Biznet Gio Cloud - NEO Virtual Compute Intel 2 Core
Comprehensive VPS benchmark results from Indonesia tested on Jul 29, 2023. Learn our methodology.
System Specifications
Additional Benchmarks
UnixBench
System Performance Index
WordPress Bench
Web Application Performance
Benchmark Steps
| # | Suite | Run At | Raw Output |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Bench
|
Jul 29, 2023 00:00 |
View Raw Output-------------------- A Bench.sh Script By Teddysun ------------------- Version : v2023-06-10 Usage : wget -qO- bench.sh | bash ---------------------------------------------------------------------- CPU Model : Intel Core Processor (Broadwell) CPU Cores : 2 @ 2194.842 MHz CPU Cache : 16384 KB AES-NI : Enabled VM-x/AMD-V : Enabled Total Disk : 58.1 GB (4.9 GB Used) Total Mem : 1.9 GB (177.3 MB Used) Total Swap : 2.0 GB (0 Used) System uptime : 0 days, 2 hour 37 min Load average : 27.39, 13.32, 6.55 OS : Ubuntu 22.04.2 LTS Arch : x86_64 (64 Bit) Kernel : 5.15.0-78-generic TCP CC : bbr Virtualization : KVM IPv4/IPv6 : Online / Offline Organization : AS133800 PT Biznet Gio Nusantara Location : Cileungsir / ID Region : West Java ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I/O Speed(1st run) : 552 MB/s I/O Speed(2nd run) : 577 MB/s I/O Speed(3rd run) : 567 MB/s I/O Speed(average) : 565.3 MB/s ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Node Name Upload Speed Download Speed Latency Speedtest.net 4346.33 Mbps 3351.42 Mbps 0.81 ms Los Angeles, US 417.92 Mbps 760.74 Mbps 201.38 ms Dallas, US 287.04 Mbps 801.69 Mbps 272.53 ms Montreal, CA 214.61 Mbps 393.20 Mbps 304.30 ms Paris, FR 334.08 Mbps 1026.37 Mbps 237.62 ms Amsterdam, NL 466.71 Mbps 763.55 Mbps 173.93 ms Shanghai, CN 9.52 Mbps 677.87 Mbps 404.93 ms Hongkong, CN 1733.89 Mbps 1815.31 Mbps 46.55 ms Singapore, SG 2321.58 Mbps 1028.97 Mbps 15.09 ms Tokyo, JP 377.60 Mbps 1805.88 Mbps 218.02 ms ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Finished in : 5 min 29 sec Timestamp : 2023-07-29 08:52:50 UTC ---------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| 2 |
Benchy
|
Jul 29, 2023 00:00 |
View Raw Output# # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Benchy v2.7 # # https://github.com/L1so/benchy # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # 28 Jul 2023 19:54 UTC # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Server Insight Hardware Information --------------------- --------------------- OS : Ubuntu 22.04.2 LTS Model : Intel Core Processor (Broadwell) Location : Indonesia Core : 2 @ 2194.842 MHz Kernel : 5.15.0-25-generic AES-NI : ✔ Enabled Uptime : 0 days, 3 hrs, 0 mins, 44 secs VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled Virt : kvm Swap : 2.0 GiB Disk & Memory Usage Network Information --------------------- --------------------- Disk (1) : 59.8 GiB ASN : AS133800 Disk Usage : 6.7 GiB (11% Used) ISP : PT Biznet Gio Nusantara Mem : 1.9 GiB IPv4 : ✔ Enabled Mem Usage : 0.2 GiB (9% Used) IPv6 : ❌ Disabled Network Performance Test (Region: Asia) +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Prot. | Provider | Location | Send | Receive | Latency | +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | IPv4 | Uztelecom | Tashkent, UZ | 1.5 Gb/s | 526.4 Mb/s | 144.2 ms | | | Biznet | Jakarta, ID | 3.6 Gb/s | 1.3 Gb/s | 1.5 ms | +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ Ookla Network Speedtest (Region: Asia) +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Provider | Location | Download | Upload | Data Used | Latency | +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Biznet | Jakarta, ID | 752.3 Mb/s | 3.4 Gb/s | 4.5 GB | 1.2 ms | | U Mobile | Kuala Lumpur, MY | 1.0 Gb/s | 3.0 Gb/s | 4.7 GB | 20.6 ms | | MyRepublic | Singapore, SG | 3.3 Gb/s | 2.3 Gb/s | 9.0 GB | 14.1 ms | | CAT TELECOM | Hatyai, TH | 829.7 Mb/s | 425.8 Mb/s | 1.8 GB | 220.4 ms | | Airtel | Chennai, IN | 322.7 Mb/s | 473.9 Mb/s | 1.1 GB | 187.6 ms | +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ |
| 3 |
PassMark
|
Jul 29, 2023 00:00 |
View Raw OutputPassMark PerformanceTest Linux Intel Core Processor (Broadwell) (x86_64) 2 cores @ 0 MHz | 1.9 GiB RAM Number of Processes: 2 | Test Iterations: 2 | Test Duration: Very Long - CPU Mark: 2667 Integer Math 6562 Million Operations/s Floating Point Math 5434 Million Operations/s Prime Numbers 21.1 Million Primes/s Sorting 4074 Thousand Strings/s Encryption 844 MB/s Compression 33252 KB/s CPU Single Threaded 1680 Million Operations/s Physics 345 Frames/s Extended Instructions (SSE) 2255 Million Matrices/s Memory Mark: 1121 Database Operations 1225 Thousand Operations/s Memory Read Cached 18774 MB/s Memory Read Uncached 7310 MB/s Memory Write 8223 MB/s Available RAM 950 Megabytes Memory Latency 55 Nanoseconds Memory Threaded 16018 MB/s |
| 4 |
Speedtest Global
|
Jul 29, 2023 00:00 |
View Raw Output---------------------------- network-speed.xyz ----------------------------
A simple script to test network performance using speedtest-cli
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Version : v2023.07.24
Global Speedtest : wget -qO- network-speed.xyz | bash
Region Speedtest : wget -qO- network-speed.xyz | bash -s -- -r <region>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Basic System Info
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
CPU Model : Intel Core Processor (Broadwell)
CPU Cores : 2 @ 2194.842 MHz
CPU Cache : 16384 KB
AES-NI : ✔ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
Total Disk : 58.1 GB (4.9 GB Used)
Total RAM : 1.9 GB (200.7 MB Used)
Total Swap : 2.0 GB (0 Used)
System uptime : 0 days, 2 hour 49 min
Load average : 0.05, 1.49, 3.20
OS : Ubuntu 22.04.2 LTS
Arch : x86_64 (64 Bit)
Kernel : 5.15.0-78-generic
Virtualization : KVM
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Basic Network Info
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Primary Network : IPv4
ISP : PT Biznet Gio Nusantara
ASN : AS133800 PT Biznet Gio Nusantara
Location : Jakarta, Jakarta-JK, Indonesia
Location (IPv4) : Cileungsir, West Java, ID
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Speedtest.net (Region: GLOBAL)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Location Latency Loss DL Speed UP Speed Server
ISP: PT Biznet Gio Nusantara
Nearest 0.83 ms 0.0% 3846.34 Mbps 4456.03 Mbps MEGADATA - Jakarta
Kochi, IN 199.28 ms 0.0% 646.39 Mbps 633.00 Mbps Asianet Broadband - Cochin
Bangalore, IN 183.46 ms 0.0% 732.28 Mbps 422.49 Mbps Bharti Airtel Ltd - Bangalore
Chennai, IN 190.02 ms 0.0% 695.95 Mbps 420.32 Mbps Tata Play Fiber - Chennai
Mumbai, IN 183.86 ms 0.0% 765.31 Mbps 284.44 Mbps i3D.net - Mumbai
Delhi, IN 87.70 ms 0.0% 618.02 Mbps 915.37 Mbps Tata Teleservices Ltd - New Delhi
Seattle, US 231.81 ms 0.0% 695.27 Mbps 322.85 Mbps DediPath - Seattle, WA
Los Angeles, US 181.18 ms 0.0% 611.96 Mbps 402.62 Mbps ReliableSite Hosting - Los Angeles, CA
Dallas, US 262.86 ms 0.0% 500.10 Mbps 316.29 Mbps Hivelocity - Dallas, TX
Miami, US 286.00 ms 0.0% 777.39 Mbps 279.38 Mbps AT&T - Miami, FL d
New York, US 302.91 ms 0.0% 741.68 Mbps 257.68 Mbps Clouvider Ltd - New York, NY
Toronto, CA 305.52 ms 0.0% 816.84 Mbps 240.27 Mbps Rogers - Toronto, ON
London, UK 167.99 ms 0.0% 1153.62 Mbps 482.62 Mbps VeloxServ Communications - London
Amsterdam, NL 180.24 ms 0.0% 614.95 Mbps 436.57 Mbps Clouvider Ltd - Amsterdam
Paris, FR 158.37 ms N/A 1185.64 Mbps 520.96 Mbps Axione - Paris
Frankfurt, DE 165.17 ms 0.0% 1768.55 Mbps 457.50 Mbps 23M GmbH - Frankfurt Am Main
Warsaw, PL 174.52 ms 0.0% 779.23 Mbps 461.06 Mbps UPC Polska - Warszawa
Bucharest, RO 182.74 ms 0.0% 930.08 Mbps 441.48 Mbps Vodafone Romania Fixed - Bucharest - Bucharest
Jeddah, KSA 164.89 ms 0.0% 1513.93 Mbps 498.34 Mbps Saudi Telecom Company
Dubai, AE 95.35 ms 0.0% 1127.15 Mbps 875.76 Mbps du - Dubai
Below servers were done manually, because of Speedtest.net limitation put on this IP
Fujairah, AE 265.09 ms 0.0% 505.72 Mbps 885.02 Mbps ETISALAT-UAE - Fujairah
Tokyo, JP 102.05 ms 0.0% 441.19 Mbps 1838.07 Mbps fdcservers.net - Tokyo
Shanghai, CU-CN FAILED
Nanjing, CT-CN 466.05 ms 0.0% 833.70 Mbps 878.86 Mbps China Telecom JiangSu 5G - Nanjing
Hong Kong, HKG 46.22 ms 0.0% 1618.12 Mbps 1755.51 Mbps STC - Hong Kong
Singapore, SG 14.17 ms 0.0% 568.71 Mbps 2289.93 Mbps i3D.net - Singapore
Jakarta, ID 2.12 ms 0.0% 4568.99 Mbps 4725.33 Mbps PT. Telekomunikasi Indonesia - Jakarta
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Avg DL Speed : 1026.03 Mbps
Avg UL Speed : 656.25 Mbps
Total DL Data : 28.51 GB
Total UL Data : 13.75 GB
Total Data : 42.27 GB
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Duration : 10 min 41 sec
System Time : 29/07/2023 - 09:09:42 UTC
Total Script Runs : 19820
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Result : https://paste.kangserver.id/view/lb-TfEU
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| 5 |
UnixBench
|
Jul 29, 2023 00:00 |
View Raw Output------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Sat Jul 29 2023 06:55:02 - 07:23:06
2 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 33087717.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 5931.3 MWIPS (9.8 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 2738.9 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 539043.2 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 144587.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1429819.1 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 683701.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 104423.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 6079.3 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 8531.5 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1821.7 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 370596.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 33087717.0 2835.3
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 5931.3 1078.4
Execl Throughput 43.0 2738.9 636.9
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 539043.2 1361.2
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 144587.4 873.6
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1429819.1 2465.2
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 683701.3 549.6
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 104423.9 261.1
Process Creation 126.0 6079.3 482.5
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 8531.5 2012.2
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1821.7 3036.1
System Call Overhead 15000.0 370596.1 247.1
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 957.9
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Sat Jul 29 2023 07:23:06 - 07:51:10
2 CPUs in system; running 2 parallel copies of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 66392994.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 11842.3 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 4847.1 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1049259.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 287978.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 2738217.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 1354635.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 281854.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 14068.0 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 13709.6 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1829.3 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 739423.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 66392994.6 5689.2
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 11842.3 2153.1
Execl Throughput 43.0 4847.1 1127.2
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 1049259.4 2649.6
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 287978.0 1740.0
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 2738217.5 4721.1
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1354635.4 1088.9
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 281854.7 704.6
Process Creation 126.0 14068.0 1116.5
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 13709.6 3233.4
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1829.3 3048.9
System Call Overhead 15000.0 739423.8 492.9
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 1811.8
|
Onidel Cloud VPS
Performance-first cloud hosting for teams that need consistent benchmarks and transparent pricing.
- 99.99% uptime SLA
- Proven availability for critical workloads
- Plans from $4.95/month
- Predictable pricing and simple scaling
- AMD EPYC + NVMe stack
- Modern hardware with built-in DDoS protection
- 5 global regions
- Singapore, Sydney, Amsterdam, Ho Chi Minh City, more coming soon
Ideal for: demanding SaaS workloads, managed hosting agencies, and teams migrating off legacy VPS providers.
Launch faster with concierge onboarding
Start 14-day TrialCPU Performance (Geekbench)
CPU benchmarks measure processing power for compute-intensive tasks. Learn how we test CPU performance.
I/O Speed Summary (dd)
IOPS Performance by Block Size
Combined IOPS Performance
Total IOPS across all block sizes (4K, 64K, 512K, 1M)
FIO Benchmark Details
Detailed I/O performance test results
Test 1 - Block Size: 4k (mixed_rw_50_50)
Test 2 - Block Size: 64k (mixed_rw_50_50)
Test 3 - Block Size: 512k (mixed_rw_50_50)
Test 4 - Block Size: 1m (mixed_rw_50_50)
Detailed I/O Benchmark (FIO)
IOPS Performance by Block Size
Bandwidth Performance by Block Size
Detailed Test Results
| Block Size | Read IOPS | Write IOPS | Read MB/s | Write MB/s |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4k | 1,200 | 1,200 | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| 64k | 1,200 | 1,200 | 80.1 | 80.5 |
| 512k | 853 | 898 | 437.0 | 460.2 |
| 1m | 423 | 451 | 433.9 | 462.8 |
Related Resources
Browse More Benchmarks
Explore comprehensive VPS benchmarks across providers and locations.
Compare Providers
View aggregated performance metrics across all VPS providers.
Performance Dashboard
Access real-time statistics, top performers, and latest results.
Testing Methodology
Learn about our comprehensive testing procedures and tools.
Understanding VPS Benchmark Results
This comprehensive benchmark report provides detailed performance analysis for Biznet Gio Cloud NEO Virtual Compute Intel 2 Core VPS in Indonesia. Our standardized testing methodology measures CPU performance, disk I/O operations, network bandwidth, and real-world application performance to give you complete insights into VPS capabilities. Browse more VPS benchmarks to compare performance across providers.
Each benchmark metric serves a specific purpose in evaluating VPS performance. CPU benchmarks reveal processing power for applications, disk I/O tests measure storage performance for databases and file operations, network tests show bandwidth capacity for content delivery, and application benchmarks demonstrate real-world hosting performance. Together, these metrics provide a complete performance profile. Use our VPS comparison tool to analyze multiple plans side-by-side.
Benchmark Metrics & Features
Performance Analysis Use Cases
- Evaluating VPS CPU performance for compute-intensive applications
- Testing disk I/O performance for database workloads
- Comparing VPS performance across different providers
- Analyzing WordPress site performance on specific VPS plans
- Assessing value-for-money based on performance and pricing
- Checking real-world application performance metrics
- Understanding geographic performance variations by location
- Reviewing detailed benchmark metrics before VPS purchase
- Comparing single-core vs multi-core CPU performance
- Validating provider performance claims with actual data
- Making informed hosting decisions based on comprehensive benchmarks
How to Interpret Benchmark Results
1. CPU Performance (Geekbench)
Geekbench measures CPU performance through single-core and multi-core scores. Single-core scores (typically 800-2000) indicate performance for single-threaded applications and general responsiveness. Multi-core scores (1500-8000) show performance when all CPU cores are utilized for parallel processing. Higher scores mean better performance. Visit our testing methodology to learn more about CPU benchmarks.
2. Disk I/O Performance (FIO)
FIO benchmarks measure disk performance through IOPS (Input/Output Operations Per Second) and bandwidth (MB/s). High IOPS (10,000+ for NVMe, 5,000-10,000 for SSD) is crucial for database workloads with many small operations. High bandwidth is important for large file transfers and media applications. Compare disk performance across different providers in our database.
3. Application Performance
Real-world application benchmarks (WordPress, UnixBench) show how the VPS handles typical web workloads including PHP processing, database queries, and static file serving. These results measured in requests per second and page load times directly apply to web hosting scenarios. Need help choosing the right VPS? Visit about us to learn more about VPSMetrics.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I interpret the Geekbench single-core and multi-core scores?
Geekbench single-core scores indicate CPU performance for single-threaded applications, important for general responsiveness and web applications. Multi-core scores show performance when all CPU cores are utilized, crucial for parallel processing and multi-threaded applications. Higher scores indicate better performance. Modern VPS typically score 800-2000 (single) and 1500-8000 (multi) depending on the plan.
What do IOPS numbers mean in disk I/O benchmarks?
IOPS (Input/Output Operations Per Second) measures how many read/write operations your disk can handle per second. Higher IOPS means better performance for database operations and applications with many small file operations. NVMe SSD VPS typically delivers 10,000+ IOPS, while traditional SSD offers 5,000-10,000 IOPS.
What is UnixBench and why does it matter?
UnixBench is a comprehensive system-level benchmark suite that tests various aspects of Unix-like system performance including process creation, file operations, and system calls. It provides a holistic view of overall system performance beyond just CPU or disk metrics. Higher UnixBench scores indicate better overall system efficiency.
How reliable are WordPress benchmark results?
WordPress benchmarks provide real-world application performance metrics by testing actual WordPress installations. These results show how the VPS handles typical web application workloads including PHP processing, database queries, and static file serving. Results are measured in requests per second and page load times, directly applicable to web hosting scenarios.
Can I trust these benchmark results for my use case?
Our benchmarks provide standardized, reproducible test results using industry-standard tools. While they offer excellent performance indicators, your actual experience may vary based on your specific workload, application optimization, and usage patterns. Use these benchmarks as a reliable starting point for comparison between providers.
Why do benchmark results vary by location?
Different data center locations may have different hardware configurations, CPU generations, storage types, and network infrastructure. Providers often upgrade facilities at different rates across regions. Location-specific benchmarks help you choose a VPS in the right region with the best performance for your target audience.
Making Informed VPS Decisions
Use these comprehensive benchmark results to make data-driven hosting decisions. Compare multiple metrics together rather than focusing on a single aspect - a balanced VPS performs well across CPU, disk, and network benchmarks. Consider your specific workload requirements: CPU-intensive applications need high Geekbench scores, database-heavy applications require high IOPS, and content delivery services benefit from high network bandwidth.
Our benchmarks provide standardized, reproducible test results using industry-standard tools. While they offer excellent performance indicators, your actual experience may vary based on specific workload patterns and application optimization. Use these benchmarks as a reliable starting point for comparison between providers and configurations.
Compare More VPS Options
Explore additional benchmarks, compare multiple VPS plans side-by-side, and discover the best performing options for your specific requirements and budget.