Avoro - AMD EPYC 2 Core 8 GB Ram
Comprehensive VPS benchmark results from Germany tested on Jun 16, 2023. Learn our methodology.
System Specifications
Additional Benchmarks
UnixBench
System Performance Index
WordPress Bench
Web Application Performance
Benchmark Steps
| # | Suite | Run At | Raw Output |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Bench
|
Jun 16, 2023 00:00 |
View Raw Output-------------------- A Bench.sh Script By Teddysun ------------------- Version : v2023-06-10 Usage : wget -qO- bench.sh | bash ---------------------------------------------------------------------- CPU Model : AMD EPYC 7513 32-Core Processor CPU Cores : 2 @ 2595.124 MHz CPU Cache : 512 KB AES-NI : Enabled VM-x/AMD-V : Enabled Total Disk : 39.3 GB (6.3 GB Used) Total Mem : 7.8 GB (230.2 MB Used) Total Swap : 1024.0 MB (0 Used) System uptime : 0 days, 14 hour 32 min Load average : 0.24, 0.48, 0.61 OS : Ubuntu 22.04.2 LTS Arch : x86_64 (64 Bit) Kernel : 5.15.0-73-generic TCP CC : bbr Virtualization : KVM IPv4/IPv6 : Online / Online Organization : AS58212 dataforest GmbH Location : Frankfurt am Main / DE Region : Hesse ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I/O Speed(1st run) : 1.3 GB/s I/O Speed(2nd run) : 1.6 GB/s I/O Speed(3rd run) : 1.5 GB/s I/O Speed(average) : 1501.9 MB/s ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Node Name Upload Speed Download Speed Latency Speedtest.net 8470.01 Mbps 5339.98 Mbps 3.06 ms Los Angeles, US 554.02 Mbps 3059.49 Mbps 144.32 ms Dallas, US 697.87 Mbps 2465.25 Mbps 116.63 ms Montreal, CA 582.10 Mbps 697.66 Mbps 90.40 ms Paris, FR 3802.74 Mbps 5550.00 Mbps 18.92 ms Amsterdam, NL 3952.15 Mbps 7166.82 Mbps 7.36 ms Shanghai, CN 314.17 Mbps 2051.64 Mbps 259.65 ms Nanjing, CN 98.98 Mbps 34.82 Mbps 240.48 ms Hongkong, CN 419.86 Mbps 4006.09 Mbps 199.02 ms Singapore, SG 475.83 Mbps 985.12 Mbps 155.68 ms Tokyo, JP 336.09 Mbps 3143.90 Mbps 219.48 ms ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Finished in : 5 min 29 sec Timestamp : 2023-06-16 05:39:34 UTC ---------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| 2 |
Benchy
|
Jun 16, 2023 00:00 |
View Raw Output# # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Benchy v2.6 # # https://github.com/L1so/benchy # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # 16 Jun 2023 08:30 UTC # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Server Insight Hardware Information --------------------- --------------------- OS : Ubuntu 22.04.2 LTS Model : AMD EPYC 7513 32-Core Processor Location : Germany Core : 2 @ 2595.124 MHz Kernel : 5.15.0-75-generic AES-NI : ✔ Enabled Uptime : 0 days, 0 hrs, 1 mins, 30 secs VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled Virt : kvm Swap : 1024.0 MiB Disk & Memory Usage Network Information --------------------- --------------------- Disk (1) : 39.3 GiB ASN : AS58212 Disk Usage : 6.5 GiB (16% Used) ISP : dataforest GmbH Mem : 7.8 GiB IPv4 : ✔ Enabled Mem Usage : 0.2 GiB (2% Used) IPv6 : ✔ Enabled Ookla Network Speedtest (Region: Europe) +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Provider | Location | Download | Upload | Data Used | Latency | +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | TestDebit | Marseille, FR | 7.6 Gb/s | 4.2 Gb/s | 15.4 GB | 18.7 ms | | NovoServe | Schiphol-Rijk, NL | 6.7 Gb/s | 9.8 Gb/s | 18.7 GB | 6.4 ms | | Swish Fibre | London, GB | 6.2 Gb/s | 5.2 Gb/s | 11.8 GB | 15.8 ms | | Skynet | Warsaw, PL | 4.8 Gb/s | 4.7 Gb/s | 11.4 GB | 19.8 ms | | Vodafone | Milan, IT | 6.9 Gb/s | 5.6 Gb/s | 12.9 GB | 9.8 ms | +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ Network Performance Test (Region: Europe) +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Prot. | Provider | Location | Send | Receive | Latency | +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | IPv4 | FiberBy | Copenhagen, DK | 5.0 Gb/s | 7.6 Gb/s | 17.4 ms | | | WOBCOM | Wolfsburg, DE | 7.6 Gb/s | 8.2 Gb/s | 7.6 ms | | | Novogara | Amsterdam, NL | 2.0 Gb/s | 79.4 Mb/s | 8.1 ms | | | Sasag | Schaff, CH | 5.6 Gb/s | 73.5 Mb/s | 7.2 ms | | | Alwyzon | Vienna, AT | 6.0 Gb/s | 77.9 Mb/s | 11.6 ms | +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | IPv6 | FiberBy | Copenhagen, DK | 4.8 Gb/s | 3.8 Gb/s | 17.5 ms | | | WOBCOM | Wolfsburg, DE | 8.1 Gb/s | 5.5 Gb/s | 7.7 ms | | | Novogara | Amsterdam, NL | 8.2 Gb/s | 8.3 Gb/s | 8.1 ms | | | Sasag | Schaff, CH | 9.1 Gb/s | 4.5 Gb/s | 7.2 ms | | | Alwyzon | Vienna, AT | 6.0 Gb/s | 4.8 Gb/s | 11.6 ms | +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ Something wrong while doing iPerf3 IPv4. Some of the Receive Speeds, even below 100 Mbps. It happened also in YABS, see above. |
| 3 |
PassMark
|
Jun 16, 2023 00:00 |
View Raw OutputPassMark PerformanceTest Linux AMD EPYC 7513 32-Core Processor (x86_64) 2 cores @ 0 MHz | 7.8 GiB RAM Number of Processes: 2 | Test Iterations: 2 | Test Duration: Very Long - CPU Mark: 4083 Integer Math 10035 Million Operations/s Floating Point Math 7856 Million Operations/s Prime Numbers 26.5 Million Primes/s Sorting 5420 Thousand Strings/s Encryption 2180 MB/s Compression 39018 KB/s CPU Single Threaded 2154 Million Operations/s Physics 453 Frames/s Extended Instructions (SSE) 3088 Million Matrices/s Memory Mark: 1654 Database Operations 1412 Thousand Operations/s Memory Read Cached 19753 MB/s Memory Read Uncached 11996 MB/s Memory Write 12569 MB/s Available RAM 6644 Megabytes Memory Latency 91 Nanoseconds Memory Threaded 24902 MB/s |
| 4 |
Speedtest Global
|
Jun 16, 2023 00:00 |
View Raw Output---------------------------- network-speed.xyz ----------------------------
A simple script to test network performance using speedtest-cli
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Version : v2023.05.28
Global Speedtest : wget -qO- network-speed.xyz | bash
Region Speedtest : wget -qO- network-speed.xyz | bash -s -- -r <region>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Basic System Info
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
CPU Model : AMD EPYC 7513 32-Core Processor
CPU Cores : 2 @ 2595.124 MHz
CPU Cache : 512 KB
AES-NI : ✔ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
Total Disk : 39.3 GB (6.3 GB Used)
Total RAM : 7.8 GB (195.9 MB Used)
Total Swap : 1024.0 MB (0 Used)
System uptime : 0 days, 14 hour 44 min
Load average : 0.05, 0.28, 0.48
OS : Ubuntu 22.04.2 LTS
Arch : x86_64 (64 Bit)
Kernel : 5.15.0-73-generic
Virtualization : KVM
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Basic Network Info
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Primary Network : IPv6
ISP : dataforest GmbH
ASN : AS58212 dataforest GmbH
Host : dataforest GmbH
Location : Frankfurt am Main, Hesse-HE, Germany
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Speedtest.net (Region: GLOBAL)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Location Latency Loss DL Speed UP Speed Server
ISP: dataforest GmbH
Nearest 3.05 ms 0.0% 5008.99 Mbps 8688.50 Mbps Netcom Kassel Gesellschaft für Telekommunikation mbH - Kassel
Kochi, IN FAILED
Bangalore, IN 145.54 ms 0.0% 2772.01 Mbps 534.86 Mbps Bharti Airtel Ltd - Bangalore
Chennai, IN FAILED
Mumbai, IN 109.92 ms 0.0% 6878.00 Mbps 745.41 Mbps i3D.net - Mumbai
Delhi, IN FAILED
Los Angeles, US 138.95 ms 0.0% 3663.08 Mbps 576.24 Mbps ReliableSite Hosting - Los Angeles, CA
Dallas, US 118.71 ms 0.0% 3020.66 Mbps 684.72 Mbps Hivelocity - Dallas, TX
New York, US 80.25 ms 0.0% 3591.52 Mbps 1019.84 Mbps Clouvider Ltd - New York, NY
Seattle, US 162.76 ms 0.0% 2053.02 Mbps 508.72 Mbps DediPath - Seattle, WA
Miami, US FAILED
Toronto, CA 91.51 ms 0.0% 4035.69 Mbps 900.01 Mbps Rogers - Toronto, ON
Paris, FR 18.89 ms 0.0% 7110.78 Mbps 4120.79 Mbps ORANGE FRANCE - Paris
Amsterdam, NL 6.43 ms 0.0% 6004.85 Mbps 6112.66 Mbps Clouvider Ltd - Amsterdam
Warsaw, PL 21.44 ms 0.0% 7528.17 Mbps 3832.96 Mbps UPC Polska - Warszawa
London, UK 12.41 ms 0.0% 5693.60 Mbps 6214.67 Mbps VeloxServ Communications - London
Frankfurt, DE 0.96 ms 0.0% 4829.22 Mbps 7852.40 Mbps 23M GmbH - Frankfurt Am Main
Bucharest, RO FAILED
Dubai, AE FAILED
Fujairah, AE FAILED
Jeddah, KSA 87.38 ms 0.0% 6263.73 Mbps 995.50 Mbps Saudi Telecom Company
Shanghai, CU-CN 240.34 ms 0.0% 2992.97 Mbps 314.52 Mbps China Unicom 5G - ShangHai
Nanjing, CT-CN FAILED
Hong Kong, HKG 152.09 ms N/A 2554.49 Mbps 525.00 Mbps STC - Hong Kong
Singapore, SG 145.93 ms 0.0% 5295.58 Mbps 526.45 Mbps i3D.net - Singapore
Jakarta, ID 164.12 ms 0.0% 2399.59 Mbps 495.11 Mbps PT. Telekomunikasi Indonesia - Jakarta
Tokyo, JP 234.07 ms N/A 2821.06 Mbps 334.28 Mbps fdcservers.net - Tokyo
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Avg DL Speed : 4448.27 Mbps
Avg UL Speed : 2367.51 Mbps
Total DL Data : 110.70 GB
Total UL Data : 52.39 GB
Total Data : 163.09 GB
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Duration : 9 min 32 sec
System Time : 16/06/2023 - 05:56:16 UTC
Total Script Runs : 3375
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Result : https://paste.kangserver.id/view/NfIqB9s
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| 5 |
UnixBench
|
Jun 16, 2023 00:00 |
View Raw Output------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Fri Jun 16 2023 07:16:27 - 07:44:27
2 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 39219230.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 7529.7 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 3393.4 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1246006.2 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 338237.6 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 2314322.7 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 2019653.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 57401.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 8453.1 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 11099.1 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 2386.2 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 2187254.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 39219230.8 3360.7
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 7529.7 1369.0
Execl Throughput 43.0 3393.4 789.2
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 1246006.2 3146.5
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 338237.6 2043.7
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 2314322.7 3990.2
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 2019653.4 1623.5
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 57401.3 143.5
Process Creation 126.0 8453.1 670.9
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 11099.1 2617.7
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 2386.2 3977.0
System Call Overhead 15000.0 2187254.4 1458.2
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 1568.1
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Fri Jun 16 2023 07:44:27 - 08:12:28
2 CPUs in system; running 2 parallel copies of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 78975659.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 15103.9 MWIPS (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 6060.2 lps (29.9 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 2527422.2 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 694442.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5662944.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 4120210.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 375472.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 18554.9 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 16892.5 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 2207.1 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 4316884.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 78975659.1 6767.4
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 15103.9 2746.2
Execl Throughput 43.0 6060.2 1409.3
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 2527422.2 6382.4
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 694442.8 4196.0
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 5662944.9 9763.7
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 4120210.7 3312.1
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 375472.6 938.7
Process Creation 126.0 18554.9 1472.6
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 16892.5 3984.1
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 2207.1 3678.5
System Call Overhead 15000.0 4316884.6 2877.9
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 3236.8
|
Onidel Cloud VPS
Performance-first cloud hosting for teams that need consistent benchmarks and transparent pricing.
- 99.99% uptime SLA
- Proven availability for critical workloads
- Plans from $4.95/month
- Predictable pricing and simple scaling
- AMD EPYC + NVMe stack
- Modern hardware with built-in DDoS protection
- 5 global regions
- Singapore, Sydney, Amsterdam, Ho Chi Minh City, more coming soon
Ideal for: demanding SaaS workloads, managed hosting agencies, and teams migrating off legacy VPS providers.
Launch faster with concierge onboarding
Start 14-day TrialCPU Performance (Geekbench)
CPU benchmarks measure processing power for compute-intensive tasks. Learn how we test CPU performance.
I/O Speed Summary (dd)
IOPS Performance by Block Size
Combined IOPS Performance
Total IOPS across all block sizes (4K, 64K, 512K, 1M)
FIO Benchmark Details
Detailed I/O performance test results
Test 1 - Block Size: 4k (mixed_rw_50_50)
Test 2 - Block Size: 64k (mixed_rw_50_50)
Test 3 - Block Size: 512k (mixed_rw_50_50)
Test 4 - Block Size: 1m (mixed_rw_50_50)
Detailed I/O Benchmark (FIO)
IOPS Performance by Block Size
Bandwidth Performance by Block Size
Detailed Test Results
| Block Size | Read IOPS | Write IOPS | Read MB/s | Write MB/s |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4k | 58,500 | 58,700 | 234.2 | 234.9 |
| 64k | 39,000 | 39,200 | 2,490.0 | 2,510.0 |
| 512k | 14,100 | 14,900 | 7,240.0 | 7,620.0 |
| 1m | 8,300 | 8,900 | 8,560.0 | 9,130.0 |
Related Resources
Browse More Benchmarks
Explore comprehensive VPS benchmarks across providers and locations.
Compare Providers
View aggregated performance metrics across all VPS providers.
Performance Dashboard
Access real-time statistics, top performers, and latest results.
Testing Methodology
Learn about our comprehensive testing procedures and tools.
Understanding VPS Benchmark Results
This comprehensive benchmark report provides detailed performance analysis for Avoro AMD EPYC 2 Core 8 GB Ram VPS in Germany. Our standardized testing methodology measures CPU performance, disk I/O operations, network bandwidth, and real-world application performance to give you complete insights into VPS capabilities. Browse more VPS benchmarks to compare performance across providers.
Each benchmark metric serves a specific purpose in evaluating VPS performance. CPU benchmarks reveal processing power for applications, disk I/O tests measure storage performance for databases and file operations, network tests show bandwidth capacity for content delivery, and application benchmarks demonstrate real-world hosting performance. Together, these metrics provide a complete performance profile. Use our VPS comparison tool to analyze multiple plans side-by-side.
Benchmark Metrics & Features
Performance Analysis Use Cases
- Evaluating VPS CPU performance for compute-intensive applications
- Testing disk I/O performance for database workloads
- Comparing VPS performance across different providers
- Analyzing WordPress site performance on specific VPS plans
- Assessing value-for-money based on performance and pricing
- Checking real-world application performance metrics
- Understanding geographic performance variations by location
- Reviewing detailed benchmark metrics before VPS purchase
- Comparing single-core vs multi-core CPU performance
- Validating provider performance claims with actual data
- Making informed hosting decisions based on comprehensive benchmarks
How to Interpret Benchmark Results
1. CPU Performance (Geekbench)
Geekbench measures CPU performance through single-core and multi-core scores. Single-core scores (typically 800-2000) indicate performance for single-threaded applications and general responsiveness. Multi-core scores (1500-8000) show performance when all CPU cores are utilized for parallel processing. Higher scores mean better performance. Visit our testing methodology to learn more about CPU benchmarks.
2. Disk I/O Performance (FIO)
FIO benchmarks measure disk performance through IOPS (Input/Output Operations Per Second) and bandwidth (MB/s). High IOPS (10,000+ for NVMe, 5,000-10,000 for SSD) is crucial for database workloads with many small operations. High bandwidth is important for large file transfers and media applications. Compare disk performance across different providers in our database.
3. Application Performance
Real-world application benchmarks (WordPress, UnixBench) show how the VPS handles typical web workloads including PHP processing, database queries, and static file serving. These results measured in requests per second and page load times directly apply to web hosting scenarios. Need help choosing the right VPS? Visit about us to learn more about VPSMetrics.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I interpret the Geekbench single-core and multi-core scores?
Geekbench single-core scores indicate CPU performance for single-threaded applications, important for general responsiveness and web applications. Multi-core scores show performance when all CPU cores are utilized, crucial for parallel processing and multi-threaded applications. Higher scores indicate better performance. Modern VPS typically score 800-2000 (single) and 1500-8000 (multi) depending on the plan.
What do IOPS numbers mean in disk I/O benchmarks?
IOPS (Input/Output Operations Per Second) measures how many read/write operations your disk can handle per second. Higher IOPS means better performance for database operations and applications with many small file operations. NVMe SSD VPS typically delivers 10,000+ IOPS, while traditional SSD offers 5,000-10,000 IOPS.
What is UnixBench and why does it matter?
UnixBench is a comprehensive system-level benchmark suite that tests various aspects of Unix-like system performance including process creation, file operations, and system calls. It provides a holistic view of overall system performance beyond just CPU or disk metrics. Higher UnixBench scores indicate better overall system efficiency.
How reliable are WordPress benchmark results?
WordPress benchmarks provide real-world application performance metrics by testing actual WordPress installations. These results show how the VPS handles typical web application workloads including PHP processing, database queries, and static file serving. Results are measured in requests per second and page load times, directly applicable to web hosting scenarios.
Can I trust these benchmark results for my use case?
Our benchmarks provide standardized, reproducible test results using industry-standard tools. While they offer excellent performance indicators, your actual experience may vary based on your specific workload, application optimization, and usage patterns. Use these benchmarks as a reliable starting point for comparison between providers.
Why do benchmark results vary by location?
Different data center locations may have different hardware configurations, CPU generations, storage types, and network infrastructure. Providers often upgrade facilities at different rates across regions. Location-specific benchmarks help you choose a VPS in the right region with the best performance for your target audience.
Making Informed VPS Decisions
Use these comprehensive benchmark results to make data-driven hosting decisions. Compare multiple metrics together rather than focusing on a single aspect - a balanced VPS performs well across CPU, disk, and network benchmarks. Consider your specific workload requirements: CPU-intensive applications need high Geekbench scores, database-heavy applications require high IOPS, and content delivery services benefit from high network bandwidth.
Our benchmarks provide standardized, reproducible test results using industry-standard tools. While they offer excellent performance indicators, your actual experience may vary based on specific workload patterns and application optimization. Use these benchmarks as a reliable starting point for comparison between providers and configurations.
Compare More VPS Options
Explore additional benchmarks, compare multiple VPS plans side-by-side, and discover the best performing options for your specific requirements and budget.