GreenCloud - AMD EPYC 2 Core 16 GB Ram SG
Comprehensive VPS benchmark results from Singapore tested on Jul 10, 2023. Learn our methodology.
System Specifications
Additional Benchmarks
UnixBench
System Performance Index
WordPress Bench
Web Application Performance
Benchmark Steps
| # | Suite | Run At | Raw Output |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Bench
|
Jul 10, 2023 11:16 |
View Raw Output-------------------- A Bench.sh Script By Teddysun ------------------- Version : v2023-06-10 Usage : wget -qO- bench.sh | bash ---------------------------------------------------------------------- CPU Model : AMD EPYC 7763 64-Core Processor CPU Cores : 2 @ 2445.404 MHz CPU Cache : 512 KB AES-NI : Enabled VM-x/AMD-V : Enabled Total Disk : 153.6 GB (3.9 GB Used) Total Mem : 15.6 GB (105.9 MB Used) Total Swap : 4.0 GB (0 Used) System uptime : 0 days, 1 hour 1 min Load average : 0.06, 0.65, 0.84 OS : Ubuntu 22.04.2 LTS Arch : x86_64 (64 Bit) Kernel : 5.15.0-76-generic TCP CC : bbr Virtualization : KVM IPv4/IPv6 : Online / Online Organization : AS212238 Datacamp Limited Location : Singapore / SG Region : Singapore ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I/O Speed(1st run) : 2.0 GB/s I/O Speed(2nd run) : 1.9 GB/s I/O Speed(3rd run) : 2.0 GB/s I/O Speed(average) : 2013.9 MB/s ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Node Name Upload Speed Download Speed Latency Speedtest.net 9069.66 Mbps 8771.93 Mbps 0.83 ms Los Angeles, US 473.58 Mbps 4631.75 Mbps 177.54 ms Dallas, US 377.47 Mbps 3857.55 Mbps 212.78 ms Montreal, CA 321.84 Mbps 940.19 Mbps 244.06 ms Amsterdam, NL 506.25 Mbps 4429.62 Mbps 159.99 ms Shanghai, CN 71.20 Mbps 5533.47 Mbps 97.47 ms Nanjing, CN 14.32 Mbps 2329.90 Mbps 229.45 ms Hongkong, CN 2315.21 Mbps 6042.97 Mbps 36.22 ms Singapore, SG 9103.58 Mbps 8850.72 Mbps 1.53 ms Tokyo, JP 445.76 Mbps 7872.81 Mbps 66.93 ms ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Finished in : 4 min 47 sec Timestamp : 2023-07-10 11:16:19 BST ---------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| 2 |
Speedtest Global
|
Jul 10, 2023 11:36 |
View Raw Output---------------------------- network-speed.xyz ----------------------------
A simple script to test network performance using speedtest-cli
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Version : v2023.07.02
Global Speedtest : wget -qO- network-speed.xyz | bash
Region Speedtest : wget -qO- network-speed.xyz | bash -s -- -r <region>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Basic System Info
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
CPU Model : AMD EPYC 7763 64-Core Processor
CPU Cores : 2 @ 2445.404 MHz
CPU Cache : 512 KB
AES-NI : ✔ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
Total Disk : 153.6 GB (3.9 GB Used)
Total RAM : 15.6 GB (162.8 MB Used)
Total Swap : 4.0 GB (0 Used)
System uptime : 0 days, 1 hour 13 min
Load average : 0.08, 0.21, 0.49
OS : Ubuntu 22.04.2 LTS
Arch : x86_64 (64 Bit)
Kernel : 5.15.0-76-generic
Virtualization : KVM
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Basic Network Info
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Primary Network : IPv6
ISP : DataCamp Limited
ASN : AS60068 Datacamp Limited
ASN (IPv4) : AS212238 Datacamp Limited
Host : CDN77 Singapore
Location : Singapore, North West-03, Singapore
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Speedtest.net (Region: GLOBAL)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Location Latency Loss DL Speed UP Speed Server
ISP: Datacamp Limited
Nearest 0.92 ms 0.0% 8696.48 Mbps 8781.47 Mbps PT XL Axiata Tbk - Singapore
Kochi, IN 66.94 ms 0.0% 8824.58 Mbps 1399.05 Mbps Asianet Broadband - Cochin
Bangalore, IN 47.36 ms 0.0% 8757.99 Mbps 2190.92 Mbps Bharti Airtel Ltd - Bangalore
Chennai, IN 32.03 ms 0.0% 8684.21 Mbps 2482.08 Mbps Tata Play Fiber - Chennai
Mumbai, IN 64.69 ms 0.0% 8247.62 Mbps 1248.17 Mbps i3D.net - Mumbai
Delhi, IN 88.75 ms 0.0% 1935.43 Mbps 937.79 Mbps Tata Teleservices Ltd - New Delhi
Seattle, US 187.18 ms 0.0% 2335.83 Mbps 411.64 Mbps DediPath - Seattle, WA
Los Angeles, US 174.54 ms 0.0% 4542.67 Mbps 469.77 Mbps ReliableSite Hosting - Los Angeles, CA
Dallas, US 219.99 ms 0.0% 3628.38 Mbps 366.20 Mbps Hivelocity - Dallas, TX
Miami, US 242.91 ms 0.0% 3302.45 Mbps 332.21 Mbps AT&T - Miami, FL
New York, US 239.38 ms 0.0% 19.83 Mbps 341.77 Mbps Clouvider Ltd - New York, NY
Toronto, CA 224.10 ms 0.0% 3581.98 Mbps 361.45 Mbps Rogers - Toronto, ON
London, UK FAILED
Amsterdam, NL 261.48 ms 0.0% 3031.99 Mbps 292.79 Mbps Clouvider Ltd - Amsterdam
Paris, FR FAILED
Frankfurt, DE 158.53 ms 0.0% 4930.80 Mbps 509.47 Mbps 23M GmbH - Frankfurt Am Main
Warsaw, PL 278.15 ms 0.0% 2865.32 Mbps 288.47 Mbps UPC Polska - Warszawa
Bucharest, RO 253.43 ms 0.0% 3106.01 Mbps 320.28 Mbps Vodafone Romania Fixed - Bucharest - Bucharest
Jeddah, KSA 210.30 ms 0.0% 3904.68 Mbps 393.17 Mbps Saudi Telecom Company
Dubai, AE 82.14 ms 0.0% 7218.26 Mbps 1006.49 Mbps du - Dubai
Fujairah, AE 75.53 ms 0.0% 8740.15 Mbps 1038.46 Mbps ETISALAT-UAE - Fujairah
Tokyo, JP 77.46 ms N/A 7041.16 Mbps 1130.43 Mbps fdcservers.net - Tokyo
Shanghai, CU-CN 91.75 ms 10.3% 4654.22 Mbps 95.48 Mbps China Unicom 5G - ShangHai
Nanjing, CT-CN 226.24 ms 25.1% 2401.79 Mbps 16.62 Mbps China Telecom JiangSu 5G - Nanjing
Hong Kong, HKG 36.43 ms N/A 9351.56 Mbps 2301.86 Mbps STC - Hong Kong
Singapore, SG 1.03 ms 0.0% 8413.71 Mbps 8971.75 Mbps i3D.net - Singapore
Jakarta, ID 15.51 ms 0.0% 8648.87 Mbps 3311.85 Mbps PT. Telekomunikasi Indonesia - Jakarta
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Avg DL Speed : 5474.68 Mbps
Avg UL Speed : 1559.99 Mbps
Total DL Data : 177.73 GB
Total UL Data : 36.07 GB
Total Data : 213.80 GB
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Duration : 12 min 32 sec
System Time : 10/07/2023 - 11:36:24 BST
Total Script Runs : 4427
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Result : https://cdn1.frocdn.ch/fPKjzXbu2St2wYW.txt
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| 3 |
Benchy
|
Jul 10, 2023 11:46 |
View Raw Output# # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Benchy v2.7 # # https://github.com/L1so/benchy # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # 10 Jul 2023 11:46 BST # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Server Insight Hardware Information --------------------- --------------------- OS : Ubuntu 22.04.2 LTS Model : AMD EPYC 7763 64-Core Processor Location : Singapore Core : 2 @ 2445.404 MHz Kernel : 5.15.0-76-generic AES-NI : ✔ Enabled Uptime : 0 days, 1 hrs, 36 mins, 0 secs VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled Virt : kvm Swap : 4.0 GiB Disk & Memory Usage Network Information --------------------- --------------------- Disk (1) : 153.6 GiB ASN : AS212238 Disk Usage : 4.0 GiB (3% Used) ISP : Datacamp Limited Mem : 15.6 GiB IPv4 : ✔ Enabled Mem Usage : 0.1 GiB (1% Used) IPv6 : ✔ Enabled Ookla Network Speedtest (Region: Asia) +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Provider | Location | Download | Upload | Data Used | Latency | +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Biznet | Jakarta, ID | 3.8 Gb/s | 3.9 Gb/s | 10.0 GB | 13.1 ms | | Exabytes | Kuala Lumpur, MY | Failed | To | Get | Data | | MyRepublic | Singapore, SG | 8.8 Gb/s | 7.8 Gb/s | 19.1 GB | 0.91 ms | | GLBB | Tokyo, JP | Failed | To | Get | Data | | Airtel | Chennai, IN | 806.9 Mb/s | 2.5 Gb/s | 4.7 GB | 32.5 ms | +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ Network Performance Test (Region: Asia) +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Prot. | Provider | Location | Send | Receive | Latency | +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | IPv4 | Uztelecom | Tashkent, UZ | 1.1 Gb/s | 1.0 Gb/s | 237.6 ms | | | Biznet | Jakarta, ID | 3.9 Gb/s | 3.2 Gb/s | 0.0 ms | +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | IPv6 | Uztelecom | Tashkent, UZ | 733.8 Mb/s | 779.1 Mb/s | 237.7 ms | | | Biznet | Jakarta, ID | busy | busy | 0.0 ms | +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ |
| 4 |
PassMark
|
Jul 10, 2023 11:46 |
View Raw OutputPassMark PerformanceTest Linux AMD EPYC 7763 64-Core Processor (x86_64) 2 cores @ 0 MHz | 15.6 GiB RAM Number of Processes: 2 | Test Iterations: 2 | Test Duration: Very Long - CPU Mark: 4965 Integer Math 11334 Million Operations/s Floating Point Math 9156 Million Operations/s Prime Numbers 36.7 Million Primes/s Sorting 6764 Thousand Strings/s Encryption 2468 MB/s Compression 48484 KB/s CPU Single Threaded 2601 Million Operations/s Physics 647 Frames/s Extended Instructions (SSE) 4248 Million Matrices/s Memory Mark: 2479 Database Operations 1996 Thousand Operations/s Memory Read Cached 26616 MB/s Memory Read Uncached 18481 MB/s Memory Write 19375 MB/s Available RAM 15727 Megabytes Memory Latency 62 Nanoseconds Memory Threaded 34910 MB/s |
| 5 |
UnixBench
|
Jul 10, 2023 12:52 |
View Raw Output------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Mon Jul 10 2023 12:52:27 - 13:20:25
2 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 47604174.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 8482.0 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 4983.5 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1750356.7 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 460517.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5240015.7 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 2683779.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 239039.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 9441.9 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 13593.7 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 2793.1 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 3017771.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 47604174.3 4079.2
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 8482.0 1542.2
Execl Throughput 43.0 4983.5 1158.9
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 1750356.7 4420.1
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 460517.4 2782.6
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 5240015.7 9034.5
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 2683779.5 2157.4
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 239039.1 597.6
Process Creation 126.0 9441.9 749.4
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 13593.7 3206.1
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 2793.1 4655.1
System Call Overhead 15000.0 3017771.7 2011.8
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 2313.4
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Mon Jul 10 2023 13:20:25 - 13:48:22
2 CPUs in system; running 2 parallel copies of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 95546775.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 16868.0 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 7315.9 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3424385.1 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 920052.2 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 9977887.6 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 5357882.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 599549.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 18971.1 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 19673.6 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 2939.1 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 6019512.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 95546775.3 8187.4
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 16868.0 3066.9
Execl Throughput 43.0 7315.9 1701.4
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 3424385.1 8647.4
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 920052.2 5559.2
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 9977887.6 17203.3
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 5357882.9 4307.0
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 599549.0 1498.9
Process Creation 126.0 18971.1 1505.6
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 19673.6 4640.0
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 2939.1 4898.5
System Call Overhead 15000.0 6019512.2 4013.0
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 4213.6
|
Onidel Cloud VPS
Performance-first cloud hosting for teams that need consistent benchmarks and transparent pricing.
- 99.99% uptime SLA
- Proven availability for critical workloads
- Plans from $4.95/month
- Predictable pricing and simple scaling
- AMD EPYC + NVMe stack
- Modern hardware with built-in DDoS protection
- 5 global regions
- Singapore, Sydney, Amsterdam, Ho Chi Minh City, more coming soon
Ideal for: demanding SaaS workloads, managed hosting agencies, and teams migrating off legacy VPS providers.
Launch faster with concierge onboarding
Start 14-day TrialCPU Performance (Geekbench)
CPU benchmarks measure processing power for compute-intensive tasks. Learn how we test CPU performance.
I/O Speed Summary (dd)
IOPS Performance by Block Size
Combined IOPS Performance
Total IOPS across all block sizes (4K, 64K, 512K, 1M)
FIO Benchmark Details
Detailed I/O performance test results
Test 1 - Block Size: 4k (mixed_rw_50_50)
Test 2 - Block Size: 64k (mixed_rw_50_50)
Test 3 - Block Size: 512k (mixed_rw_50_50)
Test 4 - Block Size: 1m (mixed_rw_50_50)
Detailed I/O Benchmark (FIO)
IOPS Performance by Block Size
Bandwidth Performance by Block Size
Detailed Test Results
| Block Size | Read IOPS | Write IOPS | Read MB/s | Write MB/s |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4k | 84,900 | 85,100 | 339.9 | 340.8 |
| 64k | 78,300 | 78,700 | 5,010.0 | 5,040.0 |
| 512k | 15,400 | 16,200 | 7,910.0 | 8,330.0 |
| 1m | 8,400 | 9,000 | 8,670.0 | 9,250.0 |
Related Resources
Browse More Benchmarks
Explore comprehensive VPS benchmarks across providers and locations.
Compare Providers
View aggregated performance metrics across all VPS providers.
Performance Dashboard
Access real-time statistics, top performers, and latest results.
Testing Methodology
Learn about our comprehensive testing procedures and tools.
Understanding VPS Benchmark Results
This comprehensive benchmark report provides detailed performance analysis for GreenCloud AMD EPYC 2 Core 16 GB Ram SG VPS in Singapore . Our standardized testing methodology measures CPU performance, disk I/O operations, network bandwidth, and real-world application performance to give you complete insights into VPS capabilities. Browse more VPS benchmarks to compare performance across providers.
Each benchmark metric serves a specific purpose in evaluating VPS performance. CPU benchmarks reveal processing power for applications, disk I/O tests measure storage performance for databases and file operations, network tests show bandwidth capacity for content delivery, and application benchmarks demonstrate real-world hosting performance. Together, these metrics provide a complete performance profile. Use our VPS comparison tool to analyze multiple plans side-by-side.
Benchmark Metrics & Features
Performance Analysis Use Cases
- Evaluating VPS CPU performance for compute-intensive applications
- Testing disk I/O performance for database workloads
- Comparing VPS performance across different providers
- Analyzing WordPress site performance on specific VPS plans
- Assessing value-for-money based on performance and pricing
- Checking real-world application performance metrics
- Understanding geographic performance variations by location
- Reviewing detailed benchmark metrics before VPS purchase
- Comparing single-core vs multi-core CPU performance
- Validating provider performance claims with actual data
- Making informed hosting decisions based on comprehensive benchmarks
How to Interpret Benchmark Results
1. CPU Performance (Geekbench)
Geekbench measures CPU performance through single-core and multi-core scores. Single-core scores (typically 800-2000) indicate performance for single-threaded applications and general responsiveness. Multi-core scores (1500-8000) show performance when all CPU cores are utilized for parallel processing. Higher scores mean better performance. Visit our testing methodology to learn more about CPU benchmarks.
2. Disk I/O Performance (FIO)
FIO benchmarks measure disk performance through IOPS (Input/Output Operations Per Second) and bandwidth (MB/s). High IOPS (10,000+ for NVMe, 5,000-10,000 for SSD) is crucial for database workloads with many small operations. High bandwidth is important for large file transfers and media applications. Compare disk performance across different providers in our database.
3. Application Performance
Real-world application benchmarks (WordPress, UnixBench) show how the VPS handles typical web workloads including PHP processing, database queries, and static file serving. These results measured in requests per second and page load times directly apply to web hosting scenarios. Need help choosing the right VPS? Visit about us to learn more about VPSMetrics.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I interpret the Geekbench single-core and multi-core scores?
Geekbench single-core scores indicate CPU performance for single-threaded applications, important for general responsiveness and web applications. Multi-core scores show performance when all CPU cores are utilized, crucial for parallel processing and multi-threaded applications. Higher scores indicate better performance. Modern VPS typically score 800-2000 (single) and 1500-8000 (multi) depending on the plan.
What do IOPS numbers mean in disk I/O benchmarks?
IOPS (Input/Output Operations Per Second) measures how many read/write operations your disk can handle per second. Higher IOPS means better performance for database operations and applications with many small file operations. NVMe SSD VPS typically delivers 10,000+ IOPS, while traditional SSD offers 5,000-10,000 IOPS.
What is UnixBench and why does it matter?
UnixBench is a comprehensive system-level benchmark suite that tests various aspects of Unix-like system performance including process creation, file operations, and system calls. It provides a holistic view of overall system performance beyond just CPU or disk metrics. Higher UnixBench scores indicate better overall system efficiency.
How reliable are WordPress benchmark results?
WordPress benchmarks provide real-world application performance metrics by testing actual WordPress installations. These results show how the VPS handles typical web application workloads including PHP processing, database queries, and static file serving. Results are measured in requests per second and page load times, directly applicable to web hosting scenarios.
Can I trust these benchmark results for my use case?
Our benchmarks provide standardized, reproducible test results using industry-standard tools. While they offer excellent performance indicators, your actual experience may vary based on your specific workload, application optimization, and usage patterns. Use these benchmarks as a reliable starting point for comparison between providers.
Why do benchmark results vary by location?
Different data center locations may have different hardware configurations, CPU generations, storage types, and network infrastructure. Providers often upgrade facilities at different rates across regions. Location-specific benchmarks help you choose a VPS in the right region with the best performance for your target audience.
Making Informed VPS Decisions
Use these comprehensive benchmark results to make data-driven hosting decisions. Compare multiple metrics together rather than focusing on a single aspect - a balanced VPS performs well across CPU, disk, and network benchmarks. Consider your specific workload requirements: CPU-intensive applications need high Geekbench scores, database-heavy applications require high IOPS, and content delivery services benefit from high network bandwidth.
Our benchmarks provide standardized, reproducible test results using industry-standard tools. While they offer excellent performance indicators, your actual experience may vary based on specific workload patterns and application optimization. Use these benchmarks as a reliable starting point for comparison between providers and configurations.
Compare More VPS Options
Explore additional benchmarks, compare multiple VPS plans side-by-side, and discover the best performing options for your specific requirements and budget.