CH | 1.1 Gb/s | 952.2 Mb/s | 17.6 ms | | | Alwyzon | Vienna, AT | 1.1 Gb/s | 949.2 Mb/s | 20.4 ms | +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ |
| 4 |
PassMark
|
Jul 16, 2023 18:56 |
View Raw OutputPassMark PerformanceTest Linux AMD EPYC 7B13 64-Core Processor (x86_64) 2 cores @ 0 MHz | 3.8 GiB RAM Number of Processes: 2 | Test Iterations: 2 | Test Duration: Very Long - CPU Mark: 4951 Integer Math 11302 Million Operations/s Floating Point Math 9116 Million Operations/s Prime Numbers 36.6 Million Primes/s Sorting 6814 Thousand Strings/s Encryption 2452 MB/s Compression 48379 KB/s CPU Single Threaded 2600 Million Operations/s Physics 643 Frames/s Extended Instructions (SSE) 4213 Million Matrices/s Memory Mark: 2117 Database Operations 1956 Thousand Operations/s Memory Read Cached 26379 MB/s Memory Read Uncached 18677 MB/s Memory Write 19561 MB/s Available RAM 3304 Megabytes Memory Latency 59 Nanoseconds Memory Threaded 35181 MB/s |
| 5 |
UnixBench
|
Jul 16, 2023 19:40 |
View Raw Output------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Sun Jul 16 2023 19:40:47 - 20:08:44
2 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 48183327.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 8443.7 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 5008.7 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1681965.3 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 453055.2 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5468693.6 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 2595889.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 66986.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 9326.8 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 13931.2 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 2911.6 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 2996633.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 48183327.6 4128.8
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 8443.7 1535.2
Execl Throughput 43.0 5008.7 1164.8
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 1681965.3 4247.4
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 453055.2 2737.5
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 5468693.6 9428.8
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 2595889.0 2086.7
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 66986.7 167.5
Process Creation 126.0 9326.8 740.2
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 13931.2 3285.7
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 2911.6 4852.7
System Call Overhead 15000.0 2996633.4 1997.8
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 2082.9
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Sun Jul 16 2023 21:04:40 - 21:32:38
2 CPUs in system; running 2 parallel copies of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 94769129.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 16893.4 MWIPS (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 7610.5 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3294677.6 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 894202.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 10099746.3 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 5177625.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 602423.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 22249.3 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 20802.2 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 2953.8 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 5959100.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 94769129.9 8120.7
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 16893.4 3071.5
Execl Throughput 43.0 7610.5 1769.9
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 3294677.6 8319.9
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 894202.0 5403.0
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 10099746.3 17413.4
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 5177625.6 4162.1
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 602423.7 1506.1
Process Creation 126.0 22249.3 1765.8
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 20802.2 4906.2
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 2953.8 4923.0
System Call Overhead 15000.0 5959100.6 3972.7
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 4269.6
|
Onidel Cloud VPS
Performance-first cloud hosting for teams that need consistent benchmarks and transparent pricing.
- 99.99% uptime SLA
- Proven availability for critical workloads
- Plans from $4.95/month
- Predictable pricing and simple scaling
- AMD EPYC + NVMe stack
- Modern hardware with built-in DDoS protection
- 5 global regions
- Singapore, Sydney, Amsterdam, Ho Chi Minh City, more coming soon
Ideal for: demanding SaaS workloads, managed hosting agencies, and teams migrating off legacy VPS providers.
Launch faster with concierge onboarding
Start 14-day TrialCPU Performance (Geekbench)
CPU benchmarks measure processing power for compute-intensive tasks. Learn how we test CPU performance.
I/O Speed Summary (dd)
IOPS Performance by Block Size
Combined IOPS Performance
Total IOPS across all block sizes (4K, 64K, 512K, 1M)
FIO Benchmark Details
Detailed I/O performance test results
Test 1 - Block Size: 4k (mixed_rw_50_50)
Test 2 - Block Size: 64k (mixed_rw_50_50)
Test 3 - Block Size: 512k (mixed_rw_50_50)
Test 4 - Block Size: 1m (mixed_rw_50_50)
Detailed I/O Benchmark (FIO)
IOPS Performance by Block Size
Bandwidth Performance by Block Size
Detailed Test Results
| Block Size | Read IOPS | Write IOPS | Read MB/s | Write MB/s |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4k | 82,700 | 82,900 | 330.8 | 331.7 |
| 64k | 66,400 | 66,700 | 4,250.0 | 4,270.0 |
| 512k | 10,700 | 11,300 | 5,500.0 | 5,790.0 |
| 1m | 5,700 | 6,000 | 5,840.0 | 6,230.0 |
Related Resources
Browse More Benchmarks
Explore comprehensive VPS benchmarks across providers and locations.
Compare Providers
View aggregated performance metrics across all VPS providers.
Performance Dashboard
Access real-time statistics, top performers, and latest results.
Testing Methodology
Learn about our comprehensive testing procedures and tools.
Understanding VPS Benchmark Results
This comprehensive benchmark report provides detailed performance analysis for Hybula AMD EPYC 2 Core 4 GB Ram NL VPS in Netherlands. Our standardized testing methodology measures CPU performance, disk I/O operations, network bandwidth, and real-world application performance to give you complete insights into VPS capabilities. Browse more VPS benchmarks to compare performance across providers.
Each benchmark metric serves a specific purpose in evaluating VPS performance. CPU benchmarks reveal processing power for applications, disk I/O tests measure storage performance for databases and file operations, network tests show bandwidth capacity for content delivery, and application benchmarks demonstrate real-world hosting performance. Together, these metrics provide a complete performance profile. Use our VPS comparison tool to analyze multiple plans side-by-side.
Benchmark Metrics & Features
Performance Analysis Use Cases
- Evaluating VPS CPU performance for compute-intensive applications
- Testing disk I/O performance for database workloads
- Comparing VPS performance across different providers
- Analyzing WordPress site performance on specific VPS plans
- Assessing value-for-money based on performance and pricing
- Checking real-world application performance metrics
- Understanding geographic performance variations by location
- Reviewing detailed benchmark metrics before VPS purchase
- Comparing single-core vs multi-core CPU performance
- Validating provider performance claims with actual data
- Making informed hosting decisions based on comprehensive benchmarks
How to Interpret Benchmark Results
1. CPU Performance (Geekbench)
Geekbench measures CPU performance through single-core and multi-core scores. Single-core scores (typically 800-2000) indicate performance for single-threaded applications and general responsiveness. Multi-core scores (1500-8000) show performance when all CPU cores are utilized for parallel processing. Higher scores mean better performance. Visit our testing methodology to learn more about CPU benchmarks.
2. Disk I/O Performance (FIO)
FIO benchmarks measure disk performance through IOPS (Input/Output Operations Per Second) and bandwidth (MB/s). High IOPS (10,000+ for NVMe, 5,000-10,000 for SSD) is crucial for database workloads with many small operations. High bandwidth is important for large file transfers and media applications. Compare disk performance across different providers in our database.
3. Application Performance
Real-world application benchmarks (WordPress, UnixBench) show how the VPS handles typical web workloads including PHP processing, database queries, and static file serving. These results measured in requests per second and page load times directly apply to web hosting scenarios. Need help choosing the right VPS? Visit about us to learn more about VPSMetrics.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I interpret the Geekbench single-core and multi-core scores?
Geekbench single-core scores indicate CPU performance for single-threaded applications, important for general responsiveness and web applications. Multi-core scores show performance when all CPU cores are utilized, crucial for parallel processing and multi-threaded applications. Higher scores indicate better performance. Modern VPS typically score 800-2000 (single) and 1500-8000 (multi) depending on the plan.
What do IOPS numbers mean in disk I/O benchmarks?
IOPS (Input/Output Operations Per Second) measures how many read/write operations your disk can handle per second. Higher IOPS means better performance for database operations and applications with many small file operations. NVMe SSD VPS typically delivers 10,000+ IOPS, while traditional SSD offers 5,000-10,000 IOPS.
What is UnixBench and why does it matter?
UnixBench is a comprehensive system-level benchmark suite that tests various aspects of Unix-like system performance including process creation, file operations, and system calls. It provides a holistic view of overall system performance beyond just CPU or disk metrics. Higher UnixBench scores indicate better overall system efficiency.
How reliable are WordPress benchmark results?
WordPress benchmarks provide real-world application performance metrics by testing actual WordPress installations. These results show how the VPS handles typical web application workloads including PHP processing, database queries, and static file serving. Results are measured in requests per second and page load times, directly applicable to web hosting scenarios.
Can I trust these benchmark results for my use case?
Our benchmarks provide standardized, reproducible test results using industry-standard tools. While they offer excellent performance indicators, your actual experience may vary based on your specific workload, application optimization, and usage patterns. Use these benchmarks as a reliable starting point for comparison between providers.
Why do benchmark results vary by location?
Different data center locations may have different hardware configurations, CPU generations, storage types, and network infrastructure. Providers often upgrade facilities at different rates across regions. Location-specific benchmarks help you choose a VPS in the right region with the best performance for your target audience.
Making Informed VPS Decisions
Use these comprehensive benchmark results to make data-driven hosting decisions. Compare multiple metrics together rather than focusing on a single aspect - a balanced VPS performs well across CPU, disk, and network benchmarks. Consider your specific workload requirements: CPU-intensive applications need high Geekbench scores, database-heavy applications require high IOPS, and content delivery services benefit from high network bandwidth.
Our benchmarks provide standardized, reproducible test results using industry-standard tools. While they offer excellent performance indicators, your actual experience may vary based on specific workload patterns and application optimization. Use these benchmarks as a reliable starting point for comparison between providers and configurations.
Compare More VPS Options
Explore additional benchmarks, compare multiple VPS plans side-by-side, and discover the best performing options for your specific requirements and budget.