DewaBiz - Intel Xeon E5 - 4 Core 8 GB Ram ID
Comprehensive VPS benchmark results from Indonesia tested on Feb 18, 2023. Learn our methodology.
System Specifications
Additional Benchmarks
UnixBench
System Performance Index
WordPress Bench
Web Application Performance
Benchmark Steps
| # | Suite | Run At | Raw Output |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Bench
|
Feb 18, 2023 00:00 |
View Raw Output-------------------- A Bench.sh Script By Teddysun ------------------- Version : v2022-06-01 Usage : wget -qO- bench.sh | bash ---------------------------------------------------------------------- CPU Model : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2690 v4 @ 2.60GHz CPU Cores : 4 @ 2599.996 MHz CPU Cache : 35840 KB AES-NI : Enabled VM-x/AMD-V : Disabled Total Disk : 45.3 GB (3.2 GB Used) Total Mem : 7.8 GB (92.1 MB Used) Total Swap : 4.0 GB (0 Used) System uptime : 0 days, 2 hour 29 min Load average : 0.07, 0.12, 2.14 OS : Ubuntu 18.04.6 LTS Arch : x86_64 (64 Bit) Kernel : 4.15.0-204-generic TCP CC : cubic Virtualization : KVM Organization : AS140389 PT Dewa Bisnis Digital Location : Jatibarang / ID Region : West Java ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I/O Speed(1st run) : 492 MB/s I/O Speed(2nd run) : 506 MB/s I/O Speed(3rd run) : 474 MB/s I/O Speed(average) : 490.7 MB/s ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Node Name Upload Speed Download Speed Latency Speedtest.net 520.59 Mbps 364.84 Mbps 10.68 ms Los Angeles, US 208.56 Mbps 639.76 Mbps 214.69 ms ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Finished in : 3 min 20 sec Timestamp : 2023-02-18 22:19:51 PST ---------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| 2 |
PassMark
|
Feb 18, 2023 00:00 |
View Raw OutputPassMark PerformanceTest Linux Intel Xeon CPU E5-2690 v4 @ 2.60GHz (x86_64) 4 cores @ 2599 MHz | 7.8 GiB RAM Number of Processes: 4 | Test Iterations: 3 | Test Duration: Very Long -------------------------------------------------------------------------- CPU Mark: 3967 Integer Math 11513 Million Operations/s Floating Point Math 9144 Million Operations/s Prime Numbers 30.7 Million Primes/s Sorting 6607 Thousand Strings/s Encryption 1059 MB/s Compression 54060 KB/s CPU Single Threaded 1491 Million Operations/s Physics 504 Frames/s Extended Instructions (SSE) 3235 Million Matrices/s Memory Mark: 1317 Database Operations 1118 Thousand Operations/s Memory Read Cached 16831 MB/s Memory Read Uncached 6231 MB/s Memory Write 5136 MB/s Available RAM 6657 Megabytes Memory Latency 91 Nanoseconds Memory Threaded 21975 MB/s -------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| 3 |
Speedtest Lokal
|
Feb 18, 2023 00:00 |
View Raw Output Server location: Jakarta (CGK)
Your IP: 103.150.60.172 (ID)
Latency: 6.88 ms
Jitter: 0.78 ms
100kB speed: 285.39 Mbps
1MB speed: 395.43 Mbps
10MB speed: 472.08 Mbps
25MB speed: 424.80 Mbps
100MB speed: 420.89 Mbps
Download speed: 494.03 Mbps
Upload speed: 149.13 Mbps
|
| 4 |
UnixBench
|
Feb 18, 2023 00:00 |
View Raw Output------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Sat Feb 18 2023 20:21:00 - 21:05:52
4 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 28691036.8 lps (10.0 s, 10 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 4783.8 MWIPS (9.5 s, 10 samples)
Execl Throughput 2606.5 lps (30.0 s, 4 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 422054.7 KBps (30.0 s, 4 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 112330.8 KBps (30.0 s, 4 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1129830.9 KBps (30.0 s, 4 samples)
Pipe Throughput 572535.3 lps (10.0 s, 10 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 58868.2 lps (10.0 s, 10 samples)
Process Creation 5997.4 lps (30.0 s, 4 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 7871.1 lpm (60.0 s, 4 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 2372.3 lpm (60.0 s, 4 samples)
System Call Overhead 342662.7 lps (10.0 s, 10 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 28691036.8 2458.5
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 4783.8 869.8
Execl Throughput 43.0 2606.5 606.2
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 422054.7 1065.8
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 112330.8 678.7
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1129830.9 1948.0
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 572535.3 460.2
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 58868.2 147.2
Process Creation 126.0 5997.4 476.0
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 7871.1 1856.4
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 2372.3 3953.8
System Call Overhead 15000.0 342662.7 228.4
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 824.5
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Sat Feb 18 2023 21:05:52 - 21:50:53
4 CPUs in system; running 4 parallel copies of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 106430564.5 lps (10.0 s, 10 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 18488.6 MWIPS (9.7 s, 10 samples)
Execl Throughput 8842.1 lps (30.0 s, 4 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 687827.3 KBps (30.0 s, 4 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 185848.7 KBps (30.0 s, 4 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 2035257.8 KBps (30.0 s, 4 samples)
Pipe Throughput 2186412.4 lps (10.0 s, 10 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 517265.7 lps (10.0 s, 10 samples)
Process Creation 14644.1 lps (30.0 s, 4 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 17571.7 lpm (60.0 s, 4 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 2706.6 lpm (60.1 s, 4 samples)
System Call Overhead 1308059.3 lps (10.0 s, 10 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 106430564.5 9120.0
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 18488.6 3361.6
Execl Throughput 43.0 8842.1 2056.3
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 687827.3 1736.9
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 185848.7 1123.0
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 2035257.8 3509.1
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 2186412.4 1757.6
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 517265.7 1293.2
Process Creation 126.0 14644.1 1162.2
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 17571.7 4144.3
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 2706.6 4511.0
System Call Overhead 15000.0 1308059.3 872.0
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 2268.6
|
Onidel Cloud VPS
Performance-first cloud hosting for teams that need consistent benchmarks and transparent pricing.
- 99.99% uptime SLA
- Proven availability for critical workloads
- Plans from $4.95/month
- Predictable pricing and simple scaling
- AMD EPYC + NVMe stack
- Modern hardware with built-in DDoS protection
- 5 global regions
- Singapore, Sydney, Amsterdam, Ho Chi Minh City, more coming soon
Ideal for: demanding SaaS workloads, managed hosting agencies, and teams migrating off legacy VPS providers.
Launch faster with concierge onboarding
Start 14-day TrialCPU Performance (Geekbench)
CPU benchmarks measure processing power for compute-intensive tasks. Learn how we test CPU performance.
I/O Speed Summary (dd)
IOPS Performance by Block Size
Combined IOPS Performance
Total IOPS across all block sizes (4K, 64K, 512K, 1M)
FIO Benchmark Details
Detailed I/O performance test results
Test 1 - Block Size: 4k (mixed_rw_50_50)
Test 2 - Block Size: 64k (mixed_rw_50_50)
Test 3 - Block Size: 512k (mixed_rw_50_50)
Test 4 - Block Size: 1m (mixed_rw_50_50)
Detailed I/O Benchmark (FIO)
IOPS Performance by Block Size
Bandwidth Performance by Block Size
Detailed Test Results
| Block Size | Read IOPS | Write IOPS | Read MB/s | Write MB/s |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4k | 4,400 | 4,400 | 17.8 | 17.8 |
| 64k | 3,900 | 3,900 | 253.5 | 254.8 |
| 512k | 1,200 | 1,300 | 641.8 | 675.9 |
| 1m | 625 | 666 | 640.2 | 682.9 |
Related Resources
Browse More Benchmarks
Explore comprehensive VPS benchmarks across providers and locations.
Compare Providers
View aggregated performance metrics across all VPS providers.
Performance Dashboard
Access real-time statistics, top performers, and latest results.
Testing Methodology
Learn about our comprehensive testing procedures and tools.
Understanding VPS Benchmark Results
This comprehensive benchmark report provides detailed performance analysis for DewaBiz Intel Xeon E5 - 4 Core 8 GB Ram ID VPS in Indonesia. Our standardized testing methodology measures CPU performance, disk I/O operations, network bandwidth, and real-world application performance to give you complete insights into VPS capabilities. Browse more VPS benchmarks to compare performance across providers.
Each benchmark metric serves a specific purpose in evaluating VPS performance. CPU benchmarks reveal processing power for applications, disk I/O tests measure storage performance for databases and file operations, network tests show bandwidth capacity for content delivery, and application benchmarks demonstrate real-world hosting performance. Together, these metrics provide a complete performance profile. Use our VPS comparison tool to analyze multiple plans side-by-side.
Benchmark Metrics & Features
Performance Analysis Use Cases
- Evaluating VPS CPU performance for compute-intensive applications
- Testing disk I/O performance for database workloads
- Comparing VPS performance across different providers
- Analyzing WordPress site performance on specific VPS plans
- Assessing value-for-money based on performance and pricing
- Checking real-world application performance metrics
- Understanding geographic performance variations by location
- Reviewing detailed benchmark metrics before VPS purchase
- Comparing single-core vs multi-core CPU performance
- Validating provider performance claims with actual data
- Making informed hosting decisions based on comprehensive benchmarks
How to Interpret Benchmark Results
1. CPU Performance (Geekbench)
Geekbench measures CPU performance through single-core and multi-core scores. Single-core scores (typically 800-2000) indicate performance for single-threaded applications and general responsiveness. Multi-core scores (1500-8000) show performance when all CPU cores are utilized for parallel processing. Higher scores mean better performance. Visit our testing methodology to learn more about CPU benchmarks.
2. Disk I/O Performance (FIO)
FIO benchmarks measure disk performance through IOPS (Input/Output Operations Per Second) and bandwidth (MB/s). High IOPS (10,000+ for NVMe, 5,000-10,000 for SSD) is crucial for database workloads with many small operations. High bandwidth is important for large file transfers and media applications. Compare disk performance across different providers in our database.
3. Application Performance
Real-world application benchmarks (WordPress, UnixBench) show how the VPS handles typical web workloads including PHP processing, database queries, and static file serving. These results measured in requests per second and page load times directly apply to web hosting scenarios. Need help choosing the right VPS? Visit about us to learn more about VPSMetrics.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I interpret the Geekbench single-core and multi-core scores?
Geekbench single-core scores indicate CPU performance for single-threaded applications, important for general responsiveness and web applications. Multi-core scores show performance when all CPU cores are utilized, crucial for parallel processing and multi-threaded applications. Higher scores indicate better performance. Modern VPS typically score 800-2000 (single) and 1500-8000 (multi) depending on the plan.
What do IOPS numbers mean in disk I/O benchmarks?
IOPS (Input/Output Operations Per Second) measures how many read/write operations your disk can handle per second. Higher IOPS means better performance for database operations and applications with many small file operations. NVMe SSD VPS typically delivers 10,000+ IOPS, while traditional SSD offers 5,000-10,000 IOPS.
What is UnixBench and why does it matter?
UnixBench is a comprehensive system-level benchmark suite that tests various aspects of Unix-like system performance including process creation, file operations, and system calls. It provides a holistic view of overall system performance beyond just CPU or disk metrics. Higher UnixBench scores indicate better overall system efficiency.
How reliable are WordPress benchmark results?
WordPress benchmarks provide real-world application performance metrics by testing actual WordPress installations. These results show how the VPS handles typical web application workloads including PHP processing, database queries, and static file serving. Results are measured in requests per second and page load times, directly applicable to web hosting scenarios.
Can I trust these benchmark results for my use case?
Our benchmarks provide standardized, reproducible test results using industry-standard tools. While they offer excellent performance indicators, your actual experience may vary based on your specific workload, application optimization, and usage patterns. Use these benchmarks as a reliable starting point for comparison between providers.
Why do benchmark results vary by location?
Different data center locations may have different hardware configurations, CPU generations, storage types, and network infrastructure. Providers often upgrade facilities at different rates across regions. Location-specific benchmarks help you choose a VPS in the right region with the best performance for your target audience.
Making Informed VPS Decisions
Use these comprehensive benchmark results to make data-driven hosting decisions. Compare multiple metrics together rather than focusing on a single aspect - a balanced VPS performs well across CPU, disk, and network benchmarks. Consider your specific workload requirements: CPU-intensive applications need high Geekbench scores, database-heavy applications require high IOPS, and content delivery services benefit from high network bandwidth.
Our benchmarks provide standardized, reproducible test results using industry-standard tools. While they offer excellent performance indicators, your actual experience may vary based on specific workload patterns and application optimization. Use these benchmarks as a reliable starting point for comparison between providers and configurations.
Compare More VPS Options
Explore additional benchmarks, compare multiple VPS plans side-by-side, and discover the best performing options for your specific requirements and budget.