Crunchbits - Intel Xeon 2 Core 8 GB Ram US
Comprehensive VPS benchmark results from USA tested on Aug 06, 2024. Learn our methodology.
System Specifications
Additional Benchmarks
UnixBench
System Performance Index
WordPress Bench
Web Application Performance
Benchmark Steps
| # | Suite | Run At | Raw Output |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Bench
|
Aug 06, 2024 00:00 |
View Raw Output-------------------- A Bench.sh Script By Teddysun ------------------- Version : v2023-10-15 Usage : wget -qO- bench.sh | bash ---------------------------------------------------------------------- CPU Model : Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6146 CPU @ 3.20GHz CPU Cores : 2 @ 3192.500 MHz CPU Cache : 25344 KB AES-NI : ✓ Enabled VM-x/AMD-V : ✓ Enabled Total Disk : 145.3 GB (2.9 GB Used) Total Mem : 7.8 GB (227.1 MB Used) System uptime : 0 days, 10 hour 30 min Load average : 0.06, 0.23, 0.47 OS : Ubuntu 22.04.4 LTS Arch : x86_64 (64 Bit) Kernel : 5.15.0-117-generic TCP CC : bbr Virtualization : KVM IPv4/IPv6 : ✓ Online / ✓ Online Organization : AS400304 Redoubt Networks Location : Liberty Lake / US Region : Washington ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I/O Speed(1st run) : 661 MB/s I/O Speed(2nd run) : 1.1 GB/s I/O Speed(3rd run) : 1.1 GB/s I/O Speed(average) : 971.3 MB/s ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Node Name Upload Speed Download Speed Latency Speedtest.net 2491.55 Mbps 2335.85 Mbps 0.35 ms Los Angeles, US 2155.79 Mbps 2116.81 Mbps 37.62 ms Dallas, US 1222.22 Mbps 2057.50 Mbps 65.65 ms Montreal, CA 627.19 Mbps 937.25 Mbps 72.78 ms Amsterdam, NL 356.75 Mbps 1573.41 Mbps 146.87 ms Hongkong, CN 5.00 Mbps 4.98 Mbps 175.69 ms Mumbai, IN 329.78 Mbps 1586.61 Mbps 255.80 ms Singapore, SG 81.89 Mbps 22.91 Mbps 215.83 ms Tokyo, JP 830.66 Mbps 1890.52 Mbps 92.78 ms ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Finished in : 4 min 42 sec Timestamp : 2024-08-06 11:09:48 WIB ---------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| 2 |
PassMark
|
Aug 06, 2024 00:00 |
View Raw OutputPassMark PerformanceTest Linux (11.0.1002) Intel Xeon Gold 6146 CPU @ 3.20GHz (x86_64) 1 cores @ 0 MHz | 7.8 GiB RAM Number of Processes: 2 | Test Iterations: 2 | Test Duration: Very Long - CPU Mark: 3616 Integer Math 9264 Million Operations/s Floating Point Math 6536 Million Operations/s Prime Numbers 26.6 Million Primes/s Sorting 5289 Thousand Strings/s Encryption 1193 MB/s Compression 45354 KB/s CPU Single Threaded 2201 Million Operations/s Physics 442 Frames/s Extended Instructions (SSE) 3269 Million Matrices/s Memory Mark: 1519 Database Operations 679 Thousand Operations/s Memory Read Cached 26667 MB/s Memory Read Uncached 6830 MB/s Memory Write 8129 MB/s Available RAM 6446 Megabytes Memory Latency 65 Nanoseconds Memory Threaded 14121 MB/s |
| 3 |
Speedtest Global
|
Aug 06, 2024 00:00 |
View Raw Output---------------------------------- nws.sh ---------------------------------
A simple script to bench network performance using speedtest-cli
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Version : v2024.06.02
Global Speedtest : wget -qO- nws.sh | bash
Region Speedtest : wget -qO- nws.sh | bash -s -- -r <region>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Basic System Info
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
CPU Model : Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6146 CPU @ 3.20GHz
CPU Cores : 2 @ 3192.500 MHz
CPU Cache : 25344 KB
AES-NI : ✔ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
Total Disk : 145.3 GB (2.9 GB Used)
Total RAM : 7.8 GB (413.8 MB Used)
System uptime : 0 days, 3 hour 36 min
Load average : 25.11, 12.67, 6.37
OS : Ubuntu 22.04.4 LTS
Arch : x86_64 (64 Bit)
Kernel : 5.15.0-117-generic
Virtualization : KVM
TCP Control : bbr
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Basic Network Info
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Primary Network : IPv6
IPv6 Access : ✔ Online
IPv4 Access : ✔ Online
ISP : Redoubt Networks
ASN : AS400304 Redoubt Networks
Host : Redoubt Networks
Location : Liberty Lake, Washington-WA, United States
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Speedtest.net (Region: GLOBAL)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Location Latency Loss DL Speed UP Speed Server
ISP: Crunchbits
Nearest 0.34 ms 0.0% 2328.99 Mbps 2491.26 Mbps Crunchbits - Spokane, WA
Kochi, IN 246.59 ms 0.0% 927.45 Mbps 328.80 Mbps Asianet Broadband - Cochin
Bangalore, IN 250.76 ms 0.0% 1492.25 Mbps 291.30 Mbps Bharti Airtel Ltd - Bangalore
Chennai, IN 218.47 ms N/A 1650.75 Mbps 367.28 Mbps Jio - Chennai
Mumbai, IN 256.54 ms 0.0% 1779.16 Mbps 315.33 Mbps i3D.net - Mumbai
Delhi, IN 233.49 ms 0.0% 1657.69 Mbps 322.35 Mbps Tata Play Fiber - New Delhi
Seattle, US 11.76 ms N/A 2251.76 Mbps 2510.34 Mbps Comcast - Seattle, WA
Los Angeles, US 36.12 ms 0.0% 1905.82 Mbps 2228.60 Mbps ReliableSite Hosting - Los Angeles, CA
Dallas, US 65.59 ms 0.0% 2064.62 Mbps 1238.89 Mbps i3D.net - Dallas, TX
Miami, US FAILED
New York, US FAILED
Toronto, CA 58.43 ms 0.0% 1870.10 Mbps 1399.57 Mbps Rogers - Toronto, ON
Mexico City, MX 75.25 ms N/A 2044.48 Mbps 1103.31 Mbps INFINITUM - Mexico City
London, UK 129.05 ms 0.0% 2128.40 Mbps 646.74 Mbps VeloxServ Communications - London
Amsterdam, NL 142.13 ms 0.0% 2127.89 Mbps 592.16 Mbps 31173 Services AB - Amsterdam
Paris, FR 142.84 ms N/A 2123.51 Mbps 576.05 Mbps Axione - Paris
Frankfurt, DE 139.82 ms 0.0% 1514.80 Mbps 580.08 Mbps Clouvider Ltd - Frankfurt am Main
Warsaw, PL 150.68 ms 0.0% 1995.34 Mbps 541.03 Mbps Play - Warszawa
Bucharest, RO 189.98 ms 0.0% 1644.25 Mbps 428.60 Mbps Vodafone Romania Fixed - Bucharest - Bucharest
Moscow, RU 220.16 ms 0.0% 1468.57 Mbps 353.33 Mbps Rostelecom - Moscow
Jeddah, SA 215.44 ms 0.0% 2009.92 Mbps 379.93 Mbps Saudi Telecom Company
Dubai, AE 270.09 ms 0.0% 1897.73 Mbps 286.59 Mbps du - Dubai
Fujairah, AE 235.75 ms 0.0% 1758.11 Mbps 331.31 Mbps e& UAE - Fujairah
Istanbul, TR 200.35 ms 0.0% 1667.44 Mbps 400.41 Mbps Turkcell - Istanbul
Tehran, IR 234.05 ms 0.3% 1415.83 Mbps 267.30 Mbps Asiatech - Tehran
Tokyo, JP 93.61 ms 0.0% 2269.58 Mbps 866.97 Mbps IPA CyberLab 400G - Tokyo
Shanghai, CU-CN FAILED
Nanjing, CT-CN 158.30 ms 4.7% 502.39 Mbps 52.60 Mbps China Telecom JiangSu 5G - Nanjing
Hong Kong, CN 165.39 ms N/A 1723.68 Mbps 490.43 Mbps STC - Hong Kong
Singapore, SG 165.84 ms 0.0% 1856.77 Mbps 496.94 Mbps i3D.net - Singapore
Jakarta, ID FAILED - IP has been rate limited. Try again after 1 hour.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Avg DL Speed : 1780.64 Mbps
Avg UL Speed : 736.57 Mbps
Total DL Data : 65.47 GB
Total UL Data : 27.85 GB
Total Data : 93.33 GB
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Duration : 13 min 59 sec
System Time : 06/08/2024 - 04:24:33 WIB
Total Script Runs : 76992
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Result : https://result.nws.sh/r/1722892885_A6NSBK_GLOBAL.txt
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| 4 |
UnixBench
|
Aug 06, 2024 00:00 |
View Raw Output------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Tue Aug 06 2024 01:22:22 - 01:50:24
2 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 45160900.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 8118.6 MWIPS (9.8 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 2307.1 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 453787.7 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 121351.2 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1298672.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 562747.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 73393.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 6383.6 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 7570.6 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1793.7 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 292088.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 45160900.2 3869.8
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 8118.6 1476.1
Execl Throughput 43.0 2307.1 536.5
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 453787.7 1145.9
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 121351.2 733.2
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1298672.8 2239.1
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 562747.4 452.4
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 73393.7 183.5
Process Creation 126.0 6383.6 506.6
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 7570.6 1785.5
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1793.7 2989.5
System Call Overhead 15000.0 292088.2 194.7
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 891.5
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Tue Aug 06 2024 01:50:24 - 02:18:25
2 CPUs in system; running 2 parallel copies of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 93200847.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 16346.1 MWIPS (9.8 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 4345.7 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 867820.1 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 231016.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 2258787.3 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 1126176.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 247584.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 12970.2 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 13444.8 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1774.7 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 570353.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 93200847.3 7986.4
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 16346.1 2972.0
Execl Throughput 43.0 4345.7 1010.6
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 867820.1 2191.5
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 231016.8 1395.9
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 2258787.3 3894.5
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1126176.2 905.3
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 247584.6 619.0
Process Creation 126.0 12970.2 1029.4
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 13444.8 3170.9
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1774.7 2957.9
System Call Overhead 15000.0 570353.6 380.2
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 1701.3
|
Onidel Cloud VPS
Performance-first cloud hosting for teams that need consistent benchmarks and transparent pricing.
- 99.99% uptime SLA
- Proven availability for critical workloads
- Plans from $4.95/month
- Predictable pricing and simple scaling
- AMD EPYC + NVMe stack
- Modern hardware with built-in DDoS protection
- 5 global regions
- Singapore, Sydney, Amsterdam, Ho Chi Minh City, more coming soon
Ideal for: demanding SaaS workloads, managed hosting agencies, and teams migrating off legacy VPS providers.
Launch faster with concierge onboarding
Start 14-day TrialCPU Performance (Geekbench)
CPU benchmarks measure processing power for compute-intensive tasks. Learn how we test CPU performance.
I/O Speed Summary (dd)
IOPS Performance by Block Size
Combined IOPS Performance
Total IOPS across all block sizes (4K, 64K, 512K, 1M)
FIO Benchmark Details
Detailed I/O performance test results
Test 1 - Block Size: 4k (mixed_rw_50_50)
Test 2 - Block Size: 64k (mixed_rw_50_50)
Test 3 - Block Size: 512k (mixed_rw_50_50)
Test 4 - Block Size: 1m (mixed_rw_50_50)
Detailed I/O Benchmark (FIO)
IOPS Performance by Block Size
Bandwidth Performance by Block Size
Detailed Test Results
| Block Size | Read IOPS | Write IOPS | Read MB/s | Write MB/s |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4k | 20,900 | 20,900 | 83.7 | 83.9 |
| 64k | 12,300 | 12,400 | 793.2 | 797.4 |
| 512k | 2,000 | 2,100 | 1,060.0 | 1,110.0 |
| 1m | 1,200 | 1,300 | 1,260.0 | 1,350.0 |
Related Resources
Browse More Benchmarks
Explore comprehensive VPS benchmarks across providers and locations.
Compare Providers
View aggregated performance metrics across all VPS providers.
Performance Dashboard
Access real-time statistics, top performers, and latest results.
Testing Methodology
Learn about our comprehensive testing procedures and tools.
Understanding VPS Benchmark Results
This comprehensive benchmark report provides detailed performance analysis for Crunchbits Intel Xeon 2 Core 8 GB Ram US VPS in USA. Our standardized testing methodology measures CPU performance, disk I/O operations, network bandwidth, and real-world application performance to give you complete insights into VPS capabilities. Browse more VPS benchmarks to compare performance across providers.
Each benchmark metric serves a specific purpose in evaluating VPS performance. CPU benchmarks reveal processing power for applications, disk I/O tests measure storage performance for databases and file operations, network tests show bandwidth capacity for content delivery, and application benchmarks demonstrate real-world hosting performance. Together, these metrics provide a complete performance profile. Use our VPS comparison tool to analyze multiple plans side-by-side.
Benchmark Metrics & Features
Performance Analysis Use Cases
- Evaluating VPS CPU performance for compute-intensive applications
- Testing disk I/O performance for database workloads
- Comparing VPS performance across different providers
- Analyzing WordPress site performance on specific VPS plans
- Assessing value-for-money based on performance and pricing
- Checking real-world application performance metrics
- Understanding geographic performance variations by location
- Reviewing detailed benchmark metrics before VPS purchase
- Comparing single-core vs multi-core CPU performance
- Validating provider performance claims with actual data
- Making informed hosting decisions based on comprehensive benchmarks
How to Interpret Benchmark Results
1. CPU Performance (Geekbench)
Geekbench measures CPU performance through single-core and multi-core scores. Single-core scores (typically 800-2000) indicate performance for single-threaded applications and general responsiveness. Multi-core scores (1500-8000) show performance when all CPU cores are utilized for parallel processing. Higher scores mean better performance. Visit our testing methodology to learn more about CPU benchmarks.
2. Disk I/O Performance (FIO)
FIO benchmarks measure disk performance through IOPS (Input/Output Operations Per Second) and bandwidth (MB/s). High IOPS (10,000+ for NVMe, 5,000-10,000 for SSD) is crucial for database workloads with many small operations. High bandwidth is important for large file transfers and media applications. Compare disk performance across different providers in our database.
3. Application Performance
Real-world application benchmarks (WordPress, UnixBench) show how the VPS handles typical web workloads including PHP processing, database queries, and static file serving. These results measured in requests per second and page load times directly apply to web hosting scenarios. Need help choosing the right VPS? Visit about us to learn more about VPSMetrics.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I interpret the Geekbench single-core and multi-core scores?
Geekbench single-core scores indicate CPU performance for single-threaded applications, important for general responsiveness and web applications. Multi-core scores show performance when all CPU cores are utilized, crucial for parallel processing and multi-threaded applications. Higher scores indicate better performance. Modern VPS typically score 800-2000 (single) and 1500-8000 (multi) depending on the plan.
What do IOPS numbers mean in disk I/O benchmarks?
IOPS (Input/Output Operations Per Second) measures how many read/write operations your disk can handle per second. Higher IOPS means better performance for database operations and applications with many small file operations. NVMe SSD VPS typically delivers 10,000+ IOPS, while traditional SSD offers 5,000-10,000 IOPS.
What is UnixBench and why does it matter?
UnixBench is a comprehensive system-level benchmark suite that tests various aspects of Unix-like system performance including process creation, file operations, and system calls. It provides a holistic view of overall system performance beyond just CPU or disk metrics. Higher UnixBench scores indicate better overall system efficiency.
How reliable are WordPress benchmark results?
WordPress benchmarks provide real-world application performance metrics by testing actual WordPress installations. These results show how the VPS handles typical web application workloads including PHP processing, database queries, and static file serving. Results are measured in requests per second and page load times, directly applicable to web hosting scenarios.
Can I trust these benchmark results for my use case?
Our benchmarks provide standardized, reproducible test results using industry-standard tools. While they offer excellent performance indicators, your actual experience may vary based on your specific workload, application optimization, and usage patterns. Use these benchmarks as a reliable starting point for comparison between providers.
Why do benchmark results vary by location?
Different data center locations may have different hardware configurations, CPU generations, storage types, and network infrastructure. Providers often upgrade facilities at different rates across regions. Location-specific benchmarks help you choose a VPS in the right region with the best performance for your target audience.
Making Informed VPS Decisions
Use these comprehensive benchmark results to make data-driven hosting decisions. Compare multiple metrics together rather than focusing on a single aspect - a balanced VPS performs well across CPU, disk, and network benchmarks. Consider your specific workload requirements: CPU-intensive applications need high Geekbench scores, database-heavy applications require high IOPS, and content delivery services benefit from high network bandwidth.
Our benchmarks provide standardized, reproducible test results using industry-standard tools. While they offer excellent performance indicators, your actual experience may vary based on specific workload patterns and application optimization. Use these benchmarks as a reliable starting point for comparison between providers and configurations.
Compare More VPS Options
Explore additional benchmarks, compare multiple VPS plans side-by-side, and discover the best performing options for your specific requirements and budget.