Hetzner - AMD EPYC 2 Core 8 GB Ram DE
Comprehensive VPS benchmark results from Germany tested on May 03, 2023. Learn our methodology.
System Specifications
Additional Benchmarks
UnixBench
System Performance Index
WordPress Bench
Web Application Performance
Benchmark Steps
| # | Suite | Run At | Raw Output |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Bench
|
Mar 05, 2023 04:11 |
View Raw Output-------------------- A Bench.sh Script By Teddysun ------------------- Version : v2022-06-01 Usage : wget -qO- bench.sh | bash ---------------------------------------------------------------------- CPU Model : AMD EPYC Processor CPU Cores : 2 @ 2445.406 MHz CPU Cache : 512 KB AES-NI : Enabled VM-x/AMD-V : Disabled Total Disk : 75.0 GB (3.0 GB Used) Total Mem : 7.6 GB (120.7 MB Used) System uptime : 0 days, 1 hour 2 min Load average : 0.15, 0.72, 1.00 OS : Ubuntu 20.04.5 LTS Arch : x86_64 (64 Bit) Kernel : 5.4.0-144-generic TCP CC : cubic Virtualization : KVM Organization : AS24940 Hetzner Online GmbH Location : Gunzenhausen / DE Region : Bavaria ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I/O Speed(1st run) : 1.9 GB/s I/O Speed(2nd run) : 1.9 GB/s I/O Speed(3rd run) : 1.8 GB/s I/O Speed(average) : 1911.5 MB/s ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Node Name Upload Speed Download Speed Latency Speedtest.net 236.21 Mbps 329.15 Mbps 0.81 ms Los Angeles, US 584.31 Mbps 3944.58 Mbps 157.42 ms Dallas, US 688.94 Mbps 4639.80 Mbps 128.72 ms Montreal, CA 138.86 Mbps 919.86 Mbps 100.05 ms Paris, FR 5595.84 Mbps 7704.47 Mbps 15.67 ms Amsterdam, NL 3961.20 Mbps 9371.90 Mbps 9.66 ms Shanghai, CN 336.05 Mbps 3706.01 Mbps 215.91 ms Hongkong, CN 0.71 Mbps 2477.41 Mbps 299.65 ms Singapore, SG 534.41 Mbps 410.48 Mbps 160.22 ms Tokyo, JP 340.57 Mbps 1105.79 Mbps 223.70 ms ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Finished in : 5 min 25 sec Timestamp : 2023-03-05 04:11:23 UTC ---------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| 2 |
PassMark
|
Mar 05, 2023 04:11 |
View Raw OutputPassMark PerformanceTest Linux AMD EPYC Processor (x86_64) 1 cores @ 2445 MHz | 7.6 GiB RAM Number of Processes: 2 | Test Iterations: 3 | Test Duration: Very Long -------------------------------------------------------------------------- CPU Mark: 3164 Integer Math 8346 Million Operations/s Floating Point Math 4681 Million Operations/s Prime Numbers 22.2 Million Primes/s Sorting 4065 Thousand Strings/s Encryption 2168 MB/s Compression 32065 KB/s CPU Single Threaded 2392 Million Operations/s Physics 396 Frames/s Extended Instructions (SSE) 1945 Million Matrices/s Memory Mark: 1836 Database Operations 862 Thousand Operations/s Memory Read Cached 24089 MB/s Memory Read Uncached 15898 MB/s Memory Write 11633 MB/s Available RAM 6285 Megabytes Memory Latency 69 Nanoseconds Memory Threaded 22577 MB/s -------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| 3 |
UnixBench
|
Mar 05, 2023 04:24 |
View Raw Output------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Sun Mar 05 2023 04:24:52 - 05:09:38
2 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 48787737.3 lps (10.0 s, 10 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 7803.8 MWIPS (9.9 s, 10 samples)
Execl Throughput 5904.3 lps (30.0 s, 4 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1376501.0 KBps (30.0 s, 4 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 364013.7 KBps (30.0 s, 4 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 4145418.9 KBps (30.0 s, 4 samples)
Pipe Throughput 2349175.6 lps (10.0 s, 10 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 66699.0 lps (10.0 s, 10 samples)
Process Creation 14024.6 lps (30.0 s, 4 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 12146.3 lpm (60.0 s, 4 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 2155.2 lpm (60.0 s, 4 samples)
System Call Overhead 3310724.1 lps (10.0 s, 10 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 48787737.3 4180.6
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 7803.8 1418.9
Execl Throughput 43.0 5904.3 1373.1
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 1376501.0 3476.0
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 364013.7 2199.5
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 4145418.9 7147.3
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 2349175.6 1888.4
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 66699.0 166.7
Process Creation 126.0 14024.6 1113.1
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 12146.3 2864.7
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 2155.2 3591.9
System Call Overhead 15000.0 3310724.1 2207.1
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 1976.0
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Sun Mar 05 2023 05:09:38 - 05:54:26
2 CPUs in system; running 2 parallel copies of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 63938606.3 lps (10.0 s, 10 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 13369.6 MWIPS (10.0 s, 10 samples)
Execl Throughput 7470.2 lps (30.0 s, 4 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1718729.6 KBps (30.0 s, 4 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 447938.1 KBps (30.0 s, 4 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5069185.4 KBps (30.0 s, 4 samples)
Pipe Throughput 2918541.2 lps (10.0 s, 10 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 331230.7 lps (10.0 s, 10 samples)
Process Creation 22550.7 lps (30.0 s, 4 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 15289.1 lpm (60.0 s, 4 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 2230.0 lpm (60.0 s, 4 samples)
System Call Overhead 4222246.2 lps (10.0 s, 10 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 63938606.3 5478.9
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 13369.6 2430.8
Execl Throughput 43.0 7470.2 1737.3
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 1718729.6 4340.2
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 447938.1 2706.6
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 5069185.4 8740.0
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 2918541.2 2346.1
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 331230.7 828.1
Process Creation 126.0 22550.7 1789.7
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 15289.1 3605.9
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 2230.0 3716.7
System Call Overhead 15000.0 4222246.2 2814.8
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 2869.5
|
| 4 |
Speedtest Global
|
May 03, 2023 04:21 |
View Raw Outputversion : 1.7.0 your ip : 2a01:4f8:c0c:6564::1 your ISP : Hetzner Online test location code : FRA test location city : Frankfurt test location region: Europe latency ms : 4.84 Jitter ms : 0.55 100kB download Mbps : 634.23 1MB download Mbps : 2765.86 10MB download Mbps : 3921.69 25MB download Mbps : 3327.92 90th percentile download speed: 4272.79 Mbps 100kB upload Mbps : 38.37 1MB upload Mbps : 294.42 10MB upload Mbps : 1012.49 90th percentile upload speed : 947.55 Mbps |
Onidel Cloud VPS
Performance-first cloud hosting for teams that need consistent benchmarks and transparent pricing.
- 99.99% uptime SLA
- Proven availability for critical workloads
- Plans from $4.95/month
- Predictable pricing and simple scaling
- AMD EPYC + NVMe stack
- Modern hardware with built-in DDoS protection
- 5 global regions
- Singapore, Sydney, Amsterdam, Ho Chi Minh City, more coming soon
Ideal for: demanding SaaS workloads, managed hosting agencies, and teams migrating off legacy VPS providers.
Launch faster with concierge onboarding
Start 14-day TrialCPU Performance (Geekbench)
CPU benchmarks measure processing power for compute-intensive tasks. Learn how we test CPU performance.
I/O Speed Summary (dd)
IOPS Performance by Block Size
Combined IOPS Performance
Total IOPS across all block sizes (4K, 64K, 512K, 1M)
FIO Benchmark Details
Detailed I/O performance test results
Test 1 - Block Size: 4k (mixed_rw_50_50)
Test 2 - Block Size: 64k (mixed_rw_50_50)
Test 3 - Block Size: 512k (mixed_rw_50_50)
Test 4 - Block Size: 1m (mixed_rw_50_50)
Detailed I/O Benchmark (FIO)
IOPS Performance by Block Size
Bandwidth Performance by Block Size
Detailed Test Results
| Block Size | Read IOPS | Write IOPS | Read MB/s | Write MB/s |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4k | 44,900 | 45,100 | 179.9 | 180.4 |
| 64k | 21,200 | 21,300 | 1,350.0 | 1,360.0 |
| 512k | 2,800 | 3,000 | 1,460.0 | 1,540.0 |
| 1m | 1,500 | 1,600 | 1,590.0 | 1,700.0 |
Related Resources
Browse More Benchmarks
Explore comprehensive VPS benchmarks across providers and locations.
Compare Providers
View aggregated performance metrics across all VPS providers.
Performance Dashboard
Access real-time statistics, top performers, and latest results.
Testing Methodology
Learn about our comprehensive testing procedures and tools.
Understanding VPS Benchmark Results
This comprehensive benchmark report provides detailed performance analysis for Hetzner AMD EPYC 2 Core 8 GB Ram DE VPS in Germany. Our standardized testing methodology measures CPU performance, disk I/O operations, network bandwidth, and real-world application performance to give you complete insights into VPS capabilities. Browse more VPS benchmarks to compare performance across providers.
Each benchmark metric serves a specific purpose in evaluating VPS performance. CPU benchmarks reveal processing power for applications, disk I/O tests measure storage performance for databases and file operations, network tests show bandwidth capacity for content delivery, and application benchmarks demonstrate real-world hosting performance. Together, these metrics provide a complete performance profile. Use our VPS comparison tool to analyze multiple plans side-by-side.
Benchmark Metrics & Features
Performance Analysis Use Cases
- Evaluating VPS CPU performance for compute-intensive applications
- Testing disk I/O performance for database workloads
- Comparing VPS performance across different providers
- Analyzing WordPress site performance on specific VPS plans
- Assessing value-for-money based on performance and pricing
- Checking real-world application performance metrics
- Understanding geographic performance variations by location
- Reviewing detailed benchmark metrics before VPS purchase
- Comparing single-core vs multi-core CPU performance
- Validating provider performance claims with actual data
- Making informed hosting decisions based on comprehensive benchmarks
How to Interpret Benchmark Results
1. CPU Performance (Geekbench)
Geekbench measures CPU performance through single-core and multi-core scores. Single-core scores (typically 800-2000) indicate performance for single-threaded applications and general responsiveness. Multi-core scores (1500-8000) show performance when all CPU cores are utilized for parallel processing. Higher scores mean better performance. Visit our testing methodology to learn more about CPU benchmarks.
2. Disk I/O Performance (FIO)
FIO benchmarks measure disk performance through IOPS (Input/Output Operations Per Second) and bandwidth (MB/s). High IOPS (10,000+ for NVMe, 5,000-10,000 for SSD) is crucial for database workloads with many small operations. High bandwidth is important for large file transfers and media applications. Compare disk performance across different providers in our database.
3. Application Performance
Real-world application benchmarks (WordPress, UnixBench) show how the VPS handles typical web workloads including PHP processing, database queries, and static file serving. These results measured in requests per second and page load times directly apply to web hosting scenarios. Need help choosing the right VPS? Visit about us to learn more about VPSMetrics.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I interpret the Geekbench single-core and multi-core scores?
Geekbench single-core scores indicate CPU performance for single-threaded applications, important for general responsiveness and web applications. Multi-core scores show performance when all CPU cores are utilized, crucial for parallel processing and multi-threaded applications. Higher scores indicate better performance. Modern VPS typically score 800-2000 (single) and 1500-8000 (multi) depending on the plan.
What do IOPS numbers mean in disk I/O benchmarks?
IOPS (Input/Output Operations Per Second) measures how many read/write operations your disk can handle per second. Higher IOPS means better performance for database operations and applications with many small file operations. NVMe SSD VPS typically delivers 10,000+ IOPS, while traditional SSD offers 5,000-10,000 IOPS.
What is UnixBench and why does it matter?
UnixBench is a comprehensive system-level benchmark suite that tests various aspects of Unix-like system performance including process creation, file operations, and system calls. It provides a holistic view of overall system performance beyond just CPU or disk metrics. Higher UnixBench scores indicate better overall system efficiency.
How reliable are WordPress benchmark results?
WordPress benchmarks provide real-world application performance metrics by testing actual WordPress installations. These results show how the VPS handles typical web application workloads including PHP processing, database queries, and static file serving. Results are measured in requests per second and page load times, directly applicable to web hosting scenarios.
Can I trust these benchmark results for my use case?
Our benchmarks provide standardized, reproducible test results using industry-standard tools. While they offer excellent performance indicators, your actual experience may vary based on your specific workload, application optimization, and usage patterns. Use these benchmarks as a reliable starting point for comparison between providers.
Why do benchmark results vary by location?
Different data center locations may have different hardware configurations, CPU generations, storage types, and network infrastructure. Providers often upgrade facilities at different rates across regions. Location-specific benchmarks help you choose a VPS in the right region with the best performance for your target audience.
Making Informed VPS Decisions
Use these comprehensive benchmark results to make data-driven hosting decisions. Compare multiple metrics together rather than focusing on a single aspect - a balanced VPS performs well across CPU, disk, and network benchmarks. Consider your specific workload requirements: CPU-intensive applications need high Geekbench scores, database-heavy applications require high IOPS, and content delivery services benefit from high network bandwidth.
Our benchmarks provide standardized, reproducible test results using industry-standard tools. While they offer excellent performance indicators, your actual experience may vary based on specific workload patterns and application optimization. Use these benchmarks as a reliable starting point for comparison between providers and configurations.
Compare More VPS Options
Explore additional benchmarks, compare multiple VPS plans side-by-side, and discover the best performing options for your specific requirements and budget.
