CloudAja - Cloud VM C2 Intel 2 Core
Comprehensive VPS benchmark results from Indonesia tested on Mar 20, 2023. Learn our methodology.
System Specifications
Additional Benchmarks
UnixBench
System Performance Index
WordPress Bench
Web Application Performance
Benchmark Steps
| # | Suite | Run At | Raw Output |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Bench
|
Mar 20, 2023 00:00 |
View Raw Output-------------------- A Bench.sh Script By Teddysun ------------------- Version : v2022-06-01 Usage : wget -qO- bench.sh | bash ---------------------------------------------------------------------- CPU Model : Common KVM processor CPU Cores : 4 @ 2399.996 MHz CPU Cache : 16384 KB AES-NI : Disabled VM-x/AMD-V : Disabled Total Disk : 38.7 GB (3.1 GB Used) Total Mem : 1.9 GB (197.2 MB Used) System uptime : 0 days, 3 hour 16 min Load average : 0.04, 0.51, 2.30 OS : Ubuntu 20.04.6 LTS Arch : x86_64 (64 Bit) Kernel : 5.4.0-144-generic TCP CC : cubic Virtualization : KVM Organization : AS138131 CV. NATANETWORK SOLUTION Location : Surabaya / ID Region : East Java ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I/O Speed(1st run) : 609 MB/s I/O Speed(2nd run) : 978 MB/s I/O Speed(3rd run) : 979 MB/s I/O Speed(average) : 855.3 MB/s ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Node Name Upload Speed Download Speed Latency Speedtest.net 430.40 Mbps 115.85 Mbps 12.54 ms Los Angeles, US 27.94 Mbps 99.36 Mbps 253.45 ms Dallas, US 80.76 Mbps 84.50 Mbps 249.25 ms Montreal, CA 26.26 Mbps 100.64 Mbps 244.75 ms Paris, FR 65.43 Mbps 282.63 Mbps 227.95 ms Amsterdam, NL 76.91 Mbps 74.65 Mbps 182.40 ms Shanghai, CN 60.56 Mbps 257.27 Mbps 240.56 ms Nanjing, CN 0.47 Mbps 131.66 Mbps 234.71 ms Hongkong, CN 274.07 Mbps 101.17 Mbps 56.26 ms Singapore, SG 330.32 Mbps 337.21 Mbps 26.09 ms Tokyo, JP 162.75 Mbps 380.42 Mbps 93.25 ms ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Finished in : 6 min 16 sec Timestamp : 2023-03-20 10:40:06 UTC ---------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| 2 |
PassMark
|
Mar 20, 2023 00:00 |
View Raw OutputPassMark PerformanceTest Linux Common KVM processor (x86_64) 2 cores @ 2399 MHz | 1.9 GiB RAM Number of Processes: 2 | Test Iterations: 3 | Test Duration: Very Long -------------------------------------------------------------------------- CPU Mark: 2000 Integer Math 6404 Million Operations/s Floating Point Math 5500 Million Operations/s Prime Numbers 24.9 Million Primes/s Sorting 4785 Thousand Strings/s Encryption 415 MB/s Compression 33481 KB/s CPU Single Threaded 1739 Million Operations/s Physics 371 Frames/s Extended Instructions (SSE) 1133 Million Matrices/s Memory Mark: 1235 Database Operations 1110 Thousand Operations/s Memory Read Cached 19417 MB/s Memory Read Uncached 7990 MB/s Memory Write 6271 MB/s Available RAM 1533 Megabytes Memory Latency 66 Nanoseconds Memory Threaded 15238 MB/s -------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| 3 |
Speedtest Lokal
|
Mar 20, 2023 00:00 |
View Raw Output---------------------------- network-speed.xyz ----------------------------
A simple script to test network performance using speedtest-cli
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Version : 11/03/2023
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Basic System Info
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
CPU Model : Common KVM processor
CPU Cores : 4 @ 2399.996 MHz
CPU Cache : 16384 KB
AES-NI : ❌ Disabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ❌ Disabled
Total Disk : 38.7 GB (3.1 GB Used)
Total RAM : 1.9 GB (199.2 MB Used)
System uptime : 0 days, 3 hour 27 min
Load average : 0.03, 0.23, 1.25
OS : Ubuntu 20.04.6 LTS
Arch : x86_64 (64 Bit)
Kernel : 5.4.0-144-generic
Virtualization : KVM
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Basic Network Info
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Primary Network : IPv4
ISP : CV. NATANETWORK SOLUTION
ASN : AS138131 CV. NATANETWORK SOLUTION
Host : CV Jayamiqen Konstruksi
Location : Banjarmasin, South Kalimantan (KS)
Country : Indonesia
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Speedtest.net
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Location Latency Loss DL Speed UP Speed Server
ISP: Cv. Natanetwork Solution
Nearest 13.02 ms 0.0% 229.82 Mbps 390.26 Mbps Biznet Networks - Jakarta
Kochi, IN 96.17 ms 0.0% 81.17 Mbps 62.06 Mbps Asianet Broadband - Cochin
Bangalore, IN 63.79 ms N/A 91.88 Mbps 141.14 Mbps Airtel Broadband - Bangalore
Chennai, IN 59.21 ms N/A 420.84 Mbps 205.13 Mbps Jio - Chennai
Mumbai, IN 85.04 ms 0.0% 108.51 Mbps 66.30 Mbps i3D.net - Mumbai
Delhi, IN 94.82 ms 0.0% 100.02 Mbps 52.67 Mbps Tata Play Fiber - New Delhi
Los Angeles, US 198.84 ms 0.0% 87.04 Mbps 57.10 Mbps ReliableSite Hosting - Los Angeles, CA
Dallas, US 231.03 ms 0.0% 239.81 Mbps 54.42 Mbps Hivelocity - Dallas, TX
New York, US 321.25 ms 0.0% 76.61 Mbps 34.04 Mbps Clouvider Ltd - New York, NY
Seattle, US 209.01 ms N/A 267.70 Mbps 69.96 Mbps Comcast - Seattle, WA
Miami, US 256.96 ms 0.0% 4.00 Mbps 66.04 Mbps AT&T - Miami, FL
Toronto, CA 256.45 ms 0.0% 266.39 Mbps 55.18 Mbps Rogers - Toronto, ON
Paris, FR 221.55 ms 0.0% 280.81 Mbps 85.81 Mbps ORANGE FRANCE - Paris
Amsterdam, NL 189.01 ms 0.0% 107.15 Mbps 58.07 Mbps Clouvider Ltd - Amsterdam
Warsaw, PL 198.94 ms 0.0% 266.97 Mbps 68.58 Mbps UPC Polska - Warszawa
London, UK 178.69 ms 0.0% 116.07 Mbps 91.47 Mbps VeloxServ Communications - London
Frankfurt, DE 197.90 ms 0.0% 263.49 Mbps 79.40 Mbps Deutsche Telekom - Frankfurt Am Main
Dubai, AE 103.88 ms 0.0% 630.99 Mbps 111.49 Mbps du - Dubai
Fujairah, AE 100.20 ms 0.0% 471.45 Mbps 159.09 Mbps ETISALAT-UAE - Fujairah
Jeddah, KSA 175.31 ms 0.3% 274.68 Mbps 132.18 Mbps Saudi Telecom Company
Shanghai, CU-CN 256.52 ms 0.0% 275.46 Mbps 70.38 Mbps China Unicom 5G - ShangHai
Nanjing, CT-CN 238.29 ms 31.3% 121.94 Mbps 0.91 Mbps China Telecom JiangSu 5G - Nanjing
Hong Kong, SAR 60.88 ms N/A 80.13 Mbps 70.43 Mbps STC - Hong Kong
Singapore, SG 27.61 ms 0.0% 557.12 Mbps 285.88 Mbps i3D.net - Singapore
Tokyo, JP 94.28 ms N/A 108.01 Mbps 54.16 Mbps fdcservers.net - Tokyo
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Avg DL Speed : 221.12 Mbps
Avg UL Speed : 100.89 Mbps
Total DL Data : 7.51 GB
Total UL Data : 3.85 GB
Total Data : 11.36 GB
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Duration : 13 min 34 sec
System Time : 20-03-2023 10:58:03 UTC
Total Script Runs : 615
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Result : https://cdn1.frocdn.ch/gpOYeg1a7adJq3g.txt
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| 4 |
UnixBench
|
Mar 20, 2023 00:00 |
View Raw Output------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Mon Mar 20 2023 08:48:47 - 09:33:21
2 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 31935835.5 lps (10.0 s, 10 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 6142.7 MWIPS (7.9 s, 10 samples)
Execl Throughput 2637.7 lps (29.9 s, 4 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 296917.0 KBps (30.0 s, 4 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 80152.4 KBps (30.0 s, 4 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 963759.2 KBps (30.0 s, 4 samples)
Pipe Throughput 402441.3 lps (10.0 s, 10 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 38978.1 lps (10.0 s, 10 samples)
Process Creation 2918.2 lps (30.0 s, 4 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 3504.0 lpm (60.0 s, 4 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1328.5 lpm (60.0 s, 4 samples)
System Call Overhead 257638.9 lps (10.0 s, 10 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 31935835.5 2736.6
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 6142.7 1116.8
Execl Throughput 43.0 2637.7 613.4
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 296917.0 749.8
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 80152.4 484.3
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 963759.2 1661.7
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 402441.3 323.5
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 38978.1 97.4
Process Creation 126.0 2918.2 231.6
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 3504.0 826.4
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1328.5 2214.2
System Call Overhead 15000.0 257638.9 171.8
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 608.9
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Mon Mar 20 2023 09:33:21 - 10:18:02
2 CPUs in system; running 2 parallel copies of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 59710290.3 lps (10.0 s, 10 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 11838.6 MWIPS (7.9 s, 10 samples)
Execl Throughput 4547.2 lps (30.0 s, 4 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 579091.5 KBps (30.0 s, 4 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 151099.2 KBps (30.0 s, 4 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1645094.1 KBps (30.0 s, 4 samples)
Pipe Throughput 769710.5 lps (10.0 s, 10 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 171900.5 lps (10.0 s, 10 samples)
Process Creation 6816.3 lps (30.0 s, 4 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 9394.9 lpm (60.0 s, 4 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1478.2 lpm (60.1 s, 4 samples)
System Call Overhead 502882.9 lps (10.0 s, 10 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 59710290.3 5116.6
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 11838.6 2152.5
Execl Throughput 43.0 4547.2 1057.5
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 579091.5 1462.4
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 151099.2 913.0
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1645094.1 2836.4
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 769710.5 618.7
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 171900.5 429.8
Process Creation 126.0 6816.3 541.0
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 9394.9 2215.8
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1478.2 2463.7
System Call Overhead 15000.0 502882.9 335.3
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 1226.7
|
Onidel Cloud VPS
Performance-first cloud hosting for teams that need consistent benchmarks and transparent pricing.
- 99.99% uptime SLA
- Proven availability for critical workloads
- Plans from $4.95/month
- Predictable pricing and simple scaling
- AMD EPYC + NVMe stack
- Modern hardware with built-in DDoS protection
- 5 global regions
- Singapore, Sydney, Amsterdam, Ho Chi Minh City, more coming soon
Ideal for: demanding SaaS workloads, managed hosting agencies, and teams migrating off legacy VPS providers.
Launch faster with concierge onboarding
Start 14-day TrialCPU Performance (Geekbench)
CPU benchmarks measure processing power for compute-intensive tasks. Learn how we test CPU performance.
I/O Speed Summary (dd)
IOPS Performance by Block Size
Combined IOPS Performance
Total IOPS across all block sizes (4K, 64K, 512K, 1M)
FIO Benchmark Details
Detailed I/O performance test results
Test 1 - Block Size: 4k (mixed_rw_50_50)
Test 2 - Block Size: 64k (mixed_rw_50_50)
Test 3 - Block Size: 512k (mixed_rw_50_50)
Test 4 - Block Size: 1m (mixed_rw_50_50)
Detailed I/O Benchmark (FIO)
IOPS Performance by Block Size
Bandwidth Performance by Block Size
Detailed Test Results
| Block Size | Read IOPS | Write IOPS | Read MB/s | Write MB/s |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4k | 7,500 | 7,500 | 30.1 | 30.1 |
| 64k | 3,400 | 3,400 | 218.8 | 220.0 |
| 512k | 569 | 599 | 291.5 | 307.0 |
| 1m | 269 | 287 | 276.4 | 294.8 |
Related Resources
Browse More Benchmarks
Explore comprehensive VPS benchmarks across providers and locations.
Compare Providers
View aggregated performance metrics across all VPS providers.
Performance Dashboard
Access real-time statistics, top performers, and latest results.
Testing Methodology
Learn about our comprehensive testing procedures and tools.
Understanding VPS Benchmark Results
This comprehensive benchmark report provides detailed performance analysis for CloudAja Cloud VM C2 Intel 2 Core VPS in Indonesia. Our standardized testing methodology measures CPU performance, disk I/O operations, network bandwidth, and real-world application performance to give you complete insights into VPS capabilities. Browse more VPS benchmarks to compare performance across providers.
Each benchmark metric serves a specific purpose in evaluating VPS performance. CPU benchmarks reveal processing power for applications, disk I/O tests measure storage performance for databases and file operations, network tests show bandwidth capacity for content delivery, and application benchmarks demonstrate real-world hosting performance. Together, these metrics provide a complete performance profile. Use our VPS comparison tool to analyze multiple plans side-by-side.
Benchmark Metrics & Features
Performance Analysis Use Cases
- Evaluating VPS CPU performance for compute-intensive applications
- Testing disk I/O performance for database workloads
- Comparing VPS performance across different providers
- Analyzing WordPress site performance on specific VPS plans
- Assessing value-for-money based on performance and pricing
- Checking real-world application performance metrics
- Understanding geographic performance variations by location
- Reviewing detailed benchmark metrics before VPS purchase
- Comparing single-core vs multi-core CPU performance
- Validating provider performance claims with actual data
- Making informed hosting decisions based on comprehensive benchmarks
How to Interpret Benchmark Results
1. CPU Performance (Geekbench)
Geekbench measures CPU performance through single-core and multi-core scores. Single-core scores (typically 800-2000) indicate performance for single-threaded applications and general responsiveness. Multi-core scores (1500-8000) show performance when all CPU cores are utilized for parallel processing. Higher scores mean better performance. Visit our testing methodology to learn more about CPU benchmarks.
2. Disk I/O Performance (FIO)
FIO benchmarks measure disk performance through IOPS (Input/Output Operations Per Second) and bandwidth (MB/s). High IOPS (10,000+ for NVMe, 5,000-10,000 for SSD) is crucial for database workloads with many small operations. High bandwidth is important for large file transfers and media applications. Compare disk performance across different providers in our database.
3. Application Performance
Real-world application benchmarks (WordPress, UnixBench) show how the VPS handles typical web workloads including PHP processing, database queries, and static file serving. These results measured in requests per second and page load times directly apply to web hosting scenarios. Need help choosing the right VPS? Visit about us to learn more about VPSMetrics.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I interpret the Geekbench single-core and multi-core scores?
Geekbench single-core scores indicate CPU performance for single-threaded applications, important for general responsiveness and web applications. Multi-core scores show performance when all CPU cores are utilized, crucial for parallel processing and multi-threaded applications. Higher scores indicate better performance. Modern VPS typically score 800-2000 (single) and 1500-8000 (multi) depending on the plan.
What do IOPS numbers mean in disk I/O benchmarks?
IOPS (Input/Output Operations Per Second) measures how many read/write operations your disk can handle per second. Higher IOPS means better performance for database operations and applications with many small file operations. NVMe SSD VPS typically delivers 10,000+ IOPS, while traditional SSD offers 5,000-10,000 IOPS.
What is UnixBench and why does it matter?
UnixBench is a comprehensive system-level benchmark suite that tests various aspects of Unix-like system performance including process creation, file operations, and system calls. It provides a holistic view of overall system performance beyond just CPU or disk metrics. Higher UnixBench scores indicate better overall system efficiency.
How reliable are WordPress benchmark results?
WordPress benchmarks provide real-world application performance metrics by testing actual WordPress installations. These results show how the VPS handles typical web application workloads including PHP processing, database queries, and static file serving. Results are measured in requests per second and page load times, directly applicable to web hosting scenarios.
Can I trust these benchmark results for my use case?
Our benchmarks provide standardized, reproducible test results using industry-standard tools. While they offer excellent performance indicators, your actual experience may vary based on your specific workload, application optimization, and usage patterns. Use these benchmarks as a reliable starting point for comparison between providers.
Why do benchmark results vary by location?
Different data center locations may have different hardware configurations, CPU generations, storage types, and network infrastructure. Providers often upgrade facilities at different rates across regions. Location-specific benchmarks help you choose a VPS in the right region with the best performance for your target audience.
Making Informed VPS Decisions
Use these comprehensive benchmark results to make data-driven hosting decisions. Compare multiple metrics together rather than focusing on a single aspect - a balanced VPS performs well across CPU, disk, and network benchmarks. Consider your specific workload requirements: CPU-intensive applications need high Geekbench scores, database-heavy applications require high IOPS, and content delivery services benefit from high network bandwidth.
Our benchmarks provide standardized, reproducible test results using industry-standard tools. While they offer excellent performance indicators, your actual experience may vary based on specific workload patterns and application optimization. Use these benchmarks as a reliable starting point for comparison between providers and configurations.
Compare More VPS Options
Explore additional benchmarks, compare multiple VPS plans side-by-side, and discover the best performing options for your specific requirements and budget.