DutchIS - AMD EPYC Milan 2 Core 4 GB Ram NL
Comprehensive VPS benchmark results from Netherlands tested on Oct 05, 2023. Learn our methodology.
System Specifications
Additional Benchmarks
UnixBench
System Performance Index
WordPress Bench
Web Application Performance
Benchmark Steps
| # | Suite | Run At | Raw Output |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Bench
|
Oct 05, 2023 13:09 |
View Raw Output-------------------- A Bench.sh Script By Teddysun ------------------- Version : v2023-06-10 Usage : wget -qO- bench.sh | bash ---------------------------------------------------------------------- CPU Model : AMD EPYC 7313 16-Core Processor CPU Cores : 2 @ 2999.998 MHz CPU Cache : 512 KB AES-NI : Enabled VM-x/AMD-V : Enabled Total Disk : 48.4 GB (2.3 GB Used) Total Mem : 3.8 GB (182.8 MB Used) System uptime : 0 days, 0 hour 2 min Load average : 0.18, 0.05, 0.01 OS : Ubuntu 22.04.3 LTS Arch : x86_64 (64 Bit) Kernel : 5.15.0-86-generic TCP CC : bbr Virtualization : KVM IPv4/IPv6 : Online / Offline Organization : AS50673 Serverius Location : Dronten / NL Region : Flevoland ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I/O Speed(1st run) : 1.1 GB/s I/O Speed(2nd run) : 1.2 GB/s I/O Speed(3rd run) : 1.2 GB/s I/O Speed(average) : 1194.7 MB/s ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Node Name Upload Speed Download Speed Latency Speedtest.net 1045.41 Mbps 993.33 Mbps 1.08 ms Los Angeles, US 581.92 Mbps 989.16 Mbps 140.08 ms Dallas, US 726.11 Mbps 1000.40 Mbps 112.13 ms Montreal, CA 567.23 Mbps 930.69 Mbps 83.56 ms Paris, FR 1043.68 Mbps 1011.32 Mbps 15.46 ms Amsterdam, NL 1044.70 Mbps 995.13 Mbps 4.89 ms Shanghai, CN 380.96 Mbps 837.67 Mbps 189.20 ms Hongkong, CN 300.74 Mbps 863.89 Mbps 268.61 ms Singapore, SG 495.27 Mbps 843.49 Mbps 161.97 ms Tokyo, JP 180.85 Mbps 856.79 Mbps 231.45 ms ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Finished in : 5 min 0 sec Timestamp : 2023-10-05 13:09:16 UTC ---------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| 2 |
Speedtest Global
|
Oct 05, 2023 13:25 |
View Raw Output---------------------------- network-speed.xyz ----------------------------
A simple script to test network performance using speedtest-cli
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Version : v2023.09.30
Global Speedtest : wget -qO- network-speed.xyz | bash
Region Speedtest : wget -qO- network-speed.xyz | bash -s -- -r <region>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Basic System Info
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
CPU Model : AMD EPYC 7313 16-Core Processor
CPU Cores : 2 @ 2999.998 MHz
CPU Cache : 512 KB
AES-NI : ✔ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
Total Disk : 48.4 GB (2.3 GB Used)
Total RAM : 3.8 GB (186.2 MB Used)
System uptime : 0 days, 0 hour 11 min
Load average : 0.17, 0.15, 0.07
OS : Ubuntu 22.04.3 LTS
Arch : x86_64 (64 Bit)
Kernel : 5.15.0-86-generic
Virtualization : KVM
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Basic Network Info
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IPv6 Access : ❌ Offline
IPv4 Access : ✔ Online
ISP : Serverius Holding B.V.
ASN : AS50673 Serverius
Host : Serveriuscustomer
Location : Amsterdam, North Holland-NH, Netherlands
Location (IPv4) : Dronten, Flevoland, NL
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Speedtest.net (Region: GLOBAL)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Location Latency Loss DL Speed UP Speed Server
ISP: Serverius Holding B.V.
Nearest 1.02 ms 0.0% 982.31 Mbps 1041.58 Mbps Serverius Connectivity - Amsterdam
Kochi, IN 154.99 ms 0.0% 997.74 Mbps 535.27 Mbps Asianet Broadband - Cochin
Bangalore, IN 136.90 ms 0.0% 997.95 Mbps 535.87 Mbps Bharti Airtel Ltd - Bangalore
Chennai, IN 181.43 ms N/A 1000.32 Mbps 498.52 Mbps Jio - Chennai
Mumbai, IN 121.26 ms 0.0% 997.39 Mbps 661.34 Mbps i3D.net - Mumbai
Delhi, IN 139.96 ms 0.0% 986.98 Mbps 578.40 Mbps Tata Teleservices Ltd - New Delhi
Seattle, US 158.99 ms 0.0% 942.85 Mbps 550.76 Mbps Ziply Fiber - Seattle, WA
Los Angeles, US 156.99 ms 0.0% 970.41 Mbps 520.13 Mbps ReliableSite Hosting - Los Angeles, CA
Dallas, US 132.32 ms 0.0% 799.77 Mbps 647.87 Mbps Hivelocity - Dallas, TX
Miami, US FAILED
New York, US 83.96 ms 0.0% 968.67 Mbps 781.07 Mbps GSL Networks - New York, NY
Toronto, CA 90.25 ms 0.0% 987.06 Mbps 867.22 Mbps Rogers - Toronto, ON
London, UK 8.46 ms 0.0% 978.56 Mbps 1044.53 Mbps VeloxServ Communications - London
Amsterdam, NL 3.69 ms 0.0% 971.44 Mbps 1045.16 Mbps 31173 Services AB - Amsterdam
Paris, FR 16.88 ms N/A 980.34 Mbps 1050.01 Mbps Axione - Paris
Frankfurt, DE 9.20 ms 0.0% 959.81 Mbps 1048.44 Mbps 23M GmbH - Frankfurt am Main
Warsaw, PL 24.22 ms 0.0% 976.00 Mbps 1038.36 Mbps UPC Polska - Warszawa
Bucharest, RO 37.78 ms 0.0% 973.69 Mbps 978.90 Mbps Vodafone Romania Fixed - Bucharest - Bucharest
Jeddah, SA 74.20 ms 0.0% 968.34 Mbps 813.85 Mbps Saudi Telecom Company
Dubai, AE 139.42 ms 0.0% 973.72 Mbps 543.82 Mbps du - Dubai
Fujairah, AE 115.93 ms 0.0% 975.27 Mbps 643.12 Mbps ETISALAT-UAE - Fujairah
Tokyo, JP 256.85 ms N/A 709.84 Mbps 87.69 Mbps fdcservers.net - Tokyo
Shanghai, CU-CN 204.54 ms 0.0% 959.51 Mbps 388.92 Mbps China Unicom 5G - Shanghai
Nanjing, CT-CN 252.60 ms 1.3% 770.71 Mbps 91.92 Mbps China Telecom JiangSu 5G - Nanjing
Hong Kong, CN FAILED
Singapore, SG 153.68 ms 0.0% 986.87 Mbps 508.88 Mbps i3D.net - Singapore
Jakarta, ID 177.65 ms 0.0% 914.26 Mbps 362.10 Mbps PT. Telekomunikasi Indonesia - Jakarta
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Avg DL Speed : 952.40 Mbps
Avg UL Speed : 714.48 Mbps
Total DL Data : 34.73 GB
Total UL Data : 20.27 GB
Total Data : 54.00 GB
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Duration : 15 min 6 sec
System Time : 05/10/2023 - 13:25:07 UTC
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Result : https://paste.kangserver.id/view/3-jtHtk
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| 3 |
Benchy
|
Oct 05, 2023 13:38 |
View Raw Output# # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Benchy v2.7 # # https://github.com/L1so/benchy # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # 05 Oct 2023 13:38 UTC # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Server Insight Hardware Information --------------------- --------------------- OS : Ubuntu 22.04.3 LTS Model : AMD EPYC 7313 16-Core Processor Location : Netherlands Core : 2 @ 2999.998 MHz Kernel : 5.15.0-86-generic AES-NI : ✔ Enabled Uptime : 0 days, 0 hrs, 36 mins, 54 secs VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled Virt : kvm Swap : 0.0 KiB Disk & Memory Usage Network Information --------------------- --------------------- Disk (1) : 48.3 GiB ASN : AS50673 Disk Usage : 2.3 GiB (5% Used) ISP : Serverius Mem : 3.8 GiB IPv4 : ✔ Enabled Mem Usage : 0.2 GiB (5% Used) IPv6 : ❌ Disabled Ookla Network Speedtest (Region: Europe) +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Provider | Location | Download | Upload | Data Used | Latency | +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | TestDebit | Marseille, FR | 1.0 Gb/s | 1.0 Gb/s | 2.3 GB | 23.0 ms | | Vancis | Amsterdam, NL | 985.7 Mb/s | 1.0 Gb/s | 1.7 GB | 3.9 ms | | Vox | London, GB | 980.5 Mb/s | 1.0 Gb/s | 1.9 GB | 11.0 ms | | Skynet | Warsaw, PL | 973.3 Mb/s | 1.0 Gb/s | 2.2 GB | 19.5 ms | | Vodafone | Milan, IT | 1.0 Gb/s | 1.0 Gb/s | 2.5 GB | 20.4 ms | +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ Network Performance Test (Region: Europe) +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Prot. | Provider | Location | Send | Receive | Latency | +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | IPv4 | FiberBy | Copenhagen, DK | 1.0 Gb/s | 928.1 Mb/s | 13.2 ms | | | WOBCOM | Wolfsburg, DE | 1.1 Gb/s | 995.7 Mb/s | 12.1 ms | | | Novogara | Amsterdam, NL | 1.1 Gb/s | 994.3 Mb/s | 5.0 ms | | | Sasag | Schaff, CH | 1.1 Gb/s | 974.5 Mb/s | 15.2 ms | | | Alwyzon | Vienna, AT | 1.1 Gb/s | 994.1 Mb/s | 20.6 ms | +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ |
| 4 |
PassMark
|
Oct 05, 2023 13:38 |
View Raw OutputPassMark PerformanceTest Linux (11.0.1001) AMD EPYC 7313 16-Core Processor (x86_64) 2 cores @ 0 MHz | 3.8 GiB RAM Number of Processes: 2 | Test Iterations: 2 | Test Duration: Very Long - CPU Mark: 5355 Integer Math 12245 Million Operations/s Floating Point Math 9898 Million Operations/s Prime Numbers 42.7 Million Primes/s Sorting 7234 Thousand Strings/s Encryption 2612 MB/s Compression 51624 KB/s CPU Single Threaded 2788 Million Operations/s Physics 682 Frames/s Extended Instructions (SSE) 4788 Million Matrices/s Memory Mark: 2105 Database Operations 2086 Thousand Operations/s Memory Read Cached 28068 MB/s Memory Read Uncached 18787 MB/s Memory Write 19608 MB/s Available RAM 2990 Megabytes Memory Latency 59 Nanoseconds Memory Threaded 36518 MB/s |
| 5 |
UnixBench
|
Oct 05, 2023 17:43 |
View Raw Output------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Thu Oct 05 2023 17:15:40 - 17:43:36
2 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 50783651.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 8978.2 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 5209.7 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1483243.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 391146.6 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 4954121.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 2122401.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 67333.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 13400.3 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 16400.6 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 3019.1 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 1904415.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 50783651.2 4351.6
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 8978.2 1632.4
Execl Throughput 43.0 5209.7 1211.6
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 1483243.5 3745.6
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 391146.6 2363.4
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 4954121.8 8541.6
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 2122401.2 1706.1
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 67333.2 168.3
Process Creation 126.0 13400.3 1063.5
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 16400.6 3868.1
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 3019.1 5031.9
System Call Overhead 15000.0 1904415.4 1269.6
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 2030.5
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Thu Oct 05 2023 17:43:36 - 18:11:33
2 CPUs in system; running 2 parallel copies of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 100943856.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 17952.5 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 8106.1 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 2952334.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 780666.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 9106896.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 4247770.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 561525.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 21727.8 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 21472.2 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 3069.2 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 3803274.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 100943856.8 8649.9
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 17952.5 3264.1
Execl Throughput 43.0 8106.1 1885.2
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 2952334.0 7455.4
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 780666.9 4717.0
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 9106896.8 15701.5
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 4247770.4 3414.6
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 561525.8 1403.8
Process Creation 126.0 21727.8 1724.4
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 21472.2 5064.2
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 3069.2 5115.3
System Call Overhead 15000.0 3803274.9 2535.5
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 3983.3
|
Onidel Cloud VPS
Performance-first cloud hosting for teams that need consistent benchmarks and transparent pricing.
- 99.99% uptime SLA
- Proven availability for critical workloads
- Plans from $4.95/month
- Predictable pricing and simple scaling
- AMD EPYC + NVMe stack
- Modern hardware with built-in DDoS protection
- 5 global regions
- Singapore, Sydney, Amsterdam, Ho Chi Minh City, more coming soon
Ideal for: demanding SaaS workloads, managed hosting agencies, and teams migrating off legacy VPS providers.
Launch faster with concierge onboarding
Start 14-day TrialCPU Performance (Geekbench)
CPU benchmarks measure processing power for compute-intensive tasks. Learn how we test CPU performance.
I/O Speed Summary (dd)
IOPS Performance by Block Size
Combined IOPS Performance
Total IOPS across all block sizes (4K, 64K, 512K, 1M)
FIO Benchmark Details
Detailed I/O performance test results
Test 1 - Block Size: 4k (mixed_rw_50_50)
Test 2 - Block Size: 64k (mixed_rw_50_50)
Test 3 - Block Size: 512k (mixed_rw_50_50)
Test 4 - Block Size: 1m (mixed_rw_50_50)
Detailed I/O Benchmark (FIO)
IOPS Performance by Block Size
Bandwidth Performance by Block Size
Detailed Test Results
| Block Size | Read IOPS | Write IOPS | Read MB/s | Write MB/s |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4k | 60,100 | 60,300 | 240.7 | 241.4 |
| 64k | 42,300 | 42,500 | 2,700.0 | 2,720.0 |
| 512k | 9,000 | 9,500 | 4,650.0 | 4,900.0 |
| 1m | 5,500 | 5,800 | 5,650.0 | 5,020.0 |
Related Resources
Browse More Benchmarks
Explore comprehensive VPS benchmarks across providers and locations.
Compare Providers
View aggregated performance metrics across all VPS providers.
Performance Dashboard
Access real-time statistics, top performers, and latest results.
Testing Methodology
Learn about our comprehensive testing procedures and tools.
Understanding VPS Benchmark Results
This comprehensive benchmark report provides detailed performance analysis for DutchIS AMD EPYC Milan 2 Core 4 GB Ram NL VPS in Netherlands. Our standardized testing methodology measures CPU performance, disk I/O operations, network bandwidth, and real-world application performance to give you complete insights into VPS capabilities. Browse more VPS benchmarks to compare performance across providers.
Each benchmark metric serves a specific purpose in evaluating VPS performance. CPU benchmarks reveal processing power for applications, disk I/O tests measure storage performance for databases and file operations, network tests show bandwidth capacity for content delivery, and application benchmarks demonstrate real-world hosting performance. Together, these metrics provide a complete performance profile. Use our VPS comparison tool to analyze multiple plans side-by-side.
Benchmark Metrics & Features
Performance Analysis Use Cases
- Evaluating VPS CPU performance for compute-intensive applications
- Testing disk I/O performance for database workloads
- Comparing VPS performance across different providers
- Analyzing WordPress site performance on specific VPS plans
- Assessing value-for-money based on performance and pricing
- Checking real-world application performance metrics
- Understanding geographic performance variations by location
- Reviewing detailed benchmark metrics before VPS purchase
- Comparing single-core vs multi-core CPU performance
- Validating provider performance claims with actual data
- Making informed hosting decisions based on comprehensive benchmarks
How to Interpret Benchmark Results
1. CPU Performance (Geekbench)
Geekbench measures CPU performance through single-core and multi-core scores. Single-core scores (typically 800-2000) indicate performance for single-threaded applications and general responsiveness. Multi-core scores (1500-8000) show performance when all CPU cores are utilized for parallel processing. Higher scores mean better performance. Visit our testing methodology to learn more about CPU benchmarks.
2. Disk I/O Performance (FIO)
FIO benchmarks measure disk performance through IOPS (Input/Output Operations Per Second) and bandwidth (MB/s). High IOPS (10,000+ for NVMe, 5,000-10,000 for SSD) is crucial for database workloads with many small operations. High bandwidth is important for large file transfers and media applications. Compare disk performance across different providers in our database.
3. Application Performance
Real-world application benchmarks (WordPress, UnixBench) show how the VPS handles typical web workloads including PHP processing, database queries, and static file serving. These results measured in requests per second and page load times directly apply to web hosting scenarios. Need help choosing the right VPS? Visit about us to learn more about VPSMetrics.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I interpret the Geekbench single-core and multi-core scores?
Geekbench single-core scores indicate CPU performance for single-threaded applications, important for general responsiveness and web applications. Multi-core scores show performance when all CPU cores are utilized, crucial for parallel processing and multi-threaded applications. Higher scores indicate better performance. Modern VPS typically score 800-2000 (single) and 1500-8000 (multi) depending on the plan.
What do IOPS numbers mean in disk I/O benchmarks?
IOPS (Input/Output Operations Per Second) measures how many read/write operations your disk can handle per second. Higher IOPS means better performance for database operations and applications with many small file operations. NVMe SSD VPS typically delivers 10,000+ IOPS, while traditional SSD offers 5,000-10,000 IOPS.
What is UnixBench and why does it matter?
UnixBench is a comprehensive system-level benchmark suite that tests various aspects of Unix-like system performance including process creation, file operations, and system calls. It provides a holistic view of overall system performance beyond just CPU or disk metrics. Higher UnixBench scores indicate better overall system efficiency.
How reliable are WordPress benchmark results?
WordPress benchmarks provide real-world application performance metrics by testing actual WordPress installations. These results show how the VPS handles typical web application workloads including PHP processing, database queries, and static file serving. Results are measured in requests per second and page load times, directly applicable to web hosting scenarios.
Can I trust these benchmark results for my use case?
Our benchmarks provide standardized, reproducible test results using industry-standard tools. While they offer excellent performance indicators, your actual experience may vary based on your specific workload, application optimization, and usage patterns. Use these benchmarks as a reliable starting point for comparison between providers.
Why do benchmark results vary by location?
Different data center locations may have different hardware configurations, CPU generations, storage types, and network infrastructure. Providers often upgrade facilities at different rates across regions. Location-specific benchmarks help you choose a VPS in the right region with the best performance for your target audience.
Making Informed VPS Decisions
Use these comprehensive benchmark results to make data-driven hosting decisions. Compare multiple metrics together rather than focusing on a single aspect - a balanced VPS performs well across CPU, disk, and network benchmarks. Consider your specific workload requirements: CPU-intensive applications need high Geekbench scores, database-heavy applications require high IOPS, and content delivery services benefit from high network bandwidth.
Our benchmarks provide standardized, reproducible test results using industry-standard tools. While they offer excellent performance indicators, your actual experience may vary based on specific workload patterns and application optimization. Use these benchmarks as a reliable starting point for comparison between providers and configurations.
Compare More VPS Options
Explore additional benchmarks, compare multiple VPS plans side-by-side, and discover the best performing options for your specific requirements and budget.