AlphaVPS - AMD EPYC 2 Cores 8 GB Ram
Comprehensive VPS benchmark results from Germany tested on Mar 28, 2023. Learn our methodology.
System Specifications
Additional Benchmarks
UnixBench
System Performance Index
WordPress Bench
Web Application Performance
Benchmark Steps
# | Suite | Run At | Raw Output |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
Bench
|
Mar 28, 2023 00:00 |
View Raw Output-------------------- A Bench.sh Script By Teddysun ------------------- Version : v2022-06-01 Usage : wget -qO- bench.sh | bash ---------------------------------------------------------------------- CPU Model : AMD EPYC 7232P 8-Core Processor CPU Cores : 2 @ 3099.998 MHz CPU Cache : 512 KB AES-NI : Enabled VM-x/AMD-V : Enabled Total Disk : 43.2 GB (4.1 GB Used) Total Mem : 7.8 GB (146.6 MB Used) Total Swap : 1024.0 MB (0 Used) System uptime : 0 days, 0 hour 25 min Load average : 0.23, 0.82, 0.98 OS : Ubuntu 20.04.6 LTS Arch : x86_64 (64 Bit) Kernel : 5.4.0-146-generic TCP CC : cubic Virtualization : KVM Organization : AS203380 DA International Group Ltd. Location : Sofia / BG Region : Sofia-Capital ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I/O Speed(1st run) : 541 MB/s I/O Speed(2nd run) : 550 MB/s I/O Speed(3rd run) : 540 MB/s I/O Speed(average) : 543.7 MB/s ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Node Name Upload Speed Download Speed Latency Speedtest.net 12.36 Mbps 560.98 Mbps 114.32 ms Los Angeles, US 591.25 Mbps 428.87 Mbps 146.35 ms Dallas, US 725.59 Mbps 493.97 Mbps 118.46 ms Montreal, CA 781.59 Mbps 914.92 Mbps 90.28 ms Paris, FR 894.04 Mbps 683.22 Mbps 18.93 ms Amsterdam, NL 927.34 Mbps 769.37 Mbps 9.52 ms Shanghai, CN 260.87 Mbps 0.37 Mbps 341.67 ms Nanjing, CN 0.36 Mbps 493.39 Mbps 184.86 ms Guangzhou, CN 0.16 Mbps 243.64 Mbps 210.00 ms Hongkong, CN 1.69 Mbps 701.99 Mbps 356.88 ms Singapore, SG 347.00 Mbps 198.53 Mbps 238.05 ms Tokyo, JP 351.91 Mbps 397.03 Mbps 223.39 ms ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Finished in : 6 min 30 sec Timestamp : 2023-03-28 05:30:41 UTC ---------------------------------------------------------------------- |
2 |
PassMark
|
Mar 28, 2023 00:00 |
View Raw OutputPassMark PerformanceTest Linux AMD EPYC 7232P 8-Core Processor (x86_64) 2 cores @ 3099 MHz | 7.8 GiB RAM Number of Processes: 2 | Test Iterations: 3 | Test Duration: Very Long -------------------------------------------------------------------------- CPU Mark: 3058 Integer Math 8055 Million Operations/s Floating Point Math 5357 Million Operations/s Prime Numbers 11.7 Million Primes/s Sorting 3601 Thousand Strings/s Encryption 1892 MB/s Compression 31224 KB/s CPU Single Threaded 1690 Million Operations/s Physics 310 Frames/s Extended Instructions (SSE) 2547 Million Matrices/s Memory Mark: 991 Database Operations 728 Thousand Operations/s Memory Read Cached 13222 MB/s Memory Read Uncached 3728 MB/s Memory Write 3265 MB/s Available RAM 6974 Megabytes Memory Latency 88 Nanoseconds Memory Threaded 10435 MB/s -------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
3 |
Speedtest Global
|
Mar 28, 2023 00:00 |
View Raw OutputSpeedtest by Ookla Server: InterNetX GmbH - Munich (id: 27345) ISP: Clouvider Limited Idle Latency: 17.10 ms (jitter: 0.94ms, low: 15.95ms, high: 18.25ms) Download: 802.23 Mbps (data used: 1.2 GB) 18.83 ms (jitter: 4.81ms, low: 15.97ms, high: 275.08ms) Upload: 841.48 Mbps (data used: 725.1 MB) 20.16 ms (jitter: 3.09ms, low: 17.00ms, high: 42.96ms) Packet Loss: 0.0% Result URL: https://www.speedtest.net/result/c/34778f30-aa02-43dd-92fd-ae826c0e34ba |
4 |
UnixBench
|
Mar 28, 2023 00:00 |
View Raw Output------------------------------------------------------------------------ Benchmark Run: Tue Mar 28 2023 07:56:50 - 08:41:43 2 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 31298545.8 lps (10.0 s, 10 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 6206.9 MWIPS (9.9 s, 10 samples) Execl Throughput 2827.4 lps (30.0 s, 4 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 676281.3 KBps (30.0 s, 4 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 190050.6 KBps (30.0 s, 4 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1665793.5 KBps (30.0 s, 4 samples) Pipe Throughput 1241769.0 lps (10.0 s, 10 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 47764.8 lps (10.0 s, 10 samples) Process Creation 4728.2 lps (30.0 s, 4 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 5818.0 lpm (60.0 s, 4 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1186.1 lpm (60.0 s, 4 samples) System Call Overhead 1872495.4 lps (10.0 s, 10 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 31298545.8 2682.0 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 6206.9 1128.5 Execl Throughput 43.0 2827.4 657.5 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 676281.3 1707.8 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 190050.6 1148.3 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1665793.5 2872.1 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1241769.0 998.2 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 47764.8 119.4 Process Creation 126.0 4728.2 375.3 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 5818.0 1372.2 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1186.1 1976.8 System Call Overhead 15000.0 1872495.4 1248.3 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 1045.1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Benchmark Run: Tue Mar 28 2023 08:41:43 - 09:26:39 2 CPUs in system; running 2 parallel copies of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 57374438.6 lps (10.0 s, 10 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 12048.2 MWIPS (9.7 s, 10 samples) Execl Throughput 4882.3 lps (30.0 s, 4 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1045938.5 KBps (30.0 s, 4 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 288387.8 KBps (30.0 s, 4 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 2819253.9 KBps (30.0 s, 4 samples) Pipe Throughput 2326429.8 lps (10.0 s, 10 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 281900.6 lps (10.0 s, 10 samples) Process Creation 9711.7 lps (30.0 s, 4 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 8186.7 lpm (60.0 s, 4 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1470.3 lpm (60.0 s, 4 samples) System Call Overhead 3536199.5 lps (10.0 s, 10 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 57374438.6 4916.4 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 12048.2 2190.6 Execl Throughput 43.0 4882.3 1135.4 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 1045938.5 2641.3 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 288387.8 1742.5 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 2819253.9 4860.8 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 2326429.8 1870.1 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 281900.6 704.8 Process Creation 126.0 9711.7 770.8 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 8186.7 1930.8 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1470.3 2450.4 System Call Overhead 15000.0 3536199.5 2357.5 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 1954.1 |
Onidel Cloud VPS
Performance-first cloud hosting for teams that need consistent benchmarks and transparent pricing.
- 99.99% uptime SLA
- Proven availability for critical workloads
- Plans from $4.95/month
- Predictable pricing and simple scaling
- AMD EPYC + NVMe stack
- Modern hardware with built-in DDoS protection
- 5 global regions
- Singapore, Sydney, Amsterdam, Ho Chi Minh City, more coming soon
Ideal for: demanding SaaS workloads, managed hosting agencies, and teams migrating off legacy VPS providers.
Launch faster with concierge onboarding
Start 14-day TrialCPU Performance (Geekbench)
CPU benchmarks measure processing power for compute-intensive tasks. Learn how we test CPU performance.
I/O Speed Summary (dd)
IOPS Performance by Block Size
Combined IOPS Performance
Total IOPS across all block sizes (4K, 64K, 512K, 1M)
FIO Benchmark Details
Detailed I/O performance test results
Test 1 - Block Size: 4k (mixed_rw_50_50)
Test 2 - Block Size: 64k (mixed_rw_50_50)
Test 3 - Block Size: 512k (mixed_rw_50_50)
Test 4 - Block Size: 1m (mixed_rw_50_50)
Detailed I/O Benchmark (FIO)
IOPS Performance by Block Size
Bandwidth Performance by Block Size
Detailed Test Results
Block Size | Read IOPS | Write IOPS | Read MB/s | Write MB/s |
---|---|---|---|---|
4k | 52,400 | 52,500 | 209.7 | 210.2 |
64k | 43,600 | 43,800 | 2,790.0 | 2,800.0 |
512k | 11,600 | 12,200 | 5,970.0 | 6,290.0 |
1m | 7,100 | 7,600 | 7,300.0 | 7,780.0 |
Related Resources
Browse More Benchmarks
Explore comprehensive VPS benchmarks across providers and locations.
Compare Providers
View aggregated performance metrics across all VPS providers.
Performance Dashboard
Access real-time statistics, top performers, and latest results.
Testing Methodology
Learn about our comprehensive testing procedures and tools.
Understanding VPS Benchmark Results
This comprehensive benchmark report provides detailed performance analysis for AlphaVPS AMD EPYC 2 Cores 8 GB Ram VPS in Germany. Our standardized testing methodology measures CPU performance, disk I/O operations, network bandwidth, and real-world application performance to give you complete insights into VPS capabilities. Browse more VPS benchmarks to compare performance across providers.
Each benchmark metric serves a specific purpose in evaluating VPS performance. CPU benchmarks reveal processing power for applications, disk I/O tests measure storage performance for databases and file operations, network tests show bandwidth capacity for content delivery, and application benchmarks demonstrate real-world hosting performance. Together, these metrics provide a complete performance profile. Use our VPS comparison tool to analyze multiple plans side-by-side.
Benchmark Metrics & Features
Performance Analysis Use Cases
- Evaluating VPS CPU performance for compute-intensive applications
- Testing disk I/O performance for database workloads
- Comparing VPS performance across different providers
- Analyzing WordPress site performance on specific VPS plans
- Assessing value-for-money based on performance and pricing
- Checking real-world application performance metrics
- Understanding geographic performance variations by location
- Reviewing detailed benchmark metrics before VPS purchase
- Comparing single-core vs multi-core CPU performance
- Validating provider performance claims with actual data
- Making informed hosting decisions based on comprehensive benchmarks
How to Interpret Benchmark Results
1. CPU Performance (Geekbench)
Geekbench measures CPU performance through single-core and multi-core scores. Single-core scores (typically 800-2000) indicate performance for single-threaded applications and general responsiveness. Multi-core scores (1500-8000) show performance when all CPU cores are utilized for parallel processing. Higher scores mean better performance. Visit our testing methodology to learn more about CPU benchmarks.
2. Disk I/O Performance (FIO)
FIO benchmarks measure disk performance through IOPS (Input/Output Operations Per Second) and bandwidth (MB/s). High IOPS (10,000+ for NVMe, 5,000-10,000 for SSD) is crucial for database workloads with many small operations. High bandwidth is important for large file transfers and media applications. Compare disk performance across different providers in our database.
3. Application Performance
Real-world application benchmarks (WordPress, UnixBench) show how the VPS handles typical web workloads including PHP processing, database queries, and static file serving. These results measured in requests per second and page load times directly apply to web hosting scenarios. Need help choosing the right VPS? Visit about us to learn more about VPSMetrics.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I interpret the Geekbench single-core and multi-core scores?
Geekbench single-core scores indicate CPU performance for single-threaded applications, important for general responsiveness and web applications. Multi-core scores show performance when all CPU cores are utilized, crucial for parallel processing and multi-threaded applications. Higher scores indicate better performance. Modern VPS typically score 800-2000 (single) and 1500-8000 (multi) depending on the plan.
What do IOPS numbers mean in disk I/O benchmarks?
IOPS (Input/Output Operations Per Second) measures how many read/write operations your disk can handle per second. Higher IOPS means better performance for database operations and applications with many small file operations. NVMe SSD VPS typically delivers 10,000+ IOPS, while traditional SSD offers 5,000-10,000 IOPS.
What is UnixBench and why does it matter?
UnixBench is a comprehensive system-level benchmark suite that tests various aspects of Unix-like system performance including process creation, file operations, and system calls. It provides a holistic view of overall system performance beyond just CPU or disk metrics. Higher UnixBench scores indicate better overall system efficiency.
How reliable are WordPress benchmark results?
WordPress benchmarks provide real-world application performance metrics by testing actual WordPress installations. These results show how the VPS handles typical web application workloads including PHP processing, database queries, and static file serving. Results are measured in requests per second and page load times, directly applicable to web hosting scenarios.
Can I trust these benchmark results for my use case?
Our benchmarks provide standardized, reproducible test results using industry-standard tools. While they offer excellent performance indicators, your actual experience may vary based on your specific workload, application optimization, and usage patterns. Use these benchmarks as a reliable starting point for comparison between providers.
Why do benchmark results vary by location?
Different data center locations may have different hardware configurations, CPU generations, storage types, and network infrastructure. Providers often upgrade facilities at different rates across regions. Location-specific benchmarks help you choose a VPS in the right region with the best performance for your target audience.
Making Informed VPS Decisions
Use these comprehensive benchmark results to make data-driven hosting decisions. Compare multiple metrics together rather than focusing on a single aspect - a balanced VPS performs well across CPU, disk, and network benchmarks. Consider your specific workload requirements: CPU-intensive applications need high Geekbench scores, database-heavy applications require high IOPS, and content delivery services benefit from high network bandwidth.
Our benchmarks provide standardized, reproducible test results using industry-standard tools. While they offer excellent performance indicators, your actual experience may vary based on specific workload patterns and application optimization. Use these benchmarks as a reliable starting point for comparison between providers and configurations.
Compare More VPS Options
Explore additional benchmarks, compare multiple VPS plans side-by-side, and discover the best performing options for your specific requirements and budget.