ExtraVM - AMD Ryzen 9 - 2 Core 2 GB Ram US
Comprehensive VPS benchmark results from USA tested on Apr 01, 2023. Learn our methodology.
System Specifications
Additional Benchmarks
UnixBench
System Performance Index
WordPress Bench
Web Application Performance
Benchmark Steps
| # | Suite | Run At | Raw Output |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Bench
|
Mar 31, 2023 22:16 |
View Raw Output-------------------- A Bench.sh Script By Teddysun ------------------- Version : v2022-06-01 Usage : wget -qO- bench.sh | bash ---------------------------------------------------------------------- CPU Model : AMD Ryzen 9 3900X 12-Core Processor CPU Cores : 2 @ 3792.872 MHz CPU Cache : 512 KB AES-NI : Enabled VM-x/AMD-V : Enabled Total Disk : 29.0 GB (2.8 GB Used) Total Mem : 1.9 GB (217.7 MB Used) System uptime : 0 days, 1 hour 2 min Load average : 0.41, 0.12, 0.43 OS : Ubuntu 20.04.6 LTS Arch : x86_64 (64 Bit) Kernel : 5.4.0-146-generic TCP CC : bbr Virtualization : KVM Organization : AS23470 ReliableSite.Net LLC Location : Los Angeles / US Region : California ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I/O Speed(1st run) : 319 MB/s I/O Speed(2nd run) : 310 MB/s I/O Speed(3rd run) : 413 MB/s I/O Speed(average) : 347.3 MB/s ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Node Name Upload Speed Download Speed Latency Speedtest.net 911.52 Mbps 5874.58 Mbps 0.25 ms Los Angeles, US 906.98 Mbps 6704.35 Mbps 0.84 ms Dallas, US 798.65 Mbps 3955.83 Mbps 28.92 ms Montreal, CA 557.07 Mbps 910.28 Mbps 67.94 ms Paris, FR 616.18 Mbps 3956.85 Mbps 135.92 ms Amsterdam, NL 402.99 Mbps 2004.11 Mbps 131.92 ms Shanghai, CN 136.45 Mbps 1748.90 Mbps 224.41 ms Nanjing, CN 501.83 Mbps 4703.80 Mbps 145.32 ms Hongkong, CN 5.27 Mbps 4.49 Mbps 246.60 ms Singapore, SG 502.45 Mbps 2101.91 Mbps 161.13 ms Tokyo, JP 337.26 Mbps 3436.17 Mbps 107.83 ms ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Finished in : 6 min 6 sec Timestamp : 2023-03-31 22:16:31 WIB ---------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| 2 |
Speedtest Global
|
Mar 31, 2023 22:36 |
View Raw Output---------------------------- network-speed.xyz ----------------------------
A simple script to test network performance using speedtest-cli
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Version : v2023.03.25
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Basic System Info
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
CPU Model : AMD Ryzen 9 3900X 12-Core Processor
CPU Cores : 2 @ 3792.872 MHz
CPU Cache : 512 KB
AES-NI : Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : Enabled
Total Disk : 29.0 GB (2.8 GB Used)
Total RAM : 1.9 GB (221.1 MB Used)
System uptime : 0 days, 1 hour 33 min
Load average : 0.02, 0.10, 0.14
OS : Ubuntu 20.04.6 LTS
Arch : x86_64 (64 Bit)
Kernel : 5.4.0-146-generic
Virtualization : KVM
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Basic Network Info
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Primary Network : IPv6
ISP : IPvX.Solutions LLC
ASN : AS23470 ReliableSite.Net LLC
Host : EXTRAVM, LLC
Location : Los Angeles, California-CA, United States
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Speedtest.net
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Location Latency Loss DL Speed UP Speed Server
ISP: ReliableSite.Net LLC
Nearest 0.20 ms N/A 8045.23 Mbps 835.40 Mbps Netprotect - Los Angeles, CA
Kochi, IN 218.93 ms 0.0% 3007.10 Mbps 251.51 Mbps Asianet Broadband - Cochin
Bangalore, IN FAILED
Chennai, IN 273.12 ms N/A 409.48 Mbps 255.19 Mbps Jio - Chennai
Mumbai, IN 250.33 ms 0.0% 2960.78 Mbps 303.20 Mbps i3D.net - Mumbai
Delhi, IN 240.22 ms 0.0% 3173.86 Mbps 326.37 Mbps Tata Play Fiber - New Delhi
Los Angeles, US 0.16 ms 0.0% 7277.21 Mbps 846.70 Mbps ReliableSite Hosting - Los Angeles, CA
Dallas, US 52.11 ms 0.0% 4631.13 Mbps 851.34 Mbps Hivelocity - Dallas, TX
New York, US 56.66 ms 0.0% 1189.61 Mbps 774.24 Mbps Clouvider Ltd - New York, NY
Seattle, US 25.13 ms N/A 5610.07 Mbps 882.81 Mbps Comcast - Seattle, WA
Miami, US 63.62 ms 0.0% 2572.64 Mbps 929.40 Mbps AT&T - Miami, FL
Toronto, CA 69.56 ms 0.0% 3390.95 Mbps 833.38 Mbps Rogers - Toronto, ON
Paris, FR 134.51 ms 0.0% 3624.09 Mbps 601.53 Mbps ORANGE FRANCE - Paris
Amsterdam, NL 134.05 ms 0.0% 2727.03 Mbps 350.99 Mbps Clouvider Ltd - Amsterdam
Warsaw, PL 157.94 ms 0.0% 1183.21 Mbps 509.37 Mbps UPC Polska - Warszawa
London, UK 129.27 ms 0.0% 4116.48 Mbps 636.45 Mbps VeloxServ Communications - London
Frankfurt, DE 140.76 ms 0.0% 3440.96 Mbps 438.38 Mbps 23M GmbH - Frankfurt Am Main
Dubai, AE 252.93 ms 0.0% 1416.03 Mbps 300.70 Mbps du - Dubai
Fujairah, AE 258.04 ms 0.0% 2923.31 Mbps 307.81 Mbps ETISALAT-UAE - Fujairah
Jeddah, KSA 197.90 ms 0.0% 2064.31 Mbps 321.40 Mbps Saudi Telecom Company
Shanghai, CU-CN 206.07 ms 0.0% 1604.64 Mbps 193.81 Mbps China Unicom 5G - ShangHai
Nanjing, CT-CN 133.91 ms 1.0% 3410.32 Mbps 560.27 Mbps China Telecom JiangSu 5G - Nanjing
Hong Kong, HKG 159.64 ms N/A 4185.94 Mbps 461.88 Mbps STC - Hong Kong
Singapore, SG 174.43 ms 0.0% 2552.72 Mbps 397.05 Mbps i3D.net - Singapore
Jakarta, ID 249.71 ms 0.0% 2173.03 Mbps 187.51 Mbps PT Indosat Tbk - Jakarta
Tokyo, JP 99.44 ms N/A 1435.79 Mbps 654.71 Mbps fdcservers.net - Tokyo
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Avg DL Speed : 3165.03 Mbps
Avg UL Speed : 520.46 Mbps
Total DL Data : 104.05 GB
Total UL Data : 19.66 GB
Total Data : 123.71 GB
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Duration : 13 min 14 sec
System Time : 31/03/2023 - 22:36:59 WIB
Total Script Runs : 692
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Result : https://cdn1.frocdn.ch/7TI0wsOAP76cgk9.txt
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| 3 |
Benchy
|
Mar 31, 2023 22:59 |
View Raw Output# # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Benchy v2.6 # # https://github.com/L1so/benchy # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # 31 Mar 2023 22:59 WIB # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Server Insight Hardware Information --------------------- --------------------- OS : Ubuntu 20.04.6 LTS Model : AMD Ryzen 9 3900X 12-Core Processor Location : United States Core : 2 @ 3792.872 MHz Kernel : 5.4.0-146-generic AES-NI : ✔ Enabled Uptime : 0 days, 2 hrs, 9 mins, 47 secs VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled Virt : kvm Swap : 0.0 KiB Disk & Memory Usage Network Information --------------------- --------------------- Disk (1) : 28.9 GiB ASN : AS23470 Disk Usage : 2.8 GiB (10% Used) ISP : ReliableSite.Net LLC Mem : 1.9 GiB IPv4 : ✔ Enabled Mem Usage : 0.2 GiB (11% Used) IPv6 : ✔ Enabled Network Performance Test (Region: North America) +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Prot. | Provider | Location | Send | Receive | Latency | +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | IPv4 | Airstream | Wisconsin, US | 808.4 Mb/s | 2.7 Gb/s | 53.7 ms | | | Clouvider | Dallas, US | 904.4 Mb/s | 912.7 Mb/s | 29.9 ms | | | Clouvider | Phoenix, US | 998.0 Mb/s | 1.3 Gb/s | 19.8 ms | | | Clouvider | Los Angeles, US | 990.1 Mb/s | 6.7 Gb/s | 6.6 ms | +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | IPv6 | Airstream | Wisconsin, US | 947.4 Mb/s | 953.3 Mb/s | 53.8 ms | | | Clouvider | Dallas, US | 943.4 Mb/s | busy | 29.6 ms | | | Clouvider | Phoenix, US | 955.9 Mb/s | 948.7 Mb/s | 19.7 ms | | | Clouvider | Los Angeles, US | 947.0 Mb/s | 7.8 Gb/s | 0.5 ms | +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ Ookla Network Speedtest (Region: North America) +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Provider | Location | Download | Upload | Data Used | Latency | +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Comcast | Houston, US | 5.1 Gb/s | 910.1 Mb/s | 5.6 GB | 48.7 ms | | Spectrum | New York, US | 5.6 Gb/s | 803.4 Mb/s | 9.4 GB | 68.1 ms | | Telus | Edmonton, CA | 2.4 Gb/s | 908.8 Mb/s | 4.2 GB | 47.2 ms | | Airstream | Wisconsin, US | 3.4 Gb/s | 909.5 Mb/s | 4.8 GB | 54.6 ms | | Hivelocity | Dallas, US | 4.5 Gb/s | 830.7 Mb/s | 8.1 GB | 52.2 ms | +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ |
| 4 |
PassMark
|
Mar 31, 2023 22:59 |
View Raw OutputPassMark PerformanceTest Linux AMD Ryzen 9 3900X 12-Core Processor (x86_64) 2 cores @ 3792 MHz | 1.9 GiB RAM Number of Processes: 2 | Test Iterations: 3 | Test Duration: Very Long -------------------------------------------------------------------------- CPU Mark: 3783 Integer Math 11132 Million Operations/s Floating Point Math 7532 Million Operations/s Prime Numbers 35.2 Million Primes/s Sorting 5182 Thousand Strings/s Encryption 2102 MB/s Compression 44435 KB/s CPU Single Threaded 2063 Million Operations/s Physics 507 Frames/s Extended Instructions (SSE) 1551 Million Matrices/s Memory Mark: 1367 Database Operations 1453 Thousand Operations/s Memory Read Cached 26835 MB/s Memory Read Uncached 11248 MB/s Memory Write 5940 MB/s Available RAM 1436 Megabytes Memory Latency 60 Nanoseconds Memory Threaded 18226 MB/s -------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| 5 |
UnixBench
|
Apr 01, 2023 04:13 |
View Raw Output------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Sat Apr 01 2023 04:13:55 - 04:41:59
2 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 48783332.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 8621.8 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 5319.3 lps (29.9 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1152133.2 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 361215.2 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 2816060.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 2198450.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 99865.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 13112.1 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 12970.0 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 2424.3 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 3108988.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 48783332.5 4180.2
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 8621.8 1567.6
Execl Throughput 43.0 5319.3 1237.1
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 1152133.2 2909.4
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 361215.2 2182.6
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 2816060.5 4855.3
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 2198450.9 1767.2
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 99865.3 249.7
Process Creation 126.0 13112.1 1040.6
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 12970.0 3059.0
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 2424.3 4040.5
System Call Overhead 15000.0 3108988.2 2072.7
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 1945.5
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Sat Apr 01 2023 04:41:59 - 05:10:06
2 CPUs in system; running 2 parallel copies of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 96588563.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 17201.0 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 8679.5 lps (29.9 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1729404.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 485395.1 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 4202132.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 4083997.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 486053.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 19973.5 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 15959.3 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 2410.7 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 6058390.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 96588563.6 8276.7
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 17201.0 3127.4
Execl Throughput 43.0 8679.5 2018.5
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 1729404.0 4367.2
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 485395.1 2932.9
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 4202132.9 7245.1
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 4083997.5 3283.0
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 486053.4 1215.1
Process Creation 126.0 19973.5 1585.2
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 15959.3 3764.0
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 2410.7 4017.8
System Call Overhead 15000.0 6058390.0 4038.9
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 3332.0
|
Onidel Cloud VPS
Performance-first cloud hosting for teams that need consistent benchmarks and transparent pricing.
- 99.99% uptime SLA
- Proven availability for critical workloads
- Plans from $4.95/month
- Predictable pricing and simple scaling
- AMD EPYC + NVMe stack
- Modern hardware with built-in DDoS protection
- 5 global regions
- Singapore, Sydney, Amsterdam, Ho Chi Minh City, more coming soon
Ideal for: demanding SaaS workloads, managed hosting agencies, and teams migrating off legacy VPS providers.
Launch faster with concierge onboarding
Start 14-day TrialCPU Performance (Geekbench)
CPU benchmarks measure processing power for compute-intensive tasks. Learn how we test CPU performance.
I/O Speed Summary (dd)
IOPS Performance by Block Size
Combined IOPS Performance
Total IOPS across all block sizes (4K, 64K, 512K, 1M)
FIO Benchmark Details
Detailed I/O performance test results
Test 1 - Block Size: 4k (mixed_rw_50_50)
Test 2 - Block Size: 64k (mixed_rw_50_50)
Test 3 - Block Size: 512k (mixed_rw_50_50)
Test 4 - Block Size: 1m (mixed_rw_50_50)
Detailed I/O Benchmark (FIO)
IOPS Performance by Block Size
Bandwidth Performance by Block Size
Detailed Test Results
| Block Size | Read IOPS | Write IOPS | Read MB/s | Write MB/s |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4k | 7,600 | 7,600 | 30.7 | 30.7 |
| 64k | 2,700 | 2,700 | 175.6 | 176.5 |
| 512k | 668 | 703 | 342.1 | 360.3 |
| 1m | 300 | 320 | 307.8 | 328.3 |
Related Resources
Browse More Benchmarks
Explore comprehensive VPS benchmarks across providers and locations.
Compare Providers
View aggregated performance metrics across all VPS providers.
Performance Dashboard
Access real-time statistics, top performers, and latest results.
Testing Methodology
Learn about our comprehensive testing procedures and tools.
Understanding VPS Benchmark Results
This comprehensive benchmark report provides detailed performance analysis for ExtraVM AMD Ryzen 9 - 2 Core 2 GB Ram US VPS in USA. Our standardized testing methodology measures CPU performance, disk I/O operations, network bandwidth, and real-world application performance to give you complete insights into VPS capabilities. Browse more VPS benchmarks to compare performance across providers.
Each benchmark metric serves a specific purpose in evaluating VPS performance. CPU benchmarks reveal processing power for applications, disk I/O tests measure storage performance for databases and file operations, network tests show bandwidth capacity for content delivery, and application benchmarks demonstrate real-world hosting performance. Together, these metrics provide a complete performance profile. Use our VPS comparison tool to analyze multiple plans side-by-side.
Benchmark Metrics & Features
Performance Analysis Use Cases
- Evaluating VPS CPU performance for compute-intensive applications
- Testing disk I/O performance for database workloads
- Comparing VPS performance across different providers
- Analyzing WordPress site performance on specific VPS plans
- Assessing value-for-money based on performance and pricing
- Checking real-world application performance metrics
- Understanding geographic performance variations by location
- Reviewing detailed benchmark metrics before VPS purchase
- Comparing single-core vs multi-core CPU performance
- Validating provider performance claims with actual data
- Making informed hosting decisions based on comprehensive benchmarks
How to Interpret Benchmark Results
1. CPU Performance (Geekbench)
Geekbench measures CPU performance through single-core and multi-core scores. Single-core scores (typically 800-2000) indicate performance for single-threaded applications and general responsiveness. Multi-core scores (1500-8000) show performance when all CPU cores are utilized for parallel processing. Higher scores mean better performance. Visit our testing methodology to learn more about CPU benchmarks.
2. Disk I/O Performance (FIO)
FIO benchmarks measure disk performance through IOPS (Input/Output Operations Per Second) and bandwidth (MB/s). High IOPS (10,000+ for NVMe, 5,000-10,000 for SSD) is crucial for database workloads with many small operations. High bandwidth is important for large file transfers and media applications. Compare disk performance across different providers in our database.
3. Application Performance
Real-world application benchmarks (WordPress, UnixBench) show how the VPS handles typical web workloads including PHP processing, database queries, and static file serving. These results measured in requests per second and page load times directly apply to web hosting scenarios. Need help choosing the right VPS? Visit about us to learn more about VPSMetrics.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I interpret the Geekbench single-core and multi-core scores?
Geekbench single-core scores indicate CPU performance for single-threaded applications, important for general responsiveness and web applications. Multi-core scores show performance when all CPU cores are utilized, crucial for parallel processing and multi-threaded applications. Higher scores indicate better performance. Modern VPS typically score 800-2000 (single) and 1500-8000 (multi) depending on the plan.
What do IOPS numbers mean in disk I/O benchmarks?
IOPS (Input/Output Operations Per Second) measures how many read/write operations your disk can handle per second. Higher IOPS means better performance for database operations and applications with many small file operations. NVMe SSD VPS typically delivers 10,000+ IOPS, while traditional SSD offers 5,000-10,000 IOPS.
What is UnixBench and why does it matter?
UnixBench is a comprehensive system-level benchmark suite that tests various aspects of Unix-like system performance including process creation, file operations, and system calls. It provides a holistic view of overall system performance beyond just CPU or disk metrics. Higher UnixBench scores indicate better overall system efficiency.
How reliable are WordPress benchmark results?
WordPress benchmarks provide real-world application performance metrics by testing actual WordPress installations. These results show how the VPS handles typical web application workloads including PHP processing, database queries, and static file serving. Results are measured in requests per second and page load times, directly applicable to web hosting scenarios.
Can I trust these benchmark results for my use case?
Our benchmarks provide standardized, reproducible test results using industry-standard tools. While they offer excellent performance indicators, your actual experience may vary based on your specific workload, application optimization, and usage patterns. Use these benchmarks as a reliable starting point for comparison between providers.
Why do benchmark results vary by location?
Different data center locations may have different hardware configurations, CPU generations, storage types, and network infrastructure. Providers often upgrade facilities at different rates across regions. Location-specific benchmarks help you choose a VPS in the right region with the best performance for your target audience.
Making Informed VPS Decisions
Use these comprehensive benchmark results to make data-driven hosting decisions. Compare multiple metrics together rather than focusing on a single aspect - a balanced VPS performs well across CPU, disk, and network benchmarks. Consider your specific workload requirements: CPU-intensive applications need high Geekbench scores, database-heavy applications require high IOPS, and content delivery services benefit from high network bandwidth.
Our benchmarks provide standardized, reproducible test results using industry-standard tools. While they offer excellent performance indicators, your actual experience may vary based on specific workload patterns and application optimization. Use these benchmarks as a reliable starting point for comparison between providers and configurations.
Compare More VPS Options
Explore additional benchmarks, compare multiple VPS plans side-by-side, and discover the best performing options for your specific requirements and budget.
