GTHost - Intel Xeon 2 Core 2 GB Ram US
Comprehensive VPS benchmark results from USA tested on Sep 25, 2023. Learn our methodology.
System Specifications
Additional Benchmarks
UnixBench
System Performance Index
WordPress Bench
Web Application Performance
Benchmark Steps
| # | Suite | Run At | Raw Output |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Bench
|
Sep 25, 2023 10:00 |
View Raw Output-------------------- A Bench.sh Script By Teddysun ------------------- Version : v2023-06-10 Usage : wget -qO- bench.sh | bash ---------------------------------------------------------------------- CPU Model : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2678 v3 @ 2.50GHz CPU Cores : 2 @ 2499.996 MHz CPU Cache : 30720 KB AES-NI : Enabled VM-x/AMD-V : Enabled Total Disk : 38.7 GB (4.4 GB Used) Total Mem : 1.9 GB (255.9 MB Used) Total Swap : 2.0 GB (0 Used) System uptime : 0 days, 0 hour 0 min Load average : 0.99, 0.31, 0.11 OS : Ubuntu 22.04.3 LTS Arch : x86_64 (64 Bit) Kernel : 5.15.0-84-generic TCP CC : bbr Virtualization : KVM IPv4/IPv6 : Online / Online Organization : AS63023 GTHost Location : Chicago / US Region : Illinois ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I/O Speed(1st run) : 850 MB/s I/O Speed(2nd run) : 827 MB/s I/O Speed(3rd run) : 862 MB/s I/O Speed(average) : 846.3 MB/s ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Node Name Upload Speed Download Speed Latency Speedtest.net 198.20 Mbps 190.87 Mbps 0.51 ms Los Angeles, US 200.51 Mbps 190.95 Mbps 50.90 ms Dallas, US 197.57 Mbps 188.41 Mbps 22.71 ms Montreal, CA 198.37 Mbps 191.25 Mbps 18.68 ms Paris, FR 203.60 Mbps 200.00 Mbps 95.71 ms Amsterdam, NL 207.09 Mbps 191.97 Mbps 93.77 ms Shanghai, CN 116.08 Mbps 78.33 Mbps 271.99 ms Nanjing, CN 216.70 Mbps 200.95 Mbps 208.13 ms Hongkong, CN 5.33 Mbps 0.23 Mbps 207.48 ms Singapore, SG 210.72 Mbps 188.87 Mbps 187.72 ms Tokyo, JP 203.95 Mbps 193.46 Mbps 155.76 ms ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Finished in : 5 min 11 sec Timestamp : 2023-09-25 10:00:44 WIB ---------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| 2 |
Speedtest Global
|
Sep 25, 2023 10:38 |
View Raw Output---------------------------- network-speed.xyz ----------------------------
A simple script to test network performance using speedtest-cli
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Version : v2023.09.22
Global Speedtest : wget -qO- network-speed.xyz | bash
Region Speedtest : wget -qO- network-speed.xyz | bash -s -- -r <region>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Basic System Info
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
CPU Model : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2678 v3 @ 2.50GHz
CPU Cores : 2 @ 2499.996 MHz
CPU Cache : 30720 KB
AES-NI : ✔ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
Total Disk : 38.7 GB (4.4 GB Used)
Total RAM : 1.9 GB (271.4 MB Used)
Total Swap : 2.0 GB (268.0 KB Used)
System uptime : 0 days, 0 hour 31 min
Load average : 0.05, 0.07, 0.03
OS : Ubuntu 22.04.3 LTS
Arch : x86_64 (64 Bit)
Kernel : 5.15.0-84-generic
Virtualization : KVM
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Basic Network Info
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Primary Network : IPv4
ISP : GTHost
ASN : AS63023 GTHost
Host : Shock VPN LLC
Location : Chicago, Illinois-IL, United States
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Speedtest.net (Region: GLOBAL)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Location Latency Loss DL Speed UP Speed Server
ISP: GTHost
Nearest 0.75 ms N/A 191.43 Mbps 198.19 Mbps Netprotect - Chicago, IL
Kochi, IN 254.76 ms N/A 195.39 Mbps 217.43 Mbps Asianet Broadband - Cochin
Bangalore, IN 267.57 ms 0.0% 199.74 Mbps 219.24 Mbps Bharti Airtel Ltd - Bangalore
Chennai, IN 263.39 ms N/A 205.31 Mbps 216.22 Mbps Jio - Chennai
Mumbai, IN 235.80 ms 0.3% 202.02 Mbps 213.89 Mbps i3D.net - Mumbai
Delhi, IN 255.69 ms 0.3% 193.35 Mbps 220.96 Mbps Tata Teleservices Ltd - New Delhi
Seattle, US 53.99 ms 0.0% 192.00 Mbps 201.48 Mbps Ziply Fiber - Seattle, WA
Los Angeles, US 42.59 ms 0.0% 195.21 Mbps 201.50 Mbps ReliableSite Hosting - Los Angeles, CA
Dallas, US 22.65 ms 0.0% 191.35 Mbps 198.84 Mbps Hivelocity - Dallas, TX
Miami, US 35.11 ms 0.0% 191.47 Mbps 201.39 Mbps AT&T - Miami, FL
New York, US 17.94 ms 0.0% 192.65 Mbps 197.48 Mbps GSL Networks - New York, NY
Toronto, CA 26.32 ms 0.0% 191.49 Mbps 199.71 Mbps Rogers - Toronto, ON
London, UK 91.81 ms 0.0% 201.50 Mbps 204.67 Mbps VeloxServ Communications - London
Amsterdam, NL 93.28 ms 0.0% 198.24 Mbps 202.65 Mbps 31173 Services AB - Amsterdam
Paris, FR 96.30 ms N/A 169.27 Mbps 205.32 Mbps Axione - Paris
Frankfurt, DE 107.64 ms 0.0% 198.56 Mbps 203.71 Mbps 23M GmbH - Frankfurt am Main
Warsaw, PL 127.85 ms 0.0% 192.62 Mbps 208.37 Mbps UPC Polska - Warszawa
Bucharest, RO 133.03 ms 0.0% 204.11 Mbps 208.23 Mbps Vodafone Romania Fixed - Bucharest - Bucharest
Jeddah, SA 149.18 ms 0.0% 200.26 Mbps 211.67 Mbps Saudi Telecom Company
Dubai, AE 215.86 ms 0.0% 199.99 Mbps 214.90 Mbps du - Dubai
Fujairah, AE 214.52 ms 0.0% 213.32 Mbps 214.31 Mbps ETISALAT-UAE - Fujairah
Tokyo, JP 155.68 ms N/A 195.65 Mbps 203.79 Mbps fdcservers.net - Tokyo
Shanghai, CU-CN 231.24 ms 0.0% 196.09 Mbps 158.36 Mbps China Unicom 5G - Shanghai
Nanjing, CT-CN 215.10 ms 0.0% 199.64 Mbps 214.92 Mbps China Telecom JiangSu 5G - Nanjing
Hong Kong, CN 193.53 ms N/A 199.45 Mbps 206.86 Mbps STC - Hong Kong
Singapore, SG 234.53 ms 0.0% 199.31 Mbps 219.34 Mbps i3D.net - Singapore
Jakarta, ID 297.27 ms 0.0% 191.52 Mbps 211.51 Mbps PT. Telekomunikasi Indonesia - Jakarta
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Avg DL Speed : 196.28 Mbps
Avg UL Speed : 205.72 Mbps
Total DL Data : 7.47 GB
Total UL Data : 7.13 GB
Total Data : 14.60 GB
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Duration : 14 min 48 sec
System Time : 25/09/2023 - 10:38:17 WIB
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Result : https://paste.kangserver.id/view/3TBD0U8
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| 3 |
Benchy
|
Sep 25, 2023 11:06 |
View Raw Output# # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Benchy v2.7 # # https://github.com/L1so/benchy # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # 25 Sep 2023 11:06 WIB # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Server Insight Hardware Information --------------------- --------------------- OS : Ubuntu 22.04.3 LTS Model : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2678 v3 @ 2.50GHz Location : United States Core : 2 @ 2499.996 MHz Kernel : 5.15.0-84-generic AES-NI : ✔ Enabled Uptime : 0 days, 0 hrs, 23 mins, 3 secs VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled Virt : kvm Swap : 2.0 GiB Disk & Memory Usage Network Information --------------------- --------------------- Disk (1) : 38.6 GiB ASN : AS63023 Disk Usage : 4.4 GiB (11% Used) ISP : GTHost Mem : 1.9 GiB IPv4 : ✔ Enabled Mem Usage : 0.3 GiB (13% Used) IPv6 : ❌ Disabled Network Performance Test (Region: North America) +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Prot. | Provider | Location | Send | Receive | Latency | +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | IPv4 | Airstream | Wisconsin, US | 230.4 Mb/s | 194.8 Mb/s | 0.0 ms | | | Clouvider | Dallas, US | 227.7 Mb/s | 195.3 Mb/s | 0.0 ms | | | Clouvider | Phoenix, US | 223.6 Mb/s | 194.8 Mb/s | 0.0 ms | | | Clouvider | Los Angeles, US | 224.0 Mb/s | 196.4 Mb/s | 0.0 ms | +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ Ookla Network Speedtest (Region: North America) +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Provider | Location | Download | Upload | Data Used | Latency | +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Comcast | Houston, US | 191.1 Mb/s | 198.1 Mb/s | 0.5 GB | 19.2 ms | | Spectrum | New York, US | 191.1 Mb/s | 199.3 Mb/s | 0.5 GB | 21.6 ms | | Telus | Edmonton, CA | 193.5 Mb/s | 206.3 Mb/s | 0.4 GB | 61.7 ms | | Airstream | Wisconsin, US | 190.8 Mb/s | 198.7 Mb/s | 0.4 GB | 8.7 ms | | Hivelocity | Dallas, US | 191.2 Mb/s | 198.1 Mb/s | 0.5 GB | 23.1 ms | +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ |
| 4 |
PassMark
|
Sep 25, 2023 11:06 |
View Raw OutputPassMark PerformanceTest Linux (11.0.1001) Intel Xeon CPU E5-2678 v3 @ 2.50GHz (x86_64) 2 cores @ 0 MHz | 1.9 GiB RAM Number of Processes: 2 | Test Iterations: 2 | Test Duration: Very Long - CPU Mark: 2536 Integer Math 6907 Million Operations/s Floating Point Math 5017 Million Operations/s Prime Numbers 25.0 Million Primes/s Sorting 4927 Thousand Strings/s Encryption 642 MB/s Compression 33717 KB/s CPU Single Threaded 1601 Million Operations/s Physics 363 Frames/s Extended Instructions (SSE) 2230 Million Matrices/s Memory Mark: 1384 Database Operations 1369 Thousand Operations/s Memory Read Cached 20067 MB/s Memory Read Uncached 9468 MB/s Memory Write 8644 MB/s Available RAM 1409 Megabytes Memory Latency 52 Nanoseconds Memory Threaded 18375 MB/s |
| 5 |
UnixBench
|
Sep 25, 2023 14:01 |
View Raw Output------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Mon Sep 25 2023 14:01:42 - 14:29:46
2 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 34433071.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 5632.9 MWIPS (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 2432.4 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 615572.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 158560.6 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 2007380.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 753417.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 118317.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 6410.5 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 7774.9 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1777.0 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 408768.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 34433071.6 2950.6
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 5632.9 1024.2
Execl Throughput 43.0 2432.4 565.7
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 615572.4 1554.5
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 158560.6 958.1
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 2007380.5 3461.0
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 753417.1 605.6
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 118317.8 295.8
Process Creation 126.0 6410.5 508.8
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 7774.9 1833.7
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1777.0 2961.6
System Call Overhead 15000.0 408768.0 272.5
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 1014.5
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Mon Sep 25 2023 14:29:46 - 14:57:50
2 CPUs in system; running 2 parallel copies of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 67212168.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 10951.0 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 4560.0 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1184819.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 308599.3 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 3228198.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 1453054.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 291572.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 13502.1 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 13237.1 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1808.9 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 784354.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 67212168.7 5759.4
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 10951.0 1991.1
Execl Throughput 43.0 4560.0 1060.5
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 1184819.5 2992.0
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 308599.3 1864.6
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 3228198.0 5565.9
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1453054.3 1168.1
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 291572.5 728.9
Process Creation 126.0 13502.1 1071.6
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 13237.1 3122.0
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1808.9 3014.9
System Call Overhead 15000.0 784354.7 522.9
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 1858.3
|
Onidel Cloud VPS
Performance-first cloud hosting for teams that need consistent benchmarks and transparent pricing.
- 99.99% uptime SLA
- Proven availability for critical workloads
- Plans from $4.95/month
- Predictable pricing and simple scaling
- AMD EPYC + NVMe stack
- Modern hardware with built-in DDoS protection
- 5 global regions
- Singapore, Sydney, Amsterdam, Ho Chi Minh City, more coming soon
Ideal for: demanding SaaS workloads, managed hosting agencies, and teams migrating off legacy VPS providers.
Launch faster with concierge onboarding
Start 14-day TrialCPU Performance (Geekbench)
CPU benchmarks measure processing power for compute-intensive tasks. Learn how we test CPU performance.
I/O Speed Summary (dd)
IOPS Performance by Block Size
Combined IOPS Performance
Total IOPS across all block sizes (4K, 64K, 512K, 1M)
FIO Benchmark Details
Detailed I/O performance test results
Test 1 - Block Size: 4k (mixed_rw_50_50)
Test 2 - Block Size: 64k (mixed_rw_50_50)
Test 3 - Block Size: 512k (mixed_rw_50_50)
Test 4 - Block Size: 1m (mixed_rw_50_50)
Detailed I/O Benchmark (FIO)
IOPS Performance by Block Size
Bandwidth Performance by Block Size
Detailed Test Results
| Block Size | Read IOPS | Write IOPS | Read MB/s | Write MB/s |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4k | 5,000 | 5,000 | 20.0 | 20.1 |
| 64k | 5,000 | 5,000 | 323.2 | 324.9 |
| 512k | 798 | 840 | 408.7 | 430.4 |
| 1m | 406 | 433 | 416.3 | 444.0 |
Related Resources
Browse More Benchmarks
Explore comprehensive VPS benchmarks across providers and locations.
Compare Providers
View aggregated performance metrics across all VPS providers.
Performance Dashboard
Access real-time statistics, top performers, and latest results.
Testing Methodology
Learn about our comprehensive testing procedures and tools.
Understanding VPS Benchmark Results
This comprehensive benchmark report provides detailed performance analysis for GTHost Intel Xeon 2 Core 2 GB Ram US VPS in USA. Our standardized testing methodology measures CPU performance, disk I/O operations, network bandwidth, and real-world application performance to give you complete insights into VPS capabilities. Browse more VPS benchmarks to compare performance across providers.
Each benchmark metric serves a specific purpose in evaluating VPS performance. CPU benchmarks reveal processing power for applications, disk I/O tests measure storage performance for databases and file operations, network tests show bandwidth capacity for content delivery, and application benchmarks demonstrate real-world hosting performance. Together, these metrics provide a complete performance profile. Use our VPS comparison tool to analyze multiple plans side-by-side.
Benchmark Metrics & Features
Performance Analysis Use Cases
- Evaluating VPS CPU performance for compute-intensive applications
- Testing disk I/O performance for database workloads
- Comparing VPS performance across different providers
- Analyzing WordPress site performance on specific VPS plans
- Assessing value-for-money based on performance and pricing
- Checking real-world application performance metrics
- Understanding geographic performance variations by location
- Reviewing detailed benchmark metrics before VPS purchase
- Comparing single-core vs multi-core CPU performance
- Validating provider performance claims with actual data
- Making informed hosting decisions based on comprehensive benchmarks
How to Interpret Benchmark Results
1. CPU Performance (Geekbench)
Geekbench measures CPU performance through single-core and multi-core scores. Single-core scores (typically 800-2000) indicate performance for single-threaded applications and general responsiveness. Multi-core scores (1500-8000) show performance when all CPU cores are utilized for parallel processing. Higher scores mean better performance. Visit our testing methodology to learn more about CPU benchmarks.
2. Disk I/O Performance (FIO)
FIO benchmarks measure disk performance through IOPS (Input/Output Operations Per Second) and bandwidth (MB/s). High IOPS (10,000+ for NVMe, 5,000-10,000 for SSD) is crucial for database workloads with many small operations. High bandwidth is important for large file transfers and media applications. Compare disk performance across different providers in our database.
3. Application Performance
Real-world application benchmarks (WordPress, UnixBench) show how the VPS handles typical web workloads including PHP processing, database queries, and static file serving. These results measured in requests per second and page load times directly apply to web hosting scenarios. Need help choosing the right VPS? Visit about us to learn more about VPSMetrics.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I interpret the Geekbench single-core and multi-core scores?
Geekbench single-core scores indicate CPU performance for single-threaded applications, important for general responsiveness and web applications. Multi-core scores show performance when all CPU cores are utilized, crucial for parallel processing and multi-threaded applications. Higher scores indicate better performance. Modern VPS typically score 800-2000 (single) and 1500-8000 (multi) depending on the plan.
What do IOPS numbers mean in disk I/O benchmarks?
IOPS (Input/Output Operations Per Second) measures how many read/write operations your disk can handle per second. Higher IOPS means better performance for database operations and applications with many small file operations. NVMe SSD VPS typically delivers 10,000+ IOPS, while traditional SSD offers 5,000-10,000 IOPS.
What is UnixBench and why does it matter?
UnixBench is a comprehensive system-level benchmark suite that tests various aspects of Unix-like system performance including process creation, file operations, and system calls. It provides a holistic view of overall system performance beyond just CPU or disk metrics. Higher UnixBench scores indicate better overall system efficiency.
How reliable are WordPress benchmark results?
WordPress benchmarks provide real-world application performance metrics by testing actual WordPress installations. These results show how the VPS handles typical web application workloads including PHP processing, database queries, and static file serving. Results are measured in requests per second and page load times, directly applicable to web hosting scenarios.
Can I trust these benchmark results for my use case?
Our benchmarks provide standardized, reproducible test results using industry-standard tools. While they offer excellent performance indicators, your actual experience may vary based on your specific workload, application optimization, and usage patterns. Use these benchmarks as a reliable starting point for comparison between providers.
Why do benchmark results vary by location?
Different data center locations may have different hardware configurations, CPU generations, storage types, and network infrastructure. Providers often upgrade facilities at different rates across regions. Location-specific benchmarks help you choose a VPS in the right region with the best performance for your target audience.
Making Informed VPS Decisions
Use these comprehensive benchmark results to make data-driven hosting decisions. Compare multiple metrics together rather than focusing on a single aspect - a balanced VPS performs well across CPU, disk, and network benchmarks. Consider your specific workload requirements: CPU-intensive applications need high Geekbench scores, database-heavy applications require high IOPS, and content delivery services benefit from high network bandwidth.
Our benchmarks provide standardized, reproducible test results using industry-standard tools. While they offer excellent performance indicators, your actual experience may vary based on specific workload patterns and application optimization. Use these benchmarks as a reliable starting point for comparison between providers and configurations.
Compare More VPS Options
Explore additional benchmarks, compare multiple VPS plans side-by-side, and discover the best performing options for your specific requirements and budget.