Evoxt - AMD 2 Core 4 GB Ram US
Comprehensive VPS benchmark results from USA tested on Jun 05, 2023. Learn our methodology.
System Specifications
Additional Benchmarks
UnixBench
System Performance Index
WordPress Bench
Web Application Performance
Benchmark Steps
| # | Suite | Run At | Raw Output |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Speedtest Global
|
May 06, 2023 16:58 |
View Raw Output---------------------------- network-speed.xyz ----------------------------
A simple script to test network performance using speedtest-cli
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Version : v2023.05.01
Global Speedtest : wget -qO- network-speed.xyz | bash
Region Speedtest : wget -qO- network-speed.xyz | bash -s -- -r <region>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Basic System Info
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
CPU Model : QEMU Virtual CPU version 2.5+
CPU Cores : 2 @ 3600.000 MHz
CPU Cache : 512 KB
AES-NI : ❌ Disabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ❌ Disabled
Total Disk : 29.4 GB (3.7 GB Used)
Total RAM : 3.8 GB (101.7 MB Used)
System uptime : 0 days, 1 hour 30 min
Load average : 0.18, 0.26, 0.61
OS : Ubuntu 20.04.6 LTS
Arch : x86_64 (64 Bit)
Kernel : 5.4.0-148-generic
Virtualization : KVM
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Basic Network Info
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Primary Network : IPv6
ISP : Evoxtv6
ASN : AS149440 Evoxt Enterprise
Location : San Gabriel, California-CA, United States
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Speedtest.net (Region: GLOBAL)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Location Latency Loss DL Speed UP Speed Server
ISP: Evoxt Enterprise
Nearest 0.69 ms 0.0% 939.66 Mbps 933.04 Mbps Race Communications - Los Angeles, CA
Kochi, IN 223.16 ms 0.0% 954.42 Mbps 352.21 Mbps Asianet Broadband - Cochin
Bangalore, IN 236.03 ms 0.0% 934.15 Mbps 343.84 Mbps Bharti Airtel Ltd - Bangalore
Chennai, IN 196.95 ms N/A 931.26 Mbps 328.52 Mbps Jio - Chennai
Mumbai, IN 356.95 ms 0.0% 939.78 Mbps 328.17 Mbps i3D.net - Mumbai
Delhi, IN 240.34 ms 0.0% 940.48 Mbps 334.19 Mbps Tata Play Fiber - New Delhi
Los Angeles, US 0.81 ms 0.0% 906.79 Mbps 919.81 Mbps ReliableSite Hosting - Los Angeles, CA
Dallas, US 50.41 ms 0.0% 929.28 Mbps 920.08 Mbps Hivelocity - Dallas, TX
New York, US 74.25 ms 0.0% 936.29 Mbps 861.06 Mbps Clouvider Ltd - New York, NY
Seattle, US 29.63 ms N/A 927.56 Mbps 925.59 Mbps Comcast - Seattle, WA
Miami, US 67.62 ms 0.0% 950.69 Mbps 895.97 Mbps AT&T - Miami, FL
Toronto, CA 63.31 ms 0.0% 928.50 Mbps 892.96 Mbps Rogers - Toronto, ON
Paris, FR 148.67 ms 0.0% 928.76 Mbps 474.73 Mbps ORANGE FRANCE - Paris
Amsterdam, NL 156.85 ms 0.0% 929.10 Mbps 501.87 Mbps Clouvider Ltd - Amsterdam
Warsaw, PL 190.98 ms 0.0% 946.98 Mbps 404.93 Mbps UPC Polska - Warszawa
London, UK 128.65 ms 0.0% 954.74 Mbps 597.70 Mbps VeloxServ Communications - London
Frankfurt, DE 147.05 ms 0.0% 947.64 Mbps 565.36 Mbps 23M GmbH - Frankfurt Am Main
Dubai, AE 244.26 ms 0.0% 965.55 Mbps 318.28 Mbps du - Dubai
Fujairah, AE 258.24 ms 0.0% 923.80 Mbps 303.36 Mbps ETISALAT-UAE - Fujairah
Jeddah, KSA 220.21 ms 0.0% 922.81 Mbps 384.19 Mbps Saudi Telecom Company
Shanghai, CU-CN 272.91 ms 0.0% 884.79 Mbps 284.16 Mbps China Unicom 5G - ShangHai
Nanjing, CT-CN 168.13 ms 0.0% 937.94 Mbps 496.04 Mbps China Telecom JiangSu 5G - Nanjing
Hong Kong, HKG 154.90 ms N/A 950.19 Mbps 497.51 Mbps STC - Hong Kong
Singapore, SG 167.95 ms 0.0% 930.29 Mbps 446.48 Mbps i3D.net - Singapore
Jakarta, ID 258.71 ms 0.0% 943.21 Mbps 215.84 Mbps PT Indosat Tbk - Jakarta
Tokyo, JP 99.90 ms N/A 668.21 Mbps 675.67 Mbps fdcservers.net - Tokyo
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Avg DL Speed : 925.11 Mbps
Avg UL Speed : 546.22 Mbps
Total DL Data : 33.99 GB
Total UL Data : 17.74 GB
Total Data : 51.73 GB
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Duration : 12 min 38 sec
System Time : 06/05/2023 - 16:58:31 CEST
Total Script Runs : 2067
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Result : https://cdn1.frocdn.ch/8xkVQedIgAN38Ss.txt
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| 2 |
Benchy
|
May 06, 2023 17:08 |
View Raw Output# # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Benchy v2.6 # # https://github.com/L1so/benchy # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # 06 May 2023 17:08 CEST # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Server Insight Hardware Information --------------------- --------------------- OS : Ubuntu 20.04.6 LTS Model : QEMU Virtual CPU version 2.5+ Location : United States Core : 2 @ 3600.000 MHz Kernel : 5.4.0-148-generic AES-NI : ❌ Disabled Uptime : 0 days, 1 hrs, 52 mins, 58 secs VM-x/AMD-V : ❌ Disabled Virt : kvm Swap : 0.0 KiB Disk & Memory Usage Network Information --------------------- --------------------- Disk (1) : 29.4 GiB ASN : AS18779 Disk Usage : 3.8 GiB (13% Used) ISP : EGIHosting Mem : 3.8 GiB IPv4 : ✔ Enabled Mem Usage : 0.1 GiB (3% Used) IPv6 : ✔ Enabled Ookla Network Speedtest (Region: North America) +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Provider | Location | Download | Upload | Data Used | Latency | +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Comcast | Houston, US | 931.0 Mb/s | 913.3 Mb/s | 2.4 GB | 61.4 ms | | Spectrum | New York, US | 934.9 Mb/s | 898.9 Mb/s | 2.5 GB | 68.7 ms | | Telus | Edmonton, CA | 933.1 Mb/s | 891.1 Mb/s | 2.5 GB | 73.4 ms | | Airstream | Wisconsin, US | 934.7 Mb/s | 905.0 Mb/s | 2.5 GB | 54.6 ms | | Hivelocity | Dallas, US | 928.7 Mb/s | 900.2 Mb/s | 2.4 GB | 49.3 ms | +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ Network Performance Test (Region: North America) +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Prot. | Provider | Location | Send | Receive | Latency | +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | IPv4 | Airstream | Wisconsin, US | 921.9 Mb/s | 926.7 Mb/s | 53.7 ms | | | Clouvider | Dallas, US | 944.6 Mb/s | 945.7 Mb/s | 33.3 ms | | | Clouvider | Phoenix, US | 955.2 Mb/s | 955.8 Mb/s | 9.6 ms | | | Clouvider | Los Angeles, US | 901.7 Mb/s | 955.4 Mb/s | 0.9 ms | +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | IPv6 | Airstream | Wisconsin, US | 911.4 Mb/s | 918.1 Mb/s | 53.6 ms | | | Clouvider | Dallas, US | 926.5 Mb/s | 931.4 Mb/s | 33.3 ms | | | Clouvider | Phoenix, US | 946.3 Mb/s | 945.9 Mb/s | 9.7 ms | | | Clouvider | Los Angeles, US | 922.7 Mb/s | 955.4 Mb/s | 0.9 ms | +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ |
| 3 |
PassMark
|
May 06, 2023 17:08 |
View Raw OutputPassMark PerformanceTest Linux QEMU Virtual CPU version 2.5+ (x86_64) 2 cores @ 3600 MHz | 3.8 GiB RAM Number of Processes: 2 | Test Iterations: 2 | Test Duration: Very Long -------------------------------------------------------------------------- CPU Mark: 2902 Integer Math 11106 Million Operations/s Floating Point Math 7986 Million Operations/s Prime Numbers 28.8 Million Primes/s Sorting 6681 Thousand Strings/s Encryption 591 MB/s Compression 45776 KB/s CPU Single Threaded 2501 Million Operations/s Physics 420 Frames/s Extended Instructions (SSE) 1686 Million Matrices/s Memory Mark: 1777 Database Operations 1417 Thousand Operations/s Memory Read Cached 26790 MB/s Memory Read Uncached 11706 MB/s Memory Write 9088 MB/s Available RAM 3098 Megabytes Memory Latency 57 Nanoseconds Memory Threaded 20278 MB/s -------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| 4 |
UnixBench
|
May 06, 2023 19:30 |
View Raw Output------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Sat May 06 2023 19:30:11 - 19:58:05
2 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 44749015.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 8520.7 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 5175.1 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1316463.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 369644.2 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 2766803.3 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 2401142.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 114122.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 10055.9 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 10669.0 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 2261.8 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 3112081.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 44749015.2 3834.5
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 8520.7 1549.2
Execl Throughput 43.0 5175.1 1203.5
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 1316463.8 3324.4
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 369644.2 2233.5
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 2766803.3 4770.4
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 2401142.2 1930.2
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 114122.7 285.3
Process Creation 126.0 10055.9 798.1
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 10669.0 2516.3
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 2261.8 3769.6
System Call Overhead 15000.0 3112081.1 2074.7
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 1898.3
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Sat May 06 2023 19:58:05 - 20:26:01
2 CPUs in system; running 2 parallel copies of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 87850859.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 16716.7 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 9428.3 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1917356.3 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 600616.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 4523455.6 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 4609350.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 479659.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 18756.6 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 15109.0 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 2519.6 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 6058098.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 87850859.4 7527.9
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 16716.7 3039.4
Execl Throughput 43.0 9428.3 2192.6
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 1917356.3 4841.8
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 600616.4 3629.1
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 4523455.6 7799.1
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 4609350.7 3705.3
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 479659.7 1199.1
Process Creation 126.0 18756.6 1488.6
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 15109.0 3563.5
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 2519.6 4199.3
System Call Overhead 15000.0 6058098.8 4038.7
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 3440.2
|
| 5 |
Bench
|
Jun 05, 2023 16:38 |
View Raw Output-------------------- A Bench.sh Script By Teddysun ------------------- Version : v2022-06-01 Usage : wget -qO- bench.sh | bash ---------------------------------------------------------------------- CPU Model : QEMU Virtual CPU version 2.5+ CPU Cores : 2 @ 3600.000 MHz CPU Cache : 512 KB AES-NI : Disabled VM-x/AMD-V : Disabled Total Disk : 29.4 GB (3.7 GB Used) Total Mem : 3.8 GB (100.1 MB Used) System uptime : 0 days, 1 hour 18 min Load average : 0.18, 0.84, 1.11 OS : Ubuntu 20.04.6 LTS Arch : x86_64 (64 Bit) Kernel : 5.4.0-148-generic TCP CC : bbr Virtualization : KVM Organization : AS18779 EGIHosting Location : San Francisco / US Region : California ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I/O Speed(1st run) : 1.2 GB/s I/O Speed(2nd run) : 1.2 GB/s I/O Speed(3rd run) : 1.2 GB/s I/O Speed(average) : 1228.8 MB/s ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Node Name Upload Speed Download Speed Latency Speedtest.net 926.95 Mbps 929.78 Mbps 0.72 ms Los Angeles, US 909.04 Mbps 929.17 Mbps 0.95 ms Dallas, US 925.82 Mbps 926.05 Mbps 36.09 ms Montreal, CA 714.68 Mbps 921.53 Mbps 67.64 ms Paris, FR 488.97 Mbps 934.95 Mbps 146.79 ms Amsterdam, NL 494.91 Mbps 942.44 Mbps 132.47 ms Shanghai, CN 276.61 Mbps 897.90 Mbps 278.00 ms Nanjing, CN 570.95 Mbps 947.58 Mbps 137.63 ms Singapore, SG 495.09 Mbps 910.26 Mbps 161.70 ms Tokyo, JP 393.02 Mbps 937.21 Mbps 150.49 ms ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Finished in : 4 min 31 sec Timestamp : 2023-05-06 16:38:34 CEST ---------------------------------------------------------------------- |
Onidel Cloud VPS
Performance-first cloud hosting for teams that need consistent benchmarks and transparent pricing.
- 99.99% uptime SLA
- Proven availability for critical workloads
- Plans from $4.95/month
- Predictable pricing and simple scaling
- AMD EPYC + NVMe stack
- Modern hardware with built-in DDoS protection
- 5 global regions
- Singapore, Sydney, Amsterdam, Ho Chi Minh City, more coming soon
Ideal for: demanding SaaS workloads, managed hosting agencies, and teams migrating off legacy VPS providers.
Launch faster with concierge onboarding
Start 14-day TrialCPU Performance (Geekbench)
CPU benchmarks measure processing power for compute-intensive tasks. Learn how we test CPU performance.
I/O Speed Summary (dd)
IOPS Performance by Block Size
Combined IOPS Performance
Total IOPS across all block sizes (4K, 64K, 512K, 1M)
FIO Benchmark Details
Detailed I/O performance test results
Test 1 - Block Size: 4k (mixed_rw_50_50)
Test 2 - Block Size: 64k (mixed_rw_50_50)
Test 3 - Block Size: 512k (mixed_rw_50_50)
Test 4 - Block Size: 1m (mixed_rw_50_50)
Detailed I/O Benchmark (FIO)
IOPS Performance by Block Size
Bandwidth Performance by Block Size
Detailed Test Results
| Block Size | Read IOPS | Write IOPS | Read MB/s | Write MB/s |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4k | 64,100 | 64,300 | 256.7 | 257.4 |
| 64k | 9,700 | 9,800 | 624.0 | 627.3 |
| 512k | 1,200 | 1,300 | 657.7 | 692.7 |
| 1m | 664 | 708 | 680.6 | 725.9 |
Related Resources
Browse More Benchmarks
Explore comprehensive VPS benchmarks across providers and locations.
Compare Providers
View aggregated performance metrics across all VPS providers.
Performance Dashboard
Access real-time statistics, top performers, and latest results.
Testing Methodology
Learn about our comprehensive testing procedures and tools.
Understanding VPS Benchmark Results
This comprehensive benchmark report provides detailed performance analysis for Evoxt AMD 2 Core 4 GB Ram US VPS in USA. Our standardized testing methodology measures CPU performance, disk I/O operations, network bandwidth, and real-world application performance to give you complete insights into VPS capabilities. Browse more VPS benchmarks to compare performance across providers.
Each benchmark metric serves a specific purpose in evaluating VPS performance. CPU benchmarks reveal processing power for applications, disk I/O tests measure storage performance for databases and file operations, network tests show bandwidth capacity for content delivery, and application benchmarks demonstrate real-world hosting performance. Together, these metrics provide a complete performance profile. Use our VPS comparison tool to analyze multiple plans side-by-side.
Benchmark Metrics & Features
Performance Analysis Use Cases
- Evaluating VPS CPU performance for compute-intensive applications
- Testing disk I/O performance for database workloads
- Comparing VPS performance across different providers
- Analyzing WordPress site performance on specific VPS plans
- Assessing value-for-money based on performance and pricing
- Checking real-world application performance metrics
- Understanding geographic performance variations by location
- Reviewing detailed benchmark metrics before VPS purchase
- Comparing single-core vs multi-core CPU performance
- Validating provider performance claims with actual data
- Making informed hosting decisions based on comprehensive benchmarks
How to Interpret Benchmark Results
1. CPU Performance (Geekbench)
Geekbench measures CPU performance through single-core and multi-core scores. Single-core scores (typically 800-2000) indicate performance for single-threaded applications and general responsiveness. Multi-core scores (1500-8000) show performance when all CPU cores are utilized for parallel processing. Higher scores mean better performance. Visit our testing methodology to learn more about CPU benchmarks.
2. Disk I/O Performance (FIO)
FIO benchmarks measure disk performance through IOPS (Input/Output Operations Per Second) and bandwidth (MB/s). High IOPS (10,000+ for NVMe, 5,000-10,000 for SSD) is crucial for database workloads with many small operations. High bandwidth is important for large file transfers and media applications. Compare disk performance across different providers in our database.
3. Application Performance
Real-world application benchmarks (WordPress, UnixBench) show how the VPS handles typical web workloads including PHP processing, database queries, and static file serving. These results measured in requests per second and page load times directly apply to web hosting scenarios. Need help choosing the right VPS? Visit about us to learn more about VPSMetrics.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I interpret the Geekbench single-core and multi-core scores?
Geekbench single-core scores indicate CPU performance for single-threaded applications, important for general responsiveness and web applications. Multi-core scores show performance when all CPU cores are utilized, crucial for parallel processing and multi-threaded applications. Higher scores indicate better performance. Modern VPS typically score 800-2000 (single) and 1500-8000 (multi) depending on the plan.
What do IOPS numbers mean in disk I/O benchmarks?
IOPS (Input/Output Operations Per Second) measures how many read/write operations your disk can handle per second. Higher IOPS means better performance for database operations and applications with many small file operations. NVMe SSD VPS typically delivers 10,000+ IOPS, while traditional SSD offers 5,000-10,000 IOPS.
What is UnixBench and why does it matter?
UnixBench is a comprehensive system-level benchmark suite that tests various aspects of Unix-like system performance including process creation, file operations, and system calls. It provides a holistic view of overall system performance beyond just CPU or disk metrics. Higher UnixBench scores indicate better overall system efficiency.
How reliable are WordPress benchmark results?
WordPress benchmarks provide real-world application performance metrics by testing actual WordPress installations. These results show how the VPS handles typical web application workloads including PHP processing, database queries, and static file serving. Results are measured in requests per second and page load times, directly applicable to web hosting scenarios.
Can I trust these benchmark results for my use case?
Our benchmarks provide standardized, reproducible test results using industry-standard tools. While they offer excellent performance indicators, your actual experience may vary based on your specific workload, application optimization, and usage patterns. Use these benchmarks as a reliable starting point for comparison between providers.
Why do benchmark results vary by location?
Different data center locations may have different hardware configurations, CPU generations, storage types, and network infrastructure. Providers often upgrade facilities at different rates across regions. Location-specific benchmarks help you choose a VPS in the right region with the best performance for your target audience.
Making Informed VPS Decisions
Use these comprehensive benchmark results to make data-driven hosting decisions. Compare multiple metrics together rather than focusing on a single aspect - a balanced VPS performs well across CPU, disk, and network benchmarks. Consider your specific workload requirements: CPU-intensive applications need high Geekbench scores, database-heavy applications require high IOPS, and content delivery services benefit from high network bandwidth.
Our benchmarks provide standardized, reproducible test results using industry-standard tools. While they offer excellent performance indicators, your actual experience may vary based on specific workload patterns and application optimization. Use these benchmarks as a reliable starting point for comparison between providers and configurations.
Compare More VPS Options
Explore additional benchmarks, compare multiple VPS plans side-by-side, and discover the best performing options for your specific requirements and budget.